Marcel Guardia
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Research Subjects
Marcel Guardia has a total of 48 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Teresa M. Seara
Departament de Matemàtiques & IMTECH Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya Diagonal 647 08028 Barcelona Spain
17 shared publications - Inmaculada Baldomá
Universitat Politecnica de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain
9 shared publications - Pau Martín
Departament de Matemàtiques Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya Diagonal 647 08028 Barcelona Spain
6 shared publications - Mar Giralt
IMCCE CNRS Observatoire de Paris Université PSL Sorbonne Université 77 Avenue Denfert-Rochereau 75014 Paris France
5 shared publications - Emanuele Haus
Dipartimento di Matematica e Fisica, Università Roma Tre, Rome, Italy
4 shared publications - Jacques Fejoz
Université Paris Dauphine PSL, CEREMADE, Place du Maréchal de Lattre de Tassigny, Paris, France
4 shared publications
Latest Publications
- Open Access
Second-species dynamics in the restricted planar circular three body problem: chaos, final motions and periodic orbits
Consider the Restricted Planar Circular Three Body Problem (RPC3BP), which models the motion of a massless particle (Asteroid) under the gravitational influence of two massive bodies (the primaries) moving on circular orbits. By considering the ratio between the masses of the primaries to be arbitrarily small, we construct orbits with close encounters with the smaller primary (Jupiter) that realize any combination of past and future final motions (in the sense of Chazy's), including oscillatory motions. We also obtain arbitrarily large ejection-collision orbits with Jupiter and ejection-collision orbits between the two primaries (Sun and Jupiter), as well as arbitrarily large periodic orbits that pass arbitrarily close to Jupiter. Our approach combines singular perturbation theory and Levi-Civita regularization near Jupiter, and McGehee regularization near infinity and near the Sun, together with a global analysis that leads to transverse intersections of invariant manifolds.
Open AccessSecond-species dynamics in the restricted planar circular three body problem: chaos, final motions and periodic orbits
Consider the Restricted Planar Circular Three Body Problem (RPC3BP), which models the motion of a massless particle (Asteroid) under the gravitational influence of two massive bodies (the primaries) moving on circular orbits. By considering the ratio between the masses of the primaries to be arbitrarily small, we construct orbits with close encounters with the smaller primary (Jupiter) that realize any combination of past and future final motions (in the sense of Chazy's), including oscillatory motions. We also obtain arbitrarily large ejection-collision orbits with Jupiter and ejection-collision orbits between the two primaries (Sun and Jupiter), as well as arbitrarily large periodic orbits that pass arbitrarily close to Jupiter. Our approach combines singular perturbation theory and Levi-Civita regularization near Jupiter, and McGehee regularization near infinity and near the Sun, together with a global analysis that leads to transverse intersections of invariant manifolds.
- Open Access
- 1 August 2025
- Published by Springer Nature in Communications in Mathematical Physics
- Vol. 406 (9) , 1-65
On a Countable Sequence of Homoclinic Orbits Arising Near a Saddle–Center Point
Exponential small splitting of separatrices in the singular perturbation theory leads generally to nonvanishing oscillations near a saddle–center point and to nonexistence of a true homoclinic orbit. It was conjectured long ago that the oscillations may vanish at a countable set of small parameter values if there exist a quadruplet of singularities in the complex analytic extension of the limiting homoclinic orbit. The present paper gives a rigorous proof of this conjecture for a particular fourth-order equation relevant to the traveling wave reduction of the modified Korteweg–de Vries equation with the fifth-order dispersion term.
- 1 August 2025
- Published by Springer Nature in Communications in Mathematical Physics
- Vol. 406 (9) , 1-65
Open AccessOn a Countable Sequence of Homoclinic Orbits Arising Near a Saddle–Center Point
Exponential small splitting of separatrices in the singular perturbation theory leads generally to nonvanishing oscillations near a saddle–center point and to nonexistence of a true homoclinic orbit. It was conjectured long ago that the oscillations may vanish at a countable set of small parameter values if there exist a quadruplet of singularities in the complex analytic extension of the limiting homoclinic orbit. The present paper gives a rigorous proof of this conjecture for a particular fourth-order equation relevant to the traveling wave reduction of the modified Korteweg–de Vries equation with the fifth-order dispersion term.
- Open Access
- 7 June 2025
- Published by MathDoc/Centre Mersenne in Publications mathématiques de l'IHÉS
- Vol. 141, 1-98
Why are inner planets not inclined?
Poincaré’s work more than one century ago, or Laskar’s numerical simulations from the 1990’s on, have irrevocably impaired the long-held belief that the Solar System should be stable. But mathematical mechanisms explaining this instability have remained mysterious. In 1968, Arnold conjectured the existence of “Arnold diffusion” in celestial mechanics. We prove Arnold’s conjecture in the planetary spatial 4-body problem as well as in the corresponding hierarchical problem (where the bodies are increasingly separated), and show that this diffusion leads, on a long time interval, to some large-scale instability. Along the diffusive orbits, the mutual inclination of the two inner planets is close to π / 2 , which hints at why even marginal stability in planetary systems may exist only when inner planets are not inclined. More precisely, consider the normalised angular momentum of the second planet, obtained by rescaling the angular momentum by the square root of its semimajor axis and by an adequate mass factor (its direction and norm give the plane of revolution and the eccentricity of the second planet). It is a vector of the unit 3-ball. We show that any finite sequence in this ball may be realised, up to an arbitrary precision, as a sequence of values of the normalised angular momentum in the 4-body problem. For example, the second planet may flip from prograde nearly horizontal revolutions to retrograde ones. As a consequence of the proof, the non-recurrent set of any finite-order secular normal form accumulates on circular motions – a weak form of a celebrated conjecture of Herman.
- 7 June 2025
- Published by MathDoc/Centre Mersenne in Publications mathématiques de l'IHÉS
- Vol. 141, 1-98
Open AccessWhy are inner planets not inclined?
Poincaré’s work more than one century ago, or Laskar’s numerical simulations from the 1990’s on, have irrevocably impaired the long-held belief that the Solar System should be stable. But mathematical mechanisms explaining this instability have remained mysterious. In 1968, Arnold conjectured the existence of “Arnold diffusion” in celestial mechanics. We prove Arnold’s conjecture in the planetary spatial 4-body problem as well as in the corresponding hierarchical problem (where the bodies are increasingly separated), and show that this diffusion leads, on a long time interval, to some large-scale instability. Along the diffusive orbits, the mutual inclination of the two inner planets is close to π / 2 , which hints at why even marginal stability in planetary systems may exist only when inner planets are not inclined. More precisely, consider the normalised angular momentum of the second planet, obtained by rescaling the angular momentum by the square root of its semimajor axis and by an adequate mass factor (its direction and norm give the plane of revolution and the eccentricity of the second planet). It is a vector of the unit 3-ball. We show that any finite sequence in this ball may be realised, up to an arbitrary precision, as a sequence of values of the normalised angular momentum in the 4-body problem. For example, the second planet may flip from prograde nearly horizontal revolutions to retrograde ones. As a consequence of the proof, the non-recurrent set of any finite-order secular normal form accumulates on circular motions – a weak form of a celebrated conjecture of Herman.
- 10 April 2025
- Published by Springer Nature in Communications in Mathematical Physics
- Vol. 406 (5) , 1-64
Oscillatory Motions, Parabolic Orbits and Collision Orbits in the Planar Circular Restricted Three-Body Problem
- 10 April 2025
- Published by Springer Nature in Communications in Mathematical Physics
- Vol. 406 (5) , 1-64
Oscillatory Motions, Parabolic Orbits and Collision Orbits in the Planar Circular Restricted Three-Body Problem
- 20 February 2025
- Published by Springer Nature in Inventiones Mathematicae
- Vol. 240 (2) , 661-777
On small breathers of nonlinear Klein-Gordon equations via exponentially small homoclinic splitting
- 20 February 2025
- Published by Springer Nature in Inventiones Mathematicae
- Vol. 240 (2) , 661-777
On small breathers of nonlinear Klein-Gordon equations via exponentially small homoclinic splitting
- 1 January 2025
- Published by American Institute of Mathematical Sciences (AIMS) in Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems
- Vol. 45 (1) , 56-88
Breakdown of homoclinic orbits to $ L_3 $: Nonvanishing of the Stokes constant
The Restricted Planar Circular 3-Body Problem models the motion of a body of negligible mass under the gravitational influence of two massive bodies, called the primaries, which perform circular orbits coplanar with that of the massless body. In rotating coordinates, it can be modelled by a two degrees of freedom Hamiltonian system, which has five critical points called the Lagrange points. Among them, the point $ L_3 $ is a saddle-center which is collinear with the primaries and beyond the largest of the two. The papers [ 3 , 4 ] provide an asymptotic formula for the distance between the one dimensional stable and unstable manifolds of $ L_3 $ in a transverse section for small values of the mass ratio $ 0 < \mu\ll 1 $. This distance is exponentially small with respect to $ \mu $ and its first order depends on what is usually called a Stokes constant. The non-vanishing of this constant implies that the distance between the invariant manifolds at the section is not zero. In this paper, we prove that the Stokes constant is non-zero. The proof is computer assisted.- 1 January 2025
- Published by American Institute of Mathematical Sciences (AIMS) in Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems
- Vol. 45 (1) , 56-88
Breakdown of homoclinic orbits to $ L_3 $: Nonvanishing of the Stokes constant
The Restricted Planar Circular 3-Body Problem models the motion of a body of negligible mass under the gravitational influence of two massive bodies, called the primaries, which perform circular orbits coplanar with that of the massless body. In rotating coordinates, it can be modelled by a two degrees of freedom Hamiltonian system, which has five critical points called the Lagrange points. Among them, the point $ L_3 $ is a saddle-center which is collinear with the primaries and beyond the largest of the two. The papers [ 3 , 4 ] provide an asymptotic formula for the distance between the one dimensional stable and unstable manifolds of $ L_3 $ in a transverse section for small values of the mass ratio $ 0 < \mu\ll 1 $. This distance is exponentially small with respect to $ \mu $ and its first order depends on what is usually called a Stokes constant. The non-vanishing of this constant implies that the distance between the invariant manifolds at the section is not zero. In this paper, we prove that the Stokes constant is non-zero. The proof is computer assisted.- Open Access
On a countable sequence of homoclinic orbits arising near a saddle-center point
Exponential small splitting of separatrices in the singular perturbation theory leads generally to nonvanishing oscillations near a saddle--center point and to nonexistence of a true homoclinic orbit. It was conjectured long ago that the oscillations may vanish at a countable set of small parameter values if there exist a quadruplet of singularities in the complex analytic extension of the limiting homoclinic orbit. The present paper gives a rigorous proof of this conjecture for a particular fourth-order equation relevant to the traveling wave reduction of the modified Korteweg--de Vries equation with the fifth-order dispersion term.
Open AccessOn a countable sequence of homoclinic orbits arising near a saddle-center point
Exponential small splitting of separatrices in the singular perturbation theory leads generally to nonvanishing oscillations near a saddle--center point and to nonexistence of a true homoclinic orbit. It was conjectured long ago that the oscillations may vanish at a countable set of small parameter values if there exist a quadruplet of singularities in the complex analytic extension of the limiting homoclinic orbit. The present paper gives a rigorous proof of this conjecture for a particular fourth-order equation relevant to the traveling wave reduction of the modified Korteweg--de Vries equation with the fifth-order dispersion term.
- 5 November 2024
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Nonlinear Science
- Vol. 35 (1) , 1-54
On the Arnold Diffusion Mechanism in Medium Earth Orbit
- 5 November 2024
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Nonlinear Science
- Vol. 35 (1) , 1-54
On the Arnold Diffusion Mechanism in Medium Earth Orbit
- Open Access
Oscillatory motions, parabolic orbits and collision orbits in the planar circular restricted three-body problem
In this paper we consider the planar circular restricted three body problem (PCRTBP), which models the motion of a massless body under the attraction of other two bodies, the primaries, which describe circular orbits around their common center of mass. In a suitable system of coordinates, this is a two degrees of freedom Hamiltonian system. The orbits of this system are either defined for all (future or past) time or eventually go to collision with one of the primaries. For orbits defined for all time, Chazy provided a classification of all possible asymptotic behaviors, usually called final motions. By considering a sufficiently small mass ratio between the primaries, we analyze the interplay between collision orbits and various final motions and construct several types of dynamics. In particular, we show that orbits corresponding to any combination of past and future final motions can be created to pass arbitrarily close to the massive primary. Additionally, we construct arbitrarily large ejection-collision orbits (orbits which experience collision in both past and future times) and periodic orbits that are arbitrarily large and get arbitrarily close to the massive primary. Furthermore, we also establish oscillatory motions in both position and velocity, meaning that as time tends to infinity, the superior limit of the position or velocity is infinity while the inferior limit remains a real number.
Open AccessOscillatory motions, parabolic orbits and collision orbits in the planar circular restricted three-body problem
In this paper we consider the planar circular restricted three body problem (PCRTBP), which models the motion of a massless body under the attraction of other two bodies, the primaries, which describe circular orbits around their common center of mass. In a suitable system of coordinates, this is a two degrees of freedom Hamiltonian system. The orbits of this system are either defined for all (future or past) time or eventually go to collision with one of the primaries. For orbits defined for all time, Chazy provided a classification of all possible asymptotic behaviors, usually called final motions. By considering a sufficiently small mass ratio between the primaries, we analyze the interplay between collision orbits and various final motions and construct several types of dynamics. In particular, we show that orbits corresponding to any combination of past and future final motions can be created to pass arbitrarily close to the massive primary. Additionally, we construct arbitrarily large ejection-collision orbits (orbits which experience collision in both past and future times) and periodic orbits that are arbitrarily large and get arbitrarily close to the massive primary. Furthermore, we also establish oscillatory motions in both position and velocity, meaning that as time tends to infinity, the superior limit of the position or velocity is infinity while the inferior limit remains a real number.
- Open Access
On the role of the fast oscillations in the secular dynamics of the lunar coplanar perturbation on Galileo satellites
Motivated by the practical interest in the third-body perturbation as a natural cleaning mechanism for high-altitude Earth orbits, we investigate the dynamics stemming from the secular Hamiltonian associated with the lunar perturbation, assuming that the Moon lies on the ecliptic plane. The secular Hamiltonian defined in that way is characterized by two timescales. We compare the location and stability of the fixed points associated with the secular Hamiltonian averaged with respect to the fast variable with the corresponding periodic orbits of the full system. Focusing on the orbit of the Galileo satellites, it turns out that the two dynamics cannot be confused, as the relative difference depends on the ratio between the semi-major axis of Galileo and the one of the Moon, that is not negligible. The result is relevant to construct rigorously the Arnold diffusion mechanism that can drive a natural growth in eccentricity that allows a satellite initially on a circular orbit in Medium Earth Orbit to reenter into the Earth's atmosphere.
Open AccessOn the role of the fast oscillations in the secular dynamics of the lunar coplanar perturbation on Galileo satellites
Motivated by the practical interest in the third-body perturbation as a natural cleaning mechanism for high-altitude Earth orbits, we investigate the dynamics stemming from the secular Hamiltonian associated with the lunar perturbation, assuming that the Moon lies on the ecliptic plane. The secular Hamiltonian defined in that way is characterized by two timescales. We compare the location and stability of the fixed points associated with the secular Hamiltonian averaged with respect to the fast variable with the corresponding periodic orbits of the full system. Focusing on the orbit of the Galileo satellites, it turns out that the two dynamics cannot be confused, as the relative difference depends on the ratio between the semi-major axis of Galileo and the one of the Moon, that is not negligible. The result is relevant to construct rigorously the Arnold diffusion mechanism that can drive a natural growth in eccentricity that allows a satellite initially on a circular orbit in Medium Earth Orbit to reenter into the Earth's atmosphere.