Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article

Previous Organizations / Institutes

The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years


Francesco Alessandro Mistretta has a total of 579 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:

  • Ottavio De Cobelli

    Department of Urology, IRCSS European Institute of Oncology (IEO), Milan

    46 shared publications
  • Alberto Briganti

    Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute Milan Italy

    42 shared publications
  • Pierre I. Karakiewicz

    Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology University of Montréal Health Center Montréal Québec Canada

    42 shared publications
  • Zhe Tian

    Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology University of Montréal Health Center Montréal Québec Canada

    42 shared publications
  • Gennaro Musi

    Università degli Studi di Milano, 20122 Milan, Italy

    40 shared publications
  • Fred Saad

    Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology University of Montréal Health Center Montréal Québec Canada

    39 shared publications

Latest Publications

  • Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for testis cancer: a comparison between open and robot-assisted approach in oncological and surgical outcomes

    by Elena Lievore, Francesco Alessandro Mistretta, Mattia Luca Piccinelli, Chiara Vaccaro, Matteo Tallini, Marco Tozzi, Antonio Brescia, Danilo Bottero, Massimilano Depalma, Giuseppe Petralia, et al.


  • Thermal ablation for local tumor recurrence after previous partial nephrectomy: Perioperative and oncological outcomes

    by Chiara Vaccaro, Francesco A. Mistretta, Mattia Luca Piccinelli, Elena Lievore, Letizia Maria Ippolita Jannello, Matteo Fontana, Marco Tozzi, Paolo della Vigna, Guido Bonomo, Gianluca Varano, et al.


  • Effect of race/ethnicity on survival in surgically treated intermediate/high risk non‐metastatic clear cell renal carcinoma

    by Mattia Luca Piccinelli, Cristina Cano Garcia, Andrea Panunzio, Stefano Tappero, Francesco Barletta, Reha‐Baris Incesu, Zhe Tian, Stefano Luzzago, Francesco A. Mistretta, Matteo Ferro, et al.

    Purpose: It is unknown to what extent 10‐year overall survival of radical nephrectomy treated intermediate/high‐risk non‐metastatic clear cell renal carcinoma patients differs from age‐ and sex‐matched population‐based controls, especially when race/ethnicity is considered (Caucasian vs. African American vs. Hispanic vs. Asian/Pacific Islander).Methods: We relied on the SEER database (2004–2018) to identify newly diagnosed radical nephrectomy treated intermediate/high risk non‐metastatic clear cell renal carcinoma patients. For each case, we simulated an age‐ and sex‐matched control relying on Social Security Administration Life Tables with 10 years of follow‐up. We compared overall survival between renal carcinoma cases and population‐based controls. Multivariable competing risks regression models tested for predictors of cancer‐specific mortality versus other‐cause mortality.Results: Of 6877 radical nephrectomy treated intermediate/high risk non‐metastatic clear cell renal carcinoma patients, 5050 (73%) were Caucasian versus 433 (6%) African American versus 1002 (15%) Hispanic versus 392 (6%) Asian/Pacific Islanders. At 10 years, overall survival difference between radical nephrectomy treated intermediate/high risk non‐metastatic clear cell renal carcinoma patients versus population‐based controls was greatest in African Americans (51% vs. 81%, Δ = 30%), followed by Hispanics (54% vs. 80%, Δ = 26%), Asian/Pacific Islanders (56% vs. 80%, Δ = 24%) and Caucasians (52% vs. 74%, Δ = 22%). In competing risks regression, only African Americans exhibited significantly higher other cause mortality (hazard ratio = 1.3; 95% confidence interval = 1.1 – 1.6; p = 0.01) than others.Conclusion: Relative to Life Tables' derived sex‐ and age‐matched controls, radical nephrectomy treated intermediate/high‐risk non‐metastatic clear cell renal carcinoma patients exhibit worse overall survival, with worst overall survival recorded in African Americans of all race/ethnicity groups.


  • Open Access

    Image-Guided Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy on Detectable Prostate Bed Recurrence after Prostatectomy in RT-Naïve Patients

    by Riccardo Santamaria, Mattia Zaffaroni, Maria Giulia Vincini, Lorenzo Colombi, Aurora Gaeta, Federico Mastroleo, Giulia Corrao, Dario Zerini, Riccardo Villa, Giovanni Carlo Mazzola, et al.

    Purpose or Objective—The aim of the study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SBRT on detectable prostate bed recurrence in RT-naïve prostate cancer patients. Materials and methods: Eighty-six patients who underwent SBRT for macroscopic bed recurrence after prostatectomy were retrospectively included. Patients were treated based on mpMRI or choline/PSMA PET. Results: The median time to biochemical relapse (BCR) after RP was 46 months, with a median PSA at restaging of 1.04 ng/mL. Forty-six patients were staged with mpMRI and choline/PSMA PET, while ten and thirty were treated based on PET and MRI only, respectively. Only one late G ≥ 2 GI toxicity was observed. With a median BCR follow-up of 14 months, twenty-nine patients experienced a BCR with a median PSA at recurrence of 1.66 ng/mL and a median survival free from the event of 40.1 months. The median time to BCR was 17.9 months. Twenty-seven patients had clinical relapse (CR), with a median CR follow-up of 16.27 months and a median time to CR of 23.0 months. Biochemical recurrence-free survival at one and two years was 88% and 66%, respectively, while clinical recurrence-free survival at one and two years was 92% and 82%, respectively. Regarding local relapses, seven were in the field of treatment, while eight of them were outside the field of treatment. Conclusions: Data showed that SBRT targeting only the macroscopic bed recurrence instead of the whole prostate bed is safe and effective. Additional data and longer follow-ups will provide a clearer indication of the appropriate treatment and staging methodology for these patients.


  • Multiparametric MRI-based 5-year Risk Prediction Model for Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer after Radical Prostatectomy

    by Stefano Luzzago, Alberto Colombo, Francesco A. Mistretta, Sarah Alessi, Ettore Di Trapani, Paul E. Summers, Mattia Luca Piccinelli, Sara Raimondi, Silvano Vignati, Alfredo Clemente, et al.

    Background Current predictive tools to estimate the risk of biochemical recurrence (BCR) after treatment of prostate cancer do not consider multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) information. Purpose To develop a risk prediction tool that considers mpMRI findings to assess the risk of 5-year BCR after radical prostatectomy. Materials and Methods In this retrospective single-center analysis in 1459 patients with prostate cancer who underwent mpMRI before radical prostatectomy (in 2012-2015), the outcome of interest was 5-year BCR (two consecutive prostate-specific antigen [PSA] levels > 0.2 ng/mL [0.2 µg/L]). Patients were randomly divided into training (70%) and test (30%) sets. Kaplan-Meier plots were applied to the training set to estimate survival probabilities. Multivariable Cox regression models were used to test the relationship between BCR and different sets of exploratory variables. The C-index of the final model was calculated for the training and test sets and was compared with European Association of Urology, University of California San Francisco Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, and Partin risk tools using the partial likelihood ratio test. Five risk categories were created. Results The median duration of follow-up in the whole cohort was 59 months (IQR, 32-81 months); 376 of 1459 (25.8%) patients had BCR. A multivariable Cox regression model (referred to as PIPEN, and composed of PSA density, International Society of Urological Pathology grade group, Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System category, European Society of Urogenital Radiology extraprostatic extension score, nodes) fitted to the training data yielded a C-index of 0.74, superior to that of other predictive tools (C-index 0.70 for all models; P ≤ .01) and a median higher C-index on 500 test set replications (C-index, 0.73). Five PIPEN risk categories were identified with 5-year BCR-free survival rates of 92%, 84%, 71%, 56%, and 26% in very low-, low-, intermediate-, high-, and very high-risk patients, respectively (all P < .001). Conclusion A five-item model for predicting the risk of 5-year BCR after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer was developed and internally verified, and five risk categories were identified. © RSNA, 2023 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Aguirre and Ortegón in this issue.


  • Open Access

    Investigating Nutritional and Inflammatory Status as Predictive Biomarkers in Oligoreccurent Prostate Cancer—A RADIOSA Trial Preliminary Analysis

    by Mattia Zaffaroni, Maria Giulia Vincini, Giulia Corrao, Chiara Lorubbio, Ilaria Repetti, Federico Mastroleo, Costantino Putzu, Riccardo Villa, Sofia Netti, Oriana D’ecclesiis, et al.

    (1) Background: In the RADIOSA phase II randomized clinical trial (NCT03940235), the biology task entails the identification of predictive and prognostic biomarkers in the context of oligorecurrent, castration-sensitive prostate cancer in order to distinguish polymetastatic from oligometastatic disease. This may lay the groundwork for personalized treatments for those patients who could really benefit from metastasis-directed therapies. (2) Methods: Oligorecurrent PCa pts with three or fewer bone or lymph nodal localizations were randomized 1:1 to receive SBRT alone (arm A) or SBRT + 6 months of ADT (arm B). Common serum-derived biomarkers were collected at baseline, and at 3 months after RT. The prognostic nutritional index, an immune and nutrition-based prognostic score, and the controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score, a scoring system for evaluating patient’s nutritional status, were calculated in accordance with the body of available literature. As inflammatory indicators, neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and the NLR–albumin ratio (NLRAR) were assessed. Changes in these parameters between baseline and the 3-month timepoint were evaluated both in absolute and relative values. Changes in these parameters between baseline and the 3-month timepoint were evaluated. Significant differences in the trend of these parameters were assessed using the non-parametric Wilcoxon rank-sum test. A network analysis to analyze the relationships between different features stratifying patients according to the arm of study and site of metastases was performed. (3) Results: The current analysis comprised 88 patients (45 arm A, SBRT only, and 43 arm B, SBRT + ADT). When patients were stratified by ADT administration, cholesterol values showed an increasing trend in the group receiving ADT (p = 0.005) which was no longer significant at 1 year. When patients were stratified by site of metastases (52 lymph nodal, 29 bone localizations), the value of NLR was found to be increased in patients with bone localizations (p < 0.05). In addition, the network analysis showed that BMI and NRI are strongly and directly linked for patients at baseline and that this correlation is no longer found at three months. Finally, when patients were divided according to time from surgery to oligorecurrence (enrollment) the patients with a longer time (>6.7 years) showed an increase in CONUT score from baseline. All the other nutritional and inflammatory scores or parameters investigated in the present analysis showed no statistically significant differences at baseline, three months, 1 year, and in absolute change. (4) Conclusions: The nutritional and inflammatory parameters do not seem to represent valuable candidates for possible use in clinical decision making in our cohort of patients and a reliable biological characterization of the oligometastatic state in prostate cancer still seems far from being achieved. Ongoing molecular analysis will show if there is a role of mutational landscape in the definition of the oligometastatic state.


  • Open Access

    Penile-Sparing Surgery for Tumour Recurrence after Previous Glansectomy/Partial Penectomy: Treatment Feasibility and Oncological Outcomes

    by Gennaro Musi, Filippo Molinari, Francesco A. Mistretta, Mattia Luca Piccinelli, Sonia Guzzo, Marco Tozzi, Elena Lievore, Oskar Blezien, Matteo Fontana, Antonio Cioffi, et al.

    We tested the feasibility and oncological outcomes after penile-sparing surgery (PSS) for local recurrent penile cancer after a previous glansectomy/partial penectomy. We retrospectively analysed 13 patients (1997–2022) with local recurrence of penile cancer after a previous glansectomy or partial penectomy. All patients underwent PSS: circumcision, excision, or laser ablation. First, technical feasibility, treatment setting, and complications (Clavien–Dindo) were recorded. Second, Kaplan–Meier plots depicted overall and local recurrences over time. Overall, 11 (84.5%) vs. 2 (15.5%) patients were previously treated with glansectomy vs. partial penectomy. The median (IQR) time to disease recurrence was 56 (13–88) months. Six (46%) vs. two (15.5%) vs. five (38.5%) patients were treated with, respectively, local excision vs. local excision + circumcision vs. laser ablation. All procedures, except one, were performed in an outpatient setting. Only one Clavien–Dindo 2 complication was recorded. The median follow-up time was 41 months. Overall, three (23%) vs. four (30.5%) patients experienced local vs. overall recurrence, respectively. All local recurrences were safely treated with salvage surgery. In conclusion, we reported the results of a preliminary analysis testing safety, feasibility, and early oncological outcomes of PSS procedures for patients with local recurrence after previous glansectomy or partial penectomy. Stronger oncological outcomes should be tested in other series to optimise patient selection.


  • Top Cited Papers
    Open Access

    Artificial Intelligence in the Advanced Diagnosis of Bladder Cancer-Comprehensive Literature Review and Future Advancement

    by Matteo Ferro, Ugo Giovanni Falagario, Biagio Barone, Martina Maggi, Felice Crocetto, Gian Maria Busetto, Francesco del Giudice, Daniela Terracciano, Giuseppe Lucarelli, Francesco Lasorsa, et al.

    Artificial intelligence is highly regarded as the most promising future technology that will have a great impact on healthcare across all specialties. Its subsets, machine learning, deep learning, and artificial neural networks, are able to automatically learn from massive amounts of data and can improve the prediction algorithms to enhance their performance. This area is still under development, but the latest evidence shows great potential in the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of urological diseases, including bladder cancer, which are currently using old prediction tools and historical nomograms. This review focuses on highly significant and comprehensive literature evidence of artificial intelligence in the management of bladder cancer and investigates the near introduction in clinical practice.


  • Open Access

    CyberKnife Ultra-Hypofractionated SBRT for Localized Prostate Cancer with Dose Escalation to the Dominant Intraprostatic Lesion: In Silico Planning Study

    by Giovanni Carlo Mazzola, Maria Giulia Vincini, Elena Rondi, Giuseppe Ronci, Sabrina Vigorito, Mattia Zaffaroni, Giulia Corrao, Salvatore Gallo, Dario Zerini, Stefano Durante, et al.

    The aim is to evaluate the feasibility of ultra-hypofractionated (UH) SBRT with CyberKnife® (CK) radiosurgery (Accuray Inc., Sunnyvale, California, USA) for localized prostate cancer (PCa) with a concomitant focal boost to the dominant intraprostatic lesion (DIL). Patients with intermediate/high-risk PCa, with at least one visible DIL on multi-parametric MRI, were included. For each, two CK-SBRT in silico plans were calculated using 95% and 85% isodose lines (CK-95%, CK-85%) and compared with the UH-DWA plan delivered with VERO®. All plans simulated a SIB prescription of 40 Gy to PTV-DIL and 36.25 Gy to the whole prostate (PTV-prostate) in five fractions every other day. Fifteen patients were considered. All plans reached the primary planning goal (D95% > 95%) and compliance with organs at risk (OARs) constraints. DVH metrics median values increased (p < 0.05) from UH-DWA to CK-85%. The conformity index of PTV-DIL was 1.00 for all techniques, while for PTV-prostate was 0.978, 0.984, and 0.991 for UH-DWA, CK-95%, and CK-85%, respectively. The CK-85% plans were able to reach a maximum dose of 47 Gy to the DIL while respecting OARs constraints. CK-SBRT plus a focal boost to the DIL for localized PCa appears to be feasible. These encouraging dosimetric results are to be confirmed in upcoming clinical trials such as the phase-II “PRO-SPEED” IEO trial.


  • Conditional survival of patients with low-risk prostate cancer: Temporal changes in active surveillance permanence over time

    by Francesco A. Mistretta, Stefano Luzzago, Sarah Alessi, Mattia Piccinelli, Giulia Marvaso, Arturo Lo Giudice, Marco Nizzardo, Gabriele Cozzi, Matteo Fontana, Giulia Corrao, et al.