Michel Galinier

Background: The PRADO‐IC (Programme de Retour à Domicile après une Insuffisance Cardiaque) is a transition care program designed to improve the coordination of care between hospital and home that was generalized in France in 2014. The PRADO‐IC consists of an administrative assistant who visits patients during hospitalization to schedule follow‐up visits. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the PRADO‐IC program based on the hypotheses provided by health authorities. Methods and Results: The PRADOC study is a multicenter, controlled, randomized, open‐label, mixed‐method trial of the transition program PRADO‐IC versus usual management in patients hospitalized with heart failure (standard of care group; NCT03396081). A total of 404 patients were recruited between April 2018 and May 2021. The mean patient age was 75 years (±12 years) in both groups. The 2 groups were well balanced regarding severity indices. At discharge, patients homogeneously received the recommended drugs. There was no difference between groups regarding hospitalizations for acute heart failure at 1 year, with 24.60% in the standard of care group and 25.40% in the PRADO‐IC group during the year following the index hospitalization (hazard ratio, 1.04 [95% CI, 0.69–1.56]; P =0.85) or cardiovascular mortality (hazard ratio, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.34–1.31]; P =0.24). Conclusions: The PRADO‐IC has not significantly improved clinical outcomes, though a trend toward reduced cardiovascular mortality is evident. These results will help in understanding how transitional care programs remain to be integrated in pathways of current patients, including telemonitoring, and to better tailor individualized approaches. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique Identifier: NCT03396081.

Aims: We aim to evaluate the costs associated with healthcare resource consumption for chronic heart failure (HF) management in patients allocated to telemonitoring versus standard of care (SC). Methods and results: OSICAT-ECO involved 745 patients from the OSICAT trial (NCT02068118) who were successfully linked to the French national healthcare database through an indirect deterministic data linkage approach. OSICAT compared a telemonitoring programme with SC follow-up in adults hospitalized for acute HF ≤ 12 months. Healthcare resource costs included those related to hospital and ambulatory expenditure for HF and were restricted to direct costs determined from the French health data system over 18 months of follow-up. Most of the total costs (69.4%) were due to hospitalization for HF decompensation, followed by ambulatory nursing fees (11.8%). During 18-month follow-up, total costs were 2% lower in the telemonitoring versus the SC group, due primarily to a 21% reduction in nurse fees. Among patients with NYHA class III/IV, a 15% reduction in total costs (€3131 decrease) was observed over 18-month follow-up in the telemonitoring versus the SC group, with the highest difference in hospital expenditure during the first 6 months, followed by a shift in costs from hospital to ambulatory at 12 months. Conclusions: HF hospitalization and ambulatory nursing fees represented most of the costs related to HF. No benefit was observed for telemonitoring versus SC with regard to cost reductions over 18 months. Patients with severe HF showed a non-significant 15% reduction in costs, largely related to hospitalization for HF decompensation, nurse fees, and medical transport.

Transplantation of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in the setting of cardiovascular disease, such as heart failure, cardiomyopathy and ischemic heart disease, has been associated with good clinical outcomes in several trials. A reduction in left ventricular remodeling, myocardial fibrosis and scar size, an improvement in endothelial dysfunction and prolonged cardiomyocytes survival were reported. The regenerative capacity, in addition to the pro-angiogenic, anti-apoptotic and anti-inflammatory effects represent the main target properties of these cells. Herein, we review the different preconditioning methods of MSCs (hypoxia, chemical and pharmacological agents) and the novel approaches (genetically modified MSCs, MSC-derived exosomes and engineered cardiac patches) suggested to optimize the efficacy of MSC therapy.

Retrospective Study of 573 Patients with Heart Failure Evaluated for Coronary Artery Disease at Toulouse University Center, France - Article abstract #934804

Background and objectives Severe forms of Tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy (TIC) with cardiogenic shock are not well described so far, and efficiency of catheter ablation in this setting is unknown. Methods We retrospectively included consecutive patients admitted to the Intensive Cardiac Care Unit for acute heart failure with cardiogenic shock associated with atrial arrhythmia and managed by ablation. Result Fourteen patients were included, each with cardiogenic shock and two needing the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Successful ablation was performed in the acute setting or over the following weeks. Two patients experienced relapses of arrhythmias and were treated by new ablation procedures. At 7.5 ± 5 months follow-up, all patient were alive with stable sinus rhythm. The left ventricular Ejection Fraction dramatically improved (21 vs. 54%, p = 0.001) as well as the end-diastolic left ventricular diameter (61 vs. 51 mm, p = 0.01) and NYHA class (class IV in all vs. median 1, p = 0.002). Conclusion Restoration and maintenance of sinus rhythm in severe TIC with cardiogenic shock and atrial arrhythmias lead to a major increase or normalization of LVEF, reduction of ventricular dimensions, and improvement in functional status. Ablation is efficient in long-term maintenance of sinus rhythm and may be proposed early in refractory cases.

Bronchopulmonary infections are a major trigger of cardiac decompensation and are frequently associated with hospitalizations in patients with heart failure (HF). Adverse cardiac effects associated with respiratory infections, more specifically Streptococcus pneumoniae and influenza infections, are the consequence of inflammatory processes and thrombotic events. For both influenza and pneumococcal vaccinations, large multicenter randomized clinical trials are needed to evaluate their efficacy in preventing cardiovascular events, especially in HF patients. No study to date has evaluated the protective effect of the COVID-19 vaccine in patients with HF. Different guidelines recommend annual influenza vaccination for patients with established cardiovascular disease and also recommend pneumococcal vaccination in patients with HF. The Heart Failure group of the French Society of Cardiology recently strongly recommended vaccination against COVID-19 in HF patients. Nevertheless, the implementation of vaccination recommendations against respiratory infections in HF patients remains suboptimal. This suggests that a national health policy is needed to improve vaccination coverage, involving not only the general practitioner, but also other health providers, such as cardiologists, nurses, and pharmacists. This review first summarizes the pathophysiology of the interrelationships between inflammation, infection, and HF. Then, we describe the current clinical knowledge concerning the protective effect of vaccines against respiratory diseases (influenza, pneumococcal infection, and COVID-19) in patients with HF and finally we propose how vaccination coverage could be improved in these patients.

The significant morbidity and mortality in patients with heart failure (HF), notably in the most advanced forms of the disease, justify the need for novel therapeutic options. In the last year, the...