Nico Gagelmann
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Research Subjects
Nico Gagelmann has a total of 824 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Nicolaus Kröger
University Hospital Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
50 shared publications - Maximilian Merz
Division of Hematologic Oncology, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
24 shared publications - Vladan Vucinic
Department for Hematology, Cell Therapy, Hemostaseology and Infectious Diseases, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
23 shared publications - David Fandrei
Department of Hematology, Hemostaseology and Cellular Therapy, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
21 shared publications - Patrick Born
Department of Hematology, Hemostaseology and Cellular Therapy, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
20 shared publications - Uwe Platzbecker
Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
17 shared publications
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 13 October 2026
- Published by American Society of Hematology in Blood
Germline DDX41 defines a distinct subgroup in MDS undergoing transplantation with reduced relapse and improved survival
Germline DDX41 variants are a recognized cause of adult myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS), characterized by distinct biological features and favorable prognosis. The independent effect of DDX41 status on outcomes after allogeneic transplantation, the role of conditioning intensity, and treatment-related toxicity risk remain unresolved. To address this gap, we analyzed 1,514 patients with MDS undergoing transplantation prior to routine DDX41 testing alongside a wild-type comparator, providing an unbiased benchmark for this molecular subgroup. Forty-nine patients (3.2%) carried pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) germline DDX41 variants; 19 (39%) had an additional somatic DDX41 mutation, most commonly p.R525H. P/LP DDX41 cases were older (median 63 vs 59 years) and showed lower IPSS-M risk with absent TP53 mutations (0% vs 21%). In terms of outcome, 2-year relapse incidence was significantly lower in P/LP DDX41 (17% vs 34%, p=0.01). In multivariable analysis, the presence of a DDX41 P/LP variant independently associated with lower risk of relapse (hazard ratio 0.43, 95% CI 0.21-0.88; p=0.02), concentrated in the reduced-intensity/nonmyeloablative stratum. Adjusted models showed significantly improved disease-free survival (DFS) for P/LP DDX41 (hazard ratio 0.62, 95% CI 0.41-0.95; p=0.03) and no significant association with non-relapse mortality (NRM) or graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). In summary, these findings identify DDX41-associated MDS as a transplant subgroup with superior DFS regardless of conditioning intensity driven by reduced relapse risk and lack of excess NRM and GVHD supporting incorporation of germline DDX41 status into transplant planning.
- 13 October 2026
- Published by American Society of Hematology in Blood
Open AccessGermline DDX41 defines a distinct subgroup in MDS undergoing transplantation with reduced relapse and improved survival
Germline DDX41 variants are a recognized cause of adult myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS), characterized by distinct biological features and favorable prognosis. The independent effect of DDX41 status on outcomes after allogeneic transplantation, the role of conditioning intensity, and treatment-related toxicity risk remain unresolved. To address this gap, we analyzed 1,514 patients with MDS undergoing transplantation prior to routine DDX41 testing alongside a wild-type comparator, providing an unbiased benchmark for this molecular subgroup. Forty-nine patients (3.2%) carried pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) germline DDX41 variants; 19 (39%) had an additional somatic DDX41 mutation, most commonly p.R525H. P/LP DDX41 cases were older (median 63 vs 59 years) and showed lower IPSS-M risk with absent TP53 mutations (0% vs 21%). In terms of outcome, 2-year relapse incidence was significantly lower in P/LP DDX41 (17% vs 34%, p=0.01). In multivariable analysis, the presence of a DDX41 P/LP variant independently associated with lower risk of relapse (hazard ratio 0.43, 95% CI 0.21-0.88; p=0.02), concentrated in the reduced-intensity/nonmyeloablative stratum. Adjusted models showed significantly improved disease-free survival (DFS) for P/LP DDX41 (hazard ratio 0.62, 95% CI 0.41-0.95; p=0.03) and no significant association with non-relapse mortality (NRM) or graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). In summary, these findings identify DDX41-associated MDS as a transplant subgroup with superior DFS regardless of conditioning intensity driven by reduced relapse risk and lack of excess NRM and GVHD supporting incorporation of germline DDX41 status into transplant planning.
- Open Access
- 17 September 2026
- Published by Elsevier in Transplantation and Cellular Therapy
iMTSS: An Integrated Framework for Biology- and Patient-Driven Prognosis in Myelofibrosis Undergoing Transplantation
- 17 September 2026
- Published by Elsevier in Transplantation and Cellular Therapy
Open AccessiMTSS: An Integrated Framework for Biology- and Patient-Driven Prognosis in Myelofibrosis Undergoing Transplantation
- Open Access
- 3 September 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Table S1 from Outcomes of CAR T-cell Therapy and Bispecific Antibodies as Single-Modality and Sequential Strategies in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma
Covariate balance before and after IPTW
- 3 September 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Table S1 from Outcomes of CAR T-cell Therapy and Bispecific Antibodies as Single-Modality and Sequential Strategies in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma
Covariate balance before and after IPTW
- Open Access
- 3 September 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Table S3 from Outcomes of CAR T-cell Therapy and Bispecific Antibodies as Single-Modality and Sequential Strategies in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma
IPTW-weighted Kaplan-Meier estimates at 12 months
- 3 September 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Table S3 from Outcomes of CAR T-cell Therapy and Bispecific Antibodies as Single-Modality and Sequential Strategies in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma
IPTW-weighted Kaplan-Meier estimates at 12 months
- Open Access
- 3 September 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Figure S1 from Outcomes of CAR T-cell Therapy and Bispecific Antibodies as Single-Modality and Sequential Strategies in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma
Patient flow and applied analyses. Top panel – entire cohort. Middle panel – cohort for the primary multistate models and landmark analyses. Lower panel – IPTW analysis.
- 3 September 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Figure S1 from Outcomes of CAR T-cell Therapy and Bispecific Antibodies as Single-Modality and Sequential Strategies in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma
Patient flow and applied analyses. Top panel – entire cohort. Middle panel – cohort for the primary multistate models and landmark analyses. Lower panel – IPTW analysis.
- Open Access
- 3 September 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Figure S2 from Outcomes of CAR T-cell Therapy and Bispecific Antibodies as Single-Modality and Sequential Strategies in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma
Observed survival according to first immunotherapy
- 3 September 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Figure S2 from Outcomes of CAR T-cell Therapy and Bispecific Antibodies as Single-Modality and Sequential Strategies in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma
Observed survival according to first immunotherapy
- Open Access
- 3 September 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Figure S4 from Outcomes of CAR T-cell Therapy and Bispecific Antibodies as Single-Modality and Sequential Strategies in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma
RPSFTM-adjusted overall survival by initial treatment modality. RPSFTM-adjusted overall survival. The observed CAR T-first curve (solid dark blue) is compared with the observed BsAb-first curve (dashed crimson) and the RPSFTM-adjusted BsAb-first curve (solid orange). The adjusted curve represents the counterfactual survival of BsAb-first patients had no treatment switching to CAR T occurred, estimated using rank-preserving structural failure time modeling with g-estimation. Number at risk tables are shown below each panel. All estimates are descriptive and should be interpreted in the context of non-randomized treatment allocation and the assumptions of the RPSFTM framework.
- 3 September 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Figure S4 from Outcomes of CAR T-cell Therapy and Bispecific Antibodies as Single-Modality and Sequential Strategies in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma
RPSFTM-adjusted overall survival by initial treatment modality. RPSFTM-adjusted overall survival. The observed CAR T-first curve (solid dark blue) is compared with the observed BsAb-first curve (dashed crimson) and the RPSFTM-adjusted BsAb-first curve (solid orange). The adjusted curve represents the counterfactual survival of BsAb-first patients had no treatment switching to CAR T occurred, estimated using rank-preserving structural failure time modeling with g-estimation. Number at risk tables are shown below each panel. All estimates are descriptive and should be interpreted in the context of non-randomized treatment allocation and the assumptions of the RPSFTM framework.
- Open Access
- 3 September 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Figure S3 from Outcomes of CAR T-cell Therapy and Bispecific Antibodies as Single-Modality and Sequential Strategies in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma
Sensitivity analysis for 6-month landmark.
- 3 September 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Figure S3 from Outcomes of CAR T-cell Therapy and Bispecific Antibodies as Single-Modality and Sequential Strategies in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma
Sensitivity analysis for 6-month landmark.