JBJulia Butt

Julia Butt

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article

Previous Organizations / Institutes

The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years


Julia Butt has a total of 30 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    Reducing Methamphetamine Use in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Communities With the “We Can Do This” Web App: Qualitative Evaluation of Acceptability and Feasibility

    by Leda Sivak, Rachel Reilly, Shani Crumpen, Carla Treloar, Rebecca McKetin, Julia Butt, Yvette Roe, Nadine Ezard, Brendan Quinn, Jack Nagle, et al.

    Background: Preventing and treating methamphetamine-related harm in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander populations is a significant challenge for health care services. Digital health care may offer opportunities to support individuals and families in ways that complement existing methamphetamine treatment options. This study responds to a community-identified priority as Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Services identified methamphetamine use as a key concern and sought support to respond to the needs of people who use methamphetamine and their families. Objective: This paper reports on a process evaluation of the web application’s acceptability and feasibility when used by clients and clinicians in residential rehabilitation services and primary care. This study is part of a larger project entitled “Novel Interventions to address Methamphetamine use in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Communities” (NIMAC), which seeks to develop culturally appropriate and strengths-based prevention and treatment interventions to reduce methamphetamine related harm. “We Can Do This” was a web application developed for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people who are seeking to reduce or stop methamphetamine use. Methods: Clinicians and clients who had used the web application were recruited through Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Services and Aboriginal residential rehabilitation services in urban and regional Victoria and South Australia. Unidentified usage data was collected from all participants. After using the web application, those who indicated a willingness to be interviewed were contacted and interviewed by phone or in person and asked about the feasibility and acceptability of the web application. The framework method of analysis was used to structure and summarise the resulting qualitative data. Results: Interviews with 24 clients and 11 clinicians explored the acceptability and feasibility of the web application. Acceptability incorporated the following domains: affective attitude, burden, ethicality, cultural appropriateness, coherence, opportunity cost, perceived effectiveness, and self-efficacy. The evaluation of feasibility assessed barriers and facilitators to the implementation of the program, with a focus on demand, practicality, fidelity, and integration. Results indicated that both clients and clinicians found the web application content coherent, relatable, empowering, and culturally safe. Barriers to using the web application for clients included a lack of internet connectivity and personal issues such as scheduling. Conclusions: Process evaluation is often under-valued. However, as “We Can Do This” was new, innovative and targeted a hard-to-reach population, understanding its feasibility and acceptability as a clinical tool was essential to understanding its potential. “We Can Do This” is unique as the only evidence-based, culturally appropriate internet-based therapeutic program specifically designed for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people who use methamphetamine. Findings suggest it was both acceptable and feasible as a low-cost adjunct to usual care in residential rehabilitation and primary care settings.

  • Open Access

    Web-Based Application for Reducing Methamphetamine Use Among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander People: Randomized Waitlist Controlled Trial

    by Rachel Reilly, Rebecca McKetin, Federica Barzi, Tayla Degan, Nadine Ezard, Katherine Conigrave, Julia Butt, Yvette Roe, Handan Wand, Brendan Quinn, et al.

    Background: Digital interventions can help to overcome barriers to care, including stigma, geographical distance, and a lack of culturally appropriate treatment options. “We Can Do This” is a web-based app that was designed with input from cultural advisors and end users to support Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people seeking to stop or reduce their use of methamphetamine and increase psychosocial well-being. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the “We Can Do This” web-based app as a psychosocial treatment for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people who use methamphetamine. Methods: The web app was evaluated using a randomized waitlist controlled parallel group trial. Participants were Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people aged 16 years or older who self-identified as having used methamphetamine at least weekly for the past 3 months. Participants were randomized on a 1:1 ratio to receive either access to the web-based app for 6 weeks or a waitlist control group. Both groups received access to a website with harm minimization information. The primary outcome was days of methamphetamine use in the past 4 weeks assessed at 1, 2, and 3 months post randomization. Secondary outcomes included severity of methamphetamine dependence (Severity of Dependence Scale [SDS]), psychological distress (Kessler 10 [K10]), help-seeking behavior, and days spent out of role due to methamphetamine use. Results: Participants (N=210) were randomized to receive either access to the web-based app (n=115) or the waitlist control condition (n=95). Follow-up was 63% at 1 month, 57% at 2 months, and 54% at 3 months. There were no significant group differences in days of methamphetamine use in the past 4 weeks at 1 the month (mean difference 0.2 days, 95% CI –1.5 to –2), 2 months (mean difference 0.6 days, 95% CI –1 to 2.4 days) or 3 months (mean difference 1.4 days, 95% CI –0.3 to 3.3 days) follow-up. There were no significant group differences in K10 scores, SDS scores, days out of role, or help-seeking at any of the 3 follow-up timepoints. There was poor adherence to the web-based app, only 20% of participants in the intervention group returned to the web-based app after their initial log-in. Participants cited personal issues and forgetting about the web-based app as the most common reasons for nonadherence. Conclusions: We found poor engagement with this web-based app. The web-based app had no significant effects on methamphetamine use or psychosocial well-being. Poor adherence and low follow-up hindered our ability to accurately evaluate the effectiveness of the web-based app. Future web-based apps for this population need to consider methods to increase participant engagement. Trial Registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12619000134123p; https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=376088 International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID): RR2-10.2196/14084


  • Open Access

    Exposure to preference‐matched alcohol advertisements from national sports broadcasts increases short‐term alcohol consumption inclinations in risky drinkers

    by Ross C. Hollett, Jesse Fairclough, Julia Butt, Brennen Mills

    Background: In Australia, sports broadcasting is afforded special alcohol advertising rights during daytime hours, which raises public health concerns, including short‐term increases in alcohol consumption among the broad viewership of national sporting codes.Methods: We conducted a content analysis across a sample of nationally televised finals matches (N = 16) from the Australian Football League (AFL) and the National Rugby League (NRL) to determine the prevalence of alcohol advertising video clips during these broadcasts. We also conducted an online experiment exposing participants (N = 345) to a randomly selected alcohol advertisement and measured the immediate effects on self‐reported alcohol craving and drinking intentions.Results: The prevalence of alcohol advertising video clips during AFL broadcasts was 3.9% and 1.8% for NRL. While, overall, alcohol advertisement video clip exposure did not impact craving or drinking intentions, a modest increase in craving was found for a subsample of risky drinking participants (N = 107) who also reported a preference for the specific alcoholic beverage being advertised.Conclusions: Video alcohol advertisements occurred less than 1 in 20 advertisements on average and exposure to alcohol advertising elicited a low, yet measurable, short‐term increase in alcohol inclinations, among vulnerable adult drinkers when a desirable alcoholic beverage advertisement is viewed.So What?: Given that alcohol advertisements are most likely to increase consumption among risky drinkers, health messaging during sports broadcasts needs to specifically target these individuals.


  • Open Access

    An acceptability and feasibility study of the We Can Do This web-app in Australian primary care and residential rehabilitation settings for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people who use methamphetamine (Preprint)

    by Leda Sivak, Rachel Reilly, Shani Crumpen, Carla Treloar, Rebecca McKetin, Julia Butt, Yvette Roe, Nadine Ezard, Brendan Quinn, Jack Nagle, et al.

    BACKGROUND We Can Do This was a web-based application (web-app) developed for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people who are seeking to reduce or stop methamphetamine use. OBJECTIVE This paper reports on a process evaluation of the web-app’s acceptability and feasibility when used by clients and clinicians in residential rehabilitation services and primary care. METHODS Clinicians and clients who had used the web-app were recruited via Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Services and Aboriginal residential rehabilitation services in urban and regional Victoria and South Australia. Non-identified usage data was collected from all participants. After using the web-app, those who indicated a willingness to be interviewed were contacted and interviewed by phone or in person and asked about the feasibility and acceptability of the web-app. RESULTS Interviews with ten clients and eleven clinicians highlighted that both clients and clinicians found the content coherent, relatable, empowering and culturally safe. Barriers to using the web-app for clients included a lack of internet connectivity and personal issues such as scheduling. CONCLUSIONS Process evaluation is often under-valued. However, as We Can Do This was new, innovative and targeted a hard-to-reach population, understanding its feasibility and acceptability as a clinical tool was essential to understanding its potential. We Can Do This is unique as the only evidence-based, culturally appropriate online therapeutic program specifically designed for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people who use methamphetamine. Findings suggest it was both acceptable and feasible as a low-cost adjunct to usual care in residential rehabilitation and primary care settings.

  • Open Access

    Web-Based Application for Reducing Methamphetamine Use Among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander People: Randomized Waitlist Controlled Trial (Preprint)

    by Rachel Reilly, Rebecca McKetin, Federica Barzi, Tayla Degan, Nadine Ezard, Katherine Conigrave, Julia Butt, Yvette Roe, Handan Wand, Brendan Quinn, et al.

    BACKGROUND Digital interventions can help to overcome barriers to care, including stigma, geographical distance, and a lack of culturally appropriate treatment options. “We Can Do This” is a web-based app that was designed with input from cultural advisors and end users to support Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people seeking to stop or reduce their use of methamphetamine and increase psychosocial well-being. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the “We Can Do This” web-based app as a psychosocial treatment for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people who use methamphetamine. METHODS The web app was evaluated using a randomized waitlist controlled parallel group trial. Participants were Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people aged 16 years or older who self-identified as having used methamphetamine at least weekly for the past 3 months. Participants were randomized on a 1:1 ratio to receive either access to the web-based app for 6 weeks or a waitlist control group. Both groups received access to a website with harm minimization information. The primary outcome was days of methamphetamine use in the past 4 weeks assessed at 1, 2, and 3 months post randomization. Secondary outcomes included severity of methamphetamine dependence (Severity of Dependence Scale [SDS]), psychological distress (Kessler 10 [K10]), help-seeking behavior, and days spent out of role due to methamphetamine use. RESULTS Participants (N=210) were randomized to receive either access to the web-based app (n=115) or the waitlist control condition (n=95). Follow-up was 63% at 1 month, 57% at 2 months, and 54% at 3 months. There were no significant group differences in days of methamphetamine use in the past 4 weeks at 1 the month (mean difference 0.2 days, 95% CI –1.5 to –2), 2 months (mean difference 0.6 days, 95% CI –1 to 2.4 days) or 3 months (mean difference 1.4 days, 95% CI –0.3 to 3.3 days) follow-up. There were no significant group differences in K10 scores, SDS scores, days out of role, or help-seeking at any of the 3 follow-up timepoints. There was poor adherence to the web-based app, only 20% of participants in the intervention group returned to the web-based app after their initial log-in. Participants cited personal issues and forgetting about the web-based app as the most common reasons for nonadherence. CONCLUSIONS We found poor engagement with this web-based app. The web-based app had no significant effects on methamphetamine use or psychosocial well-being. Poor adherence and low follow-up hindered our ability to accurately evaluate the effectiveness of the web-based app. Future web-based apps for this population need to consider methods to increase participant engagement. CLINICALTRIAL Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12619000134123p; https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=376088 INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT RR2-10.2196/14084

  • Psychosocial stress and methamphetamine use: A mixed-methods study of intersectional stigma and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander methamphetamine use

    by Leda Sivak, Rachel Reilly, Jane Lockton, Carla Treloar, Yvette Roe, Rebecca McKetin, Julia Butt, Nadine Ezard, Hilina Winkenweder, James Ward


  • Open Access

    A Web-Based Therapeutic Program (We Can Do This) for Reducing Methamphetamine Use and Increasing Help-Seeking Among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander People: Protocol for a Randomized Wait-List Controlled Trial

    by Rachel Reilly, Rebecca McKetin, Handan Wand, Julia Butt, Matthew Smout, Nadine Ezard, Katherine Conigrave, Yvonne Clark, Brendan Quinn, Carla Treloar, et al.

    Methamphetamine use is of deep concern to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities, but access to culturally appropriate treatment resources and services is limited. Web-based programs have potential as flexible and cost-effective additions to the range of treatment options available to Aboriginal people. The We Can Do This online intervention is designed to incorporate evidence-based therapies in a culturally relevant format using narratives from Aboriginal people to contextualize the therapeutic content. The goal of the research will be to test the effectiveness of the online intervention in a wait-list controlled randomized trial across multiple sites in urban, regional, and remote locations. Participants will be Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people aged 16 years and over who have used methamphetamine at least weekly for the previous 3 months. They will be recruited online and via health services. During the intervention phase, participants will have access to the online intervention for 6 weeks with optional telephone or face-to-face support provided by participating health services. The primary outcome measure will be the number of days the participant used methamphetamine over the past 4 weeks compared to wait-list controls, assessed at baseline, 1, 2, and 3 months. Secondary outcomes will include help-seeking, readiness to change, severity of dependence, and psychological distress. Any important changes to the protocol will be agreed upon by the trial management committee and communicated to all relevant parties, including trial site representatives and the trial registry. Recruitment will commence in July 2019, and results are expected in early 2021. This research is funded by National Health and Medical Research Council project grant #1100696. The primary sponsor for the trial is the South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute. A trial management committee with representation from the participating health services, chief investigators, other Aboriginal experts, and consumers will oversee procedures, trial conduct, analysis, and reporting of the results. The trial of this online intervention builds on existing research supporting the effectiveness of Web-based therapies for a range of psychological and other health-related issues including substance use. If successful, the We Can Do this online intervention will increase the range of options available to Aboriginal people seeking to reduce or stop methamphetamine use. It may provide a pathway into treatment for people who may otherwise be disengaged with health services for a range of reasons and will be a culturally appropriate, evidence-based resource for health practitioners to offer their clients. Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12619000134123p; https://www.anzctr.org.au/ Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=376088&isReview=true PRR1-10.2196/14084