Nicholas H. B. Schräder

Nicholas H. B. Schräder

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article

Previous Organizations / Institutes

The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years


Nicholas H. B. Schräder has a total of 29 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:

  • André P. Wolff

    Affiliation Anaesthesiology Pain Centre, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands

    3 shared publications
  • André Paul Wolff

    University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Anesthesiology, UMCG Pain Center, Haren, the Netherlands

    3 shared publications
  • José C. Duipmans

    Department of Dermatology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, UMCG Center of Expertise for Blistering Diseases, European Reference Network for Rare Skin Diseases (ERN SKIN) , Groningen

    3 shared publications
  • Marieke C. Bolling

    Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands

    3 shared publications
  • José C. Duipmans

    Affiliation Department of Dermatology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands

    2 shared publications
  • Marieke C. Bolling

    Department of Dermatology and University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands

    2 shared publications

Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    Sublingual tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol to treat pain in epidermolysis bullosa: a randomized, placebo-controlled crossover study

    by Nicholas H B Schräder, José C Duipmans, Peter Sörös, Karin M Vermeulen, Roy E Stewart, Marieke C Bolling, André P Wolff

    We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial of sublingual 10% tetrahydrocannabinol/5% cannabidiol in eight adults with epidermolysis bullosa and chronic pain. No significant change in pain affect occurred, but 75% reported ≥ 30% global pain reduction. Analgesic use halved during active treatment. Mild adverse events were common and larger trials are warranted.

  • Open Access

    The C4EB study—Transvamix (10% THC / 5% CBD) to treat chronic pain in epidermolysis bullosa: A protocol for an explorative randomized, placebo controlled, and double blind intervention crossover study

    by Nicholas H. B. Schräder, José C. Duipmans, Remco J. Renken, Peter Sörös, Karin M. Vermeulen, Maria C. Bolling, André P. Wolff

    Patients with the genetic blistering skin condition epidermolysis bullosa (EB) report severe pain as a consequence of skin and mucous membrane lesions including blisters, wounds, and scars. Adequate symptom alleviation is not often achieved using conventional pharmacologic interventions. Finding novel approaches to pain care in EB is imperative to improve the quality of life of patients living with EB. There are several anecdotal reports on the use of cannabinoid-based medicines (CBMs) by EB patients to reduce the burden of symptoms. However, controlled clinical investigations assessing these reported effects are lacking. As the pain quality “unpleasantness” delineates EB pain, we hypothesize the modulation of affective pain processing in the brain by way of intervention with CBMs comprising the cannabinoids Δ-9-tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol—objectified by functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). The C4EB study is an investigator-initiated, single-centre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled and crossover trial. Adult patients with the diagnosis epidermolysis bullosa, reporting chronic pain will be eligible to participate. Following baseline measurements, participants will be randomized to receive the sublingually administered interventions placebo and Transvamix® in forward or reversed orders, each for two weeks and separated by a washout. The primary outcome is the difference in numeric rating scale pain scores between grouped interventions, using affective descriptors within the Short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire-2. Secondary outcomes include pain self-efficacy, concomitant analgesic medication-use and adverse events. Additionally, fMRI will be employed to assess brain connectivity related to neuroanatomic pain circuits at baseline, placebo and Transvamix® interventions. The study was approved by the ethical committee at the University Medical Center of Groningen in the Netherlands. Results will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal. Trial registration number: Netherlands Trial Register: NL9347 (Acronym: C4EB).


  • Open Access

    Identifying Epidermolysis Bullosa Patient Needs and Perceived Treatment Benefits: An Explorative Study Using the Patient Benefit Index

    by Nicholas H. B. Schräder, Eva W. H. Korte, José C. Duipmans, Roy E. Stewart, Maria C. Bolling, André P. Wolff

    Epidermolysis bullosa (EB) is a genetic blistering skin condition for which no cure exists. Symptom alleviation and quality of life are therefore central to EB care. This study aimed to gain insight into EB patient needs and benefits from current clinical care. Two questionnaires were administered cross-sectionally to adult EB patients at the Dutch expertise centre for blistering diseases. Patient needs and benefits were analyzed using the patient benefit index survey (PBI-S). Ancillary data were compiled pertaining to self-reported EB severity, pain and pruritus, as well as current and previous treatments. In total, 104 participants were included (response rate 69.8%). Sixty-eight participants comprised the analyzed cohort (n = 36 omitted from analysis). The needs given the highest importance were to get better skin quickly (64.7%) and to be healed of all skin alterations (61.8%). A positive correlation between pain and EB severity and the importance of most needs was observed. Minimal clinically important differences within the PBI-S, relating to reported benefits from clinical care, were reported by 60.3% of the cohort. This study highlights a discrepancy between patient needs and feasible treatment outcomes. Utilizing the PBI-S in conjunction with well-established multidisciplinary care may catalyze the process of tailoring treatments to the needs of individual patients.


  • Open Access

    Cannabinoid use and effects in patients with epidermolysis bullosa: an international cross-sectional survey study

    by Nicholas H. B. Schräder, Emily S. Gorell, Roy E. Stewart, José C. Duipmans, Nicole Harris, Victoria A. Perez, Jean Y. Tang, André P. Wolff, Marieke C. Bolling

    Background: Epidermolysis bullosa (EB) patient anecdotes and case reports indicate that cannabinoid-based medicines (CBMs) may alleviate pain and pruritus and improve wound healing. CBM use has not been characterized in the EB patient population. Objectives: To evaluate CBM use among EB patients, including CBM types, effects on symptoms (e.g., pain and pruritus), disease process (e.g., blistering, wounds, and inflammation), well-being (e.g., sleep, appetite) and concomitant medications. Methods: English-speaking EB patients or caregivers completed an online international, anonymous, cross-sectional survey regarding CBM use. Respondents reported the types of CBMs, subsequent effects including perceived EB symptom alteration, changes in medication use, and side effects. Results: Seventy-one EB patients from five continents reported using or having used CBMs to treat their EB. Missing question responses ranged between 0 (0%) and 33 (46%). Most used more than one CBM preparation (mean: 2.4 ± 1.5) and route of administration (mean: 2.1 ± 1.1). Topical and ingested were the most common routes. Pain and pruritus were reported retrospectively to decrease by 3 points (scale: 0–10; p < 0.001 for both) after CBM use. Most reported that CBM use improved their overall EB symptoms (95%), pain (94%), pruritus (91%) and wound healing (81%). Most participants (79%) reported decreased use of pain medications. The most common side-effect was dry mouth (44%). Conclusions: CBMs improve the perception of pain, pruritus, wound healing, and well-being in EB patients and reduced concomitant medication use. Nevertheless, a direct relation between the use of CBMs and reduction of the above-mentioned symptoms cannot be proven by these data. Therefore, future controlled studies using pharmaceutically standardised CBM preparations in EB are warranted to delineate the risks and benefits of CBMs.


  • Open Access

    Letter to the Editor: Ordering the Chaos in Cannabinoid-Related Research: Is it Time for a Task Force on Taxonomy?

    by Nicholas H.B. Schräder, Marieke C. Bolling, André P. Wolff

    Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research

  • Open Access

    Combined tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol to treat pain in epidermolysis bullosa: a report of three cases

    by N.H.B. Schräder, J.C. Duipmans, B. Molenbuur, A.P. Wolff, M.F. Jonkman

    Epidermolysis bullosa (EB) is a genetic blistering disorder characterized by intense pain related to disease pathology and care‐based interventions. Opioid‐based therapies underpin pain‐care in EB however are unable to provide adequate analgesia in a significant proportion of patients. Cannabinoid‐based medicines (CBMs) have been increasingly studied for pain conditions of various etiologies and pose as a novel dimension for pain‐care in EB. We present three cases of EB who were prescribed pharmaceutical‐grade sublingually administered CBMs comprising tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD). All three patients reported improved pain scores, reduced pruritus and reduction in overall analgesic drug intake.


  • Open Access

    Pain Quality Assessment Scale for Epidermolysis Bullosa

    by N Schräder, W Yuen, M Jonkman

    Pain is one of the most debilitating symptoms in epidermolysis bullosa (EB) leading to reduced quali...


  • Open Access

    Additional file 1 of Cannabinoid use and effects in patients with epidermolysis bullosa: an international cross-sectional survey study

    by Nicholas H. B. Schräder, Emily S. Gorell, Roy E. Stewart, José C. Duipmans, Nicole Harris, Victoria A. Perez, Jean Y. Tang, André P. Wolff, Marieke C. Bolling