Maurizio Evangelista
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Maurizio Evangelista has a total of 276 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Salvatore Cuzzocrea
Department of Chemical, Biological, Pharmaceutical and Environmental Sciences, University of Messina, 98166 Messina, Italy
13 shared publications - Gabriele Finco
Department of Medical Sciences and Public Health, University of Cagliari, 09124 Cagliari, Italy
12 shared publications - Rosanna Di Paola
Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Messina, 98168 Messina, Italy
11 shared publications - Enrico Gugliandolo
Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Messina, 98168 Messina, Italy
10 shared publications - Roberta Fusco
Department of Chemical, Biological, Pharmaceutical and Environmental Sciences, University of Messina, 98166 Messina, Italy
10 shared publications - Daniela Impellizzeri
Department of Chemical, Biological, Pharmaceutical and Environmental Sciences, University of Messina, 98166 Messina, Italy
9 shared publications
Latest Publications
- Open Access
RETRACTED: Fusco et al. Formyl Peptide Receptor 1 Signaling in Acute Inflammation and Neural Differentiation Induced by Traumatic Brain Injury. Biology 2020, 9, 238
The journal retracts the article, “Formyl Peptide Receptor 1 Signaling in Acute Inflammation and Neural Differentiation Induced by Traumatic Brain Injury”
Open AccessRETRACTED: Fusco et al. Formyl Peptide Receptor 1 Signaling in Acute Inflammation and Neural Differentiation Induced by Traumatic Brain Injury. Biology 2020, 9, 238
The journal retracts the article, “Formyl Peptide Receptor 1 Signaling in Acute Inflammation and Neural Differentiation Induced by Traumatic Brain Injury”
- Open Access
- 18 November 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Nutraceuticals
- Vol. 5 (4) , 38
The Role and Safety of Plant-Derived Nutraceuticals as Adjuvant Treatments for Pain Management: A Narrative Review
Chronic pain represents a major challenge for healthcare systems worldwide. Pharmacological agents such as opioids, gabapentinoids, and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are commonly used depending on the pain type (nociceptive, neuropathic, or nociplastic), but their use is often limited by adverse effects. Nutraceuticals and dietary supplements have emerged as potential adjuvants to conventional pain management, offering improved safety profiles. This narrative review aims to evaluate the preliminary evidence on the efficacy and safety of selected plant-derived nutraceuticals for pain management. Particular attention is given to a new fixed nutraceutical formulation containing lycopene, sulforaphane (Brassica oleracea), silymarin (extracted from Silybum marianum), reduced glutathione, escin (Aesculus hippocastanum), tryptophan, and green tea (Camellia sinensis). Although this formulation has not yet been evaluated in clinical trials, preliminary data suggest that individual components may target different pain mechanisms. None of the currently available nutraceuticals act comprehensively on all pain types. Additionally, the inclusion of hepatoprotective compounds (e.g., glutathione and silymarin) may be advantageous for patients receiving multiple medications. Current evidence on these nutraceuticals remains limited and primarily preclinical. Further randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm their efficacy and safety in human pain management.
- 18 November 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Nutraceuticals
- Vol. 5 (4) , 38
Open AccessThe Role and Safety of Plant-Derived Nutraceuticals as Adjuvant Treatments for Pain Management: A Narrative Review
Chronic pain represents a major challenge for healthcare systems worldwide. Pharmacological agents such as opioids, gabapentinoids, and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are commonly used depending on the pain type (nociceptive, neuropathic, or nociplastic), but their use is often limited by adverse effects. Nutraceuticals and dietary supplements have emerged as potential adjuvants to conventional pain management, offering improved safety profiles. This narrative review aims to evaluate the preliminary evidence on the efficacy and safety of selected plant-derived nutraceuticals for pain management. Particular attention is given to a new fixed nutraceutical formulation containing lycopene, sulforaphane (Brassica oleracea), silymarin (extracted from Silybum marianum), reduced glutathione, escin (Aesculus hippocastanum), tryptophan, and green tea (Camellia sinensis). Although this formulation has not yet been evaluated in clinical trials, preliminary data suggest that individual components may target different pain mechanisms. None of the currently available nutraceuticals act comprehensively on all pain types. Additionally, the inclusion of hepatoprotective compounds (e.g., glutathione and silymarin) may be advantageous for patients receiving multiple medications. Current evidence on these nutraceuticals remains limited and primarily preclinical. Further randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm their efficacy and safety in human pain management.
- 1 November 2025
- Published by Edizioni Minerva Medica in Panminerva Medica
- Vol. 67 (3)
"Osteoporosis check": a survey as a proof of concept for the prevention of bone health
Osteoporosis is a chronic disease affecting individual, public and social health. Few data are available about the awareness of osteoporosis in Italy. The main purpose of our study is to evaluate the perception of osteoporosis in a selected sample of subjects of different age and sex. This is a survey involving 299 adults (aged 18-75 years) designed to assess knowledge about osteoporosis and fracture risk conducted by a multidisciplinary research team of LUISS Guido Carli University. The knowledge of osteoporosis resulted almost high among the participants (97%) and most of them considered it a disease (86.1%). Most respondents (30.5%) did not know if they might be at risk of osteoporosis, especially the youngest (43.5%). A high percentage of participants (73.8%) considered a family history of osteoporosis the principal risk factor for bone loss, while only 8.9% thought that moderate to vigorous physical activity could favor bone loss. Many women (17.4%) did not consider menstrual irregularities a risk factor for osteoporosis. As for nutrients, 79.5% and 89.4% of subjects, respectively, thought that vitamin D and calcium might be useful to prevent bone loss. The majority of sample (74.8%) did not know the public and social impact of osteoporosis. Although this survey involved a selected population and, thus, it cannot reflect the Italian general knowledge of osteoporosis, it might contribute to estimate the actual awareness of osteoporosis among people, regardless of their current bone health status, highlighting areas for further educational and research efforts.
- 1 November 2025
- Published by Edizioni Minerva Medica in Panminerva Medica
- Vol. 67 (3)
"Osteoporosis check": a survey as a proof of concept for the prevention of bone health
Osteoporosis is a chronic disease affecting individual, public and social health. Few data are available about the awareness of osteoporosis in Italy. The main purpose of our study is to evaluate the perception of osteoporosis in a selected sample of subjects of different age and sex. This is a survey involving 299 adults (aged 18-75 years) designed to assess knowledge about osteoporosis and fracture risk conducted by a multidisciplinary research team of LUISS Guido Carli University. The knowledge of osteoporosis resulted almost high among the participants (97%) and most of them considered it a disease (86.1%). Most respondents (30.5%) did not know if they might be at risk of osteoporosis, especially the youngest (43.5%). A high percentage of participants (73.8%) considered a family history of osteoporosis the principal risk factor for bone loss, while only 8.9% thought that moderate to vigorous physical activity could favor bone loss. Many women (17.4%) did not consider menstrual irregularities a risk factor for osteoporosis. As for nutrients, 79.5% and 89.4% of subjects, respectively, thought that vitamin D and calcium might be useful to prevent bone loss. The majority of sample (74.8%) did not know the public and social impact of osteoporosis. Although this survey involved a selected population and, thus, it cannot reflect the Italian general knowledge of osteoporosis, it might contribute to estimate the actual awareness of osteoporosis among people, regardless of their current bone health status, highlighting areas for further educational and research efforts.
- Open Access
- 3 October 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Preprints.org
Gabapentinoids-Duloxetine Combination Therapy for Chronic Pain: A Mechanisms Oriented Rational to Bridge Theoretical Knowledge and Real Life Setting
Chronic pain represents a complex debilitating condition that extends beyond the protective function of physiological pain, often persisting as an independent disease entity. Chronic primary and secondary pain syndromes reflect a multifaceted continuum involving nociceptive, neuropathic and nociplastic mechanisms. The maladaptive plasticity of the peripheral and central nervous system (encompassing the ascending and descending pain pathways) sustains hypersensitivity and correlates with comorbid alterations in mood, cognition, sleep, and fatigue, underpinned by functional reorganization of brain networks. In this scenario traditional analgesics frequently demonstrate limited efficacy, while current guidelines recommend antiepileptic agents and antidepressants, particularly gabapentinoids and duloxetine, a first line pharmacological options. This review explores the mechanistic rationale and clinical evidence supporting the combined use of gabapentinoids and duloxetine in chronic pain management. These agents act on distinct yet complementary targets: gabapentinoids reduce excitatory neurotransmission via modulation of calcium channel activity, while duloxetine restores descending noradrenergic inhibition and alleviates comorbid symptoms. Clinical trial and meta-analyses highlight their individual efficacy in diabetic peripheral neuropathy, postherpetic neuralgia, and fibromyalgia. Among gabapentinoids, pregabalin exhibits a favorable pharmacokinetic profile that allows rapid titration and demonstrates effectiveness against anxiety-related sleep disorders. Importantly, emerging evidence suggests that their combination may yield superior pain relief and functional improvement compared with monotherapy, particularly in patients with residual pain. This review provides a proof of concept by bridging theoretical knowledge and real-life clinical settings aiming to develop treatment protocols based on predominant pain mechanisms that can effectively control hypersensitivity and improve quality of life.
- 3 October 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Preprints.org
Open AccessGabapentinoids-Duloxetine Combination Therapy for Chronic Pain: A Mechanisms Oriented Rational to Bridge Theoretical Knowledge and Real Life Setting
Chronic pain represents a complex debilitating condition that extends beyond the protective function of physiological pain, often persisting as an independent disease entity. Chronic primary and secondary pain syndromes reflect a multifaceted continuum involving nociceptive, neuropathic and nociplastic mechanisms. The maladaptive plasticity of the peripheral and central nervous system (encompassing the ascending and descending pain pathways) sustains hypersensitivity and correlates with comorbid alterations in mood, cognition, sleep, and fatigue, underpinned by functional reorganization of brain networks. In this scenario traditional analgesics frequently demonstrate limited efficacy, while current guidelines recommend antiepileptic agents and antidepressants, particularly gabapentinoids and duloxetine, a first line pharmacological options. This review explores the mechanistic rationale and clinical evidence supporting the combined use of gabapentinoids and duloxetine in chronic pain management. These agents act on distinct yet complementary targets: gabapentinoids reduce excitatory neurotransmission via modulation of calcium channel activity, while duloxetine restores descending noradrenergic inhibition and alleviates comorbid symptoms. Clinical trial and meta-analyses highlight their individual efficacy in diabetic peripheral neuropathy, postherpetic neuralgia, and fibromyalgia. Among gabapentinoids, pregabalin exhibits a favorable pharmacokinetic profile that allows rapid titration and demonstrates effectiveness against anxiety-related sleep disorders. Importantly, emerging evidence suggests that their combination may yield superior pain relief and functional improvement compared with monotherapy, particularly in patients with residual pain. This review provides a proof of concept by bridging theoretical knowledge and real-life clinical settings aiming to develop treatment protocols based on predominant pain mechanisms that can effectively control hypersensitivity and improve quality of life.
- Open Access
- 25 September 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Pharmaceuticals
- Vol. 18 (10) , 1434
Pregabalin and Duloxetine in Patients with Non-Nociceptive Pain: A Narrative Review Exploring the Pharmacological Effects of This Combination
Both neuropathic and nociplastic pain (non-nociceptive pain) are characterized by a similar pattern of clinical symptoms, including numbness, dysesthesia, tingling, and pricking. Whereas nociplastic pain results from altered nociception without indication of tissue damage or a somatosensory system lesion, neuropathic pain is caused by a disease or lesion affecting the somatosensory system. The available therapeutic options consist of antiepileptic drugs, antidepressants, and muscle relaxants. Unfortunately, symptoms are often refractory, and increasing drug dosage may lead to adverse events. In this narrative review, we searched PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane, and EMBASE databases from their inception up to 26 July 2025, using the key words “duloxetine,” “pregabalin,” and then ‘‘combination,’’ “nociplastic pain,” “neuropathic pain,” “efficacy,” “safety,” “pharmacology,” “pharmacokinetic,” and “pharmacodynamic.” We evaluated the role of combination therapy with duloxetine, a serotonin–norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, and pregabalin, an antiseizure medication that acts on voltage-gated calcium channels α2δ subunit, in patients with neuropathic or nociplastic pain. The literature data indicate that combination therapy has synergistic effects, leading to fewer adverse events in specific categories of patients. Available evidence showed that combination therapy is generally not inferior to monotherapy, with slight differences in safety outcomes depending on supplementation, drug labels, and titration. These results indicate that even if not superior, combination therapy may be an alternative to monotherapy in selected patients: those who experience side effects from higher dosages of duloxetine or pregabalin and for whom symptom relief from dose reduction alone is not possible; those who use medications that interact with duloxetine; those who suffer from anxiety–depression, where pain is closely linked to mental symptoms; and those who have central neuropathic pain (often refractory).
- 25 September 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Pharmaceuticals
- Vol. 18 (10) , 1434
Open AccessPregabalin and Duloxetine in Patients with Non-Nociceptive Pain: A Narrative Review Exploring the Pharmacological Effects of This Combination
Both neuropathic and nociplastic pain (non-nociceptive pain) are characterized by a similar pattern of clinical symptoms, including numbness, dysesthesia, tingling, and pricking. Whereas nociplastic pain results from altered nociception without indication of tissue damage or a somatosensory system lesion, neuropathic pain is caused by a disease or lesion affecting the somatosensory system. The available therapeutic options consist of antiepileptic drugs, antidepressants, and muscle relaxants. Unfortunately, symptoms are often refractory, and increasing drug dosage may lead to adverse events. In this narrative review, we searched PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane, and EMBASE databases from their inception up to 26 July 2025, using the key words “duloxetine,” “pregabalin,” and then ‘‘combination,’’ “nociplastic pain,” “neuropathic pain,” “efficacy,” “safety,” “pharmacology,” “pharmacokinetic,” and “pharmacodynamic.” We evaluated the role of combination therapy with duloxetine, a serotonin–norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, and pregabalin, an antiseizure medication that acts on voltage-gated calcium channels α2δ subunit, in patients with neuropathic or nociplastic pain. The literature data indicate that combination therapy has synergistic effects, leading to fewer adverse events in specific categories of patients. Available evidence showed that combination therapy is generally not inferior to monotherapy, with slight differences in safety outcomes depending on supplementation, drug labels, and titration. These results indicate that even if not superior, combination therapy may be an alternative to monotherapy in selected patients: those who experience side effects from higher dosages of duloxetine or pregabalin and for whom symptom relief from dose reduction alone is not possible; those who use medications that interact with duloxetine; those who suffer from anxiety–depression, where pain is closely linked to mental symptoms; and those who have central neuropathic pain (often refractory).
- Open Access
- 17 September 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Preprints.org
The Role and Safety of Plant Derived Nutraceuticals as Adjuvant Treatment for Pain Management: A Narrative Review
Chronic pain is a serious concern for the healthcare system, considering the high public expense. Many drugs, such as opioids, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, amitriptyline, duloxetine, and pregabalin, can be used considering the type of pain (nociceptive, neuropathic, or nociplastic). This is because prescription drugs have a significant negative impact on patient health and the economy, increasing the risk of drug interactions and side effects. Nutraceuticals/supplements may be useful to reduce safety issues, particularly in elderly patients. A new fixed nutraceutical formulation containing lycopene (Solanum lycopersicum), sulforaphane (Brassica oleracea), silymarin (Silybum marianum), reduced glutathione, escin (Aesculus hippocastanum), tryptophan, and green tea (Camellia sinensis) can be used to manage the pain even if its action on pain has not been proved in clinical trials. Nevertheless, the evidence of a strong anti-nociceptive effect by escin and green tea, alongside the antioxidant and anti-neuropathic pain properties of other components, may be useful as adjuvant therapy to reduce drug dosage and prescription. Additionally, patients in polytherapy may benefit from the presence of two hepatoprotective compounds, such as glutathione and silymarin. The aim of this narrative review is to evaluate the data available on both efficacy and safety of the described nutrients in the management of pain.
- 17 September 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Preprints.org
Open AccessThe Role and Safety of Plant Derived Nutraceuticals as Adjuvant Treatment for Pain Management: A Narrative Review
Chronic pain is a serious concern for the healthcare system, considering the high public expense. Many drugs, such as opioids, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, amitriptyline, duloxetine, and pregabalin, can be used considering the type of pain (nociceptive, neuropathic, or nociplastic). This is because prescription drugs have a significant negative impact on patient health and the economy, increasing the risk of drug interactions and side effects. Nutraceuticals/supplements may be useful to reduce safety issues, particularly in elderly patients. A new fixed nutraceutical formulation containing lycopene (Solanum lycopersicum), sulforaphane (Brassica oleracea), silymarin (Silybum marianum), reduced glutathione, escin (Aesculus hippocastanum), tryptophan, and green tea (Camellia sinensis) can be used to manage the pain even if its action on pain has not been proved in clinical trials. Nevertheless, the evidence of a strong anti-nociceptive effect by escin and green tea, alongside the antioxidant and anti-neuropathic pain properties of other components, may be useful as adjuvant therapy to reduce drug dosage and prescription. Additionally, patients in polytherapy may benefit from the presence of two hepatoprotective compounds, such as glutathione and silymarin. The aim of this narrative review is to evaluate the data available on both efficacy and safety of the described nutrients in the management of pain.
- Open Access
- 24 September 2024
- Published by MDPI AG in Journal of Clinical Medicine
- Vol. 13 (19) , 5682
Assessing Gender Differences in Neuropathic Pain Management: Findings from a Real-Life Clinical Cross-Sectional Observational Study
Introduction: Neuropathic pain is defined as pain induced by a lesion or disease of the somatosensory nervous system. Pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments are frequently employed. In the current clinical investigation, we assessed the effects of sex on the safety and effectiveness of medications used to treat neuropathic pain. Methods: We conducted a prospective analysis between 1 February 2021 and 20 April 2024, involving patients with neuropathic pain referred to the Ambulatory of Pain Medicine of “Renato Dulbecco” University Hospital in Catanzaro (Calabria, Italy). Patients over 18 years old with signs of neuropathic pain (Douleur Neuropathique en 4 questionnaire ≥ 4) were included. Exclusion criteria comprised patients with Alzheimer’s disease; patients with nociplastic or nociceptive pain; and patients with neoplasms. Patients with fewer than two accesses to ambulatory care were excluded, as were those who did not sign the informed consent. Clinical data were collected from each enrolled patient and subsequently analyzed, considering clinical outcomes. Sex and gender differences in efficacy were estimated using multivariate linear modeling and propensity-score matching. Results: During the study, 531 patients were screened, and 174 were enrolled (33.5%, mean age 61.5 ± 13.1; 64 males and 110 females, mean age 60.6 ± 13.4 and 61.96 ± 13.0) in accordance with the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Only minor differences in treatment prescription were observed based on age, body mass index, and comorbidities. Smoking, sex, educational level, and body mass index did not induce a significant change in pain perception. Males required slightly higher, though not significantly, doses of drugs for pain control than females. The treatment was not significantly more effective for females than for males. Females did not exhibit a significantly lower number of adverse drug reactions compared to males. Conclusions: The current study found that there are no appreciable differences between the sexes when it comes to the treatment of neuropathic pain.
- 24 September 2024
- Published by MDPI AG in Journal of Clinical Medicine
- Vol. 13 (19) , 5682
Open AccessAssessing Gender Differences in Neuropathic Pain Management: Findings from a Real-Life Clinical Cross-Sectional Observational Study
Introduction: Neuropathic pain is defined as pain induced by a lesion or disease of the somatosensory nervous system. Pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments are frequently employed. In the current clinical investigation, we assessed the effects of sex on the safety and effectiveness of medications used to treat neuropathic pain. Methods: We conducted a prospective analysis between 1 February 2021 and 20 April 2024, involving patients with neuropathic pain referred to the Ambulatory of Pain Medicine of “Renato Dulbecco” University Hospital in Catanzaro (Calabria, Italy). Patients over 18 years old with signs of neuropathic pain (Douleur Neuropathique en 4 questionnaire ≥ 4) were included. Exclusion criteria comprised patients with Alzheimer’s disease; patients with nociplastic or nociceptive pain; and patients with neoplasms. Patients with fewer than two accesses to ambulatory care were excluded, as were those who did not sign the informed consent. Clinical data were collected from each enrolled patient and subsequently analyzed, considering clinical outcomes. Sex and gender differences in efficacy were estimated using multivariate linear modeling and propensity-score matching. Results: During the study, 531 patients were screened, and 174 were enrolled (33.5%, mean age 61.5 ± 13.1; 64 males and 110 females, mean age 60.6 ± 13.4 and 61.96 ± 13.0) in accordance with the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Only minor differences in treatment prescription were observed based on age, body mass index, and comorbidities. Smoking, sex, educational level, and body mass index did not induce a significant change in pain perception. Males required slightly higher, though not significantly, doses of drugs for pain control than females. The treatment was not significantly more effective for females than for males. Females did not exhibit a significantly lower number of adverse drug reactions compared to males. Conclusions: The current study found that there are no appreciable differences between the sexes when it comes to the treatment of neuropathic pain.
- Open Access
What Is the Role of Palmitoylethanolamide Co-Ultramicronized with Luteolin on the Symptomatology Reported by Patients Suffering from Long COVID? A Retrospective Analysis Performed by a Group of General Practitioners in a Real-Life Setting
Long COVID is a recognized post-viral syndrome characterized by neurological, somatic and neuropsychiatric symptoms that might last for long time after SARS-CoV-2 infection. An ever-growing number of patients come to the observation of General Practitioners complaining of mild or moderate symptoms after the resolution of the acute infection. Nine General Practitioners from the Rome area (Italy) performed a retrospective analysis in order to evaluate the role of the supplementation with Palmitoylethanolamide co-ultramicronized with Luteolin (PEALUT) on neurologic and clinical symptoms reported by their patients after COVID-19 resolution. Supplementation with PEALUT helped to improve all patient-reported symptoms, especially pain, anxiety and depression, fatigue, brain fog, anosmia and dysgeusia, leading to an overall improvement in patients’ health status. To our knowledge these are the first data presented on Long COVID patients collected in a territorial setting. Despite their preliminary nature, these results highlight the pathogenetic role of “non-resolving” neuroinflammation in Long COVID development and consequently the importance of its control in the resolution of the pathology and put the focus on the General Practitioner as the primary figure for early detection and management of Long COVID syndrome in a real-life setting. Future randomized, controlled, perspective clinical trials are needed to confirm this preliminary observation.
Open AccessWhat Is the Role of Palmitoylethanolamide Co-Ultramicronized with Luteolin on the Symptomatology Reported by Patients Suffering from Long COVID? A Retrospective Analysis Performed by a Group of General Practitioners in a Real-Life Setting
Long COVID is a recognized post-viral syndrome characterized by neurological, somatic and neuropsychiatric symptoms that might last for long time after SARS-CoV-2 infection. An ever-growing number of patients come to the observation of General Practitioners complaining of mild or moderate symptoms after the resolution of the acute infection. Nine General Practitioners from the Rome area (Italy) performed a retrospective analysis in order to evaluate the role of the supplementation with Palmitoylethanolamide co-ultramicronized with Luteolin (PEALUT) on neurologic and clinical symptoms reported by their patients after COVID-19 resolution. Supplementation with PEALUT helped to improve all patient-reported symptoms, especially pain, anxiety and depression, fatigue, brain fog, anosmia and dysgeusia, leading to an overall improvement in patients’ health status. To our knowledge these are the first data presented on Long COVID patients collected in a territorial setting. Despite their preliminary nature, these results highlight the pathogenetic role of “non-resolving” neuroinflammation in Long COVID development and consequently the importance of its control in the resolution of the pathology and put the focus on the General Practitioner as the primary figure for early detection and management of Long COVID syndrome in a real-life setting. Future randomized, controlled, perspective clinical trials are needed to confirm this preliminary observation.
- Top Cited PapersOpen Access
- 6 April 2023
- Published by MDPI AG in Pharmaceutics
- Vol. 15 (4) , 1165
The Pharmacological Treatment of Chronic Pain: From Guidelines to Daily Clinical Practice
In agreement with the International Association for the Study of Pain, chronic pain is an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience associated with actual or potential tissue damage. To date, there are several types of pain: nociceptive, neuropathic, and nociplastic. In the present narrative review, we evaluated the characteristics of the drugs used for each type of pain, according to guidelines, and their effects in people with comorbidity to reduce the development of severe adverse events.
- 6 April 2023
- Published by MDPI AG in Pharmaceutics
- Vol. 15 (4) , 1165
Top Cited PapersOpen AccessThe Pharmacological Treatment of Chronic Pain: From Guidelines to Daily Clinical Practice
In agreement with the International Association for the Study of Pain, chronic pain is an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience associated with actual or potential tissue damage. To date, there are several types of pain: nociceptive, neuropathic, and nociplastic. In the present narrative review, we evaluated the characteristics of the drugs used for each type of pain, according to guidelines, and their effects in people with comorbidity to reduce the development of severe adverse events.
- Open Access
- 1 March 2022
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Pain Research
- Vol. ume 15, 723-731
Metabolomics and Microbiomics: New Potential Strategies in Chronic Pain Syndrome
Chronic pain affects almost 20% of the European adult population and it significantly reduces patients’ quality of life. Chronic pain is considered a multidimensional experience determined by the interaction of several genetic and environmental factors. The effect of specific genetic contributions is often unclear, and the interpretation of the results from studies focused on genetic influences on pain has been complicated by the existence of multiple pain phenotypes. A step forward from genetics could be given by the application of metabolomics and microbiomics tools. Metabolomics is a powerful approach for hypothesis generation in biology, and it aims to analyze low molecular weight compounds, either metabolic intermediates or metabolic end-products, resulting from human or microbial metabolism. Microbiomics is a fast-growing field in which all the microbes are examined together, and as a result, its perturbation may indicate the development of chronic diseases. By applying these methodologies for the study of chronic pain, several differences have been identified. The alteration of the choline-PAF pathway is an intriguing finding recognized by several groups. In our opinion, metabolomics and microbiomics techniques will allow significant progress into the medical field. Patients may benefit from the possibility of being stratified and classified based on their metabolic and microbial profile, which, in the next future, may lead to personalized therapy.
- 1 March 2022
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Pain Research
- Vol. ume 15, 723-731
Open AccessMetabolomics and Microbiomics: New Potential Strategies in Chronic Pain Syndrome
Chronic pain affects almost 20% of the European adult population and it significantly reduces patients’ quality of life. Chronic pain is considered a multidimensional experience determined by the interaction of several genetic and environmental factors. The effect of specific genetic contributions is often unclear, and the interpretation of the results from studies focused on genetic influences on pain has been complicated by the existence of multiple pain phenotypes. A step forward from genetics could be given by the application of metabolomics and microbiomics tools. Metabolomics is a powerful approach for hypothesis generation in biology, and it aims to analyze low molecular weight compounds, either metabolic intermediates or metabolic end-products, resulting from human or microbial metabolism. Microbiomics is a fast-growing field in which all the microbes are examined together, and as a result, its perturbation may indicate the development of chronic diseases. By applying these methodologies for the study of chronic pain, several differences have been identified. The alteration of the choline-PAF pathway is an intriguing finding recognized by several groups. In our opinion, metabolomics and microbiomics techniques will allow significant progress into the medical field. Patients may benefit from the possibility of being stratified and classified based on their metabolic and microbial profile, which, in the next future, may lead to personalized therapy.