Uwe Berger

Grass pollen, the most clinically relevant outdoor aeroallergen in Europe and worldwide, presents a complex challenge due to the diverse nature of its subspecies. This diversity complicates the interpretation of their contribution to the overall pollen burden during the grass pollen season and the selection of the appropriate allergen immunotherapy. Almost all species of the Pooideae subfamily share important major allergens, namely the allergens of Group 1 and 5, leading to a high level of cross‐reactivity at the IgE level. However, the presence of a multitude of additional minor allergens and species‐specific epitopes adds to the complexity. Timothy ( Phleum pratense ), previously considered the most relevant allergen source among grass species, is found during the late‐blooming grass pollen season, while symptom severity and pollen concentrations already show several peaks during the early‐blooming grass and main grass pollen seasons. Current data suggest a limited regional relevance of timothy grass during the natural grass pollen season in southern Europe from both the aerobiology and allergy perspectives. This review aims to discuss the latest evidence supporting a broad‐spectrum approach to best reflect natural grass pollen exposure in allergen immunotherapy, presenting a complex but crucial aspect of allergology.

Ambrosia artemisiifolia (ragweed) is a highly invasive species that produces large amounts of allergenic pollen. This poses a serious health risk to allergy sufferers. The “Ragweed Finder” is an Austrian citizen science platform (website and app) that enables the public to report occurrences of ragweed, which are then verified by experts. Over 90% of reports are confirmed as positive, with most originating from eastern Austria, where ragweed is widespread. The number of reports has generally increased over time, except in 2020 during the pandemic. Report frequency does not directly correlate with daily pollen concentrations, but peaks before and during pollen season. Most observations occur along traffic routes, likely due to seed dispersal by vehicle airflow or easier accessibility for users. Verified observations are displayed on an interactive map, helping allergy sufferers to avoid exposure and informing local authorities of the need for targeted control actions. The data are also used to raise awareness among policymakers and help to enact the first law for the control and prevention of ragweed in Burgenland (Austria), in 2021: the “Burgenland Ragweed Control Act”. This demonstrates the success of the “Ragweed Finder” as an important tool for monitoring this invasive species in Austria.

Background: Regulatory authorities recommend a combination of symptom and medication scores during the grass pollen season as a primary endpoint for Phase III allergen immunotherapy (AIT) trials targeting allergic rhinoconjunctivitis. However, many composite primary endpoint scales exist; none are validated, nor do they have a well‐justified minimal clinically important difference (MCID). Methods: Direct patient feedback from 1071 grass‐allergic patients was obtained to determine the minimally relevant improvement in allergic symptoms and translated into an MCID for the EAACI recommended CSMS _0–6 . Additionally, a clinically relevant threshold for the validated Rhinitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ(S)) was determined from studies of registered SLIT products and subsequently used as an anchor to derive the MCID for CSMS _0–6 using the data of a Phase III clinical trial with PQ Grass 27,600 SU (RESONATE). Results: 69% of grass‐allergic patients were satisfied with a 1‐point‐improvement (e.g., from “severe” to “moderate”) in their most severe symptom. This translated into an MCID range for CSMS _0–6 of −0.23 to −0.21 points or −17% to −16%. Furthermore, a −0.34 point difference in RQLQ(S) compared to placebo was justified as clinically meaningful based on Phase III data from 2 registered SLIT grass tablets. Using this RQLQ(S) threshold as an anchor, an MCID of CSMS _0–6 of −0.21 points (−16%) was derived using RESONATE. Conclusions: Both patient feedback and RESONATE results support an average MCID of −0.22 points on the CSMS _0–6 scale and −16% on a composite primary endpoint scale, providing minimal thresholds to be achieved after AIT compared to placebo to conclude a positive Phase III trial outcome.

Background: PQ Grass 27600 SU (PQ Grass) cumulative dose is a pre‐seasonal, six‐injection, aluminium‐free, modified subcutaneous immunotherapy product under development for the treatment of allergic rhinitis (AR). A pivotal Phase III randomised double‐blind, placebo‐controlled clinical trial was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PQ Grass in subjects with seasonal AR. Methods: An adaptive group sequential trial PQGrass306 (G306) with one pre‐defined interim analysis was designed, using 2 parallel groups applying a 1:1 active versus placebo randomisation of patients aged 18–65. The primary efficacy endpoint was the EAACI (European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology) Combined Symptom and Medication Score (EAACI‐CSMS _0–6 ) averaged over the peak grass pollen season (GPS). Results: 858 subjects were screened and 555 subjects were randomised. Based on the results of the pre‐defined interim analysis, the trial was stopped for success showing superiority in favour of PQ Grass. The primary endpoint EAACI‐CSMS _0–6 (peak GPS) demonstrated a highly significant and clinically meaningful point difference of PQ Grass over placebo of −0.27 points (95% CI: −0.42 to −0.12), corresponding to a relative difference of −20.3% ( p = 0.0005). Highly consistent and beneficial results were obtained for PQ Grass for all key secondary endpoints. Significant induction of blocking IgG4 and IgA antibody subclasses occurred. PQ Grass was well tolerated, and no unexpected safety signals occurred. Conclusions: This pivotal Phase III trial demonstrated a significant and clinically meaningful effect on the primary endpoint as well as highly consistent secondary endpoint results and a supportive safety profile.

The dataset presents a 43 year-long reanalysis of pollen seasons for three major allergenic genera of trees in Europe: alder (Alnus), birch (Betula), and olive (Olea). Driven by the meteorological reanalysis ERA5, the atmospheric composition model SILAM predicted the flowering period and calculated the Europe-wide dispersion pattern of pollen for the years 1980–2022. The model applied an extended 4-dimensional variational data assimilation of in-situ observations of aerobiological networks in 34 European countries to reproduce the inter-annual variability and trends of pollen production and distribution. The control variable of the assimilation procedure was the total pollen release during each flowering season, implemented as an annual correction factor to the mean pollen production. The dataset was designed as an input to studies on climate-induced and anthropogenically driven changes in the European vegetation, biodiversity monitoring, bioaerosol modelling and assessment, as well as, in combination with intra-seasonal observations, for health-related applications.

In rhinitis and asthma, several mHealth apps have been developed but only a few have been validated. However, these apps have a high potential for improving person‐centred care (PCC), especially in allergen immunotherapy (AIT). They can provide support in AIT initiation by selecting the appropriate patient and allergen shared decision‐making. They can also help in (i) the evaluation of (early) efficacy, (ii) early and late stopping rules and (iii) the evaluation of (carried‐over) efficacy after cessation of the treatment course. Future perspectives have been formulated in the first report of a joint task force (TF)—Allergic Rhinitis and Its Impact on Asthma (ARIA) and the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI)—on digital biomarkers. The TF on AIT now aims to (i) outline the potential of the clinical applications of mHealth solutions, (ii) express their current limitations, (iii) make proposals regarding further developments for both clinical practice and scientific purpose and (iv) suggest which of the tools might best comply with the purpose of digitally‐enabled PCC in AIT.

CORRIGENDUMDate: 09 Feb 2024Manuscript number: ALL-2023-01229.R1Title of Article: Response to Correspondence ALL-2023-01107 “Short-course subcutaneous treatment with PQ Grass strongly improves symptom and medication scores in grass allergy”Authors: P.J. de Kam1, S. Zielen2, J.A. Bernstein3, U. Berger4, M. Berger5, M. Cuevas6, D. Cypcar7, A. Fuhr-Horst8, W.A. Greisner9, M. Jandl10, S. Laßmann11, M. Worm12, J. Matz13, E. Sher14, C. Smith15, G.C. Steven16, R. Mösges17,18, M.H. Shamji19,20, L. DuBuske21, F. Borghese1, K. Oluwayi1, T. Zwingers1, M. Seybold1, O. Armfield1, M.D. Heath1, S.J. Hewings1, M.F. Kramer1, M.A. Skinner1Allergy Therapeutics plc, Worthing, United KingdomChildren and Adolescents Dept., Allergology, Pulmonology & Cystic fibrosis, Goethe University, Frankfurt, GermanyBernstein Clinical Research Center, LLC, Cincinnati, OH, United States of AmericaUniversity of Innsbruck, Department of Botany, Innsbruck, AustriaWiener Gesundheitsverbund, Hospital Hietzing, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Vienna, AustriaClinic and Polyclinic of Otorhinolaryngology, University Clinic Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, GermanyAllergy Partners of Western North Carolina, Asheville, NC, United States of AmericaENT Research- Institut für klinische Studien, Essen, GermanyBluegrass Allergy Research, Lexington, KY, United States of AmericaHamburger Institut für Therapieforschung GmbH, Hamburg, GermanyStudienzentrum Dr. Sabine Laßmann, Saalfeld, GermanyUniversitätsmedizin Berlin, Department of Dermatology and Allergy - Charite Campus Mitte, Berlin, GermanyChesapeake Clinical Research, Inc. White Marsh, MD, United States of AmericaAllergy Partners of New Jersey, Ocean, NJ, United States of AmericaCertified Research Associates, Cortland, NY, United States of AmericaAllergy Asthma & Sinus Center, S.C., Greenfield, WI, United States of AmericaIMSB (Institute of Computational Biology and Medical Statistics), University at Cologne, Cologne, GermanyClinCompetence, Cologne, GermanyImmunomodulation and Tolerance Group, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Department of National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United KingdomAsthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma, Imperial College London, London, United KingdomDivision of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, George Washington University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States of AmericaName of the Corresponding Author: Pieter-Jan De Kam

Response to Correspondence ALL-2023-01107 “Short-course subcutaneous treatment with PQ Grass strongly improves symptom and medication scores in grass allergy”P.J. de Kam1, S. Zielen2, J.A. Bernstein3, U. Berger4, M. Berger5, M. Cuevas6, D. Cypcar7, A. Fuhr-Horst8, W.A. Greisner9, M. Jandl10, S. Laßmann11, M. Worm12, J. Matz13, E. Sher14, C. Smith15, G.C. Steven16, R. Mösges17,18, M.H. Shamji19,20, L. DuBuske21, F. Borghese1, K. Oluwayi1, T. Zwingers1, M. Seybold1, O. Armfield1, M.D. Heath1, S.J. Hewings1, M.F. Kramer1, M.A. Skinner1Allergy Therapeutics plc, Worthing, United KingdomChildren and Adolescents Dept., Allergology, Pulmonology & Cystic fibrosis, Goethe University, Frankfurt, GermanyBernstein Clinical Research Center, LLC, Cincinnati, OH, United States of AmericaAerobiology and Pollen Research Unit, Dept. Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria.Wiener Gesundheitsverbund, Hospital Hietzing, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Vienna, AustriaClinic and Polyclinic of Otorhinolaryngology, University Clinic Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, GermanyAllergy Partners of Western North Carolina, Asheville, NC, United States of AmericaENT Research- Institut für klinische Studien, Essen, GermanyBluegrass Allergy Research, Lexington, KY, United States of AmericaHamburger Institut für Therapieforschung GmbH, Hamburg, GermanyStudienzentrum Dr. Sabine Laßmann, Saalfeld, GermanyUniversitätsmedizin Berlin, Department of Dermatology and Allergy - Charite Campus Mitte, Berlin, GermanyChesapeake Clinical Research, Inc. White Marsh, MD, United States of AmericaAllergy Partners of New Jersey, Ocean, NJ, United States of AmericaCertified Research Associates, Cortland, NY, United States of AmericaAllergy Asthma & Sinus Center, S.C., Greenfield, WI, United States of AmericaIMSB (Institute of Computational Biology and Medical Statistics), University at Cologne, Cologne, GermanyClinCompetence, Cologne, GermanyImmunomodulation and Tolerance Group, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Department of National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United KingdomAsthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma, Imperial College London, London, United KingdomDivision of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, George Washington University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States of America