Katsuhiro Aikawa

Introduction: Recently, modified thoracoabdominal nerve block through perichondrial approach (M-TAPA) has been introduced as a novel trunk block. To date, studies comparing its clinical advantages with those of existing local anesthetic techniques are scarce. We aimed to compare the analgesic efficacy of M-TAPA to that of wound infiltration analgesia (WIA) in patients who underwent gynecological laparoscopic surgeries. Methods: We studied medical records from January 2020 to July 2021 at Hokkaido University Hospital. The primary outcome was the number of analgesic requirements in the first 24 h postoperatively. Secondary outcomes were the time until the first analgesic requirement and adverse events regarding local anesthetic techniques. To address confounding, a regression model was used. Results: Data from 90 of 231 patients were analyzed (M-TAPA group, n = 40; WIA group, n = 50). For the primary outcome, means and 95% confidence intervals for each group and between-group differences were as follows: 2.25 (1.74, 2.76), 2.28 (1.81, 2.75), and −0.03 (−0.72, 0.66), respectively. Adjusted mean difference was 0.39 (−0.32, 1.11). There were no significant differences in means between groups, with or without adjustment for covariates (p = 0.93, 0.28). Furthermore, no significant difference was detected in the time until the first analgesic requirement and adverse events related to local anesthesia. Conclusion: Our results demonstrate that M-TAPA did not reduce postoperative analgesic requirements compared to WIA. In a future clinical trial, sufficient visceral pain control may be required to evaluate the effectiveness of M-TAPA over WIA in patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecological surgery.

The local anesthetic (LA) systemic toxicity of trunk blocks is a major concern. Recently, modified thoracoabdominal nerve block through perichondrial approach (M-TAPA) has attracted attention; however, plasma LA level is unknown. We tested whether the peak plasma LA concentration following M-TAPA, using 25 mL of 0.25% levobupivacaine mixed with epinephrine on each side, would be below the toxic level (2.6 μg/mL). We recruited 10 patients undergoing abdominal surgery with planned M-TAPA between November 2021 and February 2022. In all patients, 25 mL of 0.25% levobupivacaine mixed with 1:200,000 epinephrine was administered on each side. Blood samples were obtained at 10, 20, 30, 45, 60, and 120 min after the block. The highest individual peak and the mean peak plasma LA concentrations were 1.03 and 0.73 μg/mL, respectively. We could not capture the peak in five patients; however, the highest concentrations in all patients were significantly lower than the toxic level. A negative correlation between the peak level and body weight was observed. Our results indicated that the plasma LA concentration following M-TAPA using total of 50 mL of 0.25% levobupivacaine with epinephrine remains below the toxic level. Further research is required due to the small sample size of this study. Trial registry number: UMIN000045406.

超音波画像技術の進歩と抗血栓療法の普及によって，超音波ガイド下腹壁ブロックは臨床で多用されるようになった．これまで複数のアプローチが生み出されてきたが，これらを手術創に合わせて正しく選択するのは意外に難しい．効果的なブロックを行うためには，脊髄神経前枝間の交通枝や，薬液の広がりを制限する半月線の存在を理解し，液性剥離のテクニックを駆使することが重要である．本稿では，腹壁ブロックとして定着した腹横筋膜面ブロック（TAPB）と腹直筋鞘ブロック（RSB）を効果的に行うために必要な知識について解説したい．

Recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (RDEB) is a rare, hereditary mucocutaneous disorder that can involve renal insufficiency. If a vascular access for hemodialysis is unavailable, peritoneal dialysis can be utilized. This report describes an anesthetic management with ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB) in a patient with RDEB for peritoneal dialysis catheter replacement. A 49-year-old woman with RDEB needed to undergo peritoneal dialysis catheter replacement. As general, neuraxial and local infiltration anesthesia can lead to serious complications; we planned anesthetic management with subcostal TAPB as the primary analgesia modality. In the operating theater, surgery was initiated after performing left-sided subcostal TAPB. The patient complained of moderate pain at some points during surgery, and the pain was controlled with intravenous or local anesthetics without serious complications. In summary, subcostal TAPB could be a useful option for peritoneal dialysis catheter surgery in patients with RDEB.

Sciatic nerve block (SNB) is widely used as a supplemental analgesia after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) combined with femoral nerve block (FNB). Despite its effectiveness, SNB often causes peroneal nerve paralysis, which makes it difficult to detect peroneal nerve injury by surgical process. Recently, periarticular infiltration analgesia (PIA) is reported that it provides analgesia without peroneal nerve paralysis. We conducted a retrospective analysis to compare the effectiveness of SNB and PIA. This study was approved by the local institutional ethics committee; 17 patients undergoing TKA under general anesthesia with continuous femoral nerve block were enrolled in the study. All patients received continuous FNB. Nine patients received sciatic nerve block successively, while 8 patients received PIA around the time of insertion of artificial joint. Primary outcome measure was the frequency of peroneal nerve paralysis when the patients woke up. Secondary outcome measures included numerical rating scale (NRS) until postoperative day 3. While there were 6 patients who had peroneal nerve paralysis in the SNB group, none of them had it in the PIA group (P = 0.009). There were no significant differences of the NRSs between the two groups. PIA provided sufficient analgesia after TKA without peroneal nerve paralysis.