Renee Lyons
Research Subjects
Renee Lyons has a total of 13 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Brian Golden
International Centre for Health Innovation, Richard Ivey School of Business, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada
1 shared publication - Celeste Alvaro
Atlantic Health Promotion Research Centre, Faculty of Health Professions, Dalhousie University, Canada
1 shared publication - Chaim M. Bell
Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
1 shared publication - E. Richard Brown
UCLA Center for Health Policy Research, School of Public Health, University of California, USA
1 shared publication - Grace Warner
Faculty of Health, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada
1 shared publication - Jane Merkley
Executive Administration, Bridgepoint Active Healthcare, 14 St. Matthews Road, Toronto, ON M4M 2B5, Canada
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 18 December 2013
- Published by Wiley in Clinical and Translational Medicine
- Vol. 2 (1) , 16
Application of personalized medicine to chronic disease: a feasibility assessment
Personalized Medicine has the potential to improve health outcomes and reduce the cost of care; however its adoption has been slow in Canada. Bridgepoint Health is a complex continuous care provider striving to reduce the burden of polypharmacy in chronic patients. The main goal of the study was to explore the feasibility of utilizing personalized medicine in the treatment of chronic complex patients as a preliminary institutional health technology assessment. We analyzed stroke treatment optimization as a clinical indication that could serve as a “proof of concept” for the widespread implementation of pharmacogenetics. The objectives of the study were three‐fold: Review current practice in medication administration for stroke treatment at Bridgepoint Health Critically analyze evidence that pharmacogenetic testing could (or could not) enhance drug selection and treatment efficacy for stroke patients; Assess the cost‐benefit potential of a pharmacogenetic intervention for stroke. Review current practice in medication administration for stroke treatment at Bridgepoint HealthCritically analyze evidence that pharmacogenetic testing could (or could not) enhance drug selection and treatment efficacy for stroke patients;Assess the cost‐benefit potential of a pharmacogenetic intervention for stroke.We conducted a review of stroke treatment practices at Bridgepoint Health, scanned the literature for drug‐gene and drug‐outcome interactions, and evaluated the potential consequences of pharmacogenetic testing using the ACCE model.There is a substantial body of evidence suggesting that pharmacogenetic stratification of stroke treatment can improve patient outcomes in the long‐term, and provide substantial efficiencies for the healthcare system in the short‐term. Specifically, pharmacogenetic stratification of antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapies for stroke patients may have a major impact on the risk of disease recurrence, and thus should be explored further for clinical application. Bridgepoint Health, and other healthcare institutions taking this path, should consider launching pilot projects to assess the practical impact of pharmacogenetics to optimize treatment for chronic continuous care.
- 18 December 2013
- Published by Wiley in Clinical and Translational Medicine
- Vol. 2 (1) , 16
Open AccessApplication of personalized medicine to chronic disease: a feasibility assessment
Personalized Medicine has the potential to improve health outcomes and reduce the cost of care; however its adoption has been slow in Canada. Bridgepoint Health is a complex continuous care provider striving to reduce the burden of polypharmacy in chronic patients. The main goal of the study was to explore the feasibility of utilizing personalized medicine in the treatment of chronic complex patients as a preliminary institutional health technology assessment. We analyzed stroke treatment optimization as a clinical indication that could serve as a “proof of concept” for the widespread implementation of pharmacogenetics. The objectives of the study were three‐fold: Review current practice in medication administration for stroke treatment at Bridgepoint Health Critically analyze evidence that pharmacogenetic testing could (or could not) enhance drug selection and treatment efficacy for stroke patients; Assess the cost‐benefit potential of a pharmacogenetic intervention for stroke. Review current practice in medication administration for stroke treatment at Bridgepoint HealthCritically analyze evidence that pharmacogenetic testing could (or could not) enhance drug selection and treatment efficacy for stroke patients;Assess the cost‐benefit potential of a pharmacogenetic intervention for stroke.We conducted a review of stroke treatment practices at Bridgepoint Health, scanned the literature for drug‐gene and drug‐outcome interactions, and evaluated the potential consequences of pharmacogenetic testing using the ACCE model.There is a substantial body of evidence suggesting that pharmacogenetic stratification of stroke treatment can improve patient outcomes in the long‐term, and provide substantial efficiencies for the healthcare system in the short‐term. Specifically, pharmacogenetic stratification of antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapies for stroke patients may have a major impact on the risk of disease recurrence, and thus should be explored further for clinical application. Bridgepoint Health, and other healthcare institutions taking this path, should consider launching pilot projects to assess the practical impact of pharmacogenetics to optimize treatment for chronic continuous care.
- Open Access
- 30 July 2013
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Health Services Research
- Vol. 13 (1) , 289
Clinicians’ views on improving inter-organizational care transitions
Patients with complex health conditions frequently require care from multiple providers and are particularly vulnerable to poorly executed transitions from one healthcare setting to another. Poorly executed care transitions can result in negative patient outcomes (e.g. medication errors, delays in treatment) and increased healthcare spending due to re-hospitalization or emergency room visits by patients. Little is known about care transitions from acute care to complex continuing care and rehabilitation settings. Thus, a qualitative study was undertaken to explore clinicians’ perceptions of strategies aimed at improving patient care transitions from acute care hospitals to complex continuing care and rehabilitation healthcare organizations.
- 30 July 2013
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Health Services Research
- Vol. 13 (1) , 289
Open AccessClinicians’ views on improving inter-organizational care transitions
Patients with complex health conditions frequently require care from multiple providers and are particularly vulnerable to poorly executed transitions from one healthcare setting to another. Poorly executed care transitions can result in negative patient outcomes (e.g. medication errors, delays in treatment) and increased healthcare spending due to re-hospitalization or emergency room visits by patients. Little is known about care transitions from acute care to complex continuing care and rehabilitation settings. Thus, a qualitative study was undertaken to explore clinicians’ perceptions of strategies aimed at improving patient care transitions from acute care hospitals to complex continuing care and rehabilitation healthcare organizations.
- Open Access
- 20 October 2010
- Published by Springer Nature in Implementation Science
- Vol. 5 (1) , 79
Conservation of resources theory and research use in health systems
Health systems face challenges in using research evidence to improve policy and practice. These challenges are particularly evident in small and poorly resourced health systems, which are often in locations (in Canada and globally) with poorer health status. Although organizational resources have been acknowledged as important in understanding research use resource theories have not been a focus of knowledge translation (KT) research. What resources, broadly defined, are required for KT and how does their presence or absence influence research use?
- 20 October 2010
- Published by Springer Nature in Implementation Science
- Vol. 5 (1) , 79
Open AccessConservation of resources theory and research use in health systems
Health systems face challenges in using research evidence to improve policy and practice. These challenges are particularly evident in small and poorly resourced health systems, which are often in locations (in Canada and globally) with poorer health status. Although organizational resources have been acknowledged as important in understanding research use resource theories have not been a focus of knowledge translation (KT) research. What resources, broadly defined, are required for KT and how does their presence or absence influence research use?