Eugenio Molina-Navarro
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Research Subjects
Eugenio Molina-Navarro has a total of 117 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Silvia Martínez-Pérez
University of Alcalá
10 shared publications - Antonio Sastre-Merlín
University of Alcalá
9 shared publications - Hans Estrup Andersen
Department of Bioscience, Aarhus University, Silkeborg, Denmark
8 shared publications - Dennis Trolle
Department of Bioscience, Aarhus University, Silkeborg, Denmark
6 shared publications - Alejandro Sánchez-Gómez
Department of Geology, Geography and Environment University of Alcalá Alcalá de Henares (Madrid) Spain
5 shared publications - Anders Nielsen
WaterITech, Skanderborg, Denmark
5 shared publications
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 2 June 2026
- Published by Elsevier in Environmental Modelling & Software
- Vol. 204
Enhancing groundwater representation in SWAT+gwflow with an open-source zonal parameterization and calibration workflow in R
- 2 June 2026
- Published by Elsevier in Environmental Modelling & Software
- Vol. 204
Open AccessEnhancing groundwater representation in SWAT+gwflow with an open-source zonal parameterization and calibration workflow in R
- 14 February 2026
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 1-16
Drivers of Ploidy State in Freshwater Macrophyte Communities at World Scale
- 14 February 2026
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 1-16
Drivers of Ploidy State in Freshwater Macrophyte Communities at World Scale
- 7 January 2026
- Published by Springer Nature in Environmental Earth Sciences
- Vol. 85 (2) , 52
Disentangling the hydrological implications of the climate 80s effect and water transfers in a large Mediterranean river
- 7 January 2026
- Published by Springer Nature in Environmental Earth Sciences
- Vol. 85 (2) , 52
Disentangling the hydrological implications of the climate 80s effect and water transfers in a large Mediterranean river
- 1 January 2026
- Published by Springer Nature
World Atlas of Freshwater Macrophytes
- 16 April 2025
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 17-852
Species Descriptions, Distribution Maps and Images
- 16 April 2025
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 17-852
Species Descriptions, Distribution Maps and Images
- 16 April 2025
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 1-16
Freshwater Macrophyte Endemism and Rarity at Global Scale
- 16 April 2025
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 1-16
Freshwater Macrophyte Endemism and Rarity at Global Scale
- Open Access
- 18 February 2025
- Published by Nordia Geographical Publications in Nordia Geographical Publications
Freshwater plant macroecology needs to step forward from the shadows of the terrestrial domain
Freshwater plants, or macrophytes, make up only 1-2% of all plant species on Earth but play a crucial role in aquatic ecosystems. They are key to primary production, provide habitat and food for various organisms, and influence water quality. Despite their importance, freshwater plants face significant threats from global changes, which necessitates research at broader scales. Historically, freshwater plants have been less studied than terrestrial plants, partly due to a lack of global data and a focus on local scales by ecologists. Unlike terrestrial plants, freshwater plants do not always follow the same ecological patterns. In this text, we summarise current knowledge on three well-known macroecological patterns and how they differ between freshwater and terrestrial plants: latitude-species richness gradient, Rapoport’s rule and species replacement vs. species richness differences of beta diversity. For example, terrestrial plants follow the latitudinal diversity gradient hypothesis, whereas species richness peaks in the sub-tropics for freshwater plants. Although findings on Rapoport’s rule are less clear, research on terrestrial plants in North America shows that turnover (i.e., species replacing each other) is more significant in areas with high species richness and environmental stability, whereas nestedness (i.e., species composition at one site is a subset of a richer site) is more common in species-poor areas with high environmental variability. For freshwater plants, beta diversity patterns vary with latitude, but species replacement generally dominates over nestedness. Overall, freshwater plants exhibit unique macroecological patterns that differ from terrestrial plants, highlighting the need for more extensive research to understand their biodiversity and ecological roles. This can be achieved with more harmonized data sets and equal research efforts in both realms. Better knowledge of macroecological patterns and their drivers for freshwater plants is crucial for conservation efforts and policy-making aimed at preserving plant species diversity and sustaining ecosystem services in freshwater environments.
- 18 February 2025
- Published by Nordia Geographical Publications in Nordia Geographical Publications
Open AccessFreshwater plant macroecology needs to step forward from the shadows of the terrestrial domain
Freshwater plants, or macrophytes, make up only 1-2% of all plant species on Earth but play a crucial role in aquatic ecosystems. They are key to primary production, provide habitat and food for various organisms, and influence water quality. Despite their importance, freshwater plants face significant threats from global changes, which necessitates research at broader scales. Historically, freshwater plants have been less studied than terrestrial plants, partly due to a lack of global data and a focus on local scales by ecologists. Unlike terrestrial plants, freshwater plants do not always follow the same ecological patterns. In this text, we summarise current knowledge on three well-known macroecological patterns and how they differ between freshwater and terrestrial plants: latitude-species richness gradient, Rapoport’s rule and species replacement vs. species richness differences of beta diversity. For example, terrestrial plants follow the latitudinal diversity gradient hypothesis, whereas species richness peaks in the sub-tropics for freshwater plants. Although findings on Rapoport’s rule are less clear, research on terrestrial plants in North America shows that turnover (i.e., species replacing each other) is more significant in areas with high species richness and environmental stability, whereas nestedness (i.e., species composition at one site is a subset of a richer site) is more common in species-poor areas with high environmental variability. For freshwater plants, beta diversity patterns vary with latitude, but species replacement generally dominates over nestedness. Overall, freshwater plants exhibit unique macroecological patterns that differ from terrestrial plants, highlighting the need for more extensive research to understand their biodiversity and ecological roles. This can be achieved with more harmonized data sets and equal research efforts in both realms. Better knowledge of macroecological patterns and their drivers for freshwater plants is crucial for conservation efforts and policy-making aimed at preserving plant species diversity and sustaining ecosystem services in freshwater environments.
- 3 February 2025
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Hydrological Sciences Journal
- Vol. 70 (4) , 628-645
Using sensitivity analysis and soft calibration of geological regions to improve the representation of hydrological processes in a SWAT+ model
- 3 February 2025
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Hydrological Sciences Journal
- Vol. 70 (4) , 628-645
Using sensitivity analysis and soft calibration of geological regions to improve the representation of hydrological processes in a SWAT+ model
- 9 October 2024
- Published by Springer Nature in Earth Systems and Environment
- Vol. 9 (2) , 901-918
Innovating on Hydrological Modelling Calibration Towards a Realistic Simulation of Climate Change Impacts on Water Resources
- 9 October 2024
- Published by Springer Nature in Earth Systems and Environment
- Vol. 9 (2) , 901-918
Innovating on Hydrological Modelling Calibration Towards a Realistic Simulation of Climate Change Impacts on Water Resources