Juan Carlos Zuil-Escobar

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine whether manual therapy (MT) and strengthening exercises (SE) reduce pain in patients with knee osteoarthritis (KO). Clinical trials were identified through a search of PubMed, PEDro, Scopus, and Ovid databases up to April 2024. Two independent reviewers screened articles, removing duplicates, and conducted full-text evaluations. Nineteen studies were included, with eight incorporated into the meta-analysis. Of these, seven addressed MT and twelve focused on SE. Although the studies included a variety of outcomes and follow-up periods, both interventions were shown to reduce pain immediately after the intervention, with MT providing superior short-term outcomes. Improvements were noted in the VAS scale for the MT group (effect size = 0.799; Z = 2.495; p = 0.013; IC 95%= 0.171 to 1.427; Q-value = 17.721; p = 0.001) and in the WOMAC pain score for the SE compared to controls (effect size = 0.364; Z = 1.993; p = 0.046; IC 95%= 0.006 to 0.722; Q-value = 2.4; p = 0.301). Both results showed high evidence according to GRADE. However, long-term effects are inconclusive, with low/very low levels of evidence. Both MT and SE are effective interventions in reducing pain in the short term. However, more clinical trials are needed to determine the best doses and the long-term effects.

Background and Objectives: Knee osteoarthritis (KO) stands as the third leading cause of disability among the elderly, causing pain, reduced quality of life, and decreased functionality. The objective of this study is to assess the effects of an active neurodynamic technique programme at home on pain, quality of life, and function among individuals with KO. Materials and Methods: Thirty-five participants (69.7% women) aged ≥50 years with KO (Kellgren–Lawrence grades I–II) performed a femoral nerve mobilization programme at home for 6–8 weeks (20 repetitions per day). Pain intensity, using the numerical rating scale (NRS), pressure pain thresholds (PPTs), central sensitization inventory (CSI), temporal assessment, pain modulation, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), and the 12-item Short Form Survey questionnaire (SF-12) were collected before, after the intervention, and at one, three, six, and twelve months. Results: Participants improved significantly in pain (p < 0.05), with the improvement maintained throughout the follow-up in the NRS and for at least one month in the PPT. There were also statistically significant (p < 0.05) improvements in all subscales of the KOOS, which were maintained throughout the follow-up. Improvements were also found in the CSI and CPM. Conclusions: A home-based active neurodynamic programme for the femoral nerve has been demonstrated to yield positive effects on pain and function in patients with KO.

Chronic painful temporomandibular disorders (TMD) are a functional pain syndrome that embodies a spectrum of clinical manifestations and expresses great complexity through the coexistence of multiple comorbidities. Evaluate the prevalence of pain comorbidities, explore the correlation between comorbidities, kinesiophobia, catastrophizing, and pain disability at baseline, and determine variables of interest for prediction response to physiotherapy interventions at different follow-up times. This is a secondary analysis of a previously conducted randomized controlled trial (RCT). Outcomes and covariables for this secondary analysis were collected from subjects with chronic TMD (≥3 months), based on the DC/TMD diagnostic criteria, assigned to a multimodal treatment and a second manual therapy control group. The participants underwent follow-up assessment at 7 and 19 weeks. The outcomes (dependent variables) for these analyses were craniofacial pain disability, catastrophizing, and kinesiophobia. However, these outcomes were also used as covariables of interest in addition to comorbidity prevalence and severity at baseline for different analyses. We performed linear regression analyses to determine the association between our outcomes and covariables at baseline and at different follow-ups. Comorbidity severity explained craniofacial pain disability at baseline, showing a strong correlation (Standardized B: 0.40, p-value: 0.017). Higher comorbidity severity, led to higher craniofacial pain score. Comorbidity severity and baseline catastrophizing predicted a better response to treatment for craniofacial pain improvements at short and long term (R² .22, p-value : 0.009 and R² .19, p-value: 0.02 respectively). This study provides insight into the prevention and clinical management of chronic pain related to TMD.

Background: The objective was to evaluate the prevalence of latent trigger points (LTrPs) in lower limb muscles in participants with a high medial longitudinal arch (MLA) of the foot compared to controls. Methods: Participants with a navicular drop test of 4–9 mm were included in the control group; the high MLA group included navicular drop test values of ≤4 mm. The presence of LTrPs was assessed by palpation techniques. The muscles evaluated were medial gastrocnemius (LTrP1), lateral gastrocnemius (LTrP2), soleus (LTrP1), peroneus longus, peroneus brevis, tibialis anterior, extensor digitorum longus, flexor digitorum longus, rectus femoris, vastus medialis (LTrP1 and LTrP2), and the vastus lateralis of the quadriceps (LTrP1 and LTrP2). Results: Thirty-seven participants with high MLA and thirty-seven controls were included in the study. Twenty-nine (78.4%) participants in the high MLA group had at least 1 LTrP, compared to twenty-three (62.2%) in the control group. No statistical difference (p < 0.05) was found in the total number of LTrPs between groups (4.46 ± 3.78 vs. 3.24 ± 3.85). There were more participants (p < 0.05) with LTrPs in the tibialis anterior, extensor digitorum longus, and vastus lateralis (LTrP1 and LTrP2) in the high MLA group than in the control group. Conclusion: Although no differences were found in the number of total LTrPs between groups, the prevalence was statistically significantly higher in the tibialis anterior, extensor digitorum longus, and vastus lateralis of the participants with high MLA of the foot.

Purpose: The purpose of our study was to test the intra‐rater and inter‐rater reliability of the DYNEELAX® arthrometer in healthy subjects. Since rotational laxity will be measured for the first time in humans, indications for normative values will also be presented.Methods: Knee anterior laxity and rotational laxity using a DYNEELAX® arthrometer were assessed in 73 subjects (39 females and 34 males). An intraclass correlation coefficient was calculated to evaluate the intra‐rater and inter‐rater reliability of the DYNEELAX®.Results: An intraclass correlation coefficient for intra‐rater reliability ranges from 0.631 (95% confidence interval; [CI]: 0.47–0.75) to 0.699 (95% CI: 0.56–0.80) and from 0.916 (95% CI: 0.87–0.95) to 0.94 (95% CI: 0.91–0.96) for anterior knee laxity and rotational knee laxity, respectively. An intraclass correlation coefficient for inter‐rater reliability ranges from 0.578 (95% CI: 0.40–0.71) to 0.646 (95% CI: 0.44–0.78) and from 0.822 (95% CI: 0.57–0.91) to 0.933 (95% CI: 0.89–0.96) for anterior knee laxity and rotational knee laxity, respectively.Conclusions: The DYNEELAX® arthrometer has good to excellent intra‐rater and inter‐rater reliability for rotational knee laxity and moderate intra‐rater reliability for anterior knee laxity in healthy subjects. Future studies should investigate the clinical significance of anterior and rotational laxity measured with the DYNEELAX® arthrometer in patients with knee pathology, as both laxities are critical for assessing the integrity of the intra‐articular structures of the knee in clinical practice.Level of evidence: Level IV.

Background: There has been an increase in people with disabilities who require continuous care, which often falls to informal carers (ICs). Stroke is one of the conditions where ICs are most needed. Therefore, it is necessary for ICs to improve their caregiving skills and self-care capacity. Telehealth (TH) can facilitate them. The aim of this systematic review is to summarize the evidence of the effects of interventions on ICs of stroke patients. Methods: The search was conducted in Pubmed, Scopus, Web of Science, CINALH, Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection, and APA PsycInfo. Key search terms included “stroke”, “informal caregiver” and “telemedicine”. Only randomised clinical trials were included. Results: A total of 2031 articles were found in the databases, 476 were screened and 19 clinical trials met the eligibility criteria. Different TH programmes have evaluated many outcomes related to physical and emotional health. The TH tools included phone, videophone, web-based interventions, and social media. The most investigated outcome was depression; although contradictory results were found, the TH may have helped to prevent an increase in depressive symptoms. There were inconsistent results on the caregiving burden and the preparedness of the IC. However, TH has positive effects on the health of the ICs, reducing the number of unhealthy days, anxiety, task difficulty perception, and improving psychological health. Conclusions: TH may be a useful tool to improve the abilities and health of ICs of SS. No adverse effects have been reported. More quality studies evaluating the effects of telemedicine on the ICs of stroke survivors, as well as the most appropriate doses, are needed.

Previous studies have evaluated the implementation of behavioral approaches in individuals with chronic temporomandibular disorders (TMDs). To evaluate the benefits of a behavioral approach to craniofacial pain. Second, we assessed the benefits of kinesiophobia, catastrophizing, mouth opening without pain, and forward head posture. Individuals with chronic TMDs were treated for five weeks. The intervention group (n = 17) underwent pain neuroscience education, manual therapy, and therapeutic exercise, whereas the control group (n = 17) underwent manual therapy only. Outcomes were evaluated immediately, at seven and 19 weeks follow-up. The assessment tools used were the Craniofacial Pain Disability Inventory, Pain Catastrophizing Scale, Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia, Mandibular Range of Motion Scale, and Cervical Range of Motion Tool. The interventions did not influence the differences in the improvements between the groups observed for craniofacial pain disability (inter-subject p 0.4). The intervention had a moderate influence on the improvement of kinesiophobia and catastrophizing (Inter-subject p 0.09 and 0.1 respectively) with a clinically significant effect size (Estimated mean (EM) -8.6 standard deviation (SD) ±3.48 p 0.019; and EM -7.6 SD ± 5.11 p 0.15 respectively). The behavioral approach improved catastrophizing and kinesiophobia outcomes in individuals with chronic TMDs.

The aim was to evaluate the feasibility of a home-based neurodynamic programme for patients with knee osteoarthritis (KO). Thirty participants (70% women) ≥ 50 years old with KO (Kellgren–Lawrence grades I–II) were included. Active mobilisation of the femoral nerve was performed at home over a period of 6–8 weeks. The feasibility of the programme was assessed using a survey that included questions related to understanding of the activity; adherence to the intervention; the burden caused by the intervention; self-perceived effects on the participant; follow-up; the barriers; and facilitators. Pain intensity, using the numerical rating scale (NRS); pressure pain thresholds (PPT); temporal assessment; pain modulation; Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), 12-item Short Form Survey questionnaire (SF-12), and the Central Sensitization Inventory questionnaire (CSI) were also collected, before and after the intervention. All patients performed the intervention, completed at least 42 days of activity, and considered the exercise adequate, with 28 participants (93.3%) reporting that the intervention was good for them. Statistically significant values (p < 0.05) were found for NRS, elbow PPT, external knee PPT, internal knee PPT, elbow CPM, CSI, and KOOS. Home-based active neurodynamic treatment has been shown to be a feasible and safe intervention for KO patients. In addition, this intervention has shown positive effects on pain and function.

Objectives: To evaluate the association between low back pain (LBP) and painful temporomandibular disorders (TMDs).Methods: Systematic review of observational studies. Searches were conducted using OVID MEDLINE, CINHAL, Web of Science and PUBMED databases up to 21 October 2022. Qualitative and quantitative analyses were performed. Risk of bias (RoB) was assessed using the Quality in Prognosis Studies tool (QUIPS).Results: Eight studies were included in the present review with meta‐analysis. The first onset of TMDs was more likely in patients with previous chronic LBP (hazard ratio (HR) 1.53 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.28; 1.83,p < .00001]). In addition, patients with chronic LBP had 3.25 times the odds (OR) [95% CI: 1.94; 5.43,p < .00001] of having chronic TMDs than those who did not have chronic LBP. In addition, the higher the exposure to chronic LBP, the higher the risk of developing a first onset of TMDs.Conclusions: Chronic LBP can be considered a risk/contributing factor for painful TMDs. Although there is a high certainty in the evidence linking chronic LBP with the risk of a first onset of TMDs, there are insufficient studies to draw definitive conclusions. Furthermore, while an association between chronic LBP and chronic TMDs and a dose–effect was observed between these two conditions, a limited number of studies and evidence exist to support these findings. Future studies are needed to increase the body of evidence.