Lakshmanan Sivasundaram

Background: Management of long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT) pathology is accomplished through a biceps tenotomy or tenodesis. While both modalities provide beneficial outcomes, a biceps tenodesis may confer improved cosmesis, functional outcomes, and decreased muscle cramping postoperatively. Many procedural considerations are undertaken prior to a tenodesis, such as the surgical approach and fixation device. While similar clinical outcomes are achieved between an open subpectoral and arthroscopic suprapectoral biceps tenodesis (ASPBT) with interference screw (IS) fixation, the latter technique offers a minimally invasive modality. Indications: The primary indications for an ASPBT include superior labrum anterior posterior (SLAP) tears, LHBT tears, biceps instability, bicipital tunnel disease, biceps pulley lesions, and biceps tenosynovitis. Contraindications to the arthroscopic approach include a distal lesion of the biceps tendon below the pectoralis major tendon (PMT). The IS may be used to create a biomechanically stiffer construct. Technique Description: With the arthroscope in the lateral portal, the distal aspect of the bicipital groove proximal to the superior border of the PMT is identified and opened. The LHBT is subsequently mobilized and released. An anterosuperolateral portal is localized with a spinal needle positioned perpendicular to the bicipital tunnel, 1.5 cm proximal to the superior border of the PMT. The biceps is then removed ex vivo and whip-stitches are sewn beginning 1 cm proximal to the myotendinous junction of the LHBT. After firmly associating the LHBT with the tip of the IS, a guidewire is placed 1.5 cm superior to the superior border of the PMT, perpendicular to the humerus, and a reamer is used to prepare a 6-, 7-, or 8-mm diameter socket. The tendon is inserted through the accessory portal into the tunnel, followed by screw fixation. Suture tails are tied with 5 alternating half hitches, each secured via an arthroscopic knot pusher. Results: ASPBT with IS fixation provides significant pain relief, improves range of motion (ROM), and enhances quality of life. Discussion: ASPBT with IS fixation provides significant improvements in patient-reported and functional outcomes and thus can be an acceptable treatment for LHBT pathology. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

Background: The quadriceps tendon is crucial in allowing knee extension, attaching distally to the patella. While ruptures of the tendon are rare, retear can lead to muscle atrophy and complex tendon deficits with retraction which may make revision repairs difficult to perform. To avoid re-rupture, the repair is commonly augmented with an allograft or autograft, theoretically strengthening the repair. Indications: Patients are indicated for surgery when presenting with a chronic, symptomatic quadriceps rupture verified on provocative testing and advanced imaging. Technique Description: Adhesions and fibrotic tissues around the vastus muscles and tendon are released. Sutures and anchor materials from the previous reconstruction are removed. Fibrotic tissues at the distal end of the retracted quad tendon are removed. The tendon is then loosened from the proximal aspect with the applied traction through the suspension suture placed distal to the tendon. The gap is measured and a V-Y quadricepsplasty was performed at twice the length of the measured gap. In the proximal aspect of the tendon, the limbs of the V-plasty are left incomplete. Next, traction is applied to allow for a tightening exertion to the patella. The proximal Y limb is sutured together in a side-to-side fashion to allow for tendon distalization while retaining the distal traction of the patellar tendon. The medial and lateral limbs were then closed with a suture, completing the tendon advancement. Fibrotic tissues around the superior pole of the patella are removed to prepare for tendon reattachment. Two anchors on the medial and lateral sides are placed, and the suture threads from both anchors are tied in a Krackow configuration. The medial and lateral-sided suture knots are then tied together over the tendon and covered again with the Achilles allograft, completing the repair. Results: Outcomes of revision quadriceps repair have been promising, with good to excellent functional outcomes, successful return to activities, and objective outcomes. Discussion/Conclusion: Although initial studies report favorable outcomes following current repair techniques, there is a lack of quality literature on outcomes following primary or revision quadriceps repair. Future studies are necessary to determine the reliability, efficacy, and clinical outcomes following this procedure. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

Background: Although initial studies have demonstrated that concentrated bone marrow aspirate (cBMA) injections promote rotator cuff repair (RCR) healing, there are no randomized prospective studies investigating clinical efficacy. Hypothesis/Purpose: To compare outcomes after arthroscopic RCR (aRCR) with and without cBMA augmentation. It was hypothesized that cBMA augmentation would result in statistically significant improvements in clinical outcomes and rotator cuff structural integrity. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1. Methods: Patients indicated for aRCR of isolated 1- to 3-cm supraspinatus tendon tears were randomized to receive adjunctive cBMA injection or sham incision. Bone marrow was aspirated from the iliac crest, concentrated using a commercially available system, and injected at the aRCR site after repair. Patients were assessed preoperatively and serially until 2 years postoperatively via the following functional indices: American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), Simple Shoulder Test, 12-Item Short Form Health Survey, and Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed at 1 year to assess rotator cuff structural integrity according to Sugaya classification. Treatment failure was defined as decreased 1- or 2-year ASES or SANE scores as compared with preoperative baseline, the need for revision RCR, or conversion to total shoulder arthroplasty. Results: An overall 91 patients were enrolled (control, n = 45; cBMA, n = 46): 82 (90%) completed 2-year clinical follow-up and 75 (82%) completed 1-year MRI. Functional indices significantly improved in both groups by 6 months and were sustained at 1 and 2 years (all P < .05). The control group showed significantly greater evidence of rotator cuff retear according to Sugaya classification on 1-year MRI (57% vs 18%; P < .001). Treatment failed for 7 patients in each group (control, 16%; cBMA, 15%). Conclusion: cBMA-augmented aRCR of isolated supraspinatus tendon tears may result in a structurally superior repair but largely fails to significantly improve treatment failure rates and patient-reported clinical outcomes when compared with aRCR alone. Additional study is warranted to investigate the long-term benefits of improved repair quality on clinical outcomes and repair failure rates. Registration: NCT02484950 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).

Background: Medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) injury occurs in up 96% of lateral patellar dislocations, commonly affecting those less than 20 years old. The MPFL can be reconstructed using either a double-limb or single-limb technique. While both techniques achieve similar patient outcomes, a single-limb technique may require less operative time. Indications: The MPFL reconstruction is indicated in patients with recurrent patellar subluxations, dislocations, or unresolved apprehension. Care should be exercised in identifying whether patients require additional procedures in addition to MPFL reconstruction such as tibial tubercle osteotomy or trochleoplasty. These considerations include TT-TG >17 to 20 mm and Dejour B/D trochlear dysplasia. Technique Description: Following diagnostic arthroscopy, a medial peripatellar incision is made. Layers 1 and 2 are sharply dissected over the patellar periosteum, and tissue planes are subsequently developed using Metzenbaum scissors. A plane between layers 2 and 3 extending from the medial patella to the medial femoral epicondyle is developed. Using fluoroscopy, Schöttle point is identified, and a femoral tunnel is drilled. Two PEEK anchors are placed at the junction of the proximal one-third and distal two-thirds of the patella. In parallel, a tibialis anterior graft is sized, whipstitched, and tensioned on the back table. One end of the prepared graft is secured in the femoral tunnel with a PEEK tenodesis screw. The graft is then shuttled between layers 2 and 3, followed by fixation on the patellar side using the previously placed suture anchors. Isometry of the graft is confirmed under direct and arthroscopic visualization. Results: In multiple systematic reviews of single-limb versus double-limb MPFL reconstruction, no differences were observed in terms of patient-reported outcome scores, repeat dislocation, and reoperation. Furthermore, a recent meta-analysis suggests a trend toward less postoperative stiffness (1.2% vs 3.5%, P = .09) for single-bundle techniques. Discussion/Conclusion: Single-limb MPFL reconstruction is reproducible and effective, with clinically satisfactory outcomes and low failure rates. Single-limb MPFL reconstruction demonstrates similar outcomes as double-limb reconstruction, with a potential decrease in surgical time and postoperative stiffness. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

Introduction: Successful outpatient anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction hinges on effective analgesia. Routinely, oral narcotic agents have been the preferred analgesic postoperatively in orthopaedic surgery. However, these agents have several known adverse effects and are associated with a potential for abuse. This study evaluates the efficacy of ketorolac, a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug with analgesic properties, as an adjuvant agent for postoperative pain control after ACL reconstruction. Methods: Adult patients undergoing primary ACL reconstruction were prospectively enrolled. Exclusion criteria involved patients with a history of bleeding diathesis, renal dysfunction, chronic analgesia use, or alcohol abuse. Eligible patients were randomized into one of two groups. The control group received a standard-of-care pain protocol involving oxycodone-acetaminophen 5 to 325 on discharge. The ketorolac group additionally received intravenous ketorolac postoperatively and 3 days of oral ketorolac on discharge. Pain levels and total narcotic utilization were recorded three times per day for the first 5 days after surgery. Pain and functional outcomes were obtained at 2 and 6 weeks postoperatively. Results: The final analysis included 48 patients; the mean age of the cohort was 32 ± 11.6 years, and 60.4% of patients were female. No differences were observed in preoperative demographics, comorbidities, and preoperative functional scores between the two groups. Over the first 5 days after surgery, patients in the ketorolac group consumed a mean of 45.4% fewer narcotic pills than the control group (P < 0.001). In addition, mean postoperative pain scores were 22.36 points lower for patients in the ketorolac group (P < 0.001). There was no difference in functional outcome scores at up to 6 weeks postoperatively or adverse events between the two groups with no reported cases of gastrointestinal bleeding. Discussion: The use of adjunctive intravenous and short-term oral ketorolac substantially reduces narcotic utilization and pain levels after ACL reconstruction. ClinicalTrial.gov Registration Number: NCT04246554.

Purpose: To systematically review and meta-analyze studies reporting lateral center edge angle as it relates to patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures and clinically notable outcome assessments for patients undergoing hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome or labral pathology with borderline dysplastic hips (BDH). Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, and the Web of Science Core Collection databases were queried for articles evaluating lateral center edge angle as a predictor of PRO after hip arthroscopy. Articles were eligible for meta-analysis if they compared PROs measures between patients with normal acetabular coverage and borderline dysplasia and were at least level III evidence. Continuous random-effects models with standardized mean differences were used to compare postoperative Hip Outcome Score—Activities of Daily Living and sports subscales, modified Harris Hip Score, international Hip Outcome Tool scores, Satisfaction, and Visual Analog Scale Pain scores between normal coverage and borderline dysplastic groups. Results: Overall, 989 hips undergoing arthroscopy from six investigations were included in this meta-analysis, including 315 borderline dysplastic subjects (mean age 27.5 years) and 674 subjects with normal coverage (mean age 26.9 years). Borderline dysplastic and normal coverage cohorts were followed for an average of 37.0 and 36.8 months, respectively. Postoperative PRO measures (Hip Outcome Score—Activities of Daily Living, Hip Outcome Score-Sports Subscale, modified Harris Hip Score, international Hip Outcome Tool-12, Satisfaction, and Visual Analog Scale Pain) collected approximately three years after hip arthroscopy were not markedly different between subjects with BDH when compared with patients with normal coverage. Conclusions: In a meta-analysis of the available literature, patients with BDH are able to equally reach statistically similar clinical outcomes after isolated hip arthroscopy as compared with control subjects without dysplasia at short-term follow-up. A BDH should not be considered a contraindication to hip arthroscopy when optimal PRO achievement is the goal. Level of Evidence: Level III, Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: Current joint-sparing treatment options for massive, irreparable rotator cuff tears aim to prevent superior migration of the humeral head and maintain the subacromial space. Although options such as superior capsular reconstruction and posterosuperior tendon transfer may appropriately restore function and reduce pain, these procedures harbor significant comorbidity and intense postoperative rehabilitation. Recently, studies have demonstrated excellent results from a subacromial balloon spacer composed of a biocompatible copolymer that degrades over the 12 months following implantation. This spacer enables a more anatomic position of the humeral head to restore normal shoulder biomechanics. Indications: The subacromial balloon spacer is primarily indicated in patients with massive, irreparable rotator cuff tears who demonstrate proximal humeral migration. Contraindications include subscapularis or teres minor tendon tears, deltoid dysfunction, and pseudoparalysis. Technique Description: Standard arthroscopic portals are established, and a diagnostic arthroscopy is performed to assess the glenohumeral joint space and subscapularis tendon. A subacromial bursectomy is performed without proceeding medial to the superior glenoid rim. The subacromial space is measured utilizing an arthroscopic measurement probe to ensure that the selected spacer will lie slightly medial to the glenoid. The rotator cuff is then reapproximated from the lateral to medial aspect of the tear and repaired via a side-to-side manner with high strength, nonabsorbable tape, and a self-capturing suture device. Following repair, the deployment device is inserted through the lateral portal, placed slightly medial to the glenoid, and inflated with saline. Results: Utilization of the described subacromial balloon augmentation provides significant pain relief by restoring glenohumeral biomechanics, improvements in range of motion, and an enhancement in quality of life. Discussion: This case report and video review of a technique for utilizing a subacromial balloon spacer demonstrates an effective, simple, and safe treatment for massive, irreparable rotator cuff tears. Positive results rely on appropriate inflation and secure fixation. Recent clinical trial data suggest that functional outcomes for the subacromial balloon spacer are noninferior to that of partial rotator cuff repair. These promising results suggest that the subacromial balloon spacer may prove an essential tool for joint-preserving surgery following massive, irreparable rotator cuff tears.

Background: Hamstring injuries at the musculotendinous junction are relatively common. However, injuries to the proximal hamstring account for just 12% of hamstring injuries. Surgical repair of these injuries including both open and endoscopic techniques are becoming increasingly more common. Indications: Surgical intervention is generally reserved for cases with 2 or more torn tendons and at least 2 centimeters of retraction. Technique Description: The combined open and endoscopic technique utilizes direct posterior and posterolateral portals. After visualizing the posterior femoral cutaneous (PFCN) and sciatic nerves (SN), the proximal hamstring tear is identified, and the shaver is used to remove any surrounding adhesions and aid in clearing any hematoma. The ischial tuberosity is prepared using a shaver, radiofrequency ablation, and a 5.5 mm, round arthroscopic burr. Two, 4.5 mm, doubled-loaded anchors are placed into the ischium. The incision for the open portion of the case is created by incising the skin between the direct posterior and posterolateral portals. A dissection is continued down to the gluteal fascia, and the gluteal fascia is incised in line with the surgical incision. The gluteus maximus is retracted then the hamstring stump is secured with a stay suture and brought outside the surgical incision for inspection. The double-loaded sutures are passed in a running locking technique. The other suture limbs are then passed through the central aspect of the tendon and tensioned to reduce the proximal hamstring onto the prepared tuberosity. Results: Significant postoperative improvements in patient-reported outcomes have been reported for open and endoscopic repairs in isolation, but to date there are no outcomes studies on the combined “Scopen” technique. Postoperative complications may include numbness or neuropraxia, re-rupture, infection, and deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Discussion: The endoscopic portion allows an improved view and preservation of the SN and PFCN, as well as a detailed view of the ischial tuberosity for decortication and anchor placement in comparison with a purely open approach. In comparison with a purely endoscopic approach, this combined approach can be used in patients with retraction >4 cm, and can also be utilized for chronic, retracted tears as well.

Background: Focal cartilage defects of the knee are painful and difficult to treat, especially in younger patients ¹ . Seen in up to 60% of patients who undergo knee arthroscopy ² , chondral lesions are most common on the patella and medial femoral condyle ³ . Although the majority of lesions are asymptomatic, a variety of treatment options exist for those that are symptomatic; however, no clear gold-standard treatment has been established. In recent years, osteochondral allograft transplantation has been increasingly utilized because of its versatility and encouraging outcomes ^4–7 . The procedure entails replacing damaged cartilage with a graft of subchondral bone and cartilage from a deceased donor. Indications for this procedure include a symptomatic, full-thickness osteochondral defect typically ≥2 cm² in size in someone who has failed conservative management. Relative indications include patient age of 8,9 . Description: Osteochondral allograft transplantation requires meticulous planning, beginning with preoperative radiographs to evaluate the patient’s alignment, estimate the lesion size, and aid in matching of a donor femoral condyle. The procedure begins with the patient supine and the knee flexed. A standard arthrotomy incision is performed on the operative side. Once exposure is obtained, a bore is utilized to remove host tissue from the lesion typically to a depth of 5 to 8 mm. Measurements are taken and the donor condyle is appropriately sized to match. A coring reamer is utilized to create the plug from donor tissue, which is trimmed to the corresponding depth. After marrow elements are removed via pulse lavage, the allograft plug is placed within the femoral condyle lesion through minimal force. Alternatives: Nonoperative treatment involves a reduction in high-impact activities and physical therapy. Surgical alternatives include chondroplasty, microfracture, and osteochondral autograft transplantation; however, these options are typically performed for smaller lesions ( 5,9 . The mean survival of grafts was 94% at 5 years and 84% at 10 years ⁵ . Overall, data on long-term survival are lacking because interest in and use of this procedure have only increased over the past few decades ¹⁰ . Finally, the rate of return to sport is promising, with the systematic review by Campbell et al. showing rates as high as 88% with an average time to return to sport of 9.6 months ¹¹ . Postoperatively, patients can expect to immediately begin passive range of motion. Progression of heel-touch weight-bearing begins at 6 weeks, and patients may return to sport-specific activity after 8 months, as tolerated. Important Tips: Ensure that the allograft is of adequate quality and is size-matched prior to performing the surgical procedure. The cannulated cylinder should be perpendicular to both the host lesion and graft tissue in order to ensure symmetric estimations of size. Save subchondral bone shavings when preparing the host lesion. These can be utilized to take up space if your graft depth is not sufficient to fill the host defect. Utilize saline solution irrigation judiciously when reaming out the host tissue and graft plug. Acronyms & Abbreviations: AAROM = active-assisted range of motion ACI = autologous chondrocyte implantation AP = anteroposterior BMI = body mass index CPM = continuous passive range of motion Glut/glutes = gluteal muscles HTO = high tibial osteotomy ICRS = International Cartilage Repair Society LFC = lateral femoral condyle LTP = lateral tibial plateau MACI = matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation MFC = medial femoral condyle Mobs = mobilization MRI = magnetic resonance imaging NSAIDs = non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs OAT = osteochondral allograft transplantation PROM = passive range of motion Quad = quadriceps muscles ROM = range of motion SLR = straight leg raise