Svetlana Skurtveit

Background: Suicide risk is elevated after prison release, but population‐level evidence on temporal risk patterns and associated factors remains limited. We aimed to describe characteristics of individuals who die by suicide after release from Norwegian prisons, compare their suicide mortality with the general population, and examine risk factors over time. Material and Methods: Data from the Norwegian Prison Release Study (nPRIS), including all people in prison in Norway (2000–2022), were linked to the Norwegian Cause of Death Registry, the Norwegian Prison Registry, the Norwegian Patient Registry, and Statistics Norway. We calculated crude mortality rates (CMR) per 100,000 person‐years, standardized mortality ratios (SMR), annual age‐standardized years of life lost rate (ASYR), and Cox proportional hazards models. Results: From 2000 to 2022, 1183 suicides (9.1% of all deaths; CMR 81; 95% CI 76–85) occurred after release (90% male). The SMR was higher in women (SMR 8.64; 95% CI 7.17–10.34) than men (SMR 3.98; 95% CI 3.76–4.22). In multivariable models (2009–2022; n = 57,034; 516 suicides), strong independent associations with suicide 6 months post‐release included self‐harm (adjusted HR [aHR] 4.76; 95% CI 2.60–8.72), severe mental illness (aHR 1.95; 95% CI 1.16–3.27), release from high‐security prisons (aHR 1.93; 95% CI 1.12–3.33), and pretrial detention (aHR 1.82; 95% CI 1.06–3.13). Conclusions: Suicide risk is substantially and persistently elevated relative to the general population, peaks immediately after release, and is concentrated among people with prior self‐harm, severe mental illness, and those released from high‐security settings.

Background: Increasing oxycodone prescribing and its association with opioid‐related harms have raised concerns. In Norway, nearly 90% of opioids are prescribed in primary care, making primary care decisions important to overall opioid exposure. In‐hospital use may influence primary care practices through several mechanisms. This study analyses oxycodone and morphine use in Norwegian hospitals and its association with primary care prescribing from 2010 to 2021, alongside a review of tender agreements for these medications. Methods: Morphine and oxycodone, available in all relevant formulations, served as opioid proxies to compare covariation between hospitals and their catchment areas. We analyzed 2010–2021 procurement data from hospital pharmacies and primary care dispensing data from the Norwegian Prescription Database for all hospital trusts. Correlations between hospital and primary care morphine‐to‐oxycodone prescribing ratios were assessed using Pearson's r . Annual tender agreements were obtained from the national Hospital Procurement Organization. Results: Hospital oxycodone use increased by 67.0% and primary care prescribing rose by 86.5%. Morphine use increased by 12.6% in hospitals but decreased by 23.2% in primary care. A moderate covariation (Pearson's r = 0.48) between hospital use and primary care prescribing was observed. Hospital tender agreements for morphine declined by 80%, while those for oxycodone remained stable. Conclusions: Oxycodone use substantially increased relative to morphine in Norwegian hospitals and primary care. Prescription patterns show moderate covariation, suggesting a potential link between hospital and primary care prescribing, though causality remains uncertain. Tender agreements may contribute to prescribing trends in hospitals, with possible associations in primary care. Significance: This study is the first to provide quantitative evidence of covariation between in‐hospital use and primary care opioid prescribing across a national healthcare system. Despite recommendations favoring morphine, oxycodone prescribing continues to rise in Norway, with marked geographical variation. By linking procurement data, prescription patterns and tender agreements, our findings highlight the need to consider hospital practices and structural factors when addressing opioid prescribing. These results offer new insights into potential levers for opioid stewardship across care levels.

The aim was to estimate all-cause and cause-specific mortality in long-term prescription opioid users compared to the general population. This nationwide registry–based cohort study used data of patients aged 15 to 69 years with no previous cancer diagnosis and a recorded episode of long-term opioid analgesics use (anatomical therapeutic chemical [ATC] group N02A; N = 116,006) in Norway between 2011 and 2019. Sex-specific crude mortality rates (CMR) and age-standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) were calculated for all-cause and cause-specific mortality, ie, natural and unnatural causes for the whole study population and for different age groups (15-34, 35-54, and 55-69 years). Overall, 4.6% (2491/54,535) of men and 2.7% (1680/61,471) of women died during the follow-up period. Crude mortality rates for all-cause mortality were 1194 and 724 deaths per 100,000 person-years (PY) in men and women, respectively. Men had higher CMRs across all causes, particularly unnatural causes (221 and 101 deaths per 100,000 PY in men and women, respectively). Patients with long-term opioid use had a 4 times higher all-cause mortality (SMR = 3.8 [95% CI = 3.6-3.9] in men and 3.7 [3.5-3.9] in women aged 15-69 years) compared to the general Norwegian population of the same age. Excess mortality was observed across all causes, particularly suicide, accidents, and accidental poisoning. Standardized mortality ratios decreased with age and were highest for the youngest age group (15-34 years), particularly among men. Long-term prescription opioid use is associated with an increased risk of death. Clinicians should weigh the risks of long-term opioid use against the benefits.

The aim of this study was to examine variations in use of antidepressants among children and adolescents in the three Scandinavian countries (Sweden, Norway, and Denmark). We identified new users of antidepressants (5–17 years) during 2007–2018 and described the annual incidence rate, treatment duration, concomitant psychotropic drug use, and the clinical setting of the prescribing physician (in Sweden and Denmark). Incident use of antidepressants increased by a factor 1.9 in Sweden, 1.3 in Norway and decreased by a factor 0.6 in Denmark during the study period. In Sweden, 58% of antidepressant users were covered by a prescription 12 months after initiation compared to 40% in Norway and 49% in Denmark. Also, 34% of Swedish antidepressant users were in continuous treatment after 12 months compared to 26% in Norway and 31% in Denmark. Concomitant use of other psychotropics was more common in Sweden (57%) than in Norway (37%) and Denmark (27%). During 2007–2018, clinicians from psychiatry settings initiated 75% of antidepressant treatments in Sweden, while this was the case for 50% of prescriptions in Denmark, although the proportion increased over time. The number of new antidepressant users is high and still rising in Sweden compared to Norway and Denmark. Swedish antidepressant users are more likely to use other psychotropics and to be covered by an antidepressant prescription after one year. Most antidepressants in Sweden are prescribed by physicians within psychiatric settings suggesting that they are based on specialized psychiatric evaluation.

Opioid and nonopioid analgesics are commonly prescribed to young people to alleviate pain. Even short-term prescriptions increase the risk of persistent use and future misuse of potent analgesics, such as opioids. Childhood trauma exposure has been found to be related to pain conditions and to using more prescription analgesics. This large, prospective cohort study aimed to investigate the association of a broad range of childhood trauma exposures with prescription rates for opioid and nonopioid analgesics in adolescence and young adulthood. Self-reported data on childhood trauma exposures from adolescents (aged 13-19 years) who participated in the Young-HUNT3 Study (2006-2008, n = 8199) were linked to data from the Norwegian Prescription Database (NorPD, 2004-2021). We found that exposure to childhood trauma was consistently associated with higher prescription rates for opioids throughout adolescence and young adulthood. The highest incidence rate ratio (IRR) in adolescence was observed for sexual abuse (IRR 1.63, confidence interval [CI] 1.19-2.23). In young adulthood, the highest IRR was observed for physical violence (2.66, CI 2.27-3.12). The same overall pattern was observed for nonopioid analgesics. The more frequent prescriptions of opioid and nonopioid analgesics to participants exposed to childhood trauma suggests a higher symptom load of pain causing them to seek professional help with pain relief. Receiving potent analgesics is not without risk, and the likelihood of misuse may be elevated among trauma-exposed individuals. A trauma-informed approach to pain could be vital for guiding clinicians to the most effective and least harmful treatment for each patient.

Purpose: Opioid analgesics (OA) and other pharmaceuticals have been associated with drug‐induced deaths. However, there is a lack of knowledge regarding patterns of use of these pharmaceuticals in the population and regarding such associations. We identify and describe subgroups of people with different patterns of filled prescriptions of OA and other relevant pharmaceuticals and examine associations with drug‐induced deaths. In addition, we estimate the proportion of drug‐induced deaths with a filled OA prescription and OA as cause of death.Methods: A Norwegian population‐based nested case‐control register study with cases (drug‐induced deaths 2010–2018, N = 2388) and population controls matched for age, gender and year of inclusion (N = 21 465). Patterns of filled prescriptions for opioid analgesics (OA), benzodiazepines and benzodiazepine‐related drugs, gabapentinoids, ADHD medication and antidepressants/antipsychotics were explored by k‐means cluster analysis. Associations with drug‐induced deaths were estimated by conditional logistic regression adjusted for sociodemographic characteristics. Overlap of filled OA prescriptions and OA as cause of death was estimated.Results: Five clusters were identified: ‘few prescriptions’, ‘weak OA’, ‘ADHD medication’, ‘sedative/psychiatric morbidity’ and ‘strong OA’. The ‘strong OA’ cluster had higher socioeconomic status compared to the other groupings. The risk of drug‐induced death was also highest in this cluster (OR = 35.5; CI 25.6–49.3) and, for 68% (CI 64–73) of cases, filled prescriptions for OA was indicated as the underlying cause of death.Conclusions: The cluster analysis identified a subgroup with filled prescriptions of OA and other pharmaceuticals and a higher socioeconomic status than other subgroups. This subgroup had a high risk of drug‐induced death that needs to be addressed.

We have previously shown that the use of hypnotic drugs increased among young Scandinavians during 2012–2018. This study aimed to explore psychiatric and somatic morbidity among adolescent hypnotic drug users in a cohort study of 13–17-year-old individuals during 2008–2018 in Norway. Data sources were (i) prescription data from the Norwegian Prescription Database linked to specialist health care diagnoses from the Norwegian Patient Registry and (ii) sleep disorder diagnoses from the Primary Health Care Database. Hypnotic drugs were defined as the sedative antihistamine alimemazine and the ATC group “Hypnotics and Sedatives” (N05C), excluding midazolam. In 2017, 2519 girls (16.5/1000) and 1718 boys (10.7/1000) were incident (new) users of hypnotic drugs. Most of these new users (82% of girls, 77% of boys) were referred to secondary health care, where the most frequent diagnoses were mental and behavioral disorders (51.8% of girls, 46.2% of boys), while only 3.2% received a specific sleep disorder diagnosis. The most common mental and behavioral disorders were “Neurotic stress-related disorders” among girls (27.4%) and “Behavioral and emotional disorders” among boys (23.6%). In conclusion, the trend of increasing hypnotic drug use among adolescents reflects the initiation of hypnotic drugs in a subgroup of the population with a higher disease burden, mainly due to psychiatric disorders, than the general population.

Objectives: Since 2008, patients have had access to reimbursed analgesics, including opioids, for chronic pain in Norway. There is a need for knowledge on the occurrence and trends over time of substance use disorder (SUD) diagnoses among patients who receive reimbursed opioids for chronic pain. The primary aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of SUD diagnoses in patients with chronic pain using reimbursed opioids from 2010 to 2019 in Norway. The secondary aim was to investigate the prevalence of other mental health diagnoses among those receiving reimbursed opioids in the subgroups with and without SUD diagnoses. Methods: A cross-sectional design utilising data from four Norwegian nationwide registries. Results: The annual number of individuals with SUD diagnoses increased from 377 to 932 from 2010 to 2019, while the annual prevalence of individuals with SUD remained relatively stable at around 5%. There was a higher prevalence for all categories of other mental health diagnoses among individuals with a SUD diagnosis, compared to those without a SUD diagnosis. Conclusion: The prevalence of SUD diagnoses was low in the population using reimbursed opioids for chronic pain in Norway, but the number of patients increased in the study period because the number of individuals receiving reimbursed opioids increased. Patients with a SUD used on average twice the daily doses of opioids compared to patients without a SUD. They were also more likely to have an additional mental health diagnosis.