Jill Flo

Objectives: There is limited knowledge about students’ experiences with virtual simulation when using a video conferencing system. Therefore, the aim of this study was to explore how second-year undergraduate nursing students experienced learning through virtual simulations during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: The study had an exploratory design with both quantitative and qualitative approaches. In total, 69 nursing students participated in two sessions of virtual simulation during spring 2020, and 33 students answered online questionnaires at session 1. To further explore students’ experiences, one focus group interview and one individual interview were conducted using a video conferencing system after session 2. In addition, system information on use during both sessions was collected. Results: Changes in the students’ ratings of their experiences of virtual simulation with the Body Interact ™ system were statistically significant. The virtual simulation helped them to bridge gaps in both the teaching and learning processes. Four important aspects of learning were identified: 1) learning by self-training, 2) learning from the software ( Body Interact ™), 3) learning from peers, and 4) learning from faculty. Conclusions: We conclude that virtual simulation through a video conferencing system can be useful for student learning and feedback from both peers and faculty is important.

This study was a part of a municipal research and development programme in home healthcare (HHC). The Oulu Patient Classification instrument (OPCq), part of the RAFAELA Nursing Intensity and Staffing system, was used to measure nursing intensity (NI) for the first time in HHC in Norway. The aim was to describe nurses’ work experiences and perceptions of the usability of the OPCq instrument when classifying NI in HHC. Twenty-two members of staff participated in four focus-group interviews. Content analyses were used to analyze and interpret the data. Three themes emerged: 1) Classifying the modified OPCq levels correctly; 2) Technological problems hinder use of the instrument; 3) Classifying NI when time pressure dominates. The OPCq instrument is useful in classifying NI, although some minor adjustments might be needed for its use in HHC. The nurses considered the OPCq instrument useful in illuminating the actual work situation in HHC and the time pressure they experience.

Aim: To test the interrater reliability of the modified Oulu Patient Classification instrument, using a multiple parallel classification method based on oral case presentations in home health care in Norway.Design: Reliability study.Methods: Data were collected at two municipal home healthcare units during 2013–2014. The reliability of the modified OPCq instrument was tested using a new multiple parallel classification method. The data material consisted of 2 010 parallel classifications, analysed using consensus in per cent and Cohen's kappa. Cronbach's alpha was used to measure internal consistency.Results: For parallel classifications, consensus varied between 64.78–77.61%. Interrater reliability varied between 0.49–0.69 (Cohen's kappa), the internal consistency between 0.81–0.94 (Cronbach's alpha). Analysis of the raw scores showed 27.2% classifications had the same points, 39.1% differed one point, 17.9% differed two points and 16.5% differed ≥3 points.