Matteo Costantini
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Research Subjects
Matteo Costantini has a total of 40 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Giorgia Gurioli
Biosciences Laboratory, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, Meldola, Italy
2 shared publications - Ugo De Giorgi
Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) Dino Amadori, Meldola, Italy
2 shared publications - Alberto Farolfi
Medical Oncology, Breast & GYN Unit, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo Per Lo Studio Dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, Meldola, Italy
1 shared publication - Amelia Altavilla
IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", Meldola, Italy
1 shared publication - Andrea Amadori
Gynecology Unit, Ospedale di Forlì, 47121 Forlì, Italy
1 shared publication - Anna Miserocchi
IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, 47121 Meldola, Italy
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
Post-VABB Cavity-Targeted Avidin-Pretargeted [90Y]Y-DOTA-Biotin in Nonpalpable Breast Cancer: A Phase I Activity-Escalation Study (ARTHE)
Background/Objectives: Vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (VABB) is widely used for the diagnosis of nonpalpable breast cancer but is not considered definitive treatment because microscopic residual disease may persist within or around the biopsy cavity. The ARTHE phase I trial evaluated a cavity-targeted radionuclide strategy based on same-session sequential intralesional administration of avidin followed by [90Y]Y-DOTA-biotin after VABB. Methods: Eighteen women with nonpalpable breast cancer measuring ≤15 mm and a skin-to-cavity distance ≥ 13 mm were treated in three sequential activity-escalation cohorts. The primary objective was to assess acute local and systemic safety, including dose-limiting toxicity. The protocol-specified co-primary objective was to evaluate preliminary antitumor activity, assessed as breast-only pathologic complete response (pCR) at surgery. Given the phase I single-arm design, pCR was analyzed descriptively. The protocol-specified secondary objective was patient-specific dosimetry. Additional exploratory assessments included post-injection biodistribution and integration with subsequent breast-conserving surgery. Results: No dose-limiting toxicities, grade ≥ 3 adverse events, clinically relevant hematologic toxicity, treatment discontinuations, hospitalizations, or treatment-related surgical delays were observed. Local toxicity was limited to grade 1 injection-site pain and/or erythema. Post-injection imaging consistently demonstrated focal intralesional localization without clinically relevant extra-lesional uptake. All patients underwent breast-conserving surgery 4–7 weeks after treatment. No residual tumor cellularity (RTC), from either invasive or in situ carcinoma, was identified in the breast surgical specimen in 5/18 patients (27.8%). However, because diagnostic VABB may have removed part or all of the malignant lesion, the absence of residual carcinoma at surgery cannot be attributed specifically to the radionuclide treatment. Conclusions: The intralesional avidin-mediated local trapping strategy using [90Y]Y-DOTA-biotin after VABB was feasible, showed favorable acute and short-term tolerability, was associated with early focal localization on post-injection imaging, and was compatible with standard breast-conserving surgery. Controlled studies are warranted to determine the therapeutic contribution of this post-biopsy cavity-targeted strategy, optimize administered activity, and refine patient selection.
Open AccessPost-VABB Cavity-Targeted Avidin-Pretargeted [90Y]Y-DOTA-Biotin in Nonpalpable Breast Cancer: A Phase I Activity-Escalation Study (ARTHE)
Background/Objectives: Vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (VABB) is widely used for the diagnosis of nonpalpable breast cancer but is not considered definitive treatment because microscopic residual disease may persist within or around the biopsy cavity. The ARTHE phase I trial evaluated a cavity-targeted radionuclide strategy based on same-session sequential intralesional administration of avidin followed by [90Y]Y-DOTA-biotin after VABB. Methods: Eighteen women with nonpalpable breast cancer measuring ≤15 mm and a skin-to-cavity distance ≥ 13 mm were treated in three sequential activity-escalation cohorts. The primary objective was to assess acute local and systemic safety, including dose-limiting toxicity. The protocol-specified co-primary objective was to evaluate preliminary antitumor activity, assessed as breast-only pathologic complete response (pCR) at surgery. Given the phase I single-arm design, pCR was analyzed descriptively. The protocol-specified secondary objective was patient-specific dosimetry. Additional exploratory assessments included post-injection biodistribution and integration with subsequent breast-conserving surgery. Results: No dose-limiting toxicities, grade ≥ 3 adverse events, clinically relevant hematologic toxicity, treatment discontinuations, hospitalizations, or treatment-related surgical delays were observed. Local toxicity was limited to grade 1 injection-site pain and/or erythema. Post-injection imaging consistently demonstrated focal intralesional localization without clinically relevant extra-lesional uptake. All patients underwent breast-conserving surgery 4–7 weeks after treatment. No residual tumor cellularity (RTC), from either invasive or in situ carcinoma, was identified in the breast surgical specimen in 5/18 patients (27.8%). However, because diagnostic VABB may have removed part or all of the malignant lesion, the absence of residual carcinoma at surgery cannot be attributed specifically to the radionuclide treatment. Conclusions: The intralesional avidin-mediated local trapping strategy using [90Y]Y-DOTA-biotin after VABB was feasible, showed favorable acute and short-term tolerability, was associated with early focal localization on post-injection imaging, and was compatible with standard breast-conserving surgery. Controlled studies are warranted to determine the therapeutic contribution of this post-biopsy cavity-targeted strategy, optimize administered activity, and refine patient selection.
- Open Access
- 25 May 2019
- Published by MDPI AG in International Journal of Molecular Sciences
- Vol. 20 (10) , 2569
Immune System and DNA Repair Defects in Ovarian Cancer: Implications for Locoregional Approaches
In the last few years, substantial progress has been made in the treatment of ovarian cancer, with increased knowledge about the biology of the disease. Ovarian cancer is a neoplasm strongly linked to defects in DNA repair mechanisms, where deficiency in the homologous recombination (HR) system results in a better response of ovarian cancers to therapy, whether platinum-based chemotherapy, anthracyclines, or poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors. More recently, it has been demonstrated that different ovarian cancer histotypes may have different immunogenicity. Interestingly, defects in HR systems are associated more frequently with higher tumor infiltrating lymphocytes, providing a rationale for developing combination therapy with immune-modulating agents and PARP inhibitors. Again, locoregional therapies combining heat shock and chemotherapy delivery have been shown to induce an anticancer immune response in vitro. Thus, the potential for locoregional therapeutic approaches that may impact the immune system, perhaps in combination with immune-modulating agents or PARP inhibitors, needs to be further explored. With this premise, we reviewed the main biological and clinical data demonstrating a strict interplay between the immune system, DNA repair mechanisms, and intraperitoneal therapies in ovarian cancer, with a focus on potential future therapeutic implications.
- 25 May 2019
- Published by MDPI AG in International Journal of Molecular Sciences
- Vol. 20 (10) , 2569
Open AccessImmune System and DNA Repair Defects in Ovarian Cancer: Implications for Locoregional Approaches
In the last few years, substantial progress has been made in the treatment of ovarian cancer, with increased knowledge about the biology of the disease. Ovarian cancer is a neoplasm strongly linked to defects in DNA repair mechanisms, where deficiency in the homologous recombination (HR) system results in a better response of ovarian cancers to therapy, whether platinum-based chemotherapy, anthracyclines, or poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors. More recently, it has been demonstrated that different ovarian cancer histotypes may have different immunogenicity. Interestingly, defects in HR systems are associated more frequently with higher tumor infiltrating lymphocytes, providing a rationale for developing combination therapy with immune-modulating agents and PARP inhibitors. Again, locoregional therapies combining heat shock and chemotherapy delivery have been shown to induce an anticancer immune response in vitro. Thus, the potential for locoregional therapeutic approaches that may impact the immune system, perhaps in combination with immune-modulating agents or PARP inhibitors, needs to be further explored. With this premise, we reviewed the main biological and clinical data demonstrating a strict interplay between the immune system, DNA repair mechanisms, and intraperitoneal therapies in ovarian cancer, with a focus on potential future therapeutic implications.
- Open Access
- 10 August 2016
- Published by Wiley in Disease Markers
- Vol. 2016, 1-6
GSTP1Methylation and Protein Expression in Prostate Cancer: Diagnostic Implications
GSTP1belongs to the GSTs family, a group of enzymes involved in detoxification of exogenous substances and it also plays an important role in cell cycle regulation. Its dysregulation correlates with a large variety of tumors, in particular with prostate cancer. We investigatedGSTP1methylation status with methylation specific PCR (MS-PCR) in prostate cancer (PCa) and in benign tissue of 56 prostatectomies. We also performed immunohistochemistry (IHC) so as to correlate gene methylation with gene silencing.GSTP1appears methylated in PCa and not in healthy tissue; IHC confirmed that methylation leads to protein underexpression (). GSTP1 is highly expressed in basal cell layer and luminal cells in benign glands while in prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) it stains only basal cell layer, whereas PCa glands are completely negative. We demonstrated that methylation leads to underexpression of GSTP1. The progressive loss of GSTP1 expression from healthy glands to PIN and to PCa glands underlines its involvement in early carcinogenesis.- 10 August 2016
- Published by Wiley in Disease Markers
- Vol. 2016, 1-6
Open AccessGSTP1Methylation and Protein Expression in Prostate Cancer: Diagnostic Implications
GSTP1belongs to the GSTs family, a group of enzymes involved in detoxification of exogenous substances and it also plays an important role in cell cycle regulation. Its dysregulation correlates with a large variety of tumors, in particular with prostate cancer. We investigatedGSTP1methylation status with methylation specific PCR (MS-PCR) in prostate cancer (PCa) and in benign tissue of 56 prostatectomies. We also performed immunohistochemistry (IHC) so as to correlate gene methylation with gene silencing.GSTP1appears methylated in PCa and not in healthy tissue; IHC confirmed that methylation leads to protein underexpression (). GSTP1 is highly expressed in basal cell layer and luminal cells in benign glands while in prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) it stains only basal cell layer, whereas PCa glands are completely negative. We demonstrated that methylation leads to underexpression of GSTP1. The progressive loss of GSTP1 expression from healthy glands to PIN and to PCa glands underlines its involvement in early carcinogenesis.