Abhishek Chaturvedi

This review highlights the importance of radiography and CT in evaluating right ventricular assist devices, after placement and in detection of complications.

CT imaging is important in the identification of left ventricular assist device–associated complications.

Cardiac tumors, although rare, carry high morbidity and mortality rates. They are commonly first identified either at echocardiography or incidentally at thoracoabdominal CT performed for noncardiac indications. Multimodality imaging often helps to determine the cause of these masses. Cardiac tumors comprise a distinct category in the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of tumors. The updated 2021 WHO classification of tumors of the heart incorporates new entities and reclassifies others. In the new classification system, papillary fibroelastoma is recognized as the most common primary cardiac neoplasm. Pseudotumors including thrombi and anatomic variants (eg, crista terminalis, accessory papillary muscles, or coumadin ridge) are the most common intracardiac masses identified at imaging. Cardiac metastases are substantially more common than primary cardiac tumors. Although echocardiography is usually the first examination, cardiac MRI is the modality of choice for the identification and characterization of cardiac masses. Cardiac CT serves as an alternative in patients who cannot tolerate MRI. PET performed with CT or MRI enables metabolic characterization of malignant cardiac masses. Imaging individualized to a particular tumor type and location is crucial for treatment planning. Tumor terminology changes as our understanding of tumor biology and behavior evolves. Familiarity with the updated classification system is important as a guide to radiologic investigation and medical or surgical management. ^©RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article.

Acute heart failure and cardiogenic shock are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients who have had recent cardiac surgery, myocardial infarct or pulmonary hypertension. The use of percutaneous mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices before organ failure occurs can improve outcomes in these patients. Imaging plays a key role in identifying appropriate positioning of MCS devices for supporting ventricle function. These devices can be used for left ventricle, right ventricle or biventricular support. Fluoroscopy, angiography and echocardiography are used for implanting these devices. Radiographs and CT can identify both intra- and extra-cardiac complications. The cardiothoracic imager will see increasing use of these devices and familiarity with their normal appearance and complications is important. Critical relevance statement: Chest radiographs and CT are useful for assessing the position of the mechanical cardiac support device used for treatment of acute heart failure. CT can identify cardiac and extra-cardiac complications associated with these devices. Graphical Key points: IABP upper/distal marker should be 2–3 cm distal to the ostia of the left subclavian artery. Inlet of Impella CP should be 3.5 cm below the aortic valve. The Impella 5.5 does not have a pigtail portion. The inlet should be about 5 cm below the aortic annulus. Impella RP inlet port should be in the right atrium or inferior vena cava, the pigtail portion should be positioned in the main pulmonary artery. Protek Duo inflow is in the right atrium or right ventricle. The outflow is in the main pulmonary artery.

Purpose: To identify imaging parameters that can help in the diagnosis of cardiac tamponade on non–electrocardiogram (ECG)-gated computed tomography (CT) of the chest. Materials and Methods: Retrospective analysis of 64 patients who had undergone CT and echocardiography for evaluation of cardiac tamponade. Of 64 patients, 34 were diagnosed with tamponade and underwent pericardiocentesis for further diagnosis and treatment. CT measurements obtained were: pericardial effusion (PeEff) pocket size in 6 locations (anterior, posterior, superior, inferior, right, and left lateral), pericardial thickening, diameters of the coronary sinus, upper superior vena cava, lower superior vena cava, and inferior vena cava. In addition, cardiac chamber sizes were measured. Subjective assessment of coronary sinus compression, pericardial enhancement, and pericardial thickening were also recorded. Results: Measurement of the sum of the right lateral and left lateral PeEff thickness resulted in 91.2% sensitivity and 86.7% specificity for cardiac tamponade with a threshold of 30 mm (receiver-operating characteristic area under the curve=0.94 [0.84 to 0.98], P16 mm, sum of right lateral and left lateral PeEff>30 mm, and presence of pericardial thickening resulted in 56% sensitivity and 100% specificity and positive predictive value for the determination of cardiac tamponade. Conclusions: Our study suggests that CT measurements related to PeEff size and thickness aid in the diagnosis of cardiac tamponade.

Purpose: Identify a measurable parameter from test bolus of computed tomography angiography that can differentiate aortic stenosis patients with normal systolic function from those with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included patients (undergoing evaluation for transcatheter aortic valve replacement) who had retrospective electrocardiogram-gated cardiac computed tomography angiography using test bolus. The measured variables were time to peak contrast enhancement in the pulmonary artery (PA(time)), in the ascending (AsAo(time)) and descending aorta (DsAo(time)). From these, the pulmonary transit time (PTT: difference between time to peak enhancement in the ascending aorta to peak enhancement in the main pulmonary artery), aortic transit time (ATT: difference between time to peak enhancement in the descending aorta to time to peak enhancement in the ascending aorta) and DsAo(time)-PA(time)were also calculated. Biventricular volumes and function were calculated. The subjects were classified on the basis of ventricular ejection fractions: normal (EF>50%), midrange (EF 40% to 50%), and HF patients with reduced EF (EF23 seconds in the ascending or descending aorta.

An understanding of the normal developmental anatomy of the pediatric foot and ankle and the injury mechanisms and imaging manifestations of acute foot and ankle injuries aids in ensuring appropria... Distinct biologic and mechanical attributes of the pediatric skeleton translate into fracture patterns, complications, and treatment dilemmas that differ from those of adults. In children, increasi...