MBMaureen M. Bain

Maureen M. Bain

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article


Maureen M. Bain has a total of 132 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    Measuring the impact of dietary supplementation with citrus or cucumber extract on chicken gut microbiota using 16s rRNA gene sequencing

    by Francesca Riva, David H. McGuinness, Dorothy E. F. McKeegan, Jorge Peinado-Izaguerri, Geert Bruggeman, David Hermans, Peter D. Eckersall, Mark McLaughlin, Maureen Bain

    This study investigated the effects of dietary supplements, citrus (CTS) and cucumber (CMB), on the jejunum and cecum microbiota of 14- and 28-days old broiler chickens to evaluate their impact on the gut health and assess their role as alternatives to antibiotic growth promoters (ABGPs). 16SrRNA gene sequencing revealed the overall bacterial microbiota composition was significantly affected by the gut site (p?<?0.001) but not by either of the dietary supplements, CTS and CMB, at both 14 and 28 days of age. However, as a result of Linear discriminant analysis (LDA) effect size (LEfSE), CTS dietary supplements significantly increased the counts of Lactobacillus (p?<?0.01) and decreased the counts of Enterococcus (p?<?0.01) and Clostridium (p?<?0.05) in the jejunum, whereas the counts of Blautia were increased (p?<?0.01) and Enterococcus were decreased (p?<?0.05) in the cecum at both ages. Only minor CMB effects were identified in the cecum and non in the jejunum. The use of CTS dietary supplements has been shown to be associated to the reduction of potentially pathogenic bacteria (Enterococcus and Clostridium) and to the growth of beneficial bacteria (Lactobacillus and Blautia) which are known to have positive effects on chicken health in terms of nutrients absorption, stimulation and production of short chain fatty acids (SCFAs). Therefore, this study suggests that the use of a CTS supplemented diet could promote gut health while no clear advantages have been identified with the use of CMB as a dietary supplement.


  • Open Access

    Effect of an immune challenge and two feed supplements on broiler chicken individual breast muscle protein synthesis rate

    by Jorge Peinado-Izaguerri, Alexander Corbishley, Eduardo Zarzuela, Blanca Pina-Beltrán, Francesca Riva, Dorothy E.F. McKeegan, Maureen Bain, Javier Muñoz, Mangesh Bhide, Mark McLaughlin, et al.


  • Open Access

    Transcriptome analysis of the uterus of hens laying eggs differing in cuticle deposition

    by Sandra Poyatos Pertiñez, Peter W. Wilson, Wiebke Icken, David Cavero, Maureen M. Bain, Anita C. Jones, Ian C. Dunn

    Background: Avian eggs have a proteinaceous cuticle. The quantity of cuticle varies and the deposition of a good cuticle in the uterus (Shell-gland) prevents transmission of bacteria to the egg contents. Results: To understand cuticle deposition, uterus transcriptomes were compared between hens with i) naturally good and poor cuticle and, ii) where manipulation of the hypothalamo-pituitary-gonadal-oviduct axis produced eggs with or without cuticle. The highest expressed genes encoded eggshell matrix and cuticle proteins, e.g. MEPE (OC-116), BPIFB3 (OVX-36), RARRES1 (OVX-32), WAP (OVX-25), and genes for mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation, active transport and energy metabolism. Expression of a number of these genes differed between hens laying eggs with or without cuticle. There was also a high expression of clock genes. PER2, CRY2, CRY1, CLOCK and BMAL1 were differentially expressed when cuticle deposition was prevented, and they also changed throughout the egg formation cycle. This suggests an endogenous clock in the uterus may be a component of cuticle deposition control. Cuticle proteins are glycosylated and glycosaminoglycan binding genes had a lower expression when cuticle proteins were deposited on the egg. The immediate early genes, JUN and FOS, were expressed less when the cuticle had not been deposited and changed over the egg formation cycle, suggesting they are important in oviposition and cuticle deposition. The uterus transcriptome of hens with good and poor cuticle deposition did not differ. Conclusions: We have gained insights into the factors that can affect the production of the cuticle especially clock genes and immediate early genes. We have demonstrated that these genes change their expression over the period of eggshell formation supporting their importance. The lack of differences in expression between the uterus of hens laying eggs with the best and worse cuticle suggest the genetic basis of the trait may lie outside the oviduct.


  • Open Access

    Genetic variation and potential for genetic improvement of cuticle deposition on chicken eggs

    by Ian C. Dunn, John A. Woolliams, Peter W. Wilson, Wiebke Icken, David Cavero, Anita C. Jones, Fiona Quinlan-Pluck, Gareth O. S. Williams, Victor Olori, Maureen M. Bain

    The cuticle is an invisible glycosylated protein layer that covers the outside of the eggshell and forms a barrier to the transmission of microorganisms. Cuticle-specific staining and in situ absorbance measurements have been used to quantify cuticle deposition in several pure breeds of chicken. For brown eggs, a pre-stain and a post-stain absorbance measurement is required to correct for intrinsic absorption by the natural pigment. For white eggs, a post-stain absorbance measurement alone is sufficient to estimate cuticle deposition. The objective of the research was to estimate genetic parameters and provide data to promote adoption of the technique to increase cuticle deposition and reduce vertical transmission of microorganisms. For all pure breeds examined here, i.e. Rhode Island Red, two White Leghorns, White Rock and a broiler breed, the estimate of heritability for cuticle deposition from a meta-analysis was moderately high (0.38 ± 0.04). In the Rhode Island Red breed, the estimate of the genetic correlation between measurements recorded at early and late times during the egg-laying period was ~ 1. There was no negative genetic correlation between cuticle deposition and production traits. Estimates of the genetic correlation of cuticle deposition with shell color ranged from negative values or 0 in brown-egg layers to positive values in white- or tinted-egg layers. Using the intrinsic fluorescence of tryptophan in the cuticle proteins to quantify the amount of cuticle deposition failed because of complex quenching processes. Tryptophan fluorescence intensity at 330 nm was moderately heritable, but there was no evidence of a non-zero genetic correlation with cuticle deposition. This was complicated furthermore by a negative genetic correlation of fluorescence with color in brown eggs, due to the quenching of tryptophan fluorescence by energy transfer to protoporphyrin pigment. We also confirmed that removal of the cuticle increased reflection of ultraviolet wavelengths from the egg. These results provide additional evidence for the need to incorporate cuticle deposition into breeding programs of egg- and meat-type birds in order to reduce vertical and horizontal transmission of potentially pathogenic organisms and to help improve biosecurity in poultry.


  • Open Access

    Cuticle deposition improves the biosecurity of eggs through the laying cycle and can be measured on hatching eggs without compromising embryonic development

    by Maureen M Bain, Jiangxia Zheng, Melissa Zigler, Natasha Whenham, Fiona Quinlan-Pluck, Anita C Jones, Mark Roberts, Wiebke Icken, Victor E Olori, Ian C Dunn


  • Open Access

    Serum and acute phase protein changes in laying hens, infested with poultry red mite

    by Haider Kaab, Maureen M. Bain, Kathryn Bartley, Frank Turnbull, Harry W. Wright, Alasdair J. Nisbet, Richard Birchmore, P. David Eckersall


  • Top Cited Papers
    Open Access

    Increasing persistency in lay and stabilising egg quality in longer laying cycles. What are the challenges?

    by M. M. Bain, Y. Nys, I.C. Dunn

    In the past 50 years, selection starting initially at the breed level and then using quantitative genetics coupled with a sophisticated breeding pyramid, has resulted in a very productive hybrid fo...


  • Open Access

    Enhancing the egg's natural defence against bacterial penetration by increasing cuticle deposition

    by M. M. Bain, K. Mcdade, R. Burchmore, A. Law, P. W. Wilson, M. Schmutz, R. Preisinger, I. C. Dunn

    Summary: The cuticle is a proteinaceous layer covering the avian egg and is believed to form a defence to microorganism ingress. In birds that lay eggs in challenging environments, the cuticle is thicker, suggesting evolutionary pressure; however, in poultry, selection pressure for this trait has been removed because of artificial incubation. This study aimed to quantify cuticle deposition and to estimate its genetic parameters and its role on trans‐shell penetration of bacteria. Additionally, cuticle proteins were characterised to establish whether alleles for these genes explained variation in deposition. A novel and reliable quantification was achieved using the difference in reflectance of the egg at 650 nm before and after staining with a specific dye. The heritability of this novel measurement was moderate (0.27), and bacteria penetration was dependent on the natural variation in cuticle deposition. Eggs with the best cuticle were never penetrated by bacteria (P < 0.001). The cuticle proteome consisted of six major proteins. A significant association was found between alleles of one of these protein genes, ovocleidin‐116 (MEPE), and cuticle deposition (P = 0.015) and also between alleles of estrogen receptor 1 (ESR1) gene and cuticle deposition (P = 0.008). With the heritability observed, genetic selection should be possible to increase cuticle deposition in commercial poultry, so reducing trans‐generational transmission of microorganisms and reversing the lack of selection pressure for this trait during recent domestication.


  • Contributor contact details

    by Yves Nys, M. Bain, F. Van Immerseel, P. Magdelaine, N. Yang, H.M. Tukur, F. Hansstein, F.C. Schwägele, N. Guyot, J. Gautron, et al.

  • Contributor contact details

    by F. Van Immerseel, Y. Nys, M. Bain, M.T. Musgrove, M. Chemaly, G. Salvat, R. Raspoet, I. Gantois, R. Devloo, F. Pasmans, et al.