Lewis J. Bartlett

The yellow-legged hornet, Vespa velutina var. nigrithorax, is an invasive generalist predator that preys heavily on honeybees and other pollinators. Native to eastern China, northern Vietnam, and foothills of the Himalaya, it has invaded and now inhabits most of South Korea and western Europe. Here we summarize discoveries of V. velutina documented for the first time during 2025 in New Zealand (the first confirmed records from the southern hemisphere), Algeria (the first records from Africa), Northern Ireland, Denmark, and several European islands (Sardinia, the Azores, and the Isles of Scilly). We also review recent changes in the distribution of V. velutina elsewhere in Europe and North America. These range expansions highlight the high reproductive rate of the species; the extensive dispersal of young queens, both naturally and via shipments of goods by sea and over land; the ability to establish new populations despite low genetic variability; and the potential of V. velutina to harm pollinators and pollination systems.

Bee declines have been partly attributed to the impacts of invasive or emerging parasite outbreaks. For western honeybees, Apis mellifera , major losses are associated with the virus-vectoring mite, Varroa destructor . In response, beekeepers have focused breeding efforts aimed at conferring resistance to this key parasite. One method of many is survival-based beekeeping where colonies that survive despite significant Varroa infestations produce subsequent colonies. We argue that this ‘hands-off’ approach will not always lead to Varroa resistance evolving but rather tolerance. Tolerance minimizes host fitness costs of parasitism without reducing parasite abundance, whereas resistance either prevents parasitism outright or keeps parasitism intensity low. With clear epidemiological distinctions, and as honeybee disease dynamics impact other wild bees owing to shared pathogens, we discuss why tolerance outcomes in honeybee breeding have important implications for wider pollinator health. Crucially, we argue that unintentional selection for tolerance will not only lead to more spillover from honeybees but may also select for pathogens that are more virulent in wild bees leading to ‘tragedies of tolerance’. These tragedies can be avoided through successful breeding regimes that specifically select for low Varroa . We emphasize how insights from evolutionary ecology can be applied in ecologically responsible honeybee management.

Agrochemical exposure is a major contributor to ecological declines worldwide, including the loss of crucial pollinator species. In addition to direct toxicity, field-relevant doses of pesticides can increase species’ vulnerabilities to other stressors, including parasites. Experimental field demonstrations of potential interactive effects of pesticides and additional stressors are rare, as are tests of mechanisms via which pollinators tolerate pesticides. Here, we controlled honey bee colony exposure to field-relevant concentrations of 2 neonicotinoid insecticides (clothianidin and thiamethoxam) in pollen and simultaneously manipulated intracolony genetic heterogeneity. We showed that exposure increased rates of Varroa destructor (Anderson and Trueman) parasitism and that while increased genetic heterogeneity overall improved survivability, it did not reduce the negative effect size of neonicotinoid exposure. This study is, to our knowledge, the first experimental field demonstration of how neonicotinoid exposure can increase V. destructor populations in honey bees and also demonstrates that colony genetic diversity cannot mitigate the effects of neonicotinoid pesticides.

Honey bee parasites remain a critical challenge to management and conservation. Because managed honey bees are maintained in colonies kept in apiaries across landscapes, the study of honey bee parasites allows the investigation of spatial principles in parasite ecology and evolution. We used a controlled field experiment to study the relationship between population growth rate and virulence (colony survival) of the parasite Varroa destructor (Anderson and Trueman). We used a nested design of 10 patches (apiaries) of 14 colonies to examine the spatial scale at which Varroa population growth matters for colony survival. We tracked Varroa population size and colony survival across a full year and found that Varroa populations that grow faster in their host colonies during the spring and summer led to larger Varroa populations across the whole apiary (patch) and higher rates of neighboring colony loss. Crucially, this increased colony loss risk manifested at the patch scale, with mortality risk being related to spatial adjacency to colonies with fast-growing Varroa strains rather than with Varroa growth rate in the colony itself. Thus, within-colony population growth predicts whole-apiary virulence, demonstrating the need to consider multiple scales when investigating parasite growth-virulence relationships.

The negative effects of Varroa and pesticides on colony health and survival are among the most important concerns to beekeepers. To compare the relative contribution of Varroa, pesticides, and interactions between them on honey bee colony performance and survival, a 2-year longitudinal study was performed in corn and soybean growing areas of Iowa. Varroa infestation and pesticide content in stored pollen were measured from 3 apiaries across a gradient of corn and soybean production areas and compared to measurements of colony health and survival. Colonies were not treated for Varroa the first year, but were treated the second year, leading to reduced Varroa infestation that was associated with larger honey bee populations, increased honey production, and higher colony survival. Pesticide detections were highest in areas with high-intensity corn and soybean production treated with conventional methods. Pesticide detections were positively associated with honey bee population size in May 2015 in the intermediate conventional (IC) and intermediate organic (IO) apiaries. Varroa populations across all apiaries in October 2015 were negatively correlated with miticide and chlorpyrifos detections. Miticide detections across all apiaries and neonicotinoid detections in the IC apiary in May 2015 were higher in colonies that survived. In July 2015, colony survival was positively associated with total pesticide detections in all apiaries and chlorpyrifos exposure in the IC and high conventional (HC) apiaries. This research suggests that Varroa are a major cause of reduced colony performance and increased colony losses, and honey bees are resilient upon low to moderate pesticide detections.

Polyandry in social Hymenoptera is associated with reduced within-colony relatedness and increased colony-level ecologic fitness. One explanation for this sees increasing within-nest genetic diversity as a mechanism for improving group task efficiency and colony competitiveness. A queen on her mating flight captures nearly 90% of her breeding population’s allele potential by her tenth effective mating (m_e ~ 10 males). Under this population allele capture (PAC) model, colony fitness gains track mating number in an asymptotic manner, leveling out after about the tenth mating. A supporting theory we call the genotype composition (GC) model sees genetic novelty at mating levels higher than the m_e ~ 10 asymptote, the hyperpolyandry zone, resulting from unique genotype compositions whose number are potentially infinite. Colony fitness gains under the GC model will track mating number in a linear manner. We set up field colonies with Apis mellifera queens each instrumentally mated with 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, or 32 males, creating a polyandry gradient bracketing the qualitative divide of m_e ~ 10, measured tokens of colony level fitness, and collected observation hive data. Our results lead us to conclude that (1) ancestral colony traits fundamental to eusociality (cooperative brood care) respond to mating level changes at or below m_e ~ 10 in a manner consistent with the PAC model, whereas (2) more derived specialized colony phenotypes (resistance to the non-native parasite Varroa destructor) continue improving with increasing m_e in a manner consistent with the GC model. By either model, (3) the mechanism for increasing colony fitness is an increase in worker task specialisms and task efficiency. Significance statement: Polyandry is a female’s practice of mating with many males, storing their sperm, and using it to produce genetically diverse offspring. In complex social bees, a queen captures nearly 90% of her breeding population’s diversity potential by her tenth mating; however, queens in nature routinely mate with many more than ten males. We tested two models that, together, explain how social bee colonies ecologically benefit from queen mating numbers ranging from 2 to potential infinity. A population allele capture (PAC) model focuses on colony fitness gains at mating numbers at or below 10, and we provide evidence that it was at these polyandry levels that significant gains were made in an ancestral eusocial trait, cooperative brood care. A genotype composition (GC) model focuses on colony fitness gains at higher mating numbers, and we believe these gains are centered around more recently evolved ecologic specialisms such as parasite resistance.

ESA encourages all members, regardless of citizenship status, to advocate for topics that promote research, sign letters as constituents, and ensure that our science communication centers on the political topics that directly affect society. Many of us are keen to do so. While we are often flush with opportunities to undertake outreach, many of us are left out when it comes to political causes that are close to our hearts. For Emilie, it is difficult to understand who the policymakers are and how her activism could impact her immigration status. As a non-U.S. citizen, I can’t legally volunteer for political campaigns, donate, or even endorse a candidate by saying “If I could vote, I would vote for X.” Moreover, I think American entomologists don’t fully realize that advocating for foreign scientists often implies that we need to recreate a network, understand the policy-making system, and make sure that our engagement will not impact our ability to become a U.S. citizen. For example, coming from a European country, I still don’t fully understand what relates from the federal level to what relates from the state level. Another example that can impact my willingness to engage is knowing if my enrollment in some climate activist groups will hinder my ability to get a green card. Indeed, many foreign entomologists in the U.S. will ultimately apply for citizenship to be able to continue working legally. Applying for permanent residency is extremely demanding; we need to show our credentials and prove that we are irreproachable citizens. I am applying for a green card, and what a surprise to read the following question on the form I had to fill: “Have you ever been a member or involved in or in any way associated with an organization, association, fund, foundation, party, club, society or similar group in the United States?” While I understand why this question needs to be asked, I also wonder if enrolling in an environmental group can negatively impact my ability to stay in the U.S. Maybe one way to better understand how policies are made is to become an ESA Science Policy fellow, like my colleague Lewis.

A significant amount of researcher and practitioner effort has focused on developing new chemical controls for the parasitic Varroa destructor mite in beekeeping. One outcome of that has been the development and testing of “glycerol–oxalic acid” mixtures to place in colonies for extended periods of time, an off-label use of the otherwise legal miticide oxalic acid. The majority of circulated work on this approach was led by practitioners and published in nonacademic journals, highlighting a lack of effective partnership between practitioners and scientists and a possible failure of the extension mandate in beekeeping in the United States. Here, we summarize the practitioner-led studies we could locate and partner with a commercial beekeeper in the Southeast of the United States to test the “shop towel–oxalic acid–glycerol” delivery system developed by those practitioners. Our study, using 129 commercial colonies between honey flows in 2017 split into 4 treatment groups, showed no effectiveness in reducing Varroa parasitism in colonies exposed to oxalic acid–glycerol shop towels. We highlight the discrepancy between our results and those circulated by practitioners, at least for the Southeast, and the failure of extension to support practitioners engaged in research.

The nest-scavenging beetle Aethina tumida remains a persistent problem for beekeepers in parts of the Southeast United States, where warm wet soils allow beetle populations to grow rapidly and overwhelm colonies, especially during the summer dearth. Furthermore, small hive beetle infestation prevents beekeepers from easily provisioning colonies with additional pollen or protein feed (patties), preventing holistic management of honey bee health via improved nutrition, and reducing the economic potential of package and nucleus colony rearing in the Southeast. Here, we demonstrate using both in vitro laboratory trials and a small in vivo field trial that the differential specificity of anthranilic diamide insecticides (specifically, chlorantraniliprole) between bees and beetles allows for the control and prevention of small hive beetle infestation in honey bee colonies even when feeding with large patties. Honey bees show orders of magnitude higher tolerance to chlorantraniliprole compared to small hive beetles, opening new avenues for improving bee health including during spring splits and throughout the summer.

The ectoparasitic mite, Varroa destructor (Anderson and Trueman), is the leading cause of western honey bee colony, Apis mellifera (L.), mortality in the United States. Due to mounting evidence of resistance to certain approved miticides, beekeepers are struggling to keep their colonies alive. To date, there are varied but limited approved options for V. destructor control. Vaporized oxalic acid (OA) has proven to be an effective treatment against the dispersal phase of V. destructor but has its limitations since the vapor cannot penetrate the protective wax cap of honey bee pupal cells where V. destructor reproduces. In the Southeastern United States, honey bee colonies often maintain brood throughout the year, limiting the usefulness of OA. Prior studies have shown that even repeated applications of OA while brood is present are ineffective at decreasing mite populations. In the summer of 2021, we studied whether incorporating a forced brood break while vaporizing with OA would be an effective treatment against V. destructor. Ninety experimental colonies were divided into 2 blocks, one with a brood break and the other with no brood break. Within the blocks, each colony was randomly assigned 1 of 3 treatments: no OA, 2 g OA, or 3 g OA. The combination of vaporizing with OA and a forced brood break increased mite mortality by 5× and reduced mite populations significantly. These results give beekeepers in mild climates an additional integrated pest management method for controlling V. destructor during the summer season.