Jerome A. Yesavage
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Jerome A. Yesavage has a total of 330 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
Leah Friedman
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, United States
24 shared publicationsArt Noda
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
17 shared publications- Javaid I. Sheikh
AI Center for Precision Health, Weill Cornell Medicine-Qatar, Doha, Qatar
13 shared publications Jared R. Tinklenberg
Department of Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Palo Alto, California
10 shared publicationsBeatriz Hernandez
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine , Stanford, CA, USA
8 shared publicationsJauhtai Cheng
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
7 shared publications
Latest Publications
- 1 August 2025
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Neurology Genetics
- Vol. 11 (4)
Whole Genome Variable Number Tandem Repeat Analysis in Alzheimer Disease
- 1 August 2025
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Neurology Genetics
- Vol. 11 (4)
Whole Genome Variable Number Tandem Repeat Analysis in Alzheimer Disease
- Open Access
- 9 January 2025
- Published by Elsevier in Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
- Vol. 2
Predictors of dropout from TMS for treatment resistant depression
- 9 January 2025
- Published by Elsevier in Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
- Vol. 2
Open AccessPredictors of dropout from TMS for treatment resistant depression
- Open Access
- 10 April 2023
- Published by Elsevier in Biological Psychiatry
- Vol. 93 (9) , S312
539. Ketamine’s Acute Effects on Negative Brain States are Mediated Through Distinct Altered States in Humans
- 10 April 2023
- Published by Elsevier in Biological Psychiatry
- Vol. 93 (9) , S312
Open Access539. Ketamine’s Acute Effects on Negative Brain States are Mediated Through Distinct Altered States in Humans
- 13 August 2022
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
- Vol. 38 (1) , 106-118
The Benton Visual Form Discrimination Test as a Predictor of Neurocognitive Disorder in Older Veterans
The Benton Visual Form Discrimination Test (VFDT) is a commonly used measure of visual discrimination and visual recognition memory and has shown promise in distinguishing between different levels of cognitive impairment. We assess the predictive diagnostic utility of the VFDT in a sample of older Veterans with cognitive concerns. Subjects included a total of 172 mostly male Veterans over the age of 64 (mean = 76.0; SD = 7.6) recruited from a VA clinic specializing in neuropsychological assessment of older Veterans. The clinical sample included 56 subjects diagnosed with Major Neurocognitive Disorder, 74 diagnosed with Mild Neurocognitive Disorder, and 42 with No Neurocognitive Impairment. Impairment categories were modeled in separate multinomial logistic regressions with two versions of the VFDT as predictors: the Visual Form Discrimination Test-Recognition Subtest (VFDT-Rec) test (visual recognition memory) and the Visual Form Discrimination Test-Matching Subtest VFDT-Mat test (visual form discrimination). Years of education were included as a covariate. After adjusting for education, higher VFDT-Rec total scores were associated with lower odds of being categorized with a greater degree of cognitive/functional impairment (OR 0.66–0.83, p < .001). VFDT-Mat scores showed a similar pattern, but only reached statistical significance for the Major versus No Neurocognitive Impairment (OR = 0.77, p = .0010) and Major versus Mild comparisons (OR = 0.89, p = .0233). The VFDT may enhance the confidence of differential diagnosis of dementia in older adult Veterans. Formal education-adjusted norms need to be established for clinical use.
- 13 August 2022
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
- Vol. 38 (1) , 106-118
The Benton Visual Form Discrimination Test as a Predictor of Neurocognitive Disorder in Older Veterans
The Benton Visual Form Discrimination Test (VFDT) is a commonly used measure of visual discrimination and visual recognition memory and has shown promise in distinguishing between different levels of cognitive impairment. We assess the predictive diagnostic utility of the VFDT in a sample of older Veterans with cognitive concerns. Subjects included a total of 172 mostly male Veterans over the age of 64 (mean = 76.0; SD = 7.6) recruited from a VA clinic specializing in neuropsychological assessment of older Veterans. The clinical sample included 56 subjects diagnosed with Major Neurocognitive Disorder, 74 diagnosed with Mild Neurocognitive Disorder, and 42 with No Neurocognitive Impairment. Impairment categories were modeled in separate multinomial logistic regressions with two versions of the VFDT as predictors: the Visual Form Discrimination Test-Recognition Subtest (VFDT-Rec) test (visual recognition memory) and the Visual Form Discrimination Test-Matching Subtest VFDT-Mat test (visual form discrimination). Years of education were included as a covariate. After adjusting for education, higher VFDT-Rec total scores were associated with lower odds of being categorized with a greater degree of cognitive/functional impairment (OR 0.66–0.83, p < .001). VFDT-Mat scores showed a similar pattern, but only reached statistical significance for the Major versus No Neurocognitive Impairment (OR = 0.77, p = .0010) and Major versus Mild comparisons (OR = 0.89, p = .0233). The VFDT may enhance the confidence of differential diagnosis of dementia in older adult Veterans. Formal education-adjusted norms need to be established for clinical use.
- Open Access
- 10 November 2021
- Published by Elsevier in Brain Stimulation
- Vol. 15 (1) , 63-72
Anatomical and fMRI-network comparison of multiple DLPFC targeting strategies for repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment of depression
- 10 November 2021
- Published by Elsevier in Brain Stimulation
- Vol. 15 (1) , 63-72
Open AccessAnatomical and fMRI-network comparison of multiple DLPFC targeting strategies for repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment of depression
- Open Access
Survivors of SARS-CoV-2 Infection Show Neuropsychiatric Sequelae Measured by Surveys, Neurocognitive Testing, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Preliminary Results
A significant number of individuals experience physical, cognitive, and mental health symptoms in the months after acute infection with SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19. This study assessed depressive and anxious symptoms, cognition, and brain structure and function in participants with symptomatic COVID-19 confirmed by PCR testing (n=100) approximately three months following infection, leveraging self-report questionnaires, objective neurocognitive testing, and structural and functional neuroimaging data. Preliminary results demonstrated that over 1/5 of our cohort endorsed clinically significant depressive and/or anxious symptoms, and >40% of participants had cognitive impairment on objective testing across multiple domains, consistent with ‘brain-fog’. While depression and one domain of quality of life (physical functioning) were significantly different between hospitalized and non-hospitalized participants, anxiety, cognitive impairment, and most domains of functioning were not, suggesting that the severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection does not necessarily relate to the severity of neuropsychiatric outcomes and impaired functioning in the months after infection. Furthermore, we found that the majority of participants in a subset of our cohort who completed structural and functional neuroimaging (n=15) had smaller olfactory bulbs and sulci in conjunction with anosmia. We also showed that this subset of participants had dysfunction in attention network functional connectivity and ventromedial prefrontal cortex seed-based functional connectivity. These functional imaging dysfunctions have been observed previously in depression and correlated with levels of inflammation. Our results support and extend previous findings in the literature concerning the neuropsychiatric sequelae associated with long COVID. Ongoing data collection and analyses within this cohort will allow for a more comprehensive understanding of the longitudinal relationships between neuropsychiatric symptoms, neurocognitive performance, brain structure and function, and inflammatory and immune profiles.
Open AccessSurvivors of SARS-CoV-2 Infection Show Neuropsychiatric Sequelae Measured by Surveys, Neurocognitive Testing, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Preliminary Results
A significant number of individuals experience physical, cognitive, and mental health symptoms in the months after acute infection with SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19. This study assessed depressive and anxious symptoms, cognition, and brain structure and function in participants with symptomatic COVID-19 confirmed by PCR testing (n=100) approximately three months following infection, leveraging self-report questionnaires, objective neurocognitive testing, and structural and functional neuroimaging data. Preliminary results demonstrated that over 1/5 of our cohort endorsed clinically significant depressive and/or anxious symptoms, and >40% of participants had cognitive impairment on objective testing across multiple domains, consistent with ‘brain-fog’. While depression and one domain of quality of life (physical functioning) were significantly different between hospitalized and non-hospitalized participants, anxiety, cognitive impairment, and most domains of functioning were not, suggesting that the severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection does not necessarily relate to the severity of neuropsychiatric outcomes and impaired functioning in the months after infection. Furthermore, we found that the majority of participants in a subset of our cohort who completed structural and functional neuroimaging (n=15) had smaller olfactory bulbs and sulci in conjunction with anosmia. We also showed that this subset of participants had dysfunction in attention network functional connectivity and ventromedial prefrontal cortex seed-based functional connectivity. These functional imaging dysfunctions have been observed previously in depression and correlated with levels of inflammation. Our results support and extend previous findings in the literature concerning the neuropsychiatric sequelae associated with long COVID. Ongoing data collection and analyses within this cohort will allow for a more comprehensive understanding of the longitudinal relationships between neuropsychiatric symptoms, neurocognitive performance, brain structure and function, and inflammatory and immune profiles.
- Open Access
- 30 June 2020
- Published by Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc in The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
- Vol. 81 (4)
Does Nitrous Oxide Help Veterans With Posttraumatic Stress Disorder? A Case Series
This case series investigates the potential for nitrous oxide to rapidly reduce symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder. Did it help the 3 Veteran outpatients who received it? Read this report to find out.
- 30 June 2020
- Published by Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc in The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
- Vol. 81 (4)
Open AccessDoes Nitrous Oxide Help Veterans With Posttraumatic Stress Disorder? A Case Series
This case series investigates the potential for nitrous oxide to rapidly reduce symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder. Did it help the 3 Veteran outpatients who received it? Read this report to find out.
- 1 June 2020
- Vol. 37 (6) , 276-281
A Clinical Program to Implement Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Depression in the Department of Veterans Affairs.
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) uses a device to create magnetic fields that cause electrical current to flow into targeted neurons in the brain. The most common clinical use of rTMS is for the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD). The annual suicide rate of veterans has been higher than the national average; treating depression with rTMS would likely decrease suicide risk. MDD in many patients can be chronic and reoccurring with medication and psychotherapy providing inadequate relief. A pilot program was created to supply rTMS devices to 35 different sites in the VA nationwide in order to treat treatment-resistant depression. At time of analysis more than 950 veterans have started the program and 412 have finished. Nationwide, we have seen the depression scores decline, indicating an improvement in well-being. In addition, there is high patient satisfaction. Collecting data on a national level is a powerful way to examine rTMS efficacy and predictors of response which might be lost on a smaller subset of cases.
- 1 June 2020
- Vol. 37 (6) , 276-281
A Clinical Program to Implement Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Depression in the Department of Veterans Affairs.
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) uses a device to create magnetic fields that cause electrical current to flow into targeted neurons in the brain. The most common clinical use of rTMS is for the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD). The annual suicide rate of veterans has been higher than the national average; treating depression with rTMS would likely decrease suicide risk. MDD in many patients can be chronic and reoccurring with medication and psychotherapy providing inadequate relief. A pilot program was created to supply rTMS devices to 35 different sites in the VA nationwide in order to treat treatment-resistant depression. At time of analysis more than 950 veterans have started the program and 412 have finished. Nationwide, we have seen the depression scores decline, indicating an improvement in well-being. In addition, there is high patient satisfaction. Collecting data on a national level is a powerful way to examine rTMS efficacy and predictors of response which might be lost on a smaller subset of cases.