Sarah A. Moore

Physical activity improves outcomes after stroke, but barriers exist to healthcare professionals promoting physical activity in this population. This study explored barriers and facilitators to healthcare professional implementation of a stroke physical activity behaviour change intervention, Physical Activity Routines After Stroke (PARAS), to inform targeted implementation strategies. UK stroke rehabilitation teams participated in one-hour workshops discussing PARAS implementation. Transcripts were analysed inductively and deductively using the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF), facilitating the mapping of behaviour change techniques (BCTs) (Behaviour Change Techniques Taxonomy V1) and implementation strategies (Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change compilation). Five teams (35 healthcare professionals, predominantly physiotherapists) participated. Key themes included system and resource constraints, stakeholder and stroke survivor engagement, intervention adaptation, and knowledge and skills. Nine TDF domains were identified as central to implementation behaviour. Fifteen BCTs and 14 implementation strategies were mapped, with operationalisation methods including training, stakeholder engagement, identifying local determinants, audit, and resource adaptation. This is the first study applying the TDF to understand healthcare professionals' experiences implementing a physical activity behaviour change intervention post-stroke. Using the TDF enabled systematic mapping of tailored strategies supporting implementation. Findings offer practical solutions for PARAS implementation, with broader applicability across stroke rehabilitation contexts.

Motor rehabilitation aims to help people after stroke to gain optimal motor functioning, independence and quality of life. This European Stroke Organisation (ESO) guideline provides updated, evidence-based support for clinical practice in six agreed critical areas: dose for upper limb and gait therapy, high-intensity gait training, effect of therapy transfer package, group versus individual therapy and sit-to-stand training. The guideline was developed according to ESO standard operating procedures and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). Expert consensus statements are provided where a GRADE recommendation cannot be made due to insufficient evidence. For therapy dose, very low quality evidence supports a weak recommendation to provide an additional minimal dose of 20 h of repetitive upper limb practice to improve arm capacity. For gait, expert consensus suggests that an additional minimal dose of 20 h of walking practice could be beneficial for walking capacity. For high-intensity gait training, moderate quality evidence supports a strong recommendation for high-intensity gait training to improve walking endurance in people with chronic stroke and stable cardiovascular status, while low quality evidence supports a weak recommendation for improving walking speed. An expert consensus suggests using a transfer package when providing upper limb task-specific training to enhance transfer to daily life. For group therapy, a weak recommendation based on very low quality evidence suggests that task-specific group-based therapy is non-inferior to individual therapy for improving balance, gait speed and walking endurance. A weak recommendation based on moderate quality evidence suggests additional sit-to-stand training to improve balance.

Objective: To explore the feasibility of tailored implementation of a stroke physical activity behaviour change intervention (Physical Activity Routines After Stroke (PARAS)) and the feasibility of the intervention. Design: Feasibility study applying mixed methods. Setting: UK stroke services. Participants: Four stroke rehabilitation teams comprising 34 healthcare professionals. Intervention: We applied a tailored implementation process informed by the Integrated Theory-based Framework for Intervention Tailoring Strategies to the PARAS intervention. Teams each attended two facilitated workshops (face-to-face/hybrid/online) identifying barriers and facilitators (determinants) to PARAS implementation to enable development of tailored implementation plans. Plans were applied and reviewed. Main measures: Feasibility of the tailored implementation process and intervention was explored via analysis of online questionnaire responses and thematic analysis of workshop and review session content. Inductive analysis identified determinants to implementation plan completion and enabled mapping of promising implementation strategies and their operationalisation and intervention development needs. Results: Thirty-four healthcare professionals participated across four teams. The facilitated, tailored implementation process was deemed feasible. All teams reported partially achieving implementation plans. Factors influencing implementation plan success included: motivation; stakeholder involvement; leadership and planning; intervention delivery skills. Implementation strategies mapped to factors included: assess for readiness; build a coalition; identify champions; train for leadership; and develop an implementation plan and ongoing training. Intervention adaptations identified included intervention tailoring and digitising resources. Conclusion: Our implementation process and the PARAS intervention were feasible with moderate amendments. Our findings enabled development of a model to support tailored implementation of PARAS and identified intervention development needs to guide future evaluation.

Hemiparesis is a disabling consequence of stroke, causing abnormal gait patterns with biomechanical asymmetries. Gait mechanics for stroke survivors appear resistant to conventional rehabilitation. Auditory rhythmical cueing (ARC) represents an emerging intervention option. To determine effective gait interventions, objective measures of gait collected from real-world environments may be required in addition to standard clinical outcomes to aid understanding of gait mechanics. This study reports on the ability of wearable activity monitors to quantify an ARC intervention for fifty-nine stroke survivors randomised into an ARC gait and balance training programme or an equivalent training programme without ARC. Gait assessments were undertaken at baseline and at 6 weeks for 4-metre walks and continuously for 7 days following each home assessment using a wearable activity monitor. The success rates of data collection using the wearable activity monitors ranged from 64 to 95%. Forty-eight Digital Mobility Outcomes representing a broad range of gait mechanics were calculated. Visualisation of all DMOs using radar plots indicated changes from baseline in both groups, with individual data indicating large variability in response to the intervention and control programme. Including wearable activity monitors to evaluate gait interventions for stroke survivors provides additional value to traditional methods and aids understanding of individual responses; as such, they should be used for future intervention-based research.

Background Healthy childhood development is fostered through sufficient physical activity (PA; including time outdoors), limiting sedentary behaviours (SB), and adequate sleep; collectively known as movement behaviours. Though the COVID-19 virus outbreak has changed the daily lives of children and youth, it is unknown to what extent related restrictions may compromise the ability to play and meet movement behaviour recommendations. This secondary data analysis examined the immediate impacts of COVID-19 restrictions on movement and play behaviours in children and youth. Methods A national sample of Canadian parents (n = 1472) of children (5–11 years) or youth (12–17 years) (54% girls) completed an online survey that assessed immediate changes in child movement and play behaviours during the COVID-19 outbreak. Behaviours included PA and play, SB, and sleep. Family demographics and parental factors that may influence movement behaviours were assessed. Correlations between behaviours and demographic and parental factors were determined. For open-ended questions, word frequency distributions were reported. Results Only 4.8% (2.8% girls, 6.5% boys) of children and 0.6% (0.8% girls, 0.5% boys) of youth were meeting combined movement behaviour guidelines during COVID-19 restrictions. Children and youth had lower PA levels, less outside time, higher SB (including leisure screen time), and more sleep during the outbreak. Parental encouragement and support, parental engagement in PA, and family dog ownership were positively associated with healthy movement behaviours. Although families spent less time in PA and more time in SB, several parents reported adopting new hobbies or accessing new resources. Conclusions This study provides evidence of immediate collateral consequences of the COVID-19 outbreak, demonstrating an adverse impact on the movement and play behaviours of Canadian children and youth. These findings can guide efforts to preserve and promote child health during the COVID-19 outbreak and crisis recovery period, and to inform strategies to mitigate potential harm during future pandemics.

Background Healthy childhood development is fostered through sufficient physical activity (PA; including time outdoors), limiting sedentary behaviours (SB), and adequate sleep; collectively known as movement behaviours. Though the COVID-19 virus outbreak has changed the daily lives of children and youth, it is unknown to what extent related restrictions may compromise the ability to play and meet movement behaviour recommendations. This secondary data analysis examined the immediate impacts of COVID-19 restrictions on movement and play behaviours in children and youth. Methods A national sample of Canadian parents (n = 1472) of children (5–11 years) or youth (12–17 years) (54% girls) completed an online survey that assessed immediate changes in child movement and play behaviours during the COVID-19 outbreak. Behaviours included PA and play, SB, and sleep. Family demographics and parental factors that may influence movement behaviours were assessed. Correlations between behaviours and demographic and parental factors were determined. For open-ended questions, word frequency distributions were reported. Results Only 4.8% (2.8% girls, 6.5% boys) of children and 0.6% (0.8% girls, 0.5% boys) of youth were meeting combined movement behaviour guidelines during COVID-19 restrictions. Children and youth had lower PA levels, less outside time, higher SB (including leisure screen time), and more sleep during the outbreak. Parental encouragement and support, parental engagement in PA, and family dog ownership were positively associated with healthy movement behaviours. Although families spent less time in PA and more time in SB, several parents reported adopting new hobbies or accessing new resources. Conclusions This study provides evidence of immediate collateral consequences of the COVID-19 outbreak, demonstrating an adverse impact on the movement and play behaviours of Canadian children and youth. These findings can guide efforts to preserve and promote child health during the COVID-19 outbreak and crisis recovery period, and to inform strategies to mitigate potential harm during future pandemics.

Background: Gait impairment limiting mobility and restricting activities is common after stroke. Auditory rhythmical cueing (ARC) uses a metronome beat delivered during exercise to train stepping and early work reports gait improvements. This study aimed to establish the feasibility of a full scale multicentre randomised controlled trial to evaluate an ARC gait and balance training programme for use by stroke survivors in the home and outdoors. Methods: A parallel-group observer-blind pilot randomised controlled trial was conducted. Adults within 2 years of stroke with a gait-related mobility impairment were recruited from four NHS stroke services and randomised to an ARC gait and balance training programme (intervention) or the training programme without ARC (control). Both programmes consisted of 3x30 min sessions per week for 6 weeks undertaken at home/nearby outdoor community. One session per week was supervised and the remainder self-managed. Gait and balance performance assessments were undertaken at baseline, 6 and 10 weeks. Key trial outcomes included recruitment and retention rates, programme adherence, assessment data completeness and safety. Results: Between November 2018 and February 2020, 59 participants were randomised (intervention n=30, control n=29), mean recruitment rate 4/month. At baseline, 6 weeks and 10 weeks, research assessments were conducted for 59/59 (100%), 47/59 (80%) and 42/59 (71%) participants, respectively. Missing assessments were largely due to discontinuation of data collection from mid-March 2020 because of the UK COVID-19 pandemic lockdown. The proportion of participants with complete data for each individual performance assessment ranged from 100% at baseline to 68% at 10 weeks. In the intervention group, 433/540 (80%) total programme exercise sessions were undertaken, in the control group, 390/522 (75%). Falls were reported by five participants in the intervention group, six in the control group. Three serious adverse events occurred, all unrelated to the study. Conclusion: We believe that a definitive multicentre RCT to evaluate the ARC gait and balance training programme is feasible. Recruitment, programme adherence and safety were all acceptable. Although we consider that the retention rate and assessment data completeness were not sufficient for a future trial, this was largely due to the UK COVID-19 pandemic lockdown. Trial registration: ISRCTN, ISRCTN10874601, Registered on 05/03/2018,

Achieving safe, independent, and efficient walking is a top priority for stroke survivors to enable quality of life and future health. This narrative review explores the state of the science in walking recovery after stroke and potential for development. The importance of targeting walking capacity and performance is explored in relation to individual stroke survivor gait recovery, applying a common language, measurement, classification, prediction, current and future intervention development, and health care delivery. Findings are summarized in a model of current and future stroke walking recovery research and a mission statement is set for researchers and clinicians to drive the field forward to improve the lives of stroke survivors and their carers.

Background: Low levels of habitual physical activity and high levels of sedentary behaviour are commonly observed post-stroke. We aimed to assess the feasibility, acceptability and fidelity of a multifaceted, theory- and evidence-informed supported self-management intervention targeting physical activity and sedentary behaviour after stroke: Physical Activity Routines After Stroke (PARAS). Methods: Adult stroke survivors and healthcare professionals were recruited from North East England stroke services. Stroke survivor physical activity and sedentary behaviour were targeted by a self-management behavioural intervention supported by healthcare professionals trained in intervention delivery. The main outcomes were protocol and intervention acceptability and feasibility and fidelity of intervention delivery. Results: Eleven healthcare professionals (9 physiotherapists; 2 occupational therapists) participated in the study. Stroke survivor recruitment was lower than anticipated (19 versus target of up to 35). The healthcare professional training programme was feasible, with fidelity assessment of delivery supporting this finding. Data completeness was acceptable according to a priori criteria (>60%), except for stroke survivor questionnaire return rate (59%) and interview uptake (52%). No serious adverse events occurred. Healthcare professionals and stroke survivors perceived intervention delivery to be feasible and acceptable with minor modifications highlighted including the potential for earlier delivery in the stroke pathway. Conclusions: The study protocol and intervention delivery were feasible and acceptable to stroke survivors and healthcare professionals with modifications required before large-scale evaluation. Trial registration: ISRCTN35516780. Registered on October 24, 2018

Background: Although laboratory studies demonstrate that training programmes using auditory rhythmical cueing (ARC) may improve gait post-stroke, few studies have evaluated this intervention in the home and outdoors where deployment may be more appropriate. This manuscript reports stakeholder refinement of an ARC gait and balance training programme for use at home and outdoors, and a study which assessed acceptability and deliverability of this programme. Methods: Programme design and content were refined during stakeholder workshops involving physiotherapists and stroke survivors. A two-group acceptability and deliverability study was then undertaken. Twelve patients post-stroke with a gait related mobility impairment received either the ARC gait and balance training programme or the gait and balance training programme without ARC. Programme provider written notes, participant exercise and fall diaries, adverse event monitoring and feedback questionnaires captured data about deliverability, safety and acceptability of the programmes. Results: The training programme consisted of 18 sessions (six supervised, 12 self-managed) of exercises and ARC delivered by a low-cost commercially available metronome. All 12 participants completed the six supervised sessions and 10/12 completed the 12 self-managed sessions. Provider and participant session written records and feedback questionnaires confirmed programme deliverability and acceptability. Conclusion: An ARC gait and balance training programme refined by key stakeholders was feasible to deliver and acceptable to participants and providers. Trial registration: ISCTRN 12/03/2018.