Tao Yang

The Arabidopsis thaliana Heat Shock Protein-Related (AtHSPR) gene participates in plant growth and abiotic stress tolerance, while its role in biotic stress resistance remains unclear. Here, we report that the athspr mutant is sensitive to Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato (Pst) DC3000, whereas over-expression of AtHSPR enhances the defense of Arabidopsis against the pathogen. AtHSPR expression was induced by treatment with Pst DC3000, flg22, or salicylic acid (SA). Transcriptome analysis showed that mutation of AtHSPR changed the expression patterns of genes associated with defense response, oxidation–reduction, and SA responses, as well as transcription factors. The biochemical evidence revealed that AtHSPR interacted with Thimet Oligopeptidase 1 (TOP1), which modulated the SA-mediated immune response. Co-expression of AtHSPR and TOP1 showed that the TOP1 protein, normally located in the chloroplasts, gathered around the nucleus in response to a pathogen. After pathogen treatment, dynamic tubular projections (stromules) were present, extending from the chloroplasts toward the nucleus, and TOP1 was observed in the nucleus, together with AtHSPR. The top1athspr double mutant had lower SA levels and was more sensitive to pathogens than the top1 and athspr single mutants. Taken together, our results demonstrated that the interaction between AtHSPR and TOP1 plays a positive role in SA-mediated plant resistance against Pst DC3000.

The plant actin cytoskeleton is characterized by the basic properties of dynamic array, which plays a central role in numerous conserved processes that are required for diverse cellular functions. Here, we focus on how actins and actin-related proteins (ARPs), which represent two classical branches of a greatly diverse superfamily of ATPases, are involved in fundamental functions underlying signal regulation of plant growth and development. Moreover, we review the structure, assembly dynamics, and biological functions of filamentous actin (F-actin) from a molecular perspective. The various accessory proteins known as actin-binding proteins (ABPs) partner with F-actin to finely tune actin dynamics, often in response to various cell signaling pathways. Our understanding of the significance of the actin cytoskeleton in vital cellular activities has been furthered by comparison of conserved functions of actin filaments across different species combined with advanced microscopic techniques and experimental methods. We discuss the current model of the plant actin cytoskeleton, followed by examples of the signaling mechanisms under the supervision of F-actin related to cell morphogenesis, polar growth, and cytoplasmic streaming. Determination of the theoretical basis of how the cytoskeleton works is important in itself and is beneficial to future applications aimed at improving crop biomass and production efficiency.

SUPPRESSOR OF MAX2-LIKE 6, 7, and 8 (SMXL6,7,8) function as repressors and transcription factors of the strigolactone (SL) signaling pathway, playing an important role in the development and stress tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana. However, the molecular mechanism by which SMXL6,7,8 negatively regulate drought tolerance and ABA response remains largely unexplored. In the present study, the interacting protein and downstream target genes of SMXL6,7,8 were investigated. Our results showed that the substrate receptor for the CUL4-based E3 ligase DDB1-BINDING WD-REPEAT DOMAIN (DWD) HYPERSENSITIVE TO ABA DEFICIENT 1 (ABA1) (DWA1) physically interacted with SMXL6,7,8. The degradation of SMXL6,7,8 proteins were partially dependent on DWA1. Disruption of SMXL6,7,8 resulted in increased drought tolerance and could restore the drought-sensitive phenotype of the dwa1 mutant. In addition, SMXL6,7,8 could directly bind to the promoter of SUCROSE NONFERMENTING 1 (SNF1)-RELATED PROTEIN KINASE 2.3 (SnRK2.3) to repress its transcription. The mutations in SnRK2.2/2.3 significantly suppressed the hypersensitivity of smxl6/7/8 to ABA-mediated inhibition of seed germination. Conclusively, SMXL6,7,8 interact with DWA1 to negatively regulate drought tolerance and target ABA-response genes. These data provide insights into drought tolerance and ABA response in Arabidopsis via the SMXL6,7,8-mediated SL signaling pathway.

Key message AtHSPR forms a complex with KNAT5 and OFP1 to regulate primary root growth through GA-mediated root meristem activity. KNAT5–OFP1 functions as a negative regulator of AtHSPR in response to GA. Abstract Plant root growth is modulated by gibberellic acid (GA) signaling and depends on root meristem maintenance. ARABIDOPSIS THALIANA HEAT SHOCK PROTEIN-RELATED (AtHSPR) is a vital regulator of flowering time and salt stress tolerance. However, little is known about the role of AtHSPR in the regulation of primary root growth. Here, we report that athspr mutant exhibits a shorter primary root compared to wild type and that AtHSPR interacts with KNOTTED1-LIKE HOMEOBOX GENE 5 (KNAT5) and OVATE FAMILY PROTEIN 1 (OFP1). Genetic analysis showed that overexpression of KNAT5 or OFP1 caused a defect in primary root growth similar to that of the athspr mutant, but knockout of KNAT5 or OFP1 rescued the short root phenotype in the athspr mutant by altering root meristem activity. Further investigation revealed that KNAT5 interacts with OFP1 and that AtHSPR weakens the inhibition of GIBBERELLIN 20-OXIDASE 1 (GA20ox1) expression by the KNAT5–OFP1 complex. Moreover, root meristem cell proliferation and root elongation in 35S::KNAT5athspr and 35S::OFP1athspr seedlings were hypersensitive to GA₃ treatment compared to the athspr mutant. Together, our results demonstrate that the AtHSPR–KNAT5–OFP1 module regulates root growth and development by impacting the expression of GA biosynthetic gene GA20ox1, which could be a way for plants to achieve plasticity in response to the environment.

Key message Hydrogen sulfide positively regulates autophagy and the expression of hypoxia response-related genes under submergence to enhance the submergence tolerance of Arabidopsis. Abstract Flooding seriously endangers agricultural production, and it is quite necessary to explore the mechanism of plant response to submergence for improving crop yield. Both hydrogen sulfide (H₂S) and autophagy are involved in the plant response to submergence. However, the mechanisms by which H₂S and autophagy interact and influence submergence tolerance have not been thoroughly elucidated. Here, we reported that exogenous H₂S pretreatment increased the level of endogenous H₂S and alleviated plant cell death under submergence. And transgenic lines decreased in the level of endogenous H₂S, L-cysteine desulfurase 1 (des1) mutant and 35S::GFP-O-acetyl-L-serine(thiol)lyase A1 (OASA1)/des1-#56/#61, were sensitive to submergence, along with the lower transcript levels of hypoxia response genes, LOB DOMAIN 41 (LBD41) and HYPOXIA RESPONSIVE UNKNOWN PROTEIN 43 (HUP43). Submergence induced the formation of autophagosomes, and the autophagy-related (ATG) mutants (atg4a/4b, atg5, atg7) displayed sensitive phenotypes to submergence. Simultaneously, H₂S pretreatment repressed the autophagosome producing under normal conditions, but enhanced this process under submergence by regulating the expression of ATG genes. Moreover, the mutation of DES1 aggravated the sensitivity of des1/atg5 to submergence by reducing the formation of autophagosomes under submergence. Taken together, our results demonstrated that H₂S alleviated cell death through regulating autophagy and the expression of hypoxia response genes during submergence in Arabidopsis.

Strigolactones (SLs) and karrikins (KARs) are both butenolide molecules that play essential roles in plant growth and development. SLs are phytohormones, with SLs having known functions within the plant they are produced in, while KARs are found in smoke emitted from burning plant matter and affect seeds and seedlings in areas of wildfire. It has been suggested that SL and KAR signaling may share similar mechanisms. The α/β hydrolases DWARF14 (D14) and KARRIKIN INSENSITIVE 2 (KAI2), which act as receptors of SL and KAR, respectively, both interact with the F-box protein MORE AXILLARY GROWTH 2 (MAX2) in order to target SUPPRESSOR OF MAX2 1 (SMAX1)-LIKE/D53 family members for degradation via the 26S proteasome. Recent reports suggest that SLs and/or KARs are also involved in regulating plant responses and adaptation to various abiotic stresses, particularly nutrient deficiency, drought, salinity, and chilling. There is also crosstalk with other hormone signaling pathways, including auxin, gibberellic acid (GA), abscisic acid (ABA), cytokinin (CK), and ethylene (ET), under normal and abiotic stress conditions. This review briefly covers the biosynthetic and signaling pathways of SLs and KARs, compares their functions in plant growth and development, and reviews the effects of any crosstalk between SLs or KARs and other plant hormones at various stages of plant development. We also focus on the distinct responses, adaptations, and regulatory mechanisms related to SLs and/or KARs in response to various abiotic stresses. The review closes with discussion on ways to gain additional insights into the SL and KAR pathways and the crosstalk between these related phytohormones.