Carmen Silvia Miguel
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Carmen Silvia Miguel has a total of 25 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
Margarete Klein
Research Program for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder in Adults, Department of Psychiatry, University of São Paulo School of Medicine, Rua Dr. Ovídio Pires de Campos, 785-3°Andar, 05403-010 São Paulo, SP, Brazil
2 shared publicationsMaria A. Gobbo
Research Program for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder in Adults, Department of Psychiatry, University of São Paulo School of Medicine, Rua Dr. Ovídio Pires de Campos, 785-3°Andar, 05403-010 São Paulo, SP, Brazil
2 shared publicationsMaria A. Silva
Research Program for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder in Adults, Department of Psychiatry, University of São Paulo School of Medicine, Rua Dr. Ovídio Pires de Campos, 785-3°Andar, 05403-010 São Paulo, SP, Brazil
2 shared publicationsMario R. Louzã
Research Program for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder in Adults, Department of Psychiatry, University of São Paulo School of Medicine, Rua Dr. Ovídio Pires de Campos, 785-3°Andar, 05403-010 São Paulo, SP, Brazil; Program for Early Evaluation and Treatment of Psychosis, Department of Psychiatry, University of São Paulo School of Medicine, Rua Dr. Ovídio Pires de Campos, 785-3°Andar, 05403-010 São Paulo, SP, Brazil
2 shared publicationsPaula A. Martins
Program for Early Evaluation and Treatment of Psychosis, Department of Psychiatry, University of São Paulo School of Medicine, Rua Dr. Ovídio Pires de Campos, 785-3°Andar, 05403-010 São Paulo, SP, Brazil
2 shared publicationsTania M. Alves
Research Program for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder in Adults, Department of Psychiatry, University of São Paulo School of Medicine, Rua Dr. Ovídio Pires de Campos, 785-3°Andar, 05403-010 São Paulo, SP, Brazil
2 shared publications
Latest Publications
- 28 July 2016
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Attention Disorders
- Vol. 21 (6) , 455-464
High IQ May “Mask” the Diagnosis of ADHD by Compensating for Deficits in Executive Functions in Treatment-Naïve Adults With ADHD
Objective: To evaluate and compare the performance of adults with ADHD with high and standard IQ in executive functions (EF) tasks. Method: We investigated the neuropsychological performance of 51 adults with ADHD, compared with 33 healthy controls (HC) while performing a wide battery of neuropsychological tests that measure executive functioning. Adults with clinical diagnosis of ADHD were divided into two groups according to their IQ level (IQ ≥ 110—ADHD group with more elevated IQ, and IQ < 110—ADHD group with standard IQ). Results: The ADHD group with standard IQ presented a worse executive functioning compared with the HC group in the following measures: Stroop 2 (p = .000) and 3 (p = .000), Trail Making Test (TMT) B (p = .005), Wisconsin Card-Sorting Test (WCST)—perseverative errors (p = .022) and failures to maintain set (p = .020), Continuous Performance Test (CPT)—omission errors (p = .005) and commission errors (p = .000), and Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB)—conceptualization (p = .016). The ADHD group with more elevated IQ presented only impairments in the CPT—commission errors (p = .019) when compared with the control group. Conclusion: Adults with ADHD and more elevated IQ show less evidence of executive functioning deficits compared with those with ADHD and standard IQ, suggesting that a higher degree of intellectual efficiency may compensate deficits in executive functions, leading to problems in establishing a precise clinical diagnosis.
- 28 July 2016
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Attention Disorders
- Vol. 21 (6) , 455-464
High IQ May “Mask” the Diagnosis of ADHD by Compensating for Deficits in Executive Functions in Treatment-Naïve Adults With ADHD
Objective: To evaluate and compare the performance of adults with ADHD with high and standard IQ in executive functions (EF) tasks. Method: We investigated the neuropsychological performance of 51 adults with ADHD, compared with 33 healthy controls (HC) while performing a wide battery of neuropsychological tests that measure executive functioning. Adults with clinical diagnosis of ADHD were divided into two groups according to their IQ level (IQ ≥ 110—ADHD group with more elevated IQ, and IQ < 110—ADHD group with standard IQ). Results: The ADHD group with standard IQ presented a worse executive functioning compared with the HC group in the following measures: Stroop 2 (p = .000) and 3 (p = .000), Trail Making Test (TMT) B (p = .005), Wisconsin Card-Sorting Test (WCST)—perseverative errors (p = .022) and failures to maintain set (p = .020), Continuous Performance Test (CPT)—omission errors (p = .005) and commission errors (p = .000), and Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB)—conceptualization (p = .016). The ADHD group with more elevated IQ presented only impairments in the CPT—commission errors (p = .019) when compared with the control group. Conclusion: Adults with ADHD and more elevated IQ show less evidence of executive functioning deficits compared with those with ADHD and standard IQ, suggesting that a higher degree of intellectual efficiency may compensate deficits in executive functions, leading to problems in establishing a precise clinical diagnosis.
- 1 March 2016
- Published by Elsevier in Drug and Alcohol Dependence
- Vol. 160, 97-104
Cognition and impulsivity in adults with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder with and without cocaine and/or crack dependence
- 1 March 2016
- Published by Elsevier in Drug and Alcohol Dependence
- Vol. 160, 97-104
Cognition and impulsivity in adults with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder with and without cocaine and/or crack dependence
- Open Access
- 1 March 2015
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
- Vol. 11, 815-821
Neurofibromatosis type 1 and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: a case study and literature review
Background: The cognitive profile of children with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) has been well characterized, but few studies have evaluated the cognitive abilities of adults with NF1 and ADHD. Objectives: We investigated 1) the cognitive profile of an adult patient with NF1 and inattention problems, 2) changes in his cognition after 14 months of follow-up, and 3) whether the patient exhibited comorbid NF1 and ADHD or secondary ADHD-like symptoms. Methods: We administered neuropsychological tests of executive function, attention, verbal and visual memory, visuospatial function, and language during two evaluations separated by 14 months. Results: We found no changes in sustained attention, language, or verbal memory. Visual memory, verbal learning, selective attention inhibitory control, and problem solving declined over time, whereas visual search, psychomotor speed, visuospatial function, and mental flexibility improved. Conclusion: Our patient exhibited a cognitive profile characteristic of both NF1 and ADHD, leading to the hypothesis that the patient had comorbid ADHD instead of secondary ADHD-like symptoms. More studies are necessary to characterize the cognition of patients with NF1 and ADHD.
- 1 March 2015
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
- Vol. 11, 815-821
Open AccessNeurofibromatosis type 1 and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: a case study and literature review
Background: The cognitive profile of children with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) has been well characterized, but few studies have evaluated the cognitive abilities of adults with NF1 and ADHD. Objectives: We investigated 1) the cognitive profile of an adult patient with NF1 and inattention problems, 2) changes in his cognition after 14 months of follow-up, and 3) whether the patient exhibited comorbid NF1 and ADHD or secondary ADHD-like symptoms. Methods: We administered neuropsychological tests of executive function, attention, verbal and visual memory, visuospatial function, and language during two evaluations separated by 14 months. Results: We found no changes in sustained attention, language, or verbal memory. Visual memory, verbal learning, selective attention inhibitory control, and problem solving declined over time, whereas visual search, psychomotor speed, visuospatial function, and mental flexibility improved. Conclusion: Our patient exhibited a cognitive profile characteristic of both NF1 and ADHD, leading to the hypothesis that the patient had comorbid ADHD instead of secondary ADHD-like symptoms. More studies are necessary to characterize the cognition of patients with NF1 and ADHD.