Richard Ebright
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Richard Ebright has a total of 545 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Bryce E. Nickels
Waksman Institute and Department of Genetics, Rutgers University
25 shared publications Yon W. Ebright
Waksman Institute and Department of Chemistry, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA
25 shared publicationsDavid Degen
Waksman Institute and Department of Chemistry
16 shared publicationsJayanta Mukhopadhyay
Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Waksman Institute, and Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Rutgers University, Piscataway NJ 08854, USA
14 shared publications- Yu Zhang
Key Laboratory of Synthetic Biology, Key Laboratory of Plant Design, Center for Excellence in Molecular Plant Sciences, Shanghai Institute of Plant Physiology and Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences
14 shared publications - Jason T. Kaelber
Rutgers CryoEM and Nanoimaging Facility and Institute for Quantitative Biomedicine, Rutgers University
12 shared publications
Latest Publications
- Open Access
Single-molecule nanopore-tweezers analysis of transcription elongation by intact and “stalk-less” yeast RNA polymerase II
S ingle-molecule p icometer- r esolution n anopore tweezers (SPRNT) enables monitoring of translocation of a nucleic-acid motor protein on a nucleic-acid track with sequence registration, sub-nucleotide spatial resolution, sub-millisecond temporal resolution, and the ability to apply forces that assist or oppose translocation. Recently, we used SPRNT to analyze the translocation of single molecules of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase relative to the DNA template strand during transcription elongation, and we directly detected sequence-dependent pausing and formation of a “half-translocated state” at the E. coli yrbL consensus pause element. Here, we apply SPRNT to analyze the translocation of single molecules of yeast RNA polymerase II (Pol II) relative to the DNA template strand during transcription elongation with single-nucleotide spatial resolution and millisecond-scale temporal resolution at biologically relevant, saturating substrate concentrations; we compare translocation by intact, 12-subunit Pol II to translocation by a 10-subunit Pol II sub-assembly lacking the dissociable Rpb4-Rpb7 Pol II “stalk”; and we assess possible pausing by intact Pol II and stalk-less Pol II at the E. coli yrbL consensus pause element. The results show that intact Pol II elongates more rapidly than stalk-less Pol II and show that neither intact Pol II nor stalk-less Pol II pauses at the E. coli yrbL consensus pause element. One-sentence summary: Nanopore tweezers enable monitoring of translocation of RNA polymerase II relative to DNA in transcription elongation with single-nucleotide spatial resolution and millisecond-scale temporal resolution at biologically relevant, saturating substrate concentrations.
Open AccessSingle-molecule nanopore-tweezers analysis of transcription elongation by intact and “stalk-less” yeast RNA polymerase II
S ingle-molecule p icometer- r esolution n anopore tweezers (SPRNT) enables monitoring of translocation of a nucleic-acid motor protein on a nucleic-acid track with sequence registration, sub-nucleotide spatial resolution, sub-millisecond temporal resolution, and the ability to apply forces that assist or oppose translocation. Recently, we used SPRNT to analyze the translocation of single molecules of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase relative to the DNA template strand during transcription elongation, and we directly detected sequence-dependent pausing and formation of a “half-translocated state” at the E. coli yrbL consensus pause element. Here, we apply SPRNT to analyze the translocation of single molecules of yeast RNA polymerase II (Pol II) relative to the DNA template strand during transcription elongation with single-nucleotide spatial resolution and millisecond-scale temporal resolution at biologically relevant, saturating substrate concentrations; we compare translocation by intact, 12-subunit Pol II to translocation by a 10-subunit Pol II sub-assembly lacking the dissociable Rpb4-Rpb7 Pol II “stalk”; and we assess possible pausing by intact Pol II and stalk-less Pol II at the E. coli yrbL consensus pause element. The results show that intact Pol II elongates more rapidly than stalk-less Pol II and show that neither intact Pol II nor stalk-less Pol II pauses at the E. coli yrbL consensus pause element. One-sentence summary: Nanopore tweezers enable monitoring of translocation of RNA polymerase II relative to DNA in transcription elongation with single-nucleotide spatial resolution and millisecond-scale temporal resolution at biologically relevant, saturating substrate concentrations.
- Open Access
- 10 June 2026
- Published by National Academy of Sciences in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Vol. 123 (24)
Structural basis of long-range transcription–translation coupling
Structures recently have been reported of molecular assemblies that mediate transcription–translation coupling in Escherichia coli . In these molecular assemblies, termed “coupled transcription–translation complexes” or “TTC-B,” RNA polymerase (RNAP) directly interacts with the ribosome, the transcription elongation factor NusG or its paralog RfaH forms a bridge between RNAP and ribosome, and the transcription elongation factor NusA optionally forms a second bridge between RNAP and ribosome. Here, we report structures of coupled transcription–translation complexes having mRNA spacers between RNAP and ribosome longer than the maximum-length mRNA spacer compatible with formation of TTC-B. The results define a class of coupled transcription–translation complex, termed “TTC-LC,” where “LC” denotes “long-range coupling.” TTC-LC differs from TTC-B by a ~60° rotation and ~70 Å translation of RNAP relative to ribosome, resulting in loss of direct interactions between RNAP and ribosome and creation of a ~70 Å gap between RNAP and ribosome. TTC-LC accommodates long mRNA spacers by looping out mRNA from the gap between RNAP and ribosome. We present evidence that TTC-LC is a functional intermediate in assembling and disassembling TTC-B, mediating pre-TTC-B transcription–translation coupling before a ribosome catches up to RNAP, and mediating post-TTC-B transcription–translation coupling after a ribosome stops moving and RNAP continues moving. We show that TTC-B, but not TTC-LC, is severely defective in RNA-hairpin-dependent transcription termination, and that both TTC-B and TTC-LC are severely defective in Rho-dependent transcription termination.
- 10 June 2026
- Published by National Academy of Sciences in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Vol. 123 (24)
Open AccessStructural basis of long-range transcription–translation coupling
Structures recently have been reported of molecular assemblies that mediate transcription–translation coupling in Escherichia coli . In these molecular assemblies, termed “coupled transcription–translation complexes” or “TTC-B,” RNA polymerase (RNAP) directly interacts with the ribosome, the transcription elongation factor NusG or its paralog RfaH forms a bridge between RNAP and ribosome, and the transcription elongation factor NusA optionally forms a second bridge between RNAP and ribosome. Here, we report structures of coupled transcription–translation complexes having mRNA spacers between RNAP and ribosome longer than the maximum-length mRNA spacer compatible with formation of TTC-B. The results define a class of coupled transcription–translation complex, termed “TTC-LC,” where “LC” denotes “long-range coupling.” TTC-LC differs from TTC-B by a ~60° rotation and ~70 Å translation of RNAP relative to ribosome, resulting in loss of direct interactions between RNAP and ribosome and creation of a ~70 Å gap between RNAP and ribosome. TTC-LC accommodates long mRNA spacers by looping out mRNA from the gap between RNAP and ribosome. We present evidence that TTC-LC is a functional intermediate in assembling and disassembling TTC-B, mediating pre-TTC-B transcription–translation coupling before a ribosome catches up to RNAP, and mediating post-TTC-B transcription–translation coupling after a ribosome stops moving and RNAP continues moving. We show that TTC-B, but not TTC-LC, is severely defective in RNA-hairpin-dependent transcription termination, and that both TTC-B and TTC-LC are severely defective in Rho-dependent transcription termination.
- 11 March 2026
- Published by American Chemical Society (ACS) in ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters
- Vol. 17 (4) , 835-840
Solid-Phase Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of Des-hydroxy Pseudouridimycin Analogs
Pseudouridimycin (PUM) is a C-nucleoside/peptide antibiotic that selectively inhibits bacterial RNA polymerase (RNAP) and exhibits potent activity against drug-resistant pathogens. However, PUM suffers from chemical instability due to self-immolative cleavage of its central hydroxamate bond. Here, we employed cryo-electron microscopy to determine structures of PUM (1) and a chemically stabilized des-hydroxy analog of PUM (2a) bound to an Escherichia coli RNAP transcription complex. Guided by the observed bound conformation, we developed an efficient solid-phase synthesis of 50 des-hydroxy PUM analogs modified at the Gln residue and Gdn-Gly tail. Several analogs retained low-micromolar RNAP-inhibitory activity, with a para-substituted phenyl amidine analog (54) emerging as the most potent inhibitor (IC50 = 0.95 μM). These results establish a versatile synthetic platform and structural framework for optimizing stabilized PUM derivatives and provide a foundation for the development of RNAP-targeted therapeutics against resistant bacterial pathogens.
- 11 March 2026
- Published by American Chemical Society (ACS) in ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters
- Vol. 17 (4) , 835-840
Solid-Phase Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of Des-hydroxy Pseudouridimycin Analogs
Pseudouridimycin (PUM) is a C-nucleoside/peptide antibiotic that selectively inhibits bacterial RNA polymerase (RNAP) and exhibits potent activity against drug-resistant pathogens. However, PUM suffers from chemical instability due to self-immolative cleavage of its central hydroxamate bond. Here, we employed cryo-electron microscopy to determine structures of PUM (1) and a chemically stabilized des-hydroxy analog of PUM (2a) bound to an Escherichia coli RNAP transcription complex. Guided by the observed bound conformation, we developed an efficient solid-phase synthesis of 50 des-hydroxy PUM analogs modified at the Gln residue and Gdn-Gly tail. Several analogs retained low-micromolar RNAP-inhibitory activity, with a para-substituted phenyl amidine analog (54) emerging as the most potent inhibitor (IC50 = 0.95 μM). These results establish a versatile synthetic platform and structural framework for optimizing stabilized PUM derivatives and provide a foundation for the development of RNAP-targeted therapeutics against resistant bacterial pathogens.
- Open Access
- 3 October 2025
- Published by eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd in eLife
- Vol. 14
Pleomorphic effects of three small-molecule inhibitors on transcription elongation by Mycobacterium tuberculosis RNA polymerase
The Mycobacterium tuberculosis RNA polymerase (MtbRNAP) is the target of the first-line anti-tuberculosis inhibitor rifampin, however, the emergence of rifampin resistance necessitates the development of new antibiotics. Here, we communicate the first single-molecule characterization of MtbRNAP elongation and its inhibition by three diverse small-molecule inhibitors: N(α)-aroyl-N-aryl-phenylalaninamide (D-IX216), streptolydigin (Stl), and pseudouridimycin (PUM) using high-resolution optical tweezers. Compared to Escherichia coli RNA polymerase (EcoRNAP), MtbRNAP transcribes more slowly, has similar mechanical robustness, and only weakly recognizes E. coli pause sequences. The three small-molecule inhibitors of MtbRNAP exhibit strikingly different effects on transcription elongation. In the presence of D-IX216, which inhibits RNAP active-center bridge-helix motions required for nucleotide addition, the enzyme exhibits transitions between slowly and super-slowly elongating inhibited states. Stl, which inhibits the RNAP trigger-loop motions also required for nucleotide addition, inhibits RNAP primarily by inducing pausing and backtracking. PUM, a nucleoside analog of UTP, in addition to acting as a competitive inhibitor, induces the formation of slowly elongating RNAP inhibited states. Our results indicate that the three classes of small-molecule inhibitors affect the enzyme in distinct ways and show that the combination of Stl and D-IX216, which both target the RNAP bridge helix, has a strong synergistic effect on the enzyme.
- 3 October 2025
- Published by eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd in eLife
- Vol. 14
Open AccessPleomorphic effects of three small-molecule inhibitors on transcription elongation by Mycobacterium tuberculosis RNA polymerase
The Mycobacterium tuberculosis RNA polymerase (MtbRNAP) is the target of the first-line anti-tuberculosis inhibitor rifampin, however, the emergence of rifampin resistance necessitates the development of new antibiotics. Here, we communicate the first single-molecule characterization of MtbRNAP elongation and its inhibition by three diverse small-molecule inhibitors: N(α)-aroyl-N-aryl-phenylalaninamide (D-IX216), streptolydigin (Stl), and pseudouridimycin (PUM) using high-resolution optical tweezers. Compared to Escherichia coli RNA polymerase (EcoRNAP), MtbRNAP transcribes more slowly, has similar mechanical robustness, and only weakly recognizes E. coli pause sequences. The three small-molecule inhibitors of MtbRNAP exhibit strikingly different effects on transcription elongation. In the presence of D-IX216, which inhibits RNAP active-center bridge-helix motions required for nucleotide addition, the enzyme exhibits transitions between slowly and super-slowly elongating inhibited states. Stl, which inhibits the RNAP trigger-loop motions also required for nucleotide addition, inhibits RNAP primarily by inducing pausing and backtracking. PUM, a nucleoside analog of UTP, in addition to acting as a competitive inhibitor, induces the formation of slowly elongating RNAP inhibited states. Our results indicate that the three classes of small-molecule inhibitors affect the enzyme in distinct ways and show that the combination of Stl and D-IX216, which both target the RNAP bridge helix, has a strong synergistic effect on the enzyme.
- Open Access
- 17 September 2025
- Published by National Academy of Sciences in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Vol. 122 (38)
Bacillus subtilis σ A and Escherichia coli σ 70 lacking σ region 1.1 are not released during transcription initiation and elongation
A “σ cycle” in which the initiation factor σ associates with RNA polymerase (RNAP) core enzyme to permit transcription initiation and dissociates from RNAP core enzyme to permit transcription elongation, has been proposed to occur and to be an essential step for σ-exchange, with all principal σ factors from all bacteria. These proposals were based on studies of the principal σ factor of Escherichia coli , σ 70 , which generally, albeit not obligatorily, is released from RNAP upon the transition from transcription initiation to elongation. Here, we show that, in contrast to E. coli σ 70 , the Bacillus subtilis principal σ factor, σ A , is not released and is retained on RNAP core throughout transcription elongation. We further show that a mutant E. coli σ 70 derivative lacking σ region 1.1 (σ R1.1) is not released and is retained on RNAP core throughout transcription elongation. We also observe that B. subtilis σ A and the mutant E. coli σ 70 derivative lacking σ R1.1 interact much more stably with RNAP than full-length E. coli σ 70 . Our results indicate that the σ cycle is not a universal phenomenon in bacteria.
- 17 September 2025
- Published by National Academy of Sciences in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Vol. 122 (38)
Open AccessBacillus subtilis σ A and Escherichia coli σ 70 lacking σ region 1.1 are not released during transcription initiation and elongation
A “σ cycle” in which the initiation factor σ associates with RNA polymerase (RNAP) core enzyme to permit transcription initiation and dissociates from RNAP core enzyme to permit transcription elongation, has been proposed to occur and to be an essential step for σ-exchange, with all principal σ factors from all bacteria. These proposals were based on studies of the principal σ factor of Escherichia coli , σ 70 , which generally, albeit not obligatorily, is released from RNAP upon the transition from transcription initiation to elongation. Here, we show that, in contrast to E. coli σ 70 , the Bacillus subtilis principal σ factor, σ A , is not released and is retained on RNAP core throughout transcription elongation. We further show that a mutant E. coli σ 70 derivative lacking σ region 1.1 (σ R1.1) is not released and is retained on RNAP core throughout transcription elongation. We also observe that B. subtilis σ A and the mutant E. coli σ 70 derivative lacking σ R1.1 interact much more stably with RNAP than full-length E. coli σ 70 . Our results indicate that the σ cycle is not a universal phenomenon in bacteria.
- 25 September 2024
- Published by Springer Nature in Nature
- Vol. 635 (8037) , 229-236
Structural basis of archaeal FttA-dependent transcription termination
The ribonuclease FttA (also known as aCPSF and aCPSF1) mediates factor-dependent transcription termination in archaea1,2,3. Here we report the structure of a Thermococcus kodakarensis transcription pre-termination complex comprising FttA, Spt4, Spt5 and a transcription elongation complex (TEC). The structure shows that FttA interacts with the TEC in a manner that enables RNA to proceed directly from the TEC RNA-exit channel to the FttA catalytic centre and that enables endonucleolytic cleavage of RNA by FttA, followed by 5′→3′ exonucleolytic cleavage of RNA by FttA and concomitant 5′→3′ translocation of FttA on RNA, to apply mechanical force to the TEC and trigger termination. The structure further reveals that Spt5 bridges FttA and the TEC, explaining how Spt5 stimulates FttA-dependent termination. The results reveal functional analogy between bacterial and archaeal factor-dependent termination, functional homology between archaeal and eukaryotic factor-dependent termination, and fundamental mechanistic similarities in factor-dependent termination in bacteria, archaea, and eukaryotes.
- 25 September 2024
- Published by Springer Nature in Nature
- Vol. 635 (8037) , 229-236
Structural basis of archaeal FttA-dependent transcription termination
The ribonuclease FttA (also known as aCPSF and aCPSF1) mediates factor-dependent transcription termination in archaea1,2,3. Here we report the structure of a Thermococcus kodakarensis transcription pre-termination complex comprising FttA, Spt4, Spt5 and a transcription elongation complex (TEC). The structure shows that FttA interacts with the TEC in a manner that enables RNA to proceed directly from the TEC RNA-exit channel to the FttA catalytic centre and that enables endonucleolytic cleavage of RNA by FttA, followed by 5′→3′ exonucleolytic cleavage of RNA by FttA and concomitant 5′→3′ translocation of FttA on RNA, to apply mechanical force to the TEC and trigger termination. The structure further reveals that Spt5 bridges FttA and the TEC, explaining how Spt5 stimulates FttA-dependent termination. The results reveal functional analogy between bacterial and archaeal factor-dependent termination, functional homology between archaeal and eukaryotic factor-dependent termination, and fundamental mechanistic similarities in factor-dependent termination in bacteria, archaea, and eukaryotes.
- 8 August 2024
- Published by Springer Nature in Nature Structural & Molecular Biology
- Vol. 31 (12) , 1932-1941
Structural basis of RfaH-mediated transcription–translation coupling
The NusG paralog RfaH mediates bacterial transcription–translation coupling in genes that contain a DNA sequence element, termed an ops site, required for pausing RNA polymerase (RNAP) and for loading RfaH onto the paused RNAP. Here, we report cryo-electron microscopy structures of transcription–translation complexes (TTCs) containing Escherichia coli RfaH. The results show that RfaH bridges RNAP and the ribosome, with the RfaH N-terminal domain interacting with RNAP and the RfaH C-terminal domain interacting with the ribosome. The results show that the distribution of translational and orientational positions of RNAP relative to the ribosome in RfaH-coupled TTCs is more restricted than in NusG-coupled TTCs because of the more restricted flexibility of the RfaH interdomain linker. The results further suggest that the structural organization of RfaH-coupled TTCs in the ‘loading state’, in which RNAP and RfaH are located at the ops site during formation of the TTC, is the same as the structural organization of RfaH-coupled TTCs in the ‘loaded state’, in which RNAP and RfaH are located at positions downstream of the ops site during function of the TTC. The results define the structural organization of RfaH-containing TTCs and set the stage for analysis of functions of RfaH during translation initiation and transcription–translation coupling.
- 8 August 2024
- Published by Springer Nature in Nature Structural & Molecular Biology
- Vol. 31 (12) , 1932-1941
Structural basis of RfaH-mediated transcription–translation coupling
The NusG paralog RfaH mediates bacterial transcription–translation coupling in genes that contain a DNA sequence element, termed an ops site, required for pausing RNA polymerase (RNAP) and for loading RfaH onto the paused RNAP. Here, we report cryo-electron microscopy structures of transcription–translation complexes (TTCs) containing Escherichia coli RfaH. The results show that RfaH bridges RNAP and the ribosome, with the RfaH N-terminal domain interacting with RNAP and the RfaH C-terminal domain interacting with the ribosome. The results show that the distribution of translational and orientational positions of RNAP relative to the ribosome in RfaH-coupled TTCs is more restricted than in NusG-coupled TTCs because of the more restricted flexibility of the RfaH interdomain linker. The results further suggest that the structural organization of RfaH-coupled TTCs in the ‘loading state’, in which RNAP and RfaH are located at the ops site during formation of the TTC, is the same as the structural organization of RfaH-coupled TTCs in the ‘loaded state’, in which RNAP and RfaH are located at positions downstream of the ops site during function of the TTC. The results define the structural organization of RfaH-containing TTCs and set the stage for analysis of functions of RfaH during translation initiation and transcription–translation coupling.
- Open Access
Structural basis of long-range transcription-translation coupling
Structures recently have been reported of molecular assemblies that mediate transcription-translation coupling in Escherichia coli . In these molecular assemblies, termed “coupled transcription-translation complexes” or “TTC-B”, RNA polymerase (RNAP) directly interacts with the ribosome, the transcription elongation factor NusG or its paralog RfaH forms a bridge between RNAP and ribosome, and the transcription elongation factor NusA optionally forms a second bridge between RNAP and ribosome. Here, we report structures of coupled transcription-translation complexes having mRNA spacers between RNAP and ribosome longer than the maximum-length mRNA spacer compatible with formation of TTC-B. The results define a new class of coupled transcription-translation complex, termed “TTC-LC,” where “LC” denotes “long-range coupling.” TTC-LC differs from TTC-B by a ∼60° rotation and ∼70 Å translation of RNAP relative to ribosome, resulting in loss of direct interactions between RNAP and ribosome and creation of a ∼70 Å gap between RNAP and ribosome. TTC-LC accommodates long mRNA spacers by looping out mRNA from the gap between RNAP and ribosome. We present evidence that TTC-LC is an intermediate in assembling and disassembling TTC-B, mediating pre-TTC-B transcription-translation coupling before a ribosome catches up to RNAP, and mediating post-TTC-B transcription-translation coupling after a ribosome stops moving and RNAP continues moving. We show that TTC-B, but not TTC-LC, is severely defective in intrinsic, RNA-hairpin-dependent termination, and that both TTC-B and TTC-LC are severely defective in Rho-dependent termination.
Open AccessStructural basis of long-range transcription-translation coupling
Structures recently have been reported of molecular assemblies that mediate transcription-translation coupling in Escherichia coli . In these molecular assemblies, termed “coupled transcription-translation complexes” or “TTC-B”, RNA polymerase (RNAP) directly interacts with the ribosome, the transcription elongation factor NusG or its paralog RfaH forms a bridge between RNAP and ribosome, and the transcription elongation factor NusA optionally forms a second bridge between RNAP and ribosome. Here, we report structures of coupled transcription-translation complexes having mRNA spacers between RNAP and ribosome longer than the maximum-length mRNA spacer compatible with formation of TTC-B. The results define a new class of coupled transcription-translation complex, termed “TTC-LC,” where “LC” denotes “long-range coupling.” TTC-LC differs from TTC-B by a ∼60° rotation and ∼70 Å translation of RNAP relative to ribosome, resulting in loss of direct interactions between RNAP and ribosome and creation of a ∼70 Å gap between RNAP and ribosome. TTC-LC accommodates long mRNA spacers by looping out mRNA from the gap between RNAP and ribosome. We present evidence that TTC-LC is an intermediate in assembling and disassembling TTC-B, mediating pre-TTC-B transcription-translation coupling before a ribosome catches up to RNAP, and mediating post-TTC-B transcription-translation coupling after a ribosome stops moving and RNAP continues moving. We show that TTC-B, but not TTC-LC, is severely defective in intrinsic, RNA-hairpin-dependent termination, and that both TTC-B and TTC-LC are severely defective in Rho-dependent termination.
- Open Access
- 11 July 2024
- Published by National Academy of Sciences in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Vol. 121 (29)
Nanopore tweezers show fractional-nucleotide translocation in sequence-dependent pausing by RNA polymerase
RNA polymerases (RNAPs) carry out the first step in the central dogma of molecular biology by transcribing DNA into RNA. Despite their importance, much about how RNAPs work remains unclear, in part because the small (3.4 Angstrom) and fast (~40 ms/nt) steps during transcription were difficult to resolve. Here, we used high-resolution nanopore tweezers to observe the motion of single Escherichia coli RNAP molecules as it transcribes DNA ~1,000 times improved temporal resolution, resolving single-nucleotide and fractional-nucleotide steps of individual RNAPs at saturating nucleoside triphosphate concentrations. We analyzed RNAP during processive transcription elongation and sequence-dependent pausing at the yrbL elemental pause sequence. Each time RNAP encounters the yrbL elemental pause sequence, it rapidly interconverts between five translocational states, residing predominantly in a half-translocated state. The kinetics and force-dependence of this half-translocated state indicate it is a functional intermediate between pre- and post-translocated states. Using structural and kinetics data, we show that, in the half-translocated and post-translocated states, sequence-specific protein–DNA interaction occurs between RNAP and a guanine base at the downstream end of the transcription bubble (core recognition element). Kinetic data show that this interaction stabilizes the half-translocated and post-translocated states relative to the pre-translocated state. We develop a kinetic model for RNAP at the yrbL pause and discuss this in the context of key structural features.
- 11 July 2024
- Published by National Academy of Sciences in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Vol. 121 (29)
Open AccessNanopore tweezers show fractional-nucleotide translocation in sequence-dependent pausing by RNA polymerase
RNA polymerases (RNAPs) carry out the first step in the central dogma of molecular biology by transcribing DNA into RNA. Despite their importance, much about how RNAPs work remains unclear, in part because the small (3.4 Angstrom) and fast (~40 ms/nt) steps during transcription were difficult to resolve. Here, we used high-resolution nanopore tweezers to observe the motion of single Escherichia coli RNAP molecules as it transcribes DNA ~1,000 times improved temporal resolution, resolving single-nucleotide and fractional-nucleotide steps of individual RNAPs at saturating nucleoside triphosphate concentrations. We analyzed RNAP during processive transcription elongation and sequence-dependent pausing at the yrbL elemental pause sequence. Each time RNAP encounters the yrbL elemental pause sequence, it rapidly interconverts between five translocational states, residing predominantly in a half-translocated state. The kinetics and force-dependence of this half-translocated state indicate it is a functional intermediate between pre- and post-translocated states. Using structural and kinetics data, we show that, in the half-translocated and post-translocated states, sequence-specific protein–DNA interaction occurs between RNAP and a guanine base at the downstream end of the transcription bubble (core recognition element). Kinetic data show that this interaction stabilizes the half-translocated and post-translocated states relative to the pre-translocated state. We develop a kinetic model for RNAP at the yrbL pause and discuss this in the context of key structural features.
- 16 April 2024
- Published by American Society for Microbiology in Journal of Virology
- Vol. 98 (4) , e0023724
Implementing governmental oversight of enhanced potential pandemic pathogen research
We write in response to the commentary “Virology—the path forward” (1). The authors argue against the recommendations of the US National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity (NSABB) to strengthen the oversight of enhanced potential pandemic pathogen (ePPP) research (2). The authors assert that adopting the NSABB recommendations would have a sweeping negative impact on US research and harm US competitiveness, and the authors cite the development of vaccines against measles and cytomegalovirus as examples of research that would be harmed.
- 16 April 2024
- Published by American Society for Microbiology in Journal of Virology
- Vol. 98 (4) , e0023724
Implementing governmental oversight of enhanced potential pandemic pathogen research
We write in response to the commentary “Virology—the path forward” (1). The authors argue against the recommendations of the US National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity (NSABB) to strengthen the oversight of enhanced potential pandemic pathogen (ePPP) research (2). The authors assert that adopting the NSABB recommendations would have a sweeping negative impact on US research and harm US competitiveness, and the authors cite the development of vaccines against measles and cytomegalovirus as examples of research that would be harmed.