Francesco Cavalli

Background: Triple fixed-dose combination (FDC) therapy is recommended in severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients experiencing frequent exacerbations and/or symptoms not controlled by dual FDCs. Since no randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have directly compared the different inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting β₂-adrenoceptor agonist/long-acting muscarinic antagonist (ICS/LABA/LAMA) FDCs, we performed a meta-analysis to compare the impact of the current available ICS/LABA/LAMA FDCs in COPD. Methods: A meta-analysis was performed by connecting beclomethasone dipropionate/formoterol fumarate/glycopyrronium bromide or glycopyrrolate (BDP/FOR/GLY), budesonide (BUD)/GLY/FOR, and fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium bromide/vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) FDCs via ICS/LABA or LABA/LAMA FDCs arms. The safety and efficacy profiles were investigated, and the Implemented Bidimensional Surface under the cumulative ranking curve analysis (IBiS) was carried out. Protocol registration: CRD42022301189. Results: Data from 21,809 COPD patients were extracted from the ETHOS, IMPACT, KRONOS, and TRILOGY studies. No significant (p > 0.05) differences were detected across the triple FDCs with respect to the risk of exacerbation, trough forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV₁), transition dyspnea index (TDI), St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), risk of serious adverse events (SAEs), cardiovascular (CV) SAEs, pneumonia, and all-cause mortality. According to IBiS score, BDP/FOR/GLY 200/12/25 µg twice daily (BID) was the FDC reporting the best combined efficacy/safety profile (area 41.41%), although FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg once daily (QD) showed the greatest efficacy profile (50.54%). The protection against mortality related to the dose of ICS. Conclusions: All triple FDCs are effective and safe in COPD regardless of the regimen of administration (twice daily vs. once daily), with no relevant difference in the risk of CV SAEs and pneumonia.

Article: Synergy across the drugs approved for the treatment of asthma - Minerva Medica 2021 Jan 26 - Minerva Medica - Journals

Several mAbs have been tested or are currently under clinical evaluation for the treatment of COPD. They can be subdivided into those that aim to block specific pro-inflammatory and pro-neutrophilic cytokines and chemokines, such as TNF-α, IL-1β, CXCL8 and IL-1β, and those that act on T2-mediated inflammation, respectively, by blocking IL-5 and/or its receptor, preventing IL-4 and IL-13 signaling, affecting IL-33 pathway and blocking TSLP. None of these approaches has proved to be effective, probably because in COPD there is no dominant cytokine or chemokine and, therefore, a single mAb cannot be effective on all pathways. With a more in-depth understanding of the numerous pheno/endotypic pathways that play a role in COPD, it may eventually be possible to identify those specific patients in whom some of these cytokines or chemokines might predominate. In this case, it will be possible to implement a personalized treatment, but the use of each mAb will only be reserved for a very limited number of subjects.

Introduction: Phosphodiesterases (PDEs) are isoenzymes ubiquitously expressed in the lungs where they catalyse cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) and cyclic guanosine monophosphate (GMP), which are fundamental second messengers in asthma, thereby regulating the intracellular concentrations of these cyclic nucleotides, their signaling pathways and, consequently, myriad biological responses. The superfamily of PDEs is composed of 11 families with a distinct substrate specificity, molecular structure and subcellular localization. Experimental studies indicate a possible role in asthma mainly for PDE3, PDE4, PDE5 and PDE7. Consequently, drugs that inhibit PDEs may offer novel therapeutic options for the treatment of this disease. Areas Covered: In this article, we describe the progress made in recent years regarding the possibility of using PDE inhibitors in the treatment of asthma. Expert Opinion: Many data indicate the potential benefits of PDE inhibitors as an add-on treatment especially in severe asthma due to their bronchodilator and/or anti-inflammatory activity, but no compound has yet reached the market as asthma treatment mainly because of their limited tolerability. Therefore, there is a growing interest in developing new PDE inhibitors with an improved safety profile. In particular, the research is focused on the development of drugs capable of interacting simultaneously with different PDEs, or to be administered by inhalation. CHF 6001 and RPL554 are the only molecules that currently are under clinical development but there are several new agents with interesting pharmacological profiles. It will be stimulating to assess the impact of such agents on individual treatable traits in specially designed studies.

Asthma is a heterogeneous condition, but firm identification of heterogeneity-focused treatments is still lacking. Dividing patients into subgroups of asthma pheno-/endotypes based on combined clinical and cellular biological characteristics and linking them to targeted treatments could be a potentially useful approach to personalize therapy for better outcomes. Nonetheless, there are still many problems related to the identification and validation of asthma phenotypes and endotypes. Alternatively, a precision-medicine strategy for the management of patients with airways disease that is free from the traditional diagnostic labels and based on identifying "treatable traits" in each patient might be preferable. However, it would represent a quite unsophisticated approach because the definition of a treatable trait is too imprecise. In fact, there is still no understanding of the mechanisms underlying treatable traits that allow directing any targeted therapies against any particular treatable trait. Fortunately, in-depth identification of underlying molecular pathways to guide targeted treatment in individual patients is in progress thanks to the improvement in big data management obtained from ‘-omic’ sciences that is greatly increasing knowledge concerning asthma.

Introduction: The Suppressor of tumorigenicity receptor (ST2)/IL-33 axis has long been known to play a pivotal role in immunity and cell homeostasis and its imbalance has been proposed to have a role in organ fibrosis. Serum ST2 concentration has been proposed as prognostic biomarker in chronic heart failure Aims and objectives The aim of this study is to evaluate the potential role of serum ST2 as biomarker in IPF Methods: in this explorative study serum samples from 32 IPF patients and 31 healthy volunteers were subject to ST2 evaluation by means of a commercially available kit. In IPF patients ST2 levels were correlated with baseline FVC, DLCO, echocardiography variables including ejection fraction and PAPS, and serum BNP. In order to evaluate the potential prognostic role of ST2 in IPF patients, 12 months disease progression defined as death or FVC decline > 10% was evaluated dividing patients in two groups based on ST2 values (cut-off 30 ng/ml). Disease progression analysis was completed according to the methods of Kaplan and Meir. Results: serum ST2 was significantly higher in IPF patients compared to healthy volunteers (30.6±19.0 vs 19.3±8.3 ng/ml, p=0.003). In IPF patients no correlation was found between ST2 and baseline FVC (r=-0.17 , p=0.34 ), DLCO (r=0.21 , p=0.27 ), EF (r=0.17 , p=0.22 ), PAPS (r= -0.12, p=0.47) and BNP (r=0.18 , p=0.19). Interestingly, in IPF patients higher levels of ST2 (>30 ng/ml) were associated to disease progression (HR 2,24, 95% CI 1.016-4,92, p<0,05). Conclusion: Our results suggest ST2 as a potential new independent biomarker of disease progression in IPF patients