Ching-Wen Huang

Background Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) poses a clinical challenge and requires a combination of systemic therapy and conversion surgery. Although first-line chemotherapy and targeted therapy are considered the standard treatments for mCRC, the role of primary tumor resection (PTR) in asymptomatic synchronous mCRC with unresectable metastatic lesion after initial therapy remains relatively underexplored. Materials A retrospective review was conducted from January 2015 to January 2021, involving 74 patients with synchronous mCRC who received bevacizumab plus FOFIRI as first-line systemic therapy. All 74 patients had unresectable metastatic lesions confirmed through multidisciplinary team discussion. Patient characteristics, PTR data, and radiotherapy (RT) and overall survival (OS) outcomes were analyzed. The patients were categorized into a “PTR” group and a “No PTR” group and then further stratified into “4A,” “4B,” and “4C” subgroups based on the initial mCRC stage. Additionally, four subgroups—namely “PTR( +)/RT( +),” “PTR( +)/RT( −),” “PTR( −)/RT( +),” and “PTR( −)/RT( −)”—were formed to assess the combined effects of PTR and RT. Results The median OS for all the patients was 23.8 months (20.5–27.1 months). The “PTR” group exhibited a significantly higher median OS of 25.9 months (21.3–30.5 months) compared with 21.4 months (15.8–27.1 months) in the “No PTR” group (p = 0.048). Subgroup analyses revealed a trend of improved survival with PTR in patients with stage IVA and IVB; however, the results were not statistically significant (p = 0.116 and 0.493, respectively). A subgroup analysis of PTR and RT combinations revealed no significant difference in median OS rates. Conclusion For asymptomatic mCRC with synchronous unresectable distant metastasis, PTR following first-line therapy with bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI may provide a potential survival benefit, particularly in stage IVA/IVB patients compared with stage IVC patients. Additionally, RT for primary tumor did not provide an additional OS benefit in mCRC with unresectable metastasis. A prospective randomized trial with a larger sample size is essential to further elucidate the role of PTR in this context.

Background Intracorporeal anastomosis offers notable advantages over extracorporeal techniques, including reduced tissue manipulation leading to faster recovery and potentially lower risks of surgical site infections and complications. However, it also involves several challenges, such as increased operative time and the need for experienced assistants and multiple trocars. Our novel technique addresses these problems. Methods We present a novel approach for closing common enterotomies during intracorporeal anastomosis by using a linear stapler. This technique involves the use of a 6-cm straight needle, which facilitates closure of the common enterotomy. The technique can be performed independently by a single surgeon without the need for additional trocars or assistants. Results This technique was applied for 20 patients undergoing laparoscopic gastrointestinal surgery between June 2023 and February 2024. The median age of the enrolled patients was 65 years, with laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with intracorporeal ileocolostomy being the most common procedure (60% of cases). The median anastomosis time was 22.5 min. No occurrence of anastomotic leakage was reported, and only one patient (5%) developed temporary postoperative bowel obstruction, which was managed conservatively. Conclusions Our technique enables efficient and safe closure of common enterotomies during intracorporeal anastomosis, minimizing reliance on additional trocars and experienced assistants. It simplifies the procedure and ensures fullthickness stapling, potentially reducing the likelihood of complications. Because of its broad applicability across various laparoscopic surgeries, this technique offers substantial benefits and is worth recommending for intracorporeal anastomosis.

This multicenter study explored the survival benefits of upfront primary tumor resection (PTR) followed by first-line cetuximab plus chemotherapy in real-world patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Treatment options for mCRC include chemotherapy, targeted therapy, immunotherapy, and surgery. The efficacy of upfront PTR in managing mCRC remains unclear. In this retrospective study, we evaluated the outcomes of upfront PTR in 582 patients with synchronous RAS wild-type mCRC who received cetuximab plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment between November 2016 and August 2020. Of these patients, 364 (62.5%) underwent upfront PTR (PTR group) and 218 (37.5%) did not (non-PTR group). Relevant data were collected from 14 medical institutions in Taiwan. No significant differences were discovered between the PTR and non-PTR groups in median overall survival (37.9 vs. 31.7 months; P = 0.079) or progression-free survival (13.70 vs. 13.29 months; P = 0.62). Compared with patients who did not undergo metastasectomy, those who underwent this surgery exhibited significantly longer median overall survival (29.2 vs. 54.18 months; P < 0.001) and progression-free survival (12.8 vs. 15.60 months; P = 0.013). Our findings suggest that upfront PTR may not improve oncological outcomes in patients with synchronous RAS wild-type mCRC. Cetuximab-based targeted therapy plus chemotherapy appears to be suitable as first-line treatment for these patients. This study indicates that upfront PTR should be considered only for patients exhibiting symptoms such as tumor bleeding, perforation, or obstruction.

Background and Objectives: Approximately 5–10% of all patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) harbor a BRAF^V600E mutation. These patients exhibit distinct metastatic patterns, poor prognosis, and heterogenous survival outcomes. The findings from the TRIBE study indicated that the administration of FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment extended the median duration of overall survival (OS). In this study, we explored the effects of UGT1A1 polymorphism on the outcomes of irinotecan dose escalation versus FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab in patients with BRAF^V600E-mutant mCRC. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 25 patients who had received a diagnosis of BRAF^V600E-mutant mCRC between October 2015 and August 2022. All patients underwent UGT1A1 genotyping before receiving bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS), and secondary endpoints were OS and adverse events (AEs). The two treatment arms were compared in terms of 6-month PFS and 12-month OS. Results: Over a median follow-up duration of 15.0 (interquartile range, 10.0–30.5) months, no significant differences were noted between the treatment arms in severe AEs (SAEs), 6-month PFS, or 12-month OS (all p < 0.05). Regarding AEs, the FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab regimen was associated with a lower incidence of anorexia than was the FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab regimen (p = 0.042). Conclusions: Our findings indicate that FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab with irinotecan dose escalation is an effective first-line treatment regimen for patients with BRAF^V600E-mutant mCRC. This regimen leads to acceptable clinical outcomes with manageable AEs. However, the effects on survival and safety outcomes could only be speculated, and further studies are needed because of the sample size, the follow-up for the OS evaluation, and the non-uniformity in all the variables considered in the two groups.

Malnutrition is a common problem in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) receiving targeted therapy plus chemotherapy, resulting in severe toxicity and decreased survival rates. This retrospective study employing propensity score matching (PSM) examined the efficacy and safety of a supplemental home parenteral nutrition (HPN) program for patients with RAS wild-type mCRC receiving cetuximab plus chemotherapy. This retrospective nationwide registry study included data from 14 medical centers/hospitals across Taiwan, and the data period ranged from November 2016 to December 2020. Patients with RAS wild-type mCRC receiving cetuximab plus chemotherapy as their first-line therapy were included and divided into HPN and non-HPN program groups. HPN was initiated based on patient-specific factors, such as baseline nutritional status, treatment-related toxicities, and comorbidities. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using response to therapy, duration of response (DoR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). This study recruited 758 patients, of whom 110 and 648 were included in the HPN and non-HPN program groups, respectively. After 1:3 PSM, the data of 109 and 327 patients from the HPN and non-HPN program groups were analyzed, respectively. The HPN program group had a higher metastasectomy rate (33.9% vs. 20.2%, p = 0.005), and longer duration of treatment and DoR than the non-HPN program group (13.6 vs. 10.3 and 13.6 vs. 9.9 months, p = 0.001 and < 0.001, respectively). The HPN program group tended to have a longer median PFS (18.2 vs. 13.9 months, p = 0.102). Moreover, we noted a significant improvement in the median OS in the same group (53.4 vs. 34.6 months, p = 0.002). Supplemental HPN programs may be recommended for select patients with mCRC receiving targeted therapy plus chemotherapy to improve oncological outcomes.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common malignancies and is associated with high mortality rates worldwide. The underlying mechanism of tumorigenesis in CRC is complex, involving genetic, lifestyle-related, and environmental factors. Although radical resection with adjuvant FOLFOX (5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin) chemotherapy and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy have remained mainstays of treatment for patients with stage III CRC and locally advanced rectal cancer, respectively, the oncological outcomes of these treatments are often unsatisfactory. To improve patients’ chances of survival, researchers are actively searching for new biomarkers to facilitate the development of more effective treatment strategies for CRC and metastatic CRC (mCRC). MicroRNAs (miRs), small, single-stranded, noncoding RNAs, can post-transcriptionally regulate mRNA translation and trigger mRNA degradation. Recent studies have documented aberrant miR levels in patients with CRC or mCRC, and some miRs are reportedly associated with chemoresistance or radioresistance in CRC. Herein, we present a narrative review of the literature on the roles of oncogenic miRs (oncomiRs) and tumor suppressor miRs (anti-oncomiRs), some of which can be used to predict the responses of patients with CRC to chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy. Moreover, miRs may serve as potential therapeutic targets because their functions can be manipulated using synthetic antagonists and miR mimics.

Studies have demonstrated that metformin has antitumor effects in addition to therapeutic effects on hyperglycemia; however, few studies have explored the effects of metformin in chemotherapy. Therefore, we hypothesized that the administration of metformin would enhance the therapeutic effects of 5-fluorouracil and oxaliplatin (FuOx) to inhibit the growth of colorectal cancer (CRC) cells in vitro and in vivo. The results of our in vitro experiments demonstrated that metformin significantly increased the effects of FuOx with respect to cell proliferation (p < 0.05), colony formation (p < 0.05), and migration (p < 0.01) and induced cell cycle arrest in the G0/G1 phase in HT29 cells and the S phase in SW480 and SW620 cells (p < 0.05). Flow cytometry analysis revealed that metformin combined with FuOx induced late apoptosis (p < 0.05) by mediating mitochondria-related Mcl-1 and Bim protein expression. Furthermore, in vivo, metformin combined with FuOx more notably reduced tumor volume than FuOx or metformin alone did in BALB/c mice (p < 0.05). These findings demonstrate that metformin may act as an adjunctive agent to enhance the chemosensitivity of CRC cells to FuOx. However, further clinical trials are warranted to validate the clinical implications of the findings.

Personalized treatments based on the genetic profiles of tumors can simultaneously optimize efficacy and minimize toxicity, which is beneficial for improving patient outcomes. This study aimed to integrate gene alterations associated with predictive and prognostic outcomes in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) with polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and in-house next-generation sequencing (NGS) to detect KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF mutations. In the present study, 41 patients with mCRC were assessed between August 2017 and June 2019 at a single institution. The overall concordance between NGS and PCR results for detecting KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF mutations was considerably high (87.8–92.7%), with only 15 discrepant results between PCR and NGS. Our companion diagnostic test analyzes KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF as a panel of CRC molecular targets; therefore, it has the advantages of requiring fewer specimens and being more time and cost efficient than conventional testing for separate analyses, allowing for the simultaneous analysis of multiple genes.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer worldwide. The incidence and mortality rates of CRC are significantly higher in Taiwan than in other developed countries. Genes involved in CRC tumorigenesis differ depending on whether the tumor occurs on the left or right side of the colon, and genomic analysis is a keystone in the study and treatment of CRC subtypes. However, few studies have focused on the genetic landscape of Taiwanese patients with CRC. This study comprehensively analyzed the genomes of 141 Taiwanese patients with CRC through whole-exome sequencing. Significant genomic differences related to the site of CRC development were observed. Blood metabolomic profiling and polygenic risk score analysis were performed to identify potential biomarkers for the early identification and prevention of CRC in the Taiwanese population. Our findings provide vital clues for establishing population-specific treatments and health policies for CRC prevention in Taiwan.

Backgroundand objectives: Patients with BRAF-mutated metastatic colorectal cancer have considerably poorer responses to conventional systemic treatment. The real-world effects of triplet therapy with BRAF, mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase, and epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors in Asia have not been well-reported. Materials and Methods: This single-center case series included patients with BRAF-mutated metastatic colorectal cancer undergoing triplet therapy after failure of prior systemic treatment from 2016 to 2020. The primary outcome was progression-free survival, and secondary outcomes were overall survival, response rate, disease control rate, and adverse events. Results: Nine eligible patients with BRAF-mutated metastatic colorectal cancer receiving triplet therapy were enrolled, with a median follow-up time of 14.5 months (range, 1–26). Most patients (88.8%) had two or more prior systemic treatments, and the triplet regimen was mainly dabrafenib, trametinib, and panitumumab. The overall response rate and disease control rate were 11.1% and 33.3%, respectively. Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 2.9 and 7.4 months, respectively, and a trend toward better overall survival was found with left-sided metastatic colorectal cancer compared with right-sided disease (9.2 vs. 6.9 months, p = 0.093). Adverse events were mostly Grade 1–2, including nausea, hypertension, gastrointestinal symptoms, and skin disorders. Conclusions: In this single-center case series, triplet therapy with BRAF, mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase, and epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors in BRAF-mutated metastatic colorectal cancer had an acceptable safety profile and reasonable efficacy.