Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article

Previous Organizations / Institutes

The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years


Neil V. Shah has a total of 428 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:

  • Carl B. Paulino

    Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation Medicine, State University of New York, Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, New York

    33 shared publications
  • Bassel Georges Diebo

    Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island

    25 shared publications
  • Bassel G. Diebo

    Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation Medicine, State University of New York, Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, New York

    19 shared publications
  • George A. Beyer

    Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation Medicine, State University of New York, Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, New York

    19 shared publications
  • Jared M. Newman

    Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation Medicine, Downstate Medical Center, State University of New York (SUNY, Brooklyn, USA

    17 shared publications
  • Peter G. Passias

    Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina

    16 shared publications

Latest Publications

  • Baseline history of primary fragility fracture is associated with medical complications and revision through 1 year in adult spinal deformity patients undergoing thoracolumbar spinal fusion

    by Neil V. Shah, Rachel Baum, Alejandro J. Friedman, Chibuokem P. Ikwuazom, Rehan R. Khan, Alex La Poche, Stefani Manis, Dario Fucich, Juhayer S. Alam, Kyle Smith, et al.

  • Large language models for lumbar spondylolisthesis detection: a multi-center pilot comparative radiographic accuracy study

    by Rehan R. Khan, Tony Tannoury, Rohith Ryali, Matheus Alves, Brian S. Tao, Sameh Abolfotouh, Omar Alnori, Mohammad El-Sharkawi, Kamel Moufarrej, Margaret Li, et al.

  • Does Substance Abuse Predict the Development of Mental Health Disorders in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients?

    by Neil V. Shah, Harleen Kaur, Rehan R. Khan, Nathan S. Kim, Romir Patel, Oluwatobi O. Onafowokan, Adam J. Wolfert, Cameron R. Moattari, Benjamin Krasnyansky, Daniel E. Suarez, et al.

    Study Design: Retrospective cohort study. Objectives: This study aimed to determine whether substance abuse among adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients is associated with increased odds of subsequent new-onset mental health disease (MHD). Summary of Background Data: MHD prevalence in patients with a substance abuse history has been well-described. However, the impact of current or historical substance abuse/dependence in AIS patients on the risk of subsequent development of new-onset MHDs is unknown. Methods: The New York SPARCS database was reviewed to identify all 10–25-year-old AIS patients and stratified by prior or concurrent substance abuse (AIS-Sub) versus no history of substance abuse (AIS-NoSub). Cohorts were 1:1 propensity score-matched, and various comparisons were made, including incidence of subsequent MHDs. Binary stepwise logistic regressions were utilized to calculate odds ratios (OR) of developing any MHDs based on baseline substance abuse. Results: 386 AIS patients were included (193 AIS-Sub and 193 AIS-NoSub). At baseline, there were no significant differences between patient cohorts in demographic factors. AIS-Sub patients had higher rates of new-onset subsequent overall MHDs (16.1% vs. 3.6%, P P OR =6.8, 95% CI: 2.6–17.3, P =0.001), or new-onset depressive disorder ( OR =47.0, 95% CI: 3.9–568.7, P =0.002); but was not associated with the development of anxiety, stress, sleep, or eating disorders. Conclusions: AIS patients with prior or current substance abuse/dependence were at increased 2-year risk of developing any new-onset MHD, specifically depressive disorders. This data may guide preoperative screening and optimization efforts for surgeons, as MHDs have been associated with poor outcomes following spine surgery. Level of Evidence: Level III—retrospective cohort study.

  • Do Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) Adversely Impact Fracture Healing? A Critical Review of the Literature

    by Sarah G. Stroud, Lara Passfall, Juhayer S. Alam, Frank A. Segreto, Rachel Baum, Neil V. Shah, Jad Bou Monsef, Carl B. Paulino, Bassel G. Diebo

    Purpose of Review The purpose of this review was to critically appraise the literature and establish an evidence-based clinical guideline for the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in a fracture setting. Recent Findings With few exceptions, studies in animals suggest that NSAIDs impair fracture healing. It is unclear if nonselective or cyclooxygenase-(COX)2-selective NSAIDs pose differing effects on fracture healing. Human studies show NSAID use to be a consistent risk factor for fracture non-union in skeletally mature populations across the literature and indicates that indomethacin in particular poses a significant risk for non-union of adult acetabular fractures. Summary Current evidence appears to suggest no harm in using ketorolac or ibuprofen in a pediatric fracture population, while indomethacin poses a significant risk for non-union in adult acetabular fracture patients when used for six weeks. Despite the majority of available clinical studies showing NSAID use as a recurring risk factor for fracture non-union in adult populations, a lack of standardization amongst studies makes it difficult to determine any clinical recommendations about timing, dosage, duration, or type of agent administered. More high-quality prospective studies are needed.


  • Open Access

    Orthopedic surgery versus neurosurgery: Prevalence and surgical detail assessment of adult spinal fusion procedures

    by Frank A. Segreto, Oscar Krol, Samuel Gedailovich, Asher Ripp, George A. Beyer, David Kim, Daniel J. Alsoof, Hallie A. Tiburzi, Olivia Merola, Neil V. Shah, et al.

    Background: A significant procedural overlap exists between orthopedic and neurosurgeons with both subspecialties performing adult spinal fusion procedures. However, the prevalence of varying adult spinal fusion procedures performed by orthopedic surgeons, relative to neurosurgeons, is unknown. This study sought to compare the prevalence of spinal fusion procedures among orthopedic and neurosurgeons. Materials and Methods: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried for adult spinal fusion procedures from 2008 to 2016. Procedure prevalence, operative time, and hospital length of stay (LOS) were recorded and analyzed by surgical subspecialty. Spinal fusion cases investigated include all fusions, 2–3-level lumbar fusion, ≥4-level lumbar fusion, anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), 3–6-level posterior cervical fusion, and ≥ 6-level posterior cervical fusion. Results: 67,775 spinal fusions were identified, of which 44,879 (66.2%) were performed by neurosurgeons and 22,896 (33.7%) were performed by orthopedic surgeons. Procedures that involved the lumbar spine were more likely to be performed by orthopedic surgeons while cervical fusions like ACDF were more likely to be performed by neurosurgeons. Orthopedic surgeons had significantly shorter operative times (124.0 vs. 134.0 min, P < 0.001) for 2–3-level lumbar fusions while having a similar patient LOS (4.3 vs. 4.2 days, P = 0.196). The remaining procedures saw no significant difference in operative time and patient LOS between orthopedic and neurosurgeons. Conclusions: Neurosurgeons performed nearly double the amount of spinal fusion cases compared to orthopedic surgeons, with an even greater disparity seen in ACDFs, while orthopedic surgeons performed significantly more fusions of the lumbar spine. Orthopedic surgeons had shorter operative times for 2–3-level lumbar fusions.


  • Open Access

    Does structural compromise of the aorta in patients with aortic pathologies predict increased spinal and vascular complications and reoperations in patients undergoing anterior approach to the spine?

    by Neil V. Shah, Pelin Çeliker, Cirous Sadeghi, Rachel Baum, Juhayer S. Alam, Chibuokem Ikwuazom, Peter L. Zhou, Benjamin Krasnyanskiy, David Kim, Rohan Desai, et al.

    Objectives: Anterior spinal fusion (ASF) presents unique challenges, including the proximity of critical anatomic structures. Previous reports have detailed vascular injuries during exposure/approach; however, it is not well-documented whether structural aortic pathology, such as aneurysm, dissection, atherosclerosis, aortitis, or aortic tumors, impacts postoperative outcomes following anterior approach to the spine for spinal fusion. Materials and Methods: Using the New York State Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System, thoracolumbar ASF patients with a history of aneurysm, dissection, atherosclerosis, aortitis, or aortic tumors (APath) were identified and matched to patients with no aortic pathologies (No-APath). The two cohorts were compared at 90-day and 2-year follow-up for complications, readmissions, and revisions. Multivariate binary stepwise logistic regression identified independent predictors of these outcomes. Results: Ninety-nine and 64 patients were included at 90-day and 2-year follow-ups, respectively. APath and No-APath had comparable demographics. Through 90-day follow-up, both cohorts had similar vascular complications and overall complications. No-APath patients had higher surgical complications (11.1% vs. 0%, P = 0.021). At 2-year follow-up, cohorts had comparable vascular complications, overall complications, and all other outcomes (P > 0.05). Neither group was observed to require any revisions through 2-year follow-up. The presence of a structural aortic pathology was not associated with increased odds of incurring adverse outcomes at 90-day and 2-year follow-ups. Conclusions: Structural aortic compromise in the setting of thoracolumbar ASF did not predispose patients to adverse vascular, spinal-related, or medical/surgical complications, nor to anterior spinal or vascular revision or repair through 2-year follow-up. These results highlight the need for well-powered studies to further delineate the risk of anterior spinal surgery in this cohort of patients.

  • Evaluating the impact of multiple sclerosis on 2 year postoperative outcomes following long fusion for adult spinal deformity: a propensity score-matched analysis

    by Neil V. Shah, Ryan Kong, Chibuokem P. Ikwuazom, George A. Beyer, Hallie A. Tiburzi, Frank A. Segreto, Juhayer S. Alam, Adam J. Wolfert, Daniel Alsoof, Renaud Lafage, et al.

    Study design Retrospective cohort study. Purpose The impact of neuromuscular disorders such as multiple sclerosis (MS) on outcomes following long segment fusion is underreported. This study evaluates the impact of MS on two-year (2Y) postoperative complications and revisions following ≥ 4-level fusion for adult spinal deformity (ASD). Methods Patients undergoing ≥ 4-level fusion for ASD were identified from a statewide database. Patients with a baseline diagnosis of MS were also identified. Patients with infectious/traumatic/neoplastic indications were excluded. Subjects were 1:1 propensity score-matched (MS to no-MS) based on age, sex and race and compared for rates of 2Y postoperative complications and reoperations. Logistic regression models were utilized to determine risk factors for adverse outcomes at 2Y. Results 86 patients were included overall (n = 43 per group). Age, sex, and race were comparable between groups (p > 0.05). MS patients incurred higher charges for their surgical visit ($125,906 vs. $84,006, p = 0.007) with similar LOS (8.1 vs. 5.3 days, p > 0.05). MS patients experienced comparable rates of overall medical complications (30.1% vs. 25.6%) and surgical complications (34.9% vs. 30.2%); p > 0.05. MS patients had similar rates of 2Y revisions (16.3% vs. 9.3%, p = 0.333). MS was not associated with medical, surgical, or overall complications or revisions at minimum 2Y follow-up. Conclusion Patients with MS experienced similar postoperative course compared to those without MS following ≥ 4-level fusion for ASD. This data supports the findings of multiple previously published case series’ that long segment fusions for ASD can be performed relatively safely in patients with MS.

  • The impact of asymptomatic human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive disease status on inpatient complications following total joint arthroplasty: a propensity score-matched analysis

    by Neil V. Shah, Matthew J. Lettieri, David Kim, Jack J. Zhou, Nathaniel Pineda, Bassel G. Diebo, Colin Y. L. Woon, Qais Naziri

    Purpose The number of patients with asymptomatic human immunodeficiency virus (AHIV) is increasing as the efficacy of antiretroviral therapy improves. While there is research on operative risks associated with having HIV, there is a lack of literature describing the impact of well-controlled HIV on postoperative complications. This study seeks to elucidate the impact of AHIV on postoperative outcomes after total hip (THA) and knee (TKA) arthroplasty. Methods The Nationwide Inpatient Sample was retrospectively reviewed for patients undergoing TKA and THA from 2005 to 2013. Subjects were subdivided into those with AHIV and those without HIV (non-HIV). Patient demographics, hospital-related parameters, and postoperative complications were all collected. One-to-one propensity score-matching, Chi-square analysis, and multivariate logistical regressions were performed to compare both cohorts. Results There were no significant differences between AHIV and non-HIV patients undergoing TKA or THA in terms of sex, age, insurance status, or total costs (all, p ≥ 0.081). AHIV patients had longer lengths of stay (4.0 days) than non-HIV patients after both TKA (3.3 days) and THA (3.1 days) (p ≤ 0.011). Both TKA groups had similar postoperative complication rates (p > 0.081). AHIV patients undergoing THA exhibited an increased rate of overall surgical complications compared non-HIV patients (0 vs. 4.5%, p = 0.043). AHIV was not associated with increased complications following both procedures. Conclusion Despite lengthier hospital stays among AHIV patients, baseline AHIV was not associated with adverse outcomes following TKA and THA. This adds to the literature and warrants further research into the impact of asymptomatic, well-controlled HIV infection on postoperative outcomes following total joint arthroplasty.


    • 1 January 2024
      • Vol. 44  (2) , 83-88

    Identifying Predictors of Extended Intensive Care Unit Stay Following Posterior Spinal Fusion for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: An Analysis of 101 ACS NSQIP Pediatric Participating Centers

    by Neil V. Shah, Marine Coste, Nathan S. Kim, David J. Kim, Carolyn Andrews, Rachel Baum, Alejandro Friedman, Kyle Smith, Samuel Gedailovich, Adam J. Wolfert, et al.

    While prolonged operative time and increased levels fused have been shown to increase the risk of prolonged intensive care unit (ICU) length-of-stay (LOS), studies are limited in guiding decision-making regarding the need for intensive care postoperatively. This is especially the case among the cohort of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion (PSF); associations between comorbidities and ICU LOS are not well-delineated. AIS patients who underwent PSF from January 1st, 2016 to December 1st, 2016 at 101 participating centers were identified using the American College of Surgeons (ACS) National Surgical Quality Im-provement Project (NSQIP) Pediatric database. Patients were subsequently grouped by ICU LOS 0-1 day; 2-3 days; and >3 days. Multivariate regression identified predictors of increased ICU LOS. 2,346 AIS patients were included. The >3 days and 2-3 days groups had higher asthma rates compared to 0-1 day. The >3 days group had higher rates of structural airway abnormalities and he-matologic disorders. Cognitive impairment rates were highest for >3-day ICU LOS. Hematologic dis-orders, structural airway abnormalities, asthma and cognitive impairment were associated with prolonged ICU LOS. These results help inform targets for optimization of acute short-term postoperative care as well as assisting in risk stratification to improve outcomes and reduce costs for ICU-level care of AIS patients at ACS NSQIP Pediatric program-participating hospitals. Level of Evidence: III

    • 1 December 2023
      • Vol. 43  (2) , 117-124

    The Impact of Isolated Preoperative Cannabis Use on Outcomes Following Cervical Spinal Fusion: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

    by Neil V. Shah, Cameron R. Moattari, Joshua D. Lavian, Samuel Gedailovich, Benjamin Krasnyanskiy, George A. Beyer, Nolan Condron, Peter G. Passias, Renaud Lafage, Han Jo Kim, et al.

    Cannabis is the most commonly used recreational drug in the USA. Studies evaluating cannabis use and its impact on outcomes following cervical spinal fusion (CF) are limited. This study sought to assess the impact of isolated (exclusive) cannabis use on postoperative outcomes following CF by analyzing outcomes like complications, readmissions, and revisions. The New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (SPARCS) was queried for patients who underwent CF between January 2009 and September 2013. Inclusion criteria were age ≥18 years and either a minimum 90-day (for complications and readmissions) or 2-year (for revisions) follow-up surveillance. Patients with systemic disease, osteomyelitis, cancer, trauma, and concomitant substance or polysubstance abuse/dependence were excluded. Patients with a preoperative International Classification of Diseases, 9th Edition, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) diagnosis of isolated cannabis abuse (Cannabis) or dependence were identified. The primary outcome measures were 90-day complications, 90-day readmissions, and two-year revisions following CF. Cannabis patients were 1:1 propensity score-matched by age, gender, race, Deyo score, surgical approach, and tobacco use to non-cannabis users and compared for outcomes. Multivariate binary stepwise logistic regression models identified independent predictors of outcomes. 432 patients (n=216 each) with comparable age, sex, Deyo scores, tobacco use, and distribution of anterior or posterior surgical approaches were identified (all p>0.05). Cannabis patients were predominantly Black (27.8% vs. 12.0%), primarily utilized Medicaid (29.6% vs. 12.5%), and had longer LOS (3.0 vs. 1.9 days), all p≤0.001. Both cohorts experienced comparable rates of 90-day medical and surgical, as well as overall complications (5.6% vs. 3.7%) and two-year revisions (4.2% vs. 2.8%, p=0.430), but isolated cannabis patients had higher 90-day readmission rates (11.6% vs. 6.0%, p=0.042). Isolated cannabis use independently predicted 90-day readmission (Odds Ratio=2.0), but did not predict any 90-day complications or two year revisions (all p>0.05). Isolated baseline cannabis dependence/abuse was associated with increased risk of 90-day readmission following CF. Further investigation of the physiologic impact of cannabis on musculoskeletal patients may elucidate significant contributory factors. Level of Evidence: III.