Kyrill Rykov
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Kyrill Rykov has a total of 12 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Inge H. F. Reininga
Department of Trauma Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
2 shared publications - B. A. S. Knobben
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Martini Hospital Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
1 shared publication Bas A.S. Knobben
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Martini Hospital Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
1 shared publication- Bas L. E. F. Ten Have
Department of Orthopedics, Martini Hospital, 9728 NT Groningen, The Netherlands
1 shared publication Bas L.E.F. Ten Have
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Martini Hospital Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
1 shared publication- Joris J. W. Ploegmakers
University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 1 October 2025
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in JBJS Case Connector
- Vol. 15 (4)
Suspected Rifampicin-Induced Fever During Periprosthetic Joint Infection Treatment
Case: Drug-induced fever is a rare adverse reaction to antibiotics. This case report describes 2 cases of suspected rifampicin-induced fever in patients undergoing periprosthetic joint infection treatment. Both patients experienced fever with the absence of inflammatory symptoms and a discrepancy between clinical improvement and persistent fever. Discontinuation of rifampicin led to rapid symptom resolution. Conclusion: Drug-induced fever should be considered when fever persists without infectious symptoms and after excluding other causes. Prompt recognition and discontinuation can lead to rapid resolution and minimize unnecessary interventions.
- 1 October 2025
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in JBJS Case Connector
- Vol. 15 (4)
Suspected Rifampicin-Induced Fever During Periprosthetic Joint Infection Treatment
Case: Drug-induced fever is a rare adverse reaction to antibiotics. This case report describes 2 cases of suspected rifampicin-induced fever in patients undergoing periprosthetic joint infection treatment. Both patients experienced fever with the absence of inflammatory symptoms and a discrepancy between clinical improvement and persistent fever. Discontinuation of rifampicin led to rapid symptom resolution. Conclusion: Drug-induced fever should be considered when fever persists without infectious symptoms and after excluding other causes. Prompt recognition and discontinuation can lead to rapid resolution and minimize unnecessary interventions.
- 1 December 2017
- Published by Elsevier in The Journal of Arthroplasty
- Vol. 32 (12) , 3652-3658.e1
Posterolateral vs Direct Anterior Approach in Total Hip Arthroplasty (POLADA Trial): A Randomized Controlled Trial to Assess Differences in Serum Markers
- 1 December 2017
- Published by Elsevier in The Journal of Arthroplasty
- Vol. 32 (12) , 3652-3658.e1
Posterolateral vs Direct Anterior Approach in Total Hip Arthroplasty (POLADA Trial): A Randomized Controlled Trial to Assess Differences in Serum Markers
- Open Access
- 15 November 2016
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
- Vol. 17 (1) , 1-9
The design of a randomised controlled trial to evaluate the (cost-) effectiveness of the posterolateral versus the direct anterior approach for THA (POLADA – trial)
Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is one of the most successful orthopaedic procedures. Because of the increasing number of THAs, a growing demand for faster recovery and a greater emphasis on cost-effectiveness, minimally invasive THAs have been introduced in the last decades. The direct anterior approach is a minimally invasive, tissue-sparing approach in which intermuscular planes are used. Theoretically, this approach should result in a faster recovery of physical functioning and higher health-related quality of life. A randomised controlled trial will be performed. Patients will be randomly allocated to undergo THA by means of the anterior or posterolateral approach. Both the intervention and control group will consist of two subgroups: 1) patients with a good bone stock who will receive an uncemented femoral stem, and 2) patients with a poor bone stock who will receive a cemented femoral stem. Patients between 18 and 90 years with primary or secondary osteoarthritis will be included. Physical functioning and health-related quality of life will be assessed by means of questionnaires. Additionally, performance based tests will be performed to objectively assess the physical functioning. Cost-effectiveness will be assessed by obtaining data on medical costs in and outside the hospital and other nonmedical costs. Measurements will take place preoperatively, two and six weeks, three months and one year postoperatively. There is some evidence that the anterior approach results in reduced tissue damage and faster recovery in the direct postoperative period, compared to the posterolateral approach. However, there is still a lack of well-designed studies that have confirmed the better outcomes and cost-effectiveness of the anterior approach. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to assess the physical functioning, health related quality of life and the cost-effectiveness of the anterior approach, compared to the conventional posterolateral approach. Netherlands Trial Registry, number 5343 (registration date April 12, 2015)
- 15 November 2016
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
- Vol. 17 (1) , 1-9
Open AccessThe design of a randomised controlled trial to evaluate the (cost-) effectiveness of the posterolateral versus the direct anterior approach for THA (POLADA – trial)
Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is one of the most successful orthopaedic procedures. Because of the increasing number of THAs, a growing demand for faster recovery and a greater emphasis on cost-effectiveness, minimally invasive THAs have been introduced in the last decades. The direct anterior approach is a minimally invasive, tissue-sparing approach in which intermuscular planes are used. Theoretically, this approach should result in a faster recovery of physical functioning and higher health-related quality of life. A randomised controlled trial will be performed. Patients will be randomly allocated to undergo THA by means of the anterior or posterolateral approach. Both the intervention and control group will consist of two subgroups: 1) patients with a good bone stock who will receive an uncemented femoral stem, and 2) patients with a poor bone stock who will receive a cemented femoral stem. Patients between 18 and 90 years with primary or secondary osteoarthritis will be included. Physical functioning and health-related quality of life will be assessed by means of questionnaires. Additionally, performance based tests will be performed to objectively assess the physical functioning. Cost-effectiveness will be assessed by obtaining data on medical costs in and outside the hospital and other nonmedical costs. Measurements will take place preoperatively, two and six weeks, three months and one year postoperatively. There is some evidence that the anterior approach results in reduced tissue damage and faster recovery in the direct postoperative period, compared to the posterolateral approach. However, there is still a lack of well-designed studies that have confirmed the better outcomes and cost-effectiveness of the anterior approach. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to assess the physical functioning, health related quality of life and the cost-effectiveness of the anterior approach, compared to the conventional posterolateral approach. Netherlands Trial Registry, number 5343 (registration date April 12, 2015)