MBMahmoud Boussena

Mahmoud Boussena

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Mahmoud Boussena has a total of 685 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    Conspiratorial echoes of disease: The relationship between pathogen prevalence and conspiracy beliefs

    by Maciej Siemiątkowski, Maciej Górski, Michał Bilewicz, Theofilos Gkinopoulos, Brian W. Haas, Marta Roczniewska, Mohsen Joshanloo, Paul Shing-Fong Chan, Ari Nowacki, Efisio Manunta, et al.

    Conspiracy beliefs vary substantially across countries and regions, yet the ecological factors underlying this variation remain largely unexplored. Drawing on behavioral immune system theory, which suggests that pathogen threat can heighten vigilance toward potential dangers, we examined whether pathogen prevalence predicts conspiracy beliefs. Study 1 analyzed four cross-national datasets (20-32 countries) and found that conspiracy beliefs were higher in countries with greater historical pathogen prevalence. Study 2 tested this relationship in a preregistered study using a larger sample (N = 15,503 from 55 countries) and found that historical pathogen prevalence predicted higher levels of conspiracy beliefs. Study 3 extended these findings to the US state level using data from 123,781 participants across 50 states. Finally, Study 4 (N = 493) experimentally manipulated perceived pathogen prevalence and found causal effects on generic and vaccine-related conspiracy beliefs. These findings extend behavioral immune system research by relating pathogen-rich ecologies to contemporary conspiracy thinking.

  • Open Access

    Is Societal Progress Muting the Expressivity of Negative Emotions? Evidence from Two Cross-national Studies

    by June Chun Yeung, Vivian Miu-Chi Lun, Liman Man Wai Li, Michael Harris Bond, Mohsen Joshanloo, Maciej R. Górski, Miłosz Kalinowski, Victoria Wai Lan Yeung, Eric Kenson Yau, M. Azhar Hussain, et al.

    Contemporary theories of emotion emphasize the dual role of emotions as both personal experiences and communicative signals during social interactions. However, the impact of macro-level societal structures on emotional expression remains underexplored. This study investigates the expression-experience discrepancy for self-reported emotions across nations, focusing on how societal development relates to this discrepancy, which captures expressivity. Using meta-analysis and multilevel modeling with a multinational sample ( N sample = 12,549, k nation = 48; Study 1), we assessed the directions and variabilities in the frequency of expression of both positive and negative emotions, relative to the frequency of experiencing them. Negative emotions were more likely to be under-expressed. Further analyses revealed that societal trust, system quality and fairness, and the human development index significantly predicted the size of these discrepancies. Surprisingly, these effects were not associated with traditional cultural dimensions such as individualism versus collectivism, providing new insights into the social functionality of emotions from a macro perspective. These findings were replicated in an extended multinational sample ( N sample = 19,690, k nation = 65; Study 2). Our findings highlight the importance of considering structural and societal factors in emotion research and provide a foundation for future explorations into the relations between cultural contexts and the expression of emotions.

  • Open Access

    Are Positive Views of Authority a Privilege? Socioeconomic Status and Perceptions of Powerholders Across 80 Cultures

    by Arkadiusz Wasiel, Maciej Górski, Victoria Yeung, Ángel Sánchez Rodríguez, Mohsen Joshanloo, Eric Raymond Igou, Michael Harris Bond, Brian W. Haas, Heyla Sleim, Mladen Adamovic, et al.

    Public evaluation of those in power is fundamental to societal stability. However, how people judge powerholders depends on their positions within the socioeconomic hierarchy. Drawing on two large-scale cross-cultural studies encompassing 160 samples from 80 cultures, we examined whether socioeconomic status (SES) shapes how people appraise the motive of institutional powerholders. Though scepticism toward powerholders was widespread across the socioeconomic spectrum, higher-SES individuals consistently attributed lesser self-orientation and greater other-orientation to powerholders. In less corrupt societies, perceptions of powerholders were more favourable, and SES-based differences were more pronounced, indicating that the quality of national governance matters as well. In contrast, in highly corrupt national contexts, class-based distinctions largely disappeared. These findings suggest that viewing authorities as serving the common good may be both a privilege of one’s socioeconomic position and a privilege of living in a well-governed society. The results carry important implications for institutional legitimacy, social mobility, and the possible psychological foundations of populist movements.

  • Mind the Gap: Perceived Economic Inequality and the Well-Being Gap around the Globe

    by Ángel Sánchez-Rodríguez, Maciej R. Górski, Mohsen Joshanloo, Kuba Krys, Morten Tønnessen, Liman Man Wai Li, Plamen Akaliyski, Brian W. Haas, M. Azhar Hussain, Farida Guemaz, et al.

    The link between economic inequality and individual well-being has been gaining increasing research attention. This study examines this relationship using data from 71 countries with diverse national incomes, addressing three key research gaps: (1) incorporating measures of both perceived and objective economic inequality, (2) extending analysis to multiple components of well-being beyond happiness, including meaning in life, harmony, and spirituality, and (3) assessing levels of both current and ideal well-being. Findings reveal that perceived economic inequality predicts personal well-being more strongly than objective inequality. In addition, perceived inequality is associated with a wider gap between current and ideal levels of happiness, meaning, harmony, and spirituality, although national income moderates the effects of meaning, harmony, and spirituality. We discuss the implications of these results, highlighting the need for more culturally sensitive studies on perceived economic inequality and well-being.


  • Cultural religiosity moderates the relationship between being in love and subjective well-being

    by Mateusz Olechowski, Maciej R. Górski, Mohsen Joshanloo, M. Azhar Hussain, Arkadiusz Wasiel, Victoria Wai Lan Yeung, Michael Harris Bond, Brian W. Haas, Farida Guemaz, Mahmoud Boussena, et al.

  • Open Access

    Cross-cultural data on romantic love and mate preferences from 117,293 participants across 175 countries

    by Marta Kowal, Piotr Sorokowski, Biljana Gjoneska, Katarzyna Pisanski, Gerit Pfuhl, Leonardo Aguilar, Steve M. J. Janssen, Benjamin Gelbart, Patrícia Arriaga, Jan Antfolk, et al.

    Psychological studies on close relationships have often overlooked cultural diversity, dynamic processes, and potentially universal principles that shape intimate partnerships. To address the limited generalizability of previous research and advance our understanding of romantic love experiences, mate preferences, and physical attractiveness, we conducted a large-scale cross-cultural survey study on these topics. A total of 404 researchers collected data in 45 languages from April to August 2021, involving 117,293 participants from 175 countries. Aside from standard demographic questions, the survey included valuable information on variables relevant to romantic relationships: intimate, passionate, and committed love within romantic relationships, physical-attractiveness enhancing behaviors, gender equality endorsement, collectivistic attitudes, personal history of pathogenic diseases, relationship quality, jealousy, personal involvement in sexual and/or emotional infidelity, relational mobility, mate preferences, and acceptance of sugar relationships. The resulting dataset provides a rich resource for investigating patterns within, and associations across, a broad range of variables relevant to romantic relationships, with extensive opportunities to analyze individual experiences worldwide.


  • Open Access

    Love, culture, and well-being: How values moderate the link between relationship status and well-being across 57 countries

    by Magdalena Śmieja, Alicja Walczak, Jakub Cacek, Maciej R. Górski, Michael Harris Bond, Biljana Gjoneska, M. Azhar Hussain, Mohsen Joshanloo, Ewa Szumowska, Julien Teyssier, et al.


  • Open Access

    Is Societal Progress Muting the Expression of Negative Emotions? Evidence from Two Multinational Studies

    by June Chun Yeung, Vivian Miu Chi Lun, Liman Man Wai Li, Michael Harris Bond, Mohsen Joshanloo, Maciej Górski, Miłosz Kalinowski, Victoria Yeung, Eric Kenson Yau, Brian W. Haas, et al.

    Contemporary theories of emotion emphasize the dual role of emotions as both personal experiences and communicative signals during social interactions. However, the impact of macro-level societal structures on emotional expression remains underexplored. This study investigates the experience-expression discrepancy for self-reported emotions across nations, focusing on how societal development influences this discrepancy, which captures expressivity. Using meta-analysis and multilevel modelling with a multinational sample N_sample = 12,549, k_nation = 48, Study 1), we assessed the directions and variabilities in the frequency of expression of both positive and negative emotions, relative to the frequency of experiencing them. Negative emotions were more likely to be under-expressed. Further analyses revealed that societal trust, system quality and fairness, and the human development index significantly predicted the size of these discrepancies. Surprisingly, these effects were not associated with traditional cultural dimensions such as individualism versus collectivism, providing new insights into the social functionality of emotions from a macro perspective. These findings were replicated in an extended multinational sample (N_sample = 19,690, k_nation = 65, Study 2). Our findings highlight the importance of considering structural and societal factors in emotion research and provide a foundation for future explorations into the relations between cultural contexts and the expression of emotions.

  • Examining the connection between position‐based power and social status across 70 cultures

    by Arkadiusz Wasiel, Maciej R. Górski, Michael Harris Bond, Victoria Wai Lan Yeung, Plamen Akaliyski, Grace Akello, Joonha Park, Mohsen Joshanloo, Boris Sokolov, M. Azhar Hussain, et al.

    Even in the most egalitarian societies, hierarchies of power and status shape social life. However, power and received status are not synonymous—individuals in positions of power may or may not be accorded the respect corresponding to their role. Using a cooperatively collected dataset from 18,096 participants across 70 cultures, we investigate, through a survey‐based correlational design, when perceived position‐based power (operationalized as influence and control) of various powerholders is associated with their elevated social status (operationalized as perceived respect and instrumental social value). We document that the positive link between power and status characterizes most cultural regions, except for WEIRD (Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, Democratic) and Post‐Soviet regions. The strength of this association depends on individual and cultural factors. First, the perceived other‐orientation of powerholders amplifies the positive link between perceived power and status. The perceived self‐orientation of powerholders weakens this relationship. Second, among cultures characterized by low Self‐Expression versus Harmony (e.g., South Korea, Taiwan), high Embeddedness (e.g., Senegal), and high Cultural Tightness (e.g., Malaysia), the association between power and status tends to be particularly strong. The results underline the importance of both individual perceptions and societal values in how position‐based power relates to social status.


  • Conservatism Negatively Predicts Creativity: A Study Across 28 Countries

    by Agata Groyecka-Bernard, Piotr Sorokowski, Maciej Karwowski, S. Craig Roberts, Toivo Aavik, Grace Akello, Charlotte Alm, Naumana Amjad, Kelly Asao, Chiemezie S. Atama, et al.

    Previous studies have found a negative relationship between creativity and conservatism. However, as these studies were mostly conducted on samples of homogeneous nationality, the generalizability of the effect across different cultures is unknown. We addressed this gap by conducting a study in 28 countries. Based on the notion that attitudes can be shaped by both environmental and ecological factors, we hypothesized that parasite stress can also affect creativity and thus, its potential effects should be controlled for. The results of multilevel analyses showed that, as expected, conservatism was a significant predictor of lower creativity, adjusting for economic status, age, sex, education level, subjective susceptibility to disease, and country-level parasite stress. In addition, most of the variability in creativity was due to individual rather than country-level variance. Our study provides evidence for a weak but significant negative link between conservatism and creativity at the individual level (β = −0.08, p < .001) and no such effect when country-level conservatism was considered. We present our hypotheses considering previous findings on the behavioral immune system in humans.