LCLinda Cowan

Linda Cowan

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article

Previous Organizations / Institutes

The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years


Linda Cowan has a total of 65 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Leaving Slings and Other Transfer Devices Under Patients

    by Sarah E. Bradley, Margeaux Chavez, Blake Barrett, Jason Lind, Linda Cowan, Vianna Broderick, Tatjana Bulat

    PURPOSE: The purpose of this quality improvement project was to develop guidance for safe patient handling and mobility efforts to prevent pressure injuries (PIs) within the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) when slings and other transfer devices are left under patients. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: Health care staff (n = 112) in patient safety and nursing at 77 unique VHA facilities responded to surveys between November and December 2019. Interviews (n = 24) were conducted using purposive sampling with VHA staff at facilities with highest and lowest PI rates (n = 9) between January and March 2021. APPROACH: Feedback on practices and perceptions related to leaving slings and other transfer devices were evaluated using online cross-sectional surveys and interviews with VHA staff. Secondary data for VHA inpatient rates of PIs were used to examine associations with staff-reported sling and other transfer device practices. OUTCOMES: Leaving slings under patients was associated with higher proportion of patients developing PIs in intensive care units (ICUs, P = .042) and medical-surgical care units (P = .025). In addition, use of sliding boards for seated transfer among short-stay residents in Community Living Centers was associated with higher PI occurrences (P = .017). Qualitative interviews found perceptions and guidance about PI risk related to slings and other transfer devices varied among staff who consider many factors when determining risk. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: There are perceived benefits and risks of leaving slings and other transfer devices under patients and limited knowledge of PI occurrences associated with this practice. Clinical decision support can help staff determine safe sling use. More work is needed to test the safety of common sling and transfer device practices and define best practices for communicating PI risk related to sling and transfer device use across the care continuum.


  • Open Access

    Assessing Nurse Competency in the Veterans Health Administration Registered Nurse Transition-to-Practice Residency Program

    by Blake Msph Barrett, Peter PhD Toyinbo, Mary Pat PhD Couig, Margeaux Ma Chavez, Deborah Rugs, Christine Melillo, Linda PhD Cowan, Kim DNP DeMasi, Sheila Cox PhD Sullivan, Gail PhD Powell-Cope

    Background: New graduate registered nurse (RN) competencies are complex and difficult to measure. Psychometrically sound tools are needed to evaluate competencies for nurses participating in nurse residencies. Purpose: Project aims were to develop an item pool for a tool to measure new graduate RN competencies for the Veterans Health Administration RN Transition-to-Practice Residency Program; validate item pool content; and use consensus methods to improve item pool content validity. Methods: A sequential, mixed-methods design was used. Item pool creation, content validation, and revisions included a collaborative process with the evaluation team, operational stakeholders, and subject matter experts (SMEs). Results: Inclusion of SMEs in item development enhanced item pool content validity to measure nurse competency. Stakeholder feedback ensured programmatic logistical and evaluation concerns were met. Conclusions: Engaging SMEs in conceptualization, item development, and aligning existing standards enhanced item pool content validity to measure nurse competencies for new graduate RNs.


  • Retention in nursing education and scholarship programs: Survival analysis of the Veterans Health Administration National Nursing Education Initiative Data

    by Peter Toyinbo, Deborah Rugs, Nicole Nedd, Xinping Wang, Kimberly S. Hall, Martin Hyacinthe, Linda Cowan

    Aims: To investigate factors affecting non‐completion by registered nurses (RNs) participating in degree programs supported by the scholarship program of the National Nursing Education Initiative of the United States Veterans Health Administration. Secondarily, to assess overall retention in the scholarship program over time. Design: Retrospective longitudinal design using administrative data. Methods: Defining retention time as the time elapsed from enrollment date to non‐completion, we performed survival (retention) analysis (i.e.,Kaplan–Meier survival functions, log‐rank tests and Cox regressions) to retrospectively analyzea national sample of RNs ( N = 15,908) enrolled in the scholarship program between the United States federal fiscal years 2000 and 2020. Results: Nurses' mean age was 44 years (range: 19–71), and 86% were females. Six‐ and 12‐month cumulative educational program retention rates were 92% and 84% respectively. The newest group of enrollees (2016–2020), younger nurses (<50 years), and nurses in traditional degree programtype were more likely to complete their academic programs than the earlier groups, older nurses and nurses in non‐traditional type, respectively. Male nurses who aspired to advanced occupational levels upon completion were more likely to complete their academic programs compared to those who expected no change from their current level of practice. Conclusion: Multiple factors affected non‐completion of academic degree programs by RNs enrolled in the scholarship program. More work is needed to examine these plus additional plausible factors and their correlates extensively. Impact: Our findings highlighted areas for quality improvement in employee scholarship programs for RNs. The findings are expected to inform tailoring of proactive helpful intervention towards individual needs and prioritization of limited resources to maximize graduation rate from academic programs for scholarship recipients. The study will have impact on nursing workforce policy makers interested in implementing employee scholarship programs, and on their scholarship recipients.


  • Evaluation of a new assistive technology: the StandBar

    by Blake Barrett, Sam L. Phillips, Tatjana Bulat, Jason D. Lind, Lisa Ballistrea, Anita Ramrattan, Yvonne Friedman, Linda Cowan

    Evaluate the potential of a wheelchair assistive technology (StandBar) to promote power wheelchair users’ ability to safely stand independently from their power wheelchair and determine the impact ...


  • Open Access

    Pressure Injury Related to Friction and Shearing Forces in Older Adults

    by Vianna V. Broderick, Linda J. Cowan

    The scientific literature describes many physiologic changes to the human body with age.


  • A preliminary evaluation of full practice authority of advance practice registered nurses in the Veterans Health Administration

    by Deborah Rugs, Peter Toyinbo, Blake Barrett, Christine Melillo, Margeaux Chavez, Linda Cowan, Penny Kaye Jensen, Christine Engstrom, Catherine Battaglia, Suzanne Thorne-Odem, et al.


  • Pressure Injury Prevention Considerations for Older Adults

    by Linda Cowan, Vianna Broderick, Jenny G. Alderden


  • Open Access

    Understanding the impact of incontinence on Veterans’ self-management strategies, quality of life and treatment experiences

    by Linda Cowan, Sarah Bradley, Andrew R. Devendorf, Leilia Barks, Tatiana Orozco, Angelina Klanchar, Jennifer Hale-Gallardo

    Background: Urinary and fecal incontinence contribute to significant quality of life impairments for patients and caregivers. Preliminary research suggests that incontinence rates may be higher among Veterans. However, few studies have examined incontinence experiences among Veterans and their caregivers. Objectives: We aimed to demonstrate the feasibility of conducting a one-year, telephone survey with Veterans and their caregivers to help inform larger studies. By including both Veteran and caregiver perspectives, we explored how incontinence impacts Veterans’ self-management strategies, quality of life, and treatment experiences. Design: We used a mixed methods design, employing quantitative (i.e., cross-sectional survey) and qualitative approaches (i.e., semi-structured interviews). Participants: Our sample included 64 Veterans with urinary incontinence, fecal incontinence, or mixed incontinence, and 36 caregivers. A subset of 18 Veterans and 8 caregivers completed semi-structured interviews. Methods: Data were collected via telephone surveys over the course of 1-year from a small research team at the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). Participants completed measures about the Veteran’s incontinence severity, quality of life, and VHA treatment experiences. Interviews asked participants about their perceptions and satisfaction in receiving treatment for the Veterans’ incontinence. Qualitative themes were extracted using a Rapid Assessment Process model. Results: Veterans’ self-reported physical quality of life correlated negatively and significantly with both urinary and fecal incontinence severity, as well as negatively and significantly with urinary continence bother (rs range: −.36 to −.47, ps < .01). Veterans’ mental quality of life correlated negatively and significantly with urinary incontinence bother (r = −.43, p < .001). About 67% Veterans experienced incontinence symptoms for 5-years or more, yet 44% waited at least 1-year to discuss incontinence with a VHA provider. Most Veterans (92%) reported speaking with a VHA provider about incontinence, while only 42% reported speaking with a non-VHA provider. Qualitative findings revealed that, upon speaking to a provider, Veterans felt comfortable but also desired more incontinence education from their providers, including obtaining more appropriate and tailored treatment options. While most Veterans followed their provider’s treatment recommendations, some felt unsatisfied with treatments that they perceived as embarrassing. Conclusions: Recruiting a substantial sample of Veterans with incontinence, and their caregivers, is feasible using our recruitment methods, which can inform larger studies. Our study revealed that incontinence symptoms interfere significantly with the quality of life of Veterans and their caregivers. Intervening at the healthcare level by educating providers and systematizing inquiry into incontinence for higher risk populations would be fruitful to explore. Contribution of the Paper: What is already known about this topic?: Urinary incontinence is more prevalent than fecal incontinence, and both are associated with significant impairments in physical, mental, and social functioning. Urinary and fecal incontinence become more prevalent with older age and additional chronic health conditions. There is a lack of incontinence diagnoses documented in Veteran’s medical records, even when incontinence is present. Few studies have reported on caregiver burden related to incontinence care. What this paper adds: This study is the first to report on the potential delay between Veteran’s experiencing symptoms of incontinence and informing their healthcare provider or caregiver about those symptoms (sometimes 5-years or more). Insights on Veteran and caregiver satisfaction with incontinence care can guide healthcare interventions to improve incontinence care. Both Veteran quality of life and caregiver burden correlated significantly and negatively with satisfaction with incontinence treatments tried and number of treatments tried. Only 21% of Veterans were satisfied with the treatment plan they were given, suggesting a potential knowledge gap or opportunity for improvement in healthcare provider approaches to incontinence management.

  • Pressure ulcer summit 2018: An interdisciplinary approach to improve our understanding of the risk of pressure‐induced tissue damage

    by Lisa J. Gould, Gregory Bohn, Ruth Bryant, Tim Paine, Kara Couch, Linda Cowan, Frances McFarland, Richard Simman

    Pressure ulcers (PrUs) affect approximately 2.5 million patients and account for 60,000 deaths annually. They are associated with an additional annual cost of $43,000 per related hospital stay and a total cost to the US health care system as high as $25 billion. Despite the implementation of national and international PrU prevention guidelines and toolkits, rates of facility‐acquired PrU s and PrUs in people with spinal cord injury are still high. A new paradigm is needed that distinguishes between prevention and treatment research methods and includes not only the causative factors of pressure and tissue deformation but also patient‐specific anatomical differences and the concomitant biological cellular processes, including reperfusion injury, toxic metabolites, ischemia, cell distortion, impaired lymphatic drainage, and impaired interstitial fluid flow that compound existing tissue damage. The purpose of this article is to summarize the highlights from the first annual Pressure Ulcer Summit held February 9–10, 2018 in Atlanta, Georgia (sponsored by the Association for the Advancement of Wound Care in partnership with multiple professional organizations). This international, interdisciplinary summit brought together key stakeholders in wound care and PrU prevention and management to highlight advances in pathophysiology of pressure‐induced tissue damage; explore challenges in current terminologies, documentation, and data collection; describe innovations in clinical care; and identify research opportunities to advance the science of PrU prevention and management.


  • Research productivity following nursing research initiative grants

    by Shannon Munro, Cristina C. Hendrix, Linda J. Cowan, Catherine Battaglia, Virginia D. Wilder, Jill E. Bormann, Constance R. Uphold, Sheila Cox Sullivan