Saeed Shoar
Research Subjects
Saeed Shoar has a total of 183 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
Nasrin Shoar
Department of Clinical Research, ScientificWriting Corp, Houston, Texas; School of Medicine, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran
25 shared publications- Mohammad Naderan
School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
19 shared publications Mohammad Naderan
Department of Medicine and Clinical Research Tehran University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran
13 shared publicationsHabibollah Mahmoodzadeh
Tehran University of Medical Sciences
7 shared publicationsVenkat R. Modukuru
Department of Surgery, Metropolitan Hospital Center, New York Medical College, New York, NY
7 shared publications- Habibollah Mahmoodzadeh
Breast Disease Research Center, Cancer Institute of Iran, Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences
6 shared publications
Latest Publications
- 13 April 2024
- Published by Elsevier in Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases
- Vol. 20  (9) , 856-863
The association of bariatric surgery with myocardial infarction and coronary revascularization: a propensity score match analysis of National Inpatient Sample
- 13 April 2024
- Published by Elsevier in Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases
- Vol. 20  (9) , 856-863
The association of bariatric surgery with myocardial infarction and coronary revascularization: a propensity score match analysis of National Inpatient Sample
- Open Access
Prevalence and factors associated with cognitive frailty in heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol
Introduction Heart failure (HF) is a global health issue affecting millions of people worldwide. Cognitive frailty, a syndrome characterised by physical frailty and cognitive impairment without dementia, is increasingly recognised in this population. Cognitive frailty is associated with worse outcomes, including increased hospitalisation, disability and mortality. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the incidence, prevalence and predictors of cognitive frailty in HF patients. Methods A systematic search will be conducted in MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE/Ovid, Web of Science and Google Scholar from inception to the latest search date. Eligible studies will report original data on adult patients (age ≥18 years) with HF, focusing on the incidence, prevalence and predictors of cognitive frailty. Two investigators will independently extract data and assess study quality using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and mixed-methods appraisal tool. Meta-analyses and meta-regression will be performed to estimate the pooled prevalence of cognitive frailty in HF patients and to identify predictors associated with increased risk, respectively. Subgroup analyses will be conducted to explore potential sources of heterogeneity. Ethics and dissemination This systematic review does not require ethical approval and informed consent, as it does not use identifiable patient data. The results of this study will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed medical journal. This comprehensive meta-analysis of the literature on cognitive frailty among HF patients will inform tailored interventions and management strategies, ultimately improving patients’ quality of life and outcomes.
Open AccessPrevalence and factors associated with cognitive frailty in heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol
Introduction Heart failure (HF) is a global health issue affecting millions of people worldwide. Cognitive frailty, a syndrome characterised by physical frailty and cognitive impairment without dementia, is increasingly recognised in this population. Cognitive frailty is associated with worse outcomes, including increased hospitalisation, disability and mortality. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the incidence, prevalence and predictors of cognitive frailty in HF patients. Methods A systematic search will be conducted in MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE/Ovid, Web of Science and Google Scholar from inception to the latest search date. Eligible studies will report original data on adult patients (age ≥18 years) with HF, focusing on the incidence, prevalence and predictors of cognitive frailty. Two investigators will independently extract data and assess study quality using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and mixed-methods appraisal tool. Meta-analyses and meta-regression will be performed to estimate the pooled prevalence of cognitive frailty in HF patients and to identify predictors associated with increased risk, respectively. Subgroup analyses will be conducted to explore potential sources of heterogeneity. Ethics and dissemination This systematic review does not require ethical approval and informed consent, as it does not use identifiable patient data. The results of this study will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed medical journal. This comprehensive meta-analysis of the literature on cognitive frailty among HF patients will inform tailored interventions and management strategies, ultimately improving patients’ quality of life and outcomes.
- Open Access
Prevalence of myocardial fibrosis among patients living with HIV and factors associated with a higher prevalence rate: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
Introduction HIV infection is an established risk factor for the development of cardiovascular diseases. Although increasing evidence implicates a higher prevalence of myocardial fibrosis (MF) among patients living with HIV (PLWH) compared with the HIV-negative population, there is a paucity of knowledge regarding its determinants and factors associated with higher odds of MF development. We aim to perform a systematic review to estimate the prevalence of MF among PLWH. Additionally, we will determine the factors associated with higher odds of MF among PLWH compared with the HIV-negative population. Methods A systematic review will be performed by consulting the Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventional studies reporting a confirmed diagnosis of MF among PLWH. Articles will be eligible if they provide the prevalence of MF among PLWH and HIV-negative populations or the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of MF development in relation to HIV. Depending on the quality of the data and the heterogeneity among the included studies, a random-effects or fixed-effects model will be used to pool and compare the ORs of MF among PLWH and HIV-negative population. Factors associated with higher odds of MF in relation to HIV will also be determined. Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval and obtaining informed consent are not required for this systematic review as it does not use individual patients’ data. Results of this study will be published in a peer-reviewed medical journal.
Open AccessPrevalence of myocardial fibrosis among patients living with HIV and factors associated with a higher prevalence rate: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
Introduction HIV infection is an established risk factor for the development of cardiovascular diseases. Although increasing evidence implicates a higher prevalence of myocardial fibrosis (MF) among patients living with HIV (PLWH) compared with the HIV-negative population, there is a paucity of knowledge regarding its determinants and factors associated with higher odds of MF development. We aim to perform a systematic review to estimate the prevalence of MF among PLWH. Additionally, we will determine the factors associated with higher odds of MF among PLWH compared with the HIV-negative population. Methods A systematic review will be performed by consulting the Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventional studies reporting a confirmed diagnosis of MF among PLWH. Articles will be eligible if they provide the prevalence of MF among PLWH and HIV-negative populations or the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of MF development in relation to HIV. Depending on the quality of the data and the heterogeneity among the included studies, a random-effects or fixed-effects model will be used to pool and compare the ORs of MF among PLWH and HIV-negative population. Factors associated with higher odds of MF in relation to HIV will also be determined. Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval and obtaining informed consent are not required for this systematic review as it does not use individual patients’ data. Results of this study will be published in a peer-reviewed medical journal.
- 1 January 2023
- Vol. 13  (4) , 235-246
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement among heart transplant recipients with donor aortic valve diseases: a systematic review of the literature
Background: Despite high surgical risk among heart transplant (HTx) recipients, who develop aortic valve diseases (AVD), transcutaneous aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has been scarcely reported as a viable option in this patient population. Methods: A systematic review was conducted to identify studies reporting the outcomes of HTx recipients who developed AVD of the donor heart and underwent TAVR. Studies were eligible if they provided individual-level data for HTx recipients, who underwent TAVR on the donor heart. Review articles, editorials or commentaries, studies lacking original data, or those reporting surgical valve replacement for AVD in HTx recipients were excluded. Results: A total of 15 case reports, encompassing 15 patients, describing characteristics and outcomes of HTx recipients undergoing TAVR were included. These included 13 males and 2 females with an average age of 63.6 +/- 15 years. The indications for HTx were non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy, ischemic cardiomyopathy and ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy in 42.9%, 35.7%, and 21.4% of the patients, respectively. The main indication for aortic valve replacement (AVR) among HTx recipients was aortic stenosis (73.3%). The transcutaneous approach was preferred over surgical AVR due to high surgical risk in > 50% of the patients. Both pre-TAVR transvalvular pressure gradient and the peak aortic pressure gradient decreased after the TAVR. Paravalvular leak was minimal/ none to mild in all the patients post-TAVR. Most patients had an uneventful post-TAVR recovery with no recurrence of the symptoms or echocardiographic finings at a median follow-up of 6 months. Conclusions: TAVR seems to be a viable option for HTx recipients who develop donor aortic valve diseases. However, there is a paucity of knowledge on the long-term survivability of the replaced aortic valves and the clinical and echocardiographic outcomes of HTx recipients undergoing TAVR.
- 1 January 2023
- Vol. 13  (4) , 235-246
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement among heart transplant recipients with donor aortic valve diseases: a systematic review of the literature
Background: Despite high surgical risk among heart transplant (HTx) recipients, who develop aortic valve diseases (AVD), transcutaneous aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has been scarcely reported as a viable option in this patient population. Methods: A systematic review was conducted to identify studies reporting the outcomes of HTx recipients who developed AVD of the donor heart and underwent TAVR. Studies were eligible if they provided individual-level data for HTx recipients, who underwent TAVR on the donor heart. Review articles, editorials or commentaries, studies lacking original data, or those reporting surgical valve replacement for AVD in HTx recipients were excluded. Results: A total of 15 case reports, encompassing 15 patients, describing characteristics and outcomes of HTx recipients undergoing TAVR were included. These included 13 males and 2 females with an average age of 63.6 +/- 15 years. The indications for HTx were non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy, ischemic cardiomyopathy and ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy in 42.9%, 35.7%, and 21.4% of the patients, respectively. The main indication for aortic valve replacement (AVR) among HTx recipients was aortic stenosis (73.3%). The transcutaneous approach was preferred over surgical AVR due to high surgical risk in > 50% of the patients. Both pre-TAVR transvalvular pressure gradient and the peak aortic pressure gradient decreased after the TAVR. Paravalvular leak was minimal/ none to mild in all the patients post-TAVR. Most patients had an uneventful post-TAVR recovery with no recurrence of the symptoms or echocardiographic finings at a median follow-up of 6 months. Conclusions: TAVR seems to be a viable option for HTx recipients who develop donor aortic valve diseases. However, there is a paucity of knowledge on the long-term survivability of the replaced aortic valves and the clinical and echocardiographic outcomes of HTx recipients undergoing TAVR.
- Open Access
- 4 December 2022
- Published by Maad Rayan Publishing Company in Journal of Research in Clinical Medicine
- Vol. 10  (1) , 24
COVID-19 and conjunctivitis: A contemporary literature review
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a viral respiratory illness caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Since its first appearance in December 2019, COVID-19 has been responsible for a number of global outbreaks and has claimed the lives of nearly three million people as of April 2021. High infection rate, loss of taste and smell, fever, cough, and severely adverse effects on the respiratory system have been the chief attributes of the virus. However, SARS-CoV-2 has been linked to other symptoms, many of which are extra-pulmonary or not directly related to the respiratory system. The impact of SARS-CoV-2 on various ophthalmic outcomes has been manifested in many reports and literature tracing the link between COVID-19 and ocular findings in patients suffering from COVID-19. One recurrent case report presented in the literature is related to the presentation of conjunctivitis in COVID-19 patients. Conjunctivitis is a viral infection causing inflammation in conjunctiva, episclera and eyelids resulting in a change of color in eyes, called pink eyes. Swelling, itching, pain, and eye burn are some of the common symptoms. The present study reviews the latest literature on the subject by focusing on the reports of conjunctivitis symptoms in patients with COVID-19.
- 4 December 2022
- Published by Maad Rayan Publishing Company in Journal of Research in Clinical Medicine
- Vol. 10  (1) , 24
Open AccessCOVID-19 and conjunctivitis: A contemporary literature review
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a viral respiratory illness caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Since its first appearance in December 2019, COVID-19 has been responsible for a number of global outbreaks and has claimed the lives of nearly three million people as of April 2021. High infection rate, loss of taste and smell, fever, cough, and severely adverse effects on the respiratory system have been the chief attributes of the virus. However, SARS-CoV-2 has been linked to other symptoms, many of which are extra-pulmonary or not directly related to the respiratory system. The impact of SARS-CoV-2 on various ophthalmic outcomes has been manifested in many reports and literature tracing the link between COVID-19 and ocular findings in patients suffering from COVID-19. One recurrent case report presented in the literature is related to the presentation of conjunctivitis in COVID-19 patients. Conjunctivitis is a viral infection causing inflammation in conjunctiva, episclera and eyelids resulting in a change of color in eyes, called pink eyes. Swelling, itching, pain, and eye burn are some of the common symptoms. The present study reviews the latest literature on the subject by focusing on the reports of conjunctivitis symptoms in patients with COVID-19.
- 26 September 2022
- Published by Elsevier in Resuscitation
- Vol. 181, 190-196
Determinants of change in code status among patients with cardiopulmonary arrest admitted to the intensive care unit
- 26 September 2022
- Published by Elsevier in Resuscitation
- Vol. 181, 190-196
Determinants of change in code status among patients with cardiopulmonary arrest admitted to the intensive care unit
- 4 January 2022
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
- Vol. 29  (7) , e263
Letter on Incidence and prognosis of COVID-19 among heart transplant recipients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Saeed Shoar, MD; Letter on Incidence and prognosis of COVID-19 amongst heart transplant recipients: a systematic review and meta-analysis, European Journal of P
- 4 January 2022
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
- Vol. 29  (7) , e263
Letter on Incidence and prognosis of COVID-19 among heart transplant recipients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Saeed Shoar, MD; Letter on Incidence and prognosis of COVID-19 amongst heart transplant recipients: a systematic review and meta-analysis, European Journal of P
- Open Access
- 1 January 2022
- Published by SAGE Publications in Clinical Medicine Insights: Circulatory, Respiratory and Pulmonary Medicine
- Vol. 16
Immune Response to SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine among Heart Transplant Recipients: A Systematic Review
Background: Heart transplant (HTX) recipients are at a significantly higher risk of adverse clinical outcomes, due to chronic immunosuppression and co-existence of other chronic conditions, when contracting the SARS-CoV-2 infection. Although vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 is currently the most promising measure for the prevention of severe Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) among solid organ transplant recipients, the extent of immune response and its protective efficacy among patients receiving HTX has not been sufficiently studied. Methods: We performed a systematic review of the literature by inquiring PubMed/Medline to identify original studies among HTX recipients, who had received at least one dose of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. Data on the measured humoral or cellular immune response was collected from all the eligible studies. Factors associated with a poor immune response were further investigated within these studies. Results: A total of 12 studies comprising 563 HTX recipients were included. The average age of the study participants was 60.8 years. Sixty four percent of the study population were male. Ninety percent of the patients had received an mRNA vaccine (Pfizer/ BNT162b2 or Moderna/mRNA-1273). A positive immune response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccine was variably reported in 0% to 100% of the patients. Older age (> 65 years), vaccine dose (first, second, or third), time since HTX to the first dose of the vaccine, the time interval between the latest dose of the vaccine and measurement of the immune response, and the type of immunosuppressive regimen were all indicated as potential determinants of a robust immune response to the SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Conclusion: HTX recipients demonstrate a weaker immune response to the vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 compared to the general population. Older age, anti-metabolite agents such as mycophenolate mofetil, and vaccination during the first year following the HTX have been indicated as potential determinants of a poor immune response.
- 1 January 2022
- Published by SAGE Publications in Clinical Medicine Insights: Circulatory, Respiratory and Pulmonary Medicine
- Vol. 16
Open AccessImmune Response to SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine among Heart Transplant Recipients: A Systematic Review
Background: Heart transplant (HTX) recipients are at a significantly higher risk of adverse clinical outcomes, due to chronic immunosuppression and co-existence of other chronic conditions, when contracting the SARS-CoV-2 infection. Although vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 is currently the most promising measure for the prevention of severe Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) among solid organ transplant recipients, the extent of immune response and its protective efficacy among patients receiving HTX has not been sufficiently studied. Methods: We performed a systematic review of the literature by inquiring PubMed/Medline to identify original studies among HTX recipients, who had received at least one dose of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. Data on the measured humoral or cellular immune response was collected from all the eligible studies. Factors associated with a poor immune response were further investigated within these studies. Results: A total of 12 studies comprising 563 HTX recipients were included. The average age of the study participants was 60.8 years. Sixty four percent of the study population were male. Ninety percent of the patients had received an mRNA vaccine (Pfizer/ BNT162b2 or Moderna/mRNA-1273). A positive immune response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccine was variably reported in 0% to 100% of the patients. Older age (> 65 years), vaccine dose (first, second, or third), time since HTX to the first dose of the vaccine, the time interval between the latest dose of the vaccine and measurement of the immune response, and the type of immunosuppressive regimen were all indicated as potential determinants of a robust immune response to the SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Conclusion: HTX recipients demonstrate a weaker immune response to the vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 compared to the general population. Older age, anti-metabolite agents such as mycophenolate mofetil, and vaccination during the first year following the HTX have been indicated as potential determinants of a poor immune response.