Christopher John Newman

Background: Digital technologies for rehabilitation (DT4R), such as robotics and treadmill systems (RobTS), virtual reality and active video gaming (VR-AVG), and telehealth and apps (T&Apps), are promising tools for pediatric motor rehabilitation. Identifying acceptance factors is essential for effective clinical adoption. Objective: This study aimed to analyze the use of 3 different technologies for rehabilitation—RobTS, VR-AVG, and T&Apps—through a causal model based on the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT). Methods: This study was part of RehaTech4child, a cross-sectional survey (2022) supported by the European Academy of Childhood-onset Disability, aimed at professionals working in pediatric motor rehabilitation across Europe. It assessed DT4R use, intention to use, and UTAUT concepts (performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, and barriers). Structural equation modeling was performed to analyze the data and understand relationships between observed and latent variables. Results: A total of 1397 responses were received, and 635 fulfilled the eligibility criteria. The fitness indices suggested a satisfactory fit between the data and the model. The model explained 67% of the variance in the use of RobTS, 62% in VR-AVG, and 57% in T&Apps. Among all studied determinants, access had the strongest impact on use for all 3 categories of DT4R (RobTS: β=0.78, VR-AVG: β=0.73, and T&Apps: β=0.70; P <.001). Intention to use significantly impacted use behavior for all technologies; it was the second determinant after access for VR-AVG (β=0.18, P <.001) and T&Apps (β=0.21, P <.001), with a lower weight for RobTS (β=0.06, P=.007; P <.001). In the subgroup analysis of respondents reporting easy access, intention to use was the strongest determinant of use. The model explained 61% of the variance in intention to use for RobTS, 67% for VR-AVG, and 68% for T&Apps. Performance expectancy had the strongest effect on intention to use for the 3 technologies (RobTS: β=0.81, VR-AVG: β=0.84, and T&Apps: β=0.90; P <.001). For this concept, the items with the highest weights were significantly related to the effectiveness of DT4R on rehabilitation. Social influence and effort expectancy had a slight impact on intention to use. Conclusions: These results underscore the need to ensure easy access as a prerequisite for assessing relevant determinants of acceptance. Developing the evidence base for DT4R effectiveness and ensuring the availability of existing evidence may facilitate DT4R implementation. In our study, within the framework of the UTAUT model, no acceptance barrier was linked to the use of DT4R with children. Gathering families’ views may be useful for the implementation of RobTS. T&Apps may be useful for involving parents in their child’s rehabilitation. Further studies should focus on children’s and families’ points of view.

Background: Music therapy and music-based interventions are increasingly recognized as valuable adjuncts in pediatric neurorehabilitation, leveraging rhythm, singing, instrument playing, and improvisation to support children with neurological disabilities. Objective/Method: This narrative review synthesizes evidence from studies published between 2000 and 2025, focusing on children aged 3 to 18 years receiving neurorehabilitation. Results: The literature demonstrates that music therapy and music-based interventions can improve motor function—particularly gait and upper limb coordination—as well as speech production, while also reducing anxiety and enhancing participation. Techniques such as rhythmic auditory stimulation and melodic intonation therapy have shown promise in targeting movement and communication deficits. Music therapy is further associated with positive effects on vital signs and emotional well-being, supporting its role in holistic care. Neurobiological findings suggest that music-based interventions may promote neuroplasticity and strengthen brain connectivity, though high-quality mechanistic studies remain limited. Conclusions: Despite methodological heterogeneity and small sample sizes in the current literature, the overall evidence supports music therapy and music-based interventions as accessible, cost-effective, and child-centered complements to standard neurorehabilitation. Future research should prioritize rigorous clinical trials and neurobiological investigations to clarify mechanisms and optimize therapeutic protocols.

Background/Objectives: Atlantoaxial instability (AAI) affects approximately 20% of individuals with Trisomy 21. Radiological screening has been debated for decades due to its unclear clinical utility and lack of standardized diagnostic criteria. This systematic review evaluates the indications, efficacy, and clinical implications of radiological screening for AAI in children with Trisomy 21. Methods: Following the PRISMA guidelines, we conducted a systematic search in PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar for studies published between 1990 and May 2024. Studies were included if they assessed AAI screening in pediatric Trisomy 21 populations, defined AAI radiologically, and reported at least two cases. We extracted the demographic data, study design, radiological criteria, screening recommendations, and biases from these studies. Results: Of the 537 identified studies, 8 met the inclusion criteria, encompassing 2536 children (mean age: 7 years). Five studies supported routine screening, while three opposed it. Studies varied significantly in their AAI definitions, using atlanto-dental interval (ADI) thresholds of 4 mm to 6 mm, the space available for cord (SAC), and the basion-axial interval (BAI). No study demonstrated a definitive correlation between radiological findings and neurological symptoms. Conclusions: Routine radiological screening for AAI in asymptomatic children with Trisomy 21 is not supported by consistent evidence. A selective screening approach, focusing on symptomatic patients or those engaging in high-risk activities, may be more appropriate. The standardization of radiological criteria and prospective studies are needed to refine screening recommendations.

Aim: Young people with childhood‐onset motor disabilities face unique challenges in understanding and managing their condition. This study explored how they learnt about their condition.Method: A descriptive qualitative study was conducted in 2023–2024 at a Swiss paediatric neurorehabilitation unit. Ten participants aged 15–24 years were recruited through purposive sampling, representing diverse conditions and socio‐educational backgrounds. Inductive thematic analysis was conducted on interview transcripts.Results: Four themes emerged. First, learning paths revealed that participants gradually acquired knowledge about their condition. Early explanations often involved parents and visual aids, with moments of awareness and evolving information needs shaping their learning over time. Second, building blocks of understanding showed that knowledge was constructed through interactions with physicians, therapists, parents, peers and the Internet. Third, interacting with healthcare professionals highlighted the importance of trust and continuity in relationships with healthcare professionals to support learning. Last, improving the learning process suggested strategies such as dedicated consultations for recapping information during adolescence and increasing disability awareness in schools.Conclusion: Young people with motor disabilities require information and support tailored to their individual learning needs. Adapting these resources could enhance their understanding of their condition, supporting the development of their autonomy and self‐advocacy within healthcare.

This commentary is on the original article by Choi et al. on pages 1096–1105 of this issue.

Importance: Intensive interventions are provided to young children with unilateral cerebral palsy (UCP), classically focused on the upper extremity despite the frequent impairment of gross motor function. Hand-Arm Bimanual Intensive Therapy Including Lower Extremities (HABIT-ILE) effectively improves manual dexterity and gross motor function in school-aged children.Objective: To verify if HABIT-ILE would improve manual abilities in young children with UCP more than usual motor activity.Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective randomized clinical trial (November 2018 to December 2021), including 2 parallel groups and a 1:1 allocation, recruitment took place at European university hospitals, cerebral palsy specialized centers, and spontaneous applications at 3 sites: Brussels, Belgium; Brest, France; and Pisa, Italy. Matched (age at inclusion, lesion type, cause of cerebral palsy, and affected side) pairs randomization was performed. Young children were assessed at baseline (T0), 2 weeks after baseline (T1), and 3 months after baseline (T2). Health care professionals and assessors of main outcomes were blinded to group allocation. At least 23 young children (in each group) aged 12 to 59 months with spastic/dyskinetic UCP and able to follow instructions were needed. Exclusion criteria included uncontrolled seizures, scheduled botulinum toxin injections, orthopedic surgery scheduled during the 6 months before or during the study period, severe visual/cognitive impairments, or contraindications to magnetic resonance imaging.Interventions: Two weeks of usual motor activity including usual rehabilitation (control group) vs 2 weeks (50 hours) of HABIT-ILE (HABIT-ILE group).Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcome: Assisting Hand Assessment (AHA); secondary outcomes: Gross Motor Function Measure-66 (GMFM-66), Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory-Computer Adaptive Test (PEDI-CAT), and Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM).Results: Of 50 recruited young children (26 girls [52%], median age; 35.3 months for HABIT-ILE group; median age, 32.8 months for control group), 49 were included in the final analyses. Change in AHA score from T0 to T2 was significantly greater in the HABIT-ILE group (adjusted mean score difference [MD], 5.19; 95% CI, 2.84-7.55; P < .001). Changes in GMFM-66 (MD, 4.72; 95% CI, 2.66-6.78), PEDI-CAT daily activities (MD, 1.40; 95% CI, 0.29-2.51), COPM performance (MD, 3.62; 95% CI, 2.91-4.32), and satisfaction (MD, 3.53; 95% CI, 2.70-4.36) scores were greater in the HABIT ILE group.Conclusions and Relevance: In this clinical trial, early HABIT-ILE was shown to be an effective treatment to improve motor performance in young children with UCP. Moreover, the improvements had an impact on daily life activities of these children.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04020354

Delivering difficult news to parents of children with neurodisabilities, often involving new diagnoses, prognosis changes, or declines in function or health, presents a complex task. Our aim was to assess physicians’ self-perceived competence in breaking bad news (BBN) within this context. An online survey was administered to neuropediatricians and developmental and rehabilitation pediatricians in Switzerland. Among 247 invited physicians, 62 (25.1%) responded (age of 51 ± 11 years; M/F ratio of 2:3). They rated their BBN competence at 7.5 ± 1.6 out of 10. Factors significantly associated with self-perceived competence in uni- and multivariate analyses included years of professional experience (≤10 years: 6.2 ± 1.8; >10 years: 8.2 ± 0.8), and region of pregraduate training (Switzerland: 7.3 ± 1.6; European Union: 8.3 ± 0.9). The respondents highlighted the positive roles of professional and personal experience, quality relationships with families, and empathy in BBN. In summary, physicians generally expressed a sense of competence in delivering difficult news to parents of children with neurodisabilities. They underscored the significance of life experiences and certain individual qualities in their effectiveness. These findings provide valuable insights into enhancing professional training and support in this crucial yet underexplored aspect of medical practice.

Introduction Digital technologies can be used as part of paediatric motor rehabilitation to remediate impairment, promote recovery and improve function. However, the uptake of digital technologies in this clinical field may be limited. The aim of this study is to describe and explain digital technology use for paediatric motor rehabilitation. The specific objectives will be: (1) to describe the access to, acceptance of and use of digital technologies as a function of individual factors related to professionals practicing motor rehabilitation with children, and of environmental factors related to paediatric rehabilitation practice and (2) to explain digital technology use with a causal model based on the ‘unified theory of acceptance and use of technology’. Methods and analysis RehaTech4child (Rehabilitation Technologies For children) is a cross-sectional study involving an online survey, that is sponsored by the European Academy of Childhood Disability (EACD). The survey protocol follows the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology and CHERRIES (Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys) guidelines. The survey includes 43 questions about (1) respondents’ individual and environmental characteristics; (2) the ease of access to digital technologies, and the frequency, type and purpose of use of those technologies and (3) acceptance of technologies and barriers to their use. The survey is intended for professionals involved in paediatric motor rehabilitation. It is disseminated across Europe by the EACD network in 20 languages. Participation is anonymous and voluntary. We aim to include 500 respondents to ensure sufficient precision for the description of study outcomes and to perform stratified analyses by the main determinants. Ethics and dissemination Ethics approval was waived by the Brest CHRU Institutional Review Board. The study is conducted according to current French legislation (loi Jardé (n°2012-300)) and the survey is GDPR compliant. Study findings will be presented at national and international meetings and submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal. Trial registration number NCT05176522.

Medical call centres can evaluate and refer patients to an emergency department (ED), a physician or provide guidance for self-care. Our aim was (1) to determine parental adherence to an ED orientation after being referred by the nurses of a call centre, (2) to observe how adherence varies according to children’s characteristics and (3) to assess parents’ reasons for non-adherence. This was a prospective cohort study set in the Lausanne agglomeration, Switzerland. From 1 February to 5 March 2022, paediatric calls (<16 years old) with an ED orientation were selected. Life-threatening emergencies were excluded. Parental adherence was then verified in the ED. All parents were contacted by telephone to respond to a questionnaire regarding their call. Parental adherence to the ED orientation was 75%. Adherence decreased significantly with increasing distance between the place the call originated and the ED. The child’s age, sex and health complaints within calls had no effect on adherence. The three major reasons for non-adherence to telephone referral were: improvement in the child’s condition (50.7%), parents’ decision to go elsewhere (18.3%) and an appointment with a paediatrician (15.5%). Our results offer new perspectives to optimise the telephone assessment of paediatric patients and decrease barriers to adherence.