Katarzyna Struzińska
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Katarzyna Struzińska has a total of 7 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Anke Lipinsky
Department of Data and Research on Society, GESIS‐Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, Germany
1 shared publication - Beatriz Ranea-Triviño
Universidad Complutense de Madrid
1 shared publication - Ewa Radomska
Jagiellonian University, Poland
1 shared publication - Jan Bazyli Klakla
Jagiellonian University, Faculty of Law and Administration
1 shared publication Janina Czapska
Jagiellonian University
1 shared publication- Michalina Szafrańska
Jagiellonian University, Faculty of Law and Administration
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 2 April 2024
- Published by MDPI AG in Social Sciences
- Vol. 13 (4) , 199
You Can Knock on the Doors and Windows of the University, but Nobody Will Care: How Universities Benefit from Network Silence around Gender-Based Violence
This paper exposes the role of universities in creating silence around gender-based violence in higher education, drawing on narratives from 39 qualitative interviews with victims/survivors and bystanders about reporting incidents and experiences. In this paper, we extend concept of ‘network silence’ around sexual harassment to other forms of gender-based violence. Our research applies three components of the theoretical model of network silence, namely, self-silencing by victims/survivors, silencing, and not hearing by others, and analyses their contextual manifestations through the reporting experiences of victims/survivors and bystanders. This helps to identify the traits of the informal organisational structures and power dynamics, gendered attitudes, actors, and factors which facilitate silencing. The intersectional approach in our analysis of organisational contextual traits contributes to the research on inequality regimes in universities. The findings suggest that universities are making limited efforts to address silence around gender-based violence. We conclude that shared beliefs among the leadership about the reputation and prestige of the university facilitate the endurance of silence in universities. Our findings indicate reasons why universities fail to create spaces that are safe from gender-based violence.
- 2 April 2024
- Published by MDPI AG in Social Sciences
- Vol. 13 (4) , 199
Open AccessYou Can Knock on the Doors and Windows of the University, but Nobody Will Care: How Universities Benefit from Network Silence around Gender-Based Violence
This paper exposes the role of universities in creating silence around gender-based violence in higher education, drawing on narratives from 39 qualitative interviews with victims/survivors and bystanders about reporting incidents and experiences. In this paper, we extend concept of ‘network silence’ around sexual harassment to other forms of gender-based violence. Our research applies three components of the theoretical model of network silence, namely, self-silencing by victims/survivors, silencing, and not hearing by others, and analyses their contextual manifestations through the reporting experiences of victims/survivors and bystanders. This helps to identify the traits of the informal organisational structures and power dynamics, gendered attitudes, actors, and factors which facilitate silencing. The intersectional approach in our analysis of organisational contextual traits contributes to the research on inequality regimes in universities. The findings suggest that universities are making limited efforts to address silence around gender-based violence. We conclude that shared beliefs among the leadership about the reputation and prestige of the university facilitate the endurance of silence in universities. Our findings indicate reasons why universities fail to create spaces that are safe from gender-based violence.
- Open Access
- 31 May 2019
- Published by Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN (Institute of Law Studies PAS) in Archives of Criminology
- No. XLI/1,p. 325-380
Przestępczość w Krakowie w latach 2016–2017. Analiza przestrzenna
Celem artykułu jest zaprezentowanie ogólnych tendencji w przestrzennym zróżnicowaniu przestępczości w Krakowie w latach 2016–2017. Zostały one zrekonstruowane na podstawie przeprowadzonej z wykorzystaniem cyfrowej mapy zagrożeń analizy rozmieszczenia przestrzennego badanych zdarzeń oraz analizy nagromadzenia hot spot. Przestrzenna charakterystyka przestępczości sporządzona została w odniesieniu do ogółu przestępstw oraz do wybranych kategorii przestępstw. Analizy uzupełniono o wpływ zmiennej czasu – uwzględniono kategorie: roku popełnienia przestępstwa, pory roku i pory dnia.
- 31 May 2019
- Published by Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN (Institute of Law Studies PAS) in Archives of Criminology
- No. XLI/1,p. 325-380
Open AccessPrzestępczość w Krakowie w latach 2016–2017. Analiza przestrzenna
Celem artykułu jest zaprezentowanie ogólnych tendencji w przestrzennym zróżnicowaniu przestępczości w Krakowie w latach 2016–2017. Zostały one zrekonstruowane na podstawie przeprowadzonej z wykorzystaniem cyfrowej mapy zagrożeń analizy rozmieszczenia przestrzennego badanych zdarzeń oraz analizy nagromadzenia hot spot. Przestrzenna charakterystyka przestępczości sporządzona została w odniesieniu do ogółu przestępstw oraz do wybranych kategorii przestępstw. Analizy uzupełniono o wpływ zmiennej czasu – uwzględniono kategorie: roku popełnienia przestępstwa, pory roku i pory dnia.
- Open Access
- 25 April 2018
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 47-54
Social Media and Community Policing Implementation in South Eastern Europe: A Question of Trust
- 25 April 2018
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 47-54
Open AccessSocial Media and Community Policing Implementation in South Eastern Europe: A Question of Trust