Julien Dorier
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Julien Dorier has a total of 103 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Andrzej Stasiak
Center for Integrative Genomics, University of Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
22 shared publications - Fabrizio Benedetti
Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, Lausanne Branch, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
9 shared publications - Dušan Račko
Polymer Institute, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dúbravská cesta 9, 845 41 Bratislava, Slovakia
7 shared publications - Frédéric Mila
École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL)
6 shared publications - Kai Phillip Schmidt
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU)
6 shared publications Andrzej Stasiak
5 shared publications
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 16 April 2025
- Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory in Genes & Development
A boundary-defining protein facilitates megabase-scale regulatory chromosomal loop formation inDrosophilaneurons
Regulatory elements, such as enhancers and silencers, control transcription by establishing physical proximity to target gene promoters. Neurons in flies and mammals exhibit long-range three-dimensional genome contacts, proposed to connect genes with distal regulatory elements. However, the relevance of these contacts for neuronal gene transcription and the mechanisms underlying their specificity necessitate further investigation. Here, we precisely disrupt several long-range contacts in fly neurons, demonstrating their importance for megabase-range gene regulation and uncovering a hierarchical process in their formation. We further reveal an essential role for the chromosomal boundary-forming protein Cp190 in anchoring many long-range contacts, highlighting a mechanistic interplay between boundary and loop formation. Finally, we develop an unbiased proteomics-based method to systematically identify factors required for specific long-range contacts. Our findings underscore the essential role of architectural proteins such as Cp190 in cell type-specific genome organization in enabling specialized neuronal transcriptional programs.
- 16 April 2025
- Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory in Genes & Development
Open AccessA boundary-defining protein facilitates megabase-scale regulatory chromosomal loop formation inDrosophilaneurons
Regulatory elements, such as enhancers and silencers, control transcription by establishing physical proximity to target gene promoters. Neurons in flies and mammals exhibit long-range three-dimensional genome contacts, proposed to connect genes with distal regulatory elements. However, the relevance of these contacts for neuronal gene transcription and the mechanisms underlying their specificity necessitate further investigation. Here, we precisely disrupt several long-range contacts in fly neurons, demonstrating their importance for megabase-range gene regulation and uncovering a hierarchical process in their formation. We further reveal an essential role for the chromosomal boundary-forming protein Cp190 in anchoring many long-range contacts, highlighting a mechanistic interplay between boundary and loop formation. Finally, we develop an unbiased proteomics-based method to systematically identify factors required for specific long-range contacts. Our findings underscore the essential role of architectural proteins such as Cp190 in cell type-specific genome organization in enabling specialized neuronal transcriptional programs.
- Open Access
- 13 May 2022
- Published by American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in Science Advances
- Vol. 8 (19) , eabl8834
Essential role of Cp190 in physical and regulatory boundary formation
Boundaries in animal genomes delimit contact domains with enhanced internal contact frequencies and have debated functions in limiting regulatory cross-talk between domains and guiding enhancers to target promoters. Most mammalian boundaries form by stalling of chromosomal loop-extruding cohesin by CTCF, but most Drosophila boundaries form CTCF independently. However, how CTCF-independent boundaries form and function remains largely unexplored. Here, we assess genome folding and developmental gene expression in fly embryos lacking the ubiquitous boundary-associated factor Cp190. We find that sequence-specific DNA binding proteins such as CTCF and Su(Hw) directly interact with and recruit Cp190 to form most promoter-distal boundaries. Cp190 is essential for early development and prevents regulatory cross-talk between specific gene loci that pattern the embryo. Cp190 was, in contrast, dispensable for long-range enhancer-promoter communication at tested loci. Cp190 is thus currently the major player in fly boundary formation and function, revealing that diverse mechanisms evolved to partition genomes into independent regulatory domains.
- 13 May 2022
- Published by American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in Science Advances
- Vol. 8 (19) , eabl8834
Open AccessEssential role of Cp190 in physical and regulatory boundary formation
Boundaries in animal genomes delimit contact domains with enhanced internal contact frequencies and have debated functions in limiting regulatory cross-talk between domains and guiding enhancers to target promoters. Most mammalian boundaries form by stalling of chromosomal loop-extruding cohesin by CTCF, but most Drosophila boundaries form CTCF independently. However, how CTCF-independent boundaries form and function remains largely unexplored. Here, we assess genome folding and developmental gene expression in fly embryos lacking the ubiquitous boundary-associated factor Cp190. We find that sequence-specific DNA binding proteins such as CTCF and Su(Hw) directly interact with and recruit Cp190 to form most promoter-distal boundaries. Cp190 is essential for early development and prevents regulatory cross-talk between specific gene loci that pattern the embryo. Cp190 was, in contrast, dispensable for long-range enhancer-promoter communication at tested loci. Cp190 is thus currently the major player in fly boundary formation and function, revealing that diverse mechanisms evolved to partition genomes into independent regulatory domains.
- Open Access
- 12 February 2021
- Published by Springer Nature in Nature Communications
- Vol. 12 (1) , 1-16
CTCF loss has limited effects on global genome architecture in Drosophila despite critical regulatory functions
Vertebrate genomes are partitioned into contact domains defined by enhanced internal contact frequency and formed by two principal mechanisms: compartmentalization of transcriptionally active and inactive domains, and stalling of chromosomal loop-extruding cohesin by CTCF bound at domain boundaries. While Drosophila has widespread contact domains and CTCF, it is currently unclear whether CTCF-dependent domains exist in flies. We genetically ablate CTCF in Drosophila and examine impacts on genome folding and transcriptional regulation in the central nervous system. We find that CTCF is required to form a small fraction of all domain boundaries, while critically controlling expression patterns of certain genes and supporting nervous system function. We also find that CTCF recruits the pervasive boundary-associated factor Cp190 to CTCF-occupied boundaries and co-regulates a subset of genes near boundaries together with Cp190. These results highlight a profound difference in CTCF-requirement for genome folding in flies and vertebrates, in which a large fraction of boundaries are CTCF-dependent and suggest that CTCF has played mutable roles in genome architecture and direct gene expression control during metazoan evolution.
- 12 February 2021
- Published by Springer Nature in Nature Communications
- Vol. 12 (1) , 1-16
Open AccessCTCF loss has limited effects on global genome architecture in Drosophila despite critical regulatory functions
Vertebrate genomes are partitioned into contact domains defined by enhanced internal contact frequency and formed by two principal mechanisms: compartmentalization of transcriptionally active and inactive domains, and stalling of chromosomal loop-extruding cohesin by CTCF bound at domain boundaries. While Drosophila has widespread contact domains and CTCF, it is currently unclear whether CTCF-dependent domains exist in flies. We genetically ablate CTCF in Drosophila and examine impacts on genome folding and transcriptional regulation in the central nervous system. We find that CTCF is required to form a small fraction of all domain boundaries, while critically controlling expression patterns of certain genes and supporting nervous system function. We also find that CTCF recruits the pervasive boundary-associated factor Cp190 to CTCF-occupied boundaries and co-regulates a subset of genes near boundaries together with Cp190. These results highlight a profound difference in CTCF-requirement for genome folding in flies and vertebrates, in which a large fraction of boundaries are CTCF-dependent and suggest that CTCF has played mutable roles in genome architecture and direct gene expression control during metazoan evolution.
- 1 January 2020
- Published by American Mathematical Society (AMS)
- Vol. 746, 185-199
Knotoids and protein structure
Many proteins form open knots. To study and classify proteins in terms of their topology, the protein chain needs to be artificially closed in order to analyze it as a knot. The theory of knotoids provides a workaround to this approach that gives a more refined overview of the topology of knotted proteins. In this review we explain how to analyze open protein chains using the theory of knotoids.
- 1 January 2020
- Published by American Mathematical Society (AMS)
- Vol. 746, 185-199
Knotoids and protein structure
Many proteins form open knots. To study and classify proteins in terms of their topology, the protein chain needs to be artificially closed in order to analyze it as a knot. The theory of knotoids provides a workaround to this approach that gives a more refined overview of the topology of knotted proteins. In this review we explain how to analyze open protein chains using the theory of knotoids.
- Open Access
- 5 July 2019
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Nucleic Acids Research
- Vol. 47 (14) , 7182-7198
Closing the DNA replication cycle: from simple circular molecules to supercoiled and knotted DNA catenanes
Due to helical structure of DNA, massive amounts of positive supercoils are constantly introduced ahead of each replication fork. Positive supercoiling inhibits progression of replication forks but various mechanisms evolved that permit very efficient relaxation of that positive supercoiling. Some of these mechanisms lead to interesting topological situations where DNA supercoiling, catenation and knotting coexist and influence each other in DNA molecules being replicated. Here, we first review fundamental aspects of DNA supercoiling, catenation and knotting when these qualitatively different topological states do not coexist in the same circular DNA but also when they are present at the same time in replicating DNA molecules. We also review differences between eukaryotic and prokaryotic cellular strategies that permit relaxation of positive supercoiling arising ahead of the replication forks. We end our review by discussing very recent studies giving a long-sought answer to the question of how slow DNA topoisomerases capable of relaxing just a few positive supercoils per second can counteract the introduction of hundreds of positive supercoils per second ahead of advancing replication forks.
- 5 July 2019
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Nucleic Acids Research
- Vol. 47 (14) , 7182-7198
Open AccessClosing the DNA replication cycle: from simple circular molecules to supercoiled and knotted DNA catenanes
Due to helical structure of DNA, massive amounts of positive supercoils are constantly introduced ahead of each replication fork. Positive supercoiling inhibits progression of replication forks but various mechanisms evolved that permit very efficient relaxation of that positive supercoiling. Some of these mechanisms lead to interesting topological situations where DNA supercoiling, catenation and knotting coexist and influence each other in DNA molecules being replicated. Here, we first review fundamental aspects of DNA supercoiling, catenation and knotting when these qualitatively different topological states do not coexist in the same circular DNA but also when they are present at the same time in replicating DNA molecules. We also review differences between eukaryotic and prokaryotic cellular strategies that permit relaxation of positive supercoiling arising ahead of the replication forks. We end our review by discussing very recent studies giving a long-sought answer to the question of how slow DNA topoisomerases capable of relaxing just a few positive supercoils per second can counteract the introduction of hundreds of positive supercoils per second ahead of advancing replication forks.
- Open Access
A systematic classification of knotoids on the plane and on the sphere
In this paper we generate and systematically classify all prime planar knotoids with up to 5 crossings. We also extend the existing list of knotoids in $S^2$ and add all knotoids with 6 crossings.Open AccessA systematic classification of knotoids on the plane and on the sphere
In this paper we generate and systematically classify all prime planar knotoids with up to 5 crossings. We also extend the existing list of knotoids in $S^2$ and add all knotoids with 6 crossings. - 15 January 2019
- Published by Taylor & Francis
- p. 115-138
Introducing Supercoiling into Models of Chromosome Structure
This chapter presents how standard modeling software packages such as HooMD or ESPResSo can be modified to simulate supercoiled chromatin fibers. It suggests that chromatin fibers forming topologically associating domains (TADs) are supercoiled. Numerous studies have indicated that portions of deoxyribonucleic acid in interphase chromosomes are torsionally stressed and this results in supercoiling of implicated chromatin fibers. A standard beaded chain model is frequently sufficient for a coarse-grained approach to model equilibrium behavior of thermally fluctuating, torsionally unstressed polymeric chains subject to confinement. Standard beaded chain models permit free swiveling, which makes them unable to maintain torsional tension and thus not suitable to model the effects of supercoiling. Magnetic tweezers experiments have shown that the torsional stiffness of chromatin fibers depe nds on whether the fiber is overwound or underwound. An important part of the loop extrusion mechanism is that the loop extrusion process should stop when the cohesin rings reach the correctly oriented CCCTC-binding factor proteins at the TAD borders.
- 15 January 2019
- Published by Taylor & Francis
- p. 115-138
Introducing Supercoiling into Models of Chromosome Structure
This chapter presents how standard modeling software packages such as HooMD or ESPResSo can be modified to simulate supercoiled chromatin fibers. It suggests that chromatin fibers forming topologically associating domains (TADs) are supercoiled. Numerous studies have indicated that portions of deoxyribonucleic acid in interphase chromosomes are torsionally stressed and this results in supercoiling of implicated chromatin fibers. A standard beaded chain model is frequently sufficient for a coarse-grained approach to model equilibrium behavior of thermally fluctuating, torsionally unstressed polymeric chains subject to confinement. Standard beaded chain models permit free swiveling, which makes them unable to maintain torsional tension and thus not suitable to model the effects of supercoiling. Magnetic tweezers experiments have shown that the torsional stiffness of chromatin fibers depe nds on whether the fiber is overwound or underwound. An important part of the loop extrusion mechanism is that the loop extrusion process should stop when the cohesin rings reach the correctly oriented CCCTC-binding factor proteins at the TAD borders.
- Open Access
- 1 December 2018
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Nucleic Acids Research
- Vol. 47 (D1) , D367-D375
KnotProt 2.0: a database of proteins with knots and other entangled structures
The KnotProt 2.0 database (the updated version of the KnotProt database) collects information about proteins which form knots and other entangled structures. New features in KnotProt 2.0 include the characterization of both probabilistic and deterministic entanglements which can be formed by disulfide bonds and interactions via ions, a refined characterization of entanglement in terms of knotoids, the identification of the so-called cysteine knots, the possibility to analyze all or a non-redundant set of proteins, and various technical updates. The KnotProt 2.0 database classifies all entangled proteins, represents their complexity in the form of a knotting fingerprint, and presents many biological and geometrical statistics based on these results. Currently the database contains >2000 entangled structures, and it regularly self-updates based on proteins deposited in the Protein Data Bank (PDB).
- 1 December 2018
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Nucleic Acids Research
- Vol. 47 (D1) , D367-D375
Open AccessKnotProt 2.0: a database of proteins with knots and other entangled structures
The KnotProt 2.0 database (the updated version of the KnotProt database) collects information about proteins which form knots and other entangled structures. New features in KnotProt 2.0 include the characterization of both probabilistic and deterministic entanglements which can be formed by disulfide bonds and interactions via ions, a refined characterization of entanglement in terms of knotoids, the identification of the so-called cysteine knots, the possibility to analyze all or a non-redundant set of proteins, and various technical updates. The KnotProt 2.0 database classifies all entangled proteins, represents their complexity in the form of a knotting fingerprint, and presents many biological and geometrical statistics based on these results. Currently the database contains >2000 entangled structures, and it regularly self-updates based on proteins deposited in the Protein Data Bank (PDB).
- Open Access
- 5 November 2018
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Nucleic Acids Research
- Vol. 47 (2) , 521-532
Are TADs supercoiled?
Topologically associating domains (TADs) are megabase-sized building blocks of interphase chromosomes in higher eukaryotes. TADs are chromosomal regions with increased frequency of internal interactions. On average a pair of loci separated by a given genomic distance contact each other 2–3 times more frequently when they are in the same TAD as compared to a pair of loci located in two neighbouring TADs. TADs are also functional blocks of chromosomes as enhancers and their cognate promoters are normally located in the same TAD, even if their genomic distance from each other can be as large as a megabase. The internal structure of TADs, causing their increased frequency of internal interactions, is not established yet. We survey here experimental studies investigating presence of supercoiling in interphase chromosomes. We also review numerical simulation studies testing whether transcription-induced supercoiling of chromatin fibres can explain how TADs are formed and how they can assure very efficient interactions between enhancers and their cognate promoters located in the same TAD.
- 5 November 2018
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Nucleic Acids Research
- Vol. 47 (2) , 521-532
Open AccessAre TADs supercoiled?
Topologically associating domains (TADs) are megabase-sized building blocks of interphase chromosomes in higher eukaryotes. TADs are chromosomal regions with increased frequency of internal interactions. On average a pair of loci separated by a given genomic distance contact each other 2–3 times more frequently when they are in the same TAD as compared to a pair of loci located in two neighbouring TADs. TADs are also functional blocks of chromosomes as enhancers and their cognate promoters are normally located in the same TAD, even if their genomic distance from each other can be as large as a megabase. The internal structure of TADs, causing their increased frequency of internal interactions, is not established yet. We survey here experimental studies investigating presence of supercoiling in interphase chromosomes. We also review numerical simulation studies testing whether transcription-induced supercoiling of chromatin fibres can explain how TADs are formed and how they can assure very efficient interactions between enhancers and their cognate promoters located in the same TAD.
- Open Access
Knoto-ID: a tool to study the entanglement of open protein chains using the concept of knotoids
The backbone of most proteins forms an open curve. To study their entanglement, a common strategy consists in searching for the presence of knots in their backbones using topological invariants. However, this approach requires to close the curve into a loop, which alters the geometry of curve. Knoto-ID allows evaluating the entanglement of open curves without the need to close them, using the recent concept of knotoids which is a generalization of the classical knot theory to open curves. Knoto-ID can analyse the global topology of the full chain as well as the local topology by exhaustively studying all subchains or only determining the knotted core. Knoto-ID permits to localize topologically non-trivial protein folds that are not detected by informatics tools detecting knotted protein folds.
Open AccessKnoto-ID: a tool to study the entanglement of open protein chains using the concept of knotoids
The backbone of most proteins forms an open curve. To study their entanglement, a common strategy consists in searching for the presence of knots in their backbones using topological invariants. However, this approach requires to close the curve into a loop, which alters the geometry of curve. Knoto-ID allows evaluating the entanglement of open curves without the need to close them, using the recent concept of knotoids which is a generalization of the classical knot theory to open curves. Knoto-ID can analyse the global topology of the full chain as well as the local topology by exhaustively studying all subchains or only determining the knotted core. Knoto-ID permits to localize topologically non-trivial protein folds that are not detected by informatics tools detecting knotted protein folds.