Lei Yu
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Lei Yu has a total of 101 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
Yingfen Wen
Institute of Infectious Diseases, Guangzhou Eighth People's Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, No.8 Huaying Road, Jiahe Street, Baiyun District, Guangzhou, 510440, China
4 shared publicationsKexin Zhong
Institute of Infectious Diseases, Guangzhou Eighth People's Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, No.8 Huaying Road, Jiahe Street, Baiyun District, Guangzhou, 510440, China
3 shared publicationsWenxin Hong
Guangzhou Eighth People’s Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
3 shared publicationsXiaomin Xing
Institute of Infectious Diseases, Guangzhou Eighth People's Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, No.8 Huaying Road, Jiahe Street, Baiyun District, Guangzhou, 510440, China
3 shared publicationsXulei Zhang
Institute of Infectious Diseases, Guangzhou Eighth People's Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, No.8 Huaying Road, Jiahe Street, Baiyun District, Guangzhou, 510440, China
3 shared publications- Yongjun Guan
Institute of Human Virology and Department of Microbiology & Immunology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
3 shared publications
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 22 July 2025
- Published by Elsevier in Antiviral Research
- Vol. 241, 106240
Single-dose injection of human neutralizing antibody against ZIKV preserves male fertility and protects against lethal infection
- 22 July 2025
- Published by Elsevier in Antiviral Research
- Vol. 241, 106240
Open AccessSingle-dose injection of human neutralizing antibody against ZIKV preserves male fertility and protects against lethal infection
- Open Access
- 1 July 2025
- Published by Springer Nature in Scientific Reports
- Vol. 15 (1) , 20591
Dominant and cross-reactive S1-specific memory B cell response induced by primary SARS-CoV-2 infection
The protective component of specific memory B cells (MBCs) response relative to serum antibody response in primary SARS-CoV-2 infection is not well understood. Using a relatively unbiased B-cell culture method with a limited number of MBCs in each well (100 cells/well), we characterized the fine specificity of MBC responses against SARS-CoV-2 infection. While serum spike antibody is predominantly against S2 domain, the memory B cells mainly recognize S1 domain. The 44.4-85.3% of S-binding MBCs are specific to S1 domain. High frequency of MBCs (30-62% of SARS-CoV-2 S-specific MBCs) cross-reacting with SARS-CoV S has also been demonstrated. 22-33% of S1-binding MBCs were cross-reactive with the SARS-CoV RBD. In addition, a panel of human monoclonal Ab was derived from S1-binding MBCs recognizing six group epitopes (groups 1-6). Among them, RBD-specific Ab (826) in group 4 and cross-reactive Ab (808) could resist the neutralizing escape of omicron. Herein, we demonstrated that a dominant S1-directed MBC response was generated during primary SARS-CoV-2 infection. More importantly, the cross-reactive RBD-directed MBCs against SARS-CoV may protect against emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants.
- 1 July 2025
- Published by Springer Nature in Scientific Reports
- Vol. 15 (1) , 20591
Open AccessDominant and cross-reactive S1-specific memory B cell response induced by primary SARS-CoV-2 infection
The protective component of specific memory B cells (MBCs) response relative to serum antibody response in primary SARS-CoV-2 infection is not well understood. Using a relatively unbiased B-cell culture method with a limited number of MBCs in each well (100 cells/well), we characterized the fine specificity of MBC responses against SARS-CoV-2 infection. While serum spike antibody is predominantly against S2 domain, the memory B cells mainly recognize S1 domain. The 44.4-85.3% of S-binding MBCs are specific to S1 domain. High frequency of MBCs (30-62% of SARS-CoV-2 S-specific MBCs) cross-reacting with SARS-CoV S has also been demonstrated. 22-33% of S1-binding MBCs were cross-reactive with the SARS-CoV RBD. In addition, a panel of human monoclonal Ab was derived from S1-binding MBCs recognizing six group epitopes (groups 1-6). Among them, RBD-specific Ab (826) in group 4 and cross-reactive Ab (808) could resist the neutralizing escape of omicron. Herein, we demonstrated that a dominant S1-directed MBC response was generated during primary SARS-CoV-2 infection. More importantly, the cross-reactive RBD-directed MBCs against SARS-CoV may protect against emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants.
- Open Access
- 6 March 2025
- Published by Springer Nature in Communications Biology
- Vol. 8 (1) , 1-14
Potent and broadly neutralizing antibodies against sarbecoviruses elicited by single ancestral SARS-CoV-2 infection
The emergence of various SARS-CoV-2 variants presents challenges for antibody therapeutics, emphasizing the need for more potent and broadly neutralizing antibodies. Here, we employed an unbiased screening approach and successfully isolated two antibodies from individuals with only exposure to ancestral SARS-CoV-2. One of these antibodies, CYFN1006-1, exhibited robust cross-neutralization against a spectrum of SARS-CoV-2 variants, including the latest KP.2, KP.3 and XEC, with consistent IC50 values ranging from ~1 to 5 ng/mL. It also displayed broad neutralization activity against SARS-CoV and related sarbecoviruses. Structural analysis revealed that these antibodies target shared hotspot but mutation-resistant epitopes, with their Fabs locking receptor binding domains (RBDs) in the “down” conformation through interactions with adjacent Fabs and RBDs, and cross-linking Spike trimers into di-trimers. In vivo studies conducted in a JN.1-infected hamster model validated the protective efficacy of CYFN1006-1. These findings suggest that antibodies with cross-neutralization activities can be identified from individuals with exclusively ancestral virus exposure.
- 6 March 2025
- Published by Springer Nature in Communications Biology
- Vol. 8 (1) , 1-14
Open AccessPotent and broadly neutralizing antibodies against sarbecoviruses elicited by single ancestral SARS-CoV-2 infection
The emergence of various SARS-CoV-2 variants presents challenges for antibody therapeutics, emphasizing the need for more potent and broadly neutralizing antibodies. Here, we employed an unbiased screening approach and successfully isolated two antibodies from individuals with only exposure to ancestral SARS-CoV-2. One of these antibodies, CYFN1006-1, exhibited robust cross-neutralization against a spectrum of SARS-CoV-2 variants, including the latest KP.2, KP.3 and XEC, with consistent IC50 values ranging from ~1 to 5 ng/mL. It also displayed broad neutralization activity against SARS-CoV and related sarbecoviruses. Structural analysis revealed that these antibodies target shared hotspot but mutation-resistant epitopes, with their Fabs locking receptor binding domains (RBDs) in the “down” conformation through interactions with adjacent Fabs and RBDs, and cross-linking Spike trimers into di-trimers. In vivo studies conducted in a JN.1-infected hamster model validated the protective efficacy of CYFN1006-1. These findings suggest that antibodies with cross-neutralization activities can be identified from individuals with exclusively ancestral virus exposure.
- Open Access
Structural Insights into the Dynamic Assembly of a YFV sNS1 Tetramer
Yellow fever virus (YFV) infections can cause severe diseases in humans, resulting in mass casualties in Africa and the Americas each year. Secretory NS1 (sNS1) is thought to be used as a diagnostic marker of flavivirus infections, playing an essential role in the flavivirus life cycle, but little is known about the composition and structure of YFV sNS1. Here, we present that the recombinant YFV sNS1 exists in a heterogeneous mixture of oligomerizations, predominantly in the tetrameric form. The cryoEM structures show that the YFV tetramer of sNS1 is stacked by the hydrophobic interaction between β-roll domains and greasy fingers. According to the 3D variability analysis, the tetramer is in a semi-stable state that may contain multiple conformations with dynamic changes. We believe that our study provides critical insights into the oligomerization of NS1 and will aid the development of NS1-based diagnoses and therapies.
Open AccessStructural Insights into the Dynamic Assembly of a YFV sNS1 Tetramer
Yellow fever virus (YFV) infections can cause severe diseases in humans, resulting in mass casualties in Africa and the Americas each year. Secretory NS1 (sNS1) is thought to be used as a diagnostic marker of flavivirus infections, playing an essential role in the flavivirus life cycle, but little is known about the composition and structure of YFV sNS1. Here, we present that the recombinant YFV sNS1 exists in a heterogeneous mixture of oligomerizations, predominantly in the tetrameric form. The cryoEM structures show that the YFV tetramer of sNS1 is stacked by the hydrophobic interaction between β-roll domains and greasy fingers. According to the 3D variability analysis, the tetramer is in a semi-stable state that may contain multiple conformations with dynamic changes. We believe that our study provides critical insights into the oligomerization of NS1 and will aid the development of NS1-based diagnoses and therapies.
- Open Access
Structural insights into the distinct protective mechanisms of human antibodies targeting ZIKV NS1
- Open Access
- 31 January 2023
- Published by Frontiers Media SA in Frontiers in Immunology
- Vol. 14, 1093709
Patient-derived monoclonal antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein N-terminal and C-terminal domains cross-react with their counterparts of SARS-CoV, but not other human betacoronaviruses
Introduction: SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid (N) protein plays a key role in multiple stages of the viral life cycle such as viral replication and assembly. This protein is more conserved than the Spike protein of the virus and can induce both humoral and cell-mediated immune responses, thereby becoming a target for clinical diagnosis and vaccine development. However, the immunogenic characteristics of this protein during natural infection are still not completely understood.Methods: Patient-derived monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) against SARS-CoV-2 N protein were generated from memory B cells in the PBMCs using the antigen-specific B cell approach. For epitope mapping of the isolated hmAbs, a panel of series-truncated N proteins were used , which covered the N-terminal domain (NTD, aa 46-174 ) and C-terminal domain (CTD, aa 245-364 ), as well as the flanking regions of NTD and CTD. NTD- or CTD-specific Abs in the plasma from COVID-19 patients were also tested by ELISA method. Cross-binding of hmAbs or plasma Abs in COVID-19 patients to other human β-CoV N proteins was determined using the capture ELISA.Results: We isolated five N-specific monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) from memory B cells in the peripheral blood of two convalescent COVID-19 patients. Epitope mapping revealed that three of the patient-derived mAbs (N3, N5 and N31) targeted the C-terminal domain (CTD), whereas two of the mAbs (N83 and 3B7) targeted the N-terminal domain (NTD) of SARS-CoV-2 N protein. All five patient-derived mAbs were cross-reactive to the N protein of SARS-CoV but showed little to no cross-reactivity to the N proteins of other human beta coronaviruses (β-CoVs). We also tested 52 plasma samples collected from convalescent COVID-19 patients for Abs against the N proteins of human β-CoVs and found that 78.8% of plasma samples showed detectable Abs against the N proteins of SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV. No plasma sample had cross-reactive Abs to the N protein of MERS-CoV. Cross-reactive Abs to the N proteins of OC43 and HKU1 were detected in 36.5% (19/52) and 19.2% (10/52) of plasma samples, respectively.Discussion: These results suggest that natural SARS-CoV-2 infection elicits cross-reactive Abs to the N protein of SARS-CoV and that the five patient-derived mAbs to SARS-CoV-2 N protein NTD and CTD cross-react with their counterparts of SARS-CoV, but not other human β-CoVs. Thus, these five patient-derived mAbs can potentially be used for developing the next generation of COVID-19 At-Home Test kits for rapid and specific screening of SARS-CoV-2 infection.
- 31 January 2023
- Published by Frontiers Media SA in Frontiers in Immunology
- Vol. 14, 1093709
Open AccessPatient-derived monoclonal antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein N-terminal and C-terminal domains cross-react with their counterparts of SARS-CoV, but not other human betacoronaviruses
Introduction: SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid (N) protein plays a key role in multiple stages of the viral life cycle such as viral replication and assembly. This protein is more conserved than the Spike protein of the virus and can induce both humoral and cell-mediated immune responses, thereby becoming a target for clinical diagnosis and vaccine development. However, the immunogenic characteristics of this protein during natural infection are still not completely understood.Methods: Patient-derived monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) against SARS-CoV-2 N protein were generated from memory B cells in the PBMCs using the antigen-specific B cell approach. For epitope mapping of the isolated hmAbs, a panel of series-truncated N proteins were used , which covered the N-terminal domain (NTD, aa 46-174 ) and C-terminal domain (CTD, aa 245-364 ), as well as the flanking regions of NTD and CTD. NTD- or CTD-specific Abs in the plasma from COVID-19 patients were also tested by ELISA method. Cross-binding of hmAbs or plasma Abs in COVID-19 patients to other human β-CoV N proteins was determined using the capture ELISA.Results: We isolated five N-specific monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) from memory B cells in the peripheral blood of two convalescent COVID-19 patients. Epitope mapping revealed that three of the patient-derived mAbs (N3, N5 and N31) targeted the C-terminal domain (CTD), whereas two of the mAbs (N83 and 3B7) targeted the N-terminal domain (NTD) of SARS-CoV-2 N protein. All five patient-derived mAbs were cross-reactive to the N protein of SARS-CoV but showed little to no cross-reactivity to the N proteins of other human beta coronaviruses (β-CoVs). We also tested 52 plasma samples collected from convalescent COVID-19 patients for Abs against the N proteins of human β-CoVs and found that 78.8% of plasma samples showed detectable Abs against the N proteins of SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV. No plasma sample had cross-reactive Abs to the N protein of MERS-CoV. Cross-reactive Abs to the N proteins of OC43 and HKU1 were detected in 36.5% (19/52) and 19.2% (10/52) of plasma samples, respectively.Discussion: These results suggest that natural SARS-CoV-2 infection elicits cross-reactive Abs to the N protein of SARS-CoV and that the five patient-derived mAbs to SARS-CoV-2 N protein NTD and CTD cross-react with their counterparts of SARS-CoV, but not other human β-CoVs. Thus, these five patient-derived mAbs can potentially be used for developing the next generation of COVID-19 At-Home Test kits for rapid and specific screening of SARS-CoV-2 infection.
- Top Cited Papers
- 23 April 2020
- Published by American Chemical Society (ACS) in Analytical Chemistry
- Vol. 92 (10) , 7226-7231
Rapid and Sensitive Detection of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG, Using Lanthanide-Doped Nanoparticles-Based Lateral Flow Immunoassay
The outbreak of 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has been a challenge for hospital laboratories because of the huge number of samples that must be tested for the presence of the causative pathogen, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Simple and rapid immunodiagnostic methods are urgently needed to identify positive cases. Here we report the development of a rapid and sensitive lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA) that uses lanthanide-doped polysterene nanoparticles (LNPs) to detect anti-SARV-CoV-2 IgG in human serum. A recombinant nucleocapsid phosphoprotein of SARS-CoV-2 was dispensed onto a nitrocellulose membrane to capture specific IgG. Mouse anti-human IgG antibody was labeled with self-assembled LNPs that served as a fluorescent reporter. A 100-μl aliquot of serum samples (1:1000 dilution) was used for this assay and the whole detection process took 10 min. The results of the validation experiment met the requirements for clinical diagnostic reagents. A value of 0.0666 was defined as the cutoff value by assaying 51 normal samples. We tested 7 samples that were positive by reverse-transcription (RT-)PCR and 12 that were negative but clinically suspicious for the presence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG. One of the negative samples was determined to be SARS-CoV-2 IgG positive, while the results for the other samples were consistent with those obtained by RT-PCR. Thus, this assay can achieve rapid and sensitive detection of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG in human serum and allow positive identification in suspicious cases; it can also be useful for monitoring the progression COVID-19 and evaluating patients’ response to treatment.
- 23 April 2020
- Published by American Chemical Society (ACS) in Analytical Chemistry
- Vol. 92 (10) , 7226-7231
Top Cited PapersRapid and Sensitive Detection of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG, Using Lanthanide-Doped Nanoparticles-Based Lateral Flow Immunoassay
The outbreak of 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has been a challenge for hospital laboratories because of the huge number of samples that must be tested for the presence of the causative pathogen, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Simple and rapid immunodiagnostic methods are urgently needed to identify positive cases. Here we report the development of a rapid and sensitive lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA) that uses lanthanide-doped polysterene nanoparticles (LNPs) to detect anti-SARV-CoV-2 IgG in human serum. A recombinant nucleocapsid phosphoprotein of SARS-CoV-2 was dispensed onto a nitrocellulose membrane to capture specific IgG. Mouse anti-human IgG antibody was labeled with self-assembled LNPs that served as a fluorescent reporter. A 100-μl aliquot of serum samples (1:1000 dilution) was used for this assay and the whole detection process took 10 min. The results of the validation experiment met the requirements for clinical diagnostic reagents. A value of 0.0666 was defined as the cutoff value by assaying 51 normal samples. We tested 7 samples that were positive by reverse-transcription (RT-)PCR and 12 that were negative but clinically suspicious for the presence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG. One of the negative samples was determined to be SARS-CoV-2 IgG positive, while the results for the other samples were consistent with those obtained by RT-PCR. Thus, this assay can achieve rapid and sensitive detection of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG in human serum and allow positive identification in suspicious cases; it can also be useful for monitoring the progression COVID-19 and evaluating patients’ response to treatment.
- 14 January 2020
- Published by Elsevier in Virologica Sinica
- Vol. 35 (4) , 478-480
The Limitation of Rapid Tests for DENV2 Infection in Host with Unique Immune Status: Low NS1 Antigenemia and Deficient Antibody Responses
- 14 January 2020
- Published by Elsevier in Virologica Sinica
- Vol. 35 (4) , 478-480
The Limitation of Rapid Tests for DENV2 Infection in Host with Unique Immune Status: Low NS1 Antigenemia and Deficient Antibody Responses
- Open Access
- 14 June 2018
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Infectious Diseases
- Vol. 18 (1) , 1-7
Delayed and highly specific antibody response to nonstructural protein 1 (NS1) revealed during natural human ZIKV infection by NS1-based capture ELISA
Zika virus (ZIKV) had spread rapidly in the past few years in southern hemisphere where dengue virus (DENV) had caused epidemic problems for over half a century. The high degree of cross-reactivity of Envelope (E) protein specific antibody responses between ZIKV and DENV made it challenging to perform differential diagnosis between the two infections using standard ELISA method for E protein. Using an IgG capture ELISA, we investigated the kinetics of nonstructural protein 1 (NS1) antibody response during natural ZIKV infection and the cross-reactivity to NS1 proteins using convalescent sera obtained from patients infected by either DENV or ZIKV. The analyses of the sequential serum samples from ZIKV infected individuals showed NS1 specific Abs appeared 2 weeks later than E specific Abs. Notably, human sera from ZIKV infected individuals did not contain cross-reactivity to NS1 proteins of any of the four DENV serotypes. Furthermore, four out of five NS1-specific monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) isolated from ZIKV infected individuals did not bind to DENV NS1 proteins. Only limited amount of cross-reactivity to ZIKV NS1 was displayed in 108 DENV1 immune sera at 1:100 dilution. The high degree of NS1-specific Abs in both ZIKV and DENV infection revealed here suggest that NS1-based diagnostics would significantly improve the differential diagnosis between DENV and ZIKV infections.
- 14 June 2018
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Infectious Diseases
- Vol. 18 (1) , 1-7
Open AccessDelayed and highly specific antibody response to nonstructural protein 1 (NS1) revealed during natural human ZIKV infection by NS1-based capture ELISA
Zika virus (ZIKV) had spread rapidly in the past few years in southern hemisphere where dengue virus (DENV) had caused epidemic problems for over half a century. The high degree of cross-reactivity of Envelope (E) protein specific antibody responses between ZIKV and DENV made it challenging to perform differential diagnosis between the two infections using standard ELISA method for E protein. Using an IgG capture ELISA, we investigated the kinetics of nonstructural protein 1 (NS1) antibody response during natural ZIKV infection and the cross-reactivity to NS1 proteins using convalescent sera obtained from patients infected by either DENV or ZIKV. The analyses of the sequential serum samples from ZIKV infected individuals showed NS1 specific Abs appeared 2 weeks later than E specific Abs. Notably, human sera from ZIKV infected individuals did not contain cross-reactivity to NS1 proteins of any of the four DENV serotypes. Furthermore, four out of five NS1-specific monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) isolated from ZIKV infected individuals did not bind to DENV NS1 proteins. Only limited amount of cross-reactivity to ZIKV NS1 was displayed in 108 DENV1 immune sera at 1:100 dilution. The high degree of NS1-specific Abs in both ZIKV and DENV infection revealed here suggest that NS1-based diagnostics would significantly improve the differential diagnosis between DENV and ZIKV infections.