Paolo Chiesa

Detonation-based combustion systems for application in gas turbines (GTs) have received growing attention in recent decades. Such a technology leads to higher thermodynamic cycle efficiency compared to the conventional deflagrative solution as a result of pressure rise occurring during the heat addition process. This study aims to implement pressure gain combustion (PGC) into a thermodynamic cycle where the main compressor is operated at a lower pressure ratio compared to the Brayton–Joule cycle. In detail, this study focuses on the impact of the secondary air system (SAS) compressor, which is necessary to correctly feed the blade cooling circuits with adequate pressure as well as to deliver high-pressure air for cooling the PGC system. A parametric analysis based on different amounts of cooling air to the PGC system is proposed and discussed. In detail, the power demand by the SAS compressor can be as high as 5–6% of the net PGC GT power output, with maximum demands calculated in the range from 16 to 22 MW for a 335 MW F-class gas turbine. These figures are significant because the higher they are, the greater the risk of reducing the performance advantage introduced by the pressure gain combustion. In addition, the effects of SAS compressor efficiency are investigated and a preliminary assessment of both size and rotational speed of the SAS compressor is proposed as well.

Efficiency improvements in gas turbines have been realized in recent decades by raising the turbine inlet temperature. This work devotes attention to pressure-gain combustion (PGC), which is a technology capable of yielding the same time-averaged combustor outlet temperature as conventional Brayton–Joule cycles but at a higher pressure. Here, PGC is implemented in a thermodynamic cycle wherein the compression system operates at a lower pressure ratio compared to the reference Brayton–Joule cycle. Focusing on E-, F- and H-class gas turbines, representative of three different technologies, the possible PGC advantages in both simple- and combined-cycle modes are investigated by means of in-house simulation code. Specifically, this work includes the energy penalty related to the PGC system cooling in the cycle analysis. In detail, the effects of different coolant amounts on the PGC system, as well as the lower efficiency at the first expansion stage compared to conventional gas turbine systems, are analyzed. Among the three classes of gas turbines, E is the one wherein the advantages are more significant, with ultimate efficiency values in simple-cycle mode calculated in the range of 38% to 41%. The higher the gas turbine technology and power class, the lower the benefit, and current H-class gas turbines already start from a higher efficiency level. Anyway, focusing on the latter, performance improvements for the PGC combined cycle seem to be possible, with efficiency greater than 65%, exceeding the current state-of-the-art systems.

Pressure Gain Combustion (PGC) is an interesting emerging concept to enhance the performance of gas turbines currently based on the Brayton–Joule cycle. Focusing on a F-class gas turbine for land-based power generation, the current work investigates PGC potential in both simple and combined cycle operations by means of an in-house simulation software. The PGC cycle lay-out specifically includes a booster compressor for delivering cooling air to the blades at the first stage of the gas turbine expander. The effects of different amounts of air from the same booster to the PGC system for cooling requirements are also analyzed. Considering reasonable PGC values based on literature data, the efficiency of the gas turbine simple cycle rises by 2.85–3.40 percentage points in the case of no combustor cooling, or 1.85–2.25 percentage points for the most extensive cooling at the combustor, compared to the reference case. The combined cycle efficiency increases too, despite the almost equal power generation at the bottoming steam cycle. Ultimately, a revised parametric analysis with reduced efficiency at the first stage of the gas turbine expander is carried out as well to account for the losses induced by the PGC on the fluid dynamics of the expansion. In this new scenario, the risk of nullifying the advantages related to PGC is real, because of specific combinations of lower expansion efficiency at the gas turbine expander and extensive cooling at the combustor. Thus, better turbine design and effective thermal management at the combustor are fundamental to achieve the highest efficiency.

This study focuses on the design and comparison of three utility-scale combined heat and power (CHP) cycles with carbon capture and storage (CCS): (i) a CHP semi-closed oxy-combustion combined cycle (SCOC-CC), (ii) a CHP natural gas combined cycle (NGCC) with postcombustion CCS, and (iii) a CHP NGCC with postcombustion CCS and supplementary firing. Performance evaluations are conducted at the design point and partial load (gas turbine at 30%) for different exports of high-temperature pressurized steam. The comparison is extended against two reference separate production systems with CCS, one based on postcombustion technologies, and another based on oxy-combustion. Simulations of the H-class gas turbines are performed using gas steam (GS), a specific in-house validated software, while the heat recovery steam cycle is modeled using Thermoflex. The CO2 capture processes employ validated models in Aspen Plus. The results highlight the suitability of the SCOC-CC for CHP applications, demonstrating superior performance and flexibility compared to CHP postcombustion technologies at both nominal and minimum loads. The SCOC cycle achieves a maximum first-law efficiency of 65.95%, outperforming CCS technologies that generate electricity and heat separately and enabling fuel savings up to 9.2%.

The ongoing transition to energy systems with high shares of variable renewables motivates the development of novel thermal power cycles that operate economically at low capacity factors to accommodate wind and solar intermittency. This study presents two recuperated power cycles with low capital costs for this market segment: (1) the near-isothermal hydrogen turbine (NIHT) concept, capable of achieving combined cycle efficiencies without a bottoming cycle through fuel combustion in the expansion path, and (2) the intercooled recuperated water-injected (IRWI) power cycle that employs conventional combustion technology at an efficiency cost of only 4% points. The economic assessment carried out in this work reveals that the proposed cycles increasingly outperform combined cycle benchmarks with and without CO₂ capture as the plant capacity factor reduces below 50%. When the cost of fuel storage and delivery by pipelines is included in the evaluation, however, plants fired by hydrogen lose competitiveness relative to natural gas-fired plants due to the high fuel delivery costs caused by the low volumetric energy density of hydrogen. This important but uncertain cost component could erode the business case for future hydrogen-fired power plants, in which case the IRWI concept powered by natural gas emerges as a promising solution.