Emmanuel Boucrot
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Research Subjects
Emmanuel Boucrot has a total of 127 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Harvey T. McMahon
MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Francis Crick Avenue, Cambridge, UK
7 shared publications Harvey T. McMahon
MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology
4 shared publicationsKieran McGourty
University College London
4 shared publications- Kieran McGourty
Department of Chemical Sciences, Bernal Institute, University of Limerick, Ireland; SSPC Science Foundation Ireland Research Centre for Pharmaceuticals, University of Limerick, Ireland
4 shared publications Antonio P. A. Ferreira
Institute of Structural and Molecular Biology, University College London, London, UK
3 shared publications- Els Halff
Social, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
3 shared publications
Latest Publications
- Open Access
ECM Signatures Reveal Quiescent Stem Cell Diversity in the Colonic Niche
Colonic stem cells have a key role in the continuous regeneration of a healthy intestinal epithelium. Despite considerable advances in single-cell omics technologies, the transcriptional heterogeneity of rare cell types such as colonic stem cells, as well as their functional states and niche-specific behaviors, remain poorly characterised. In this study, we leverage a meta-analysis of scRNA-seq and spatial transcriptomic datasets to comprehensively map the heterogeneity of colonic stem cells. We identify multiple, previously underappreciated stem cell states, including distinct quiescent subtypes marked by CDKN1A (P21), CDKN1B (P27), and CDKN1C (P57), proliferative populations defined by MKI67 (Ki67) and LRIG1 , and a lineage-committed intermediate subpopulation expressing MUC2 . Strikingly, we find that these states can be robustly identified solely by their extracellular matrix (ECM) gene expression signatures, revealing ECM composition as a critical determinant of stem cell identity. Notably, LAMA1 expression is highly specific to the P57+ quiescent population, linking laminin-mediated microenvironments to the active maintenance of deep quiescence, consistent with our recent findings associating LAMA1 with quiescent cell survival. By applying these ECM gene signatures, we delineate discrete “micro-niches” of quiescent stem cells in healthy tissue and provide evidence that analogous states persist in the colorectal cancer (CRC) environment. Extending our approach to an unrelated tissue, the pancreas, we detect parallel quiescent cell subtypes, illustrating the broader applicability of ECM-based signatures. Taken together, our findings redefine the concept of stem cell heterogeneity in the colon, establish ECM-driven gene signatures as a powerful tool for characterizing stem cell states, and offer new perspectives on the niche-dependent regulation of both healthy and cancerous stem cell populations.
Open AccessECM Signatures Reveal Quiescent Stem Cell Diversity in the Colonic Niche
Colonic stem cells have a key role in the continuous regeneration of a healthy intestinal epithelium. Despite considerable advances in single-cell omics technologies, the transcriptional heterogeneity of rare cell types such as colonic stem cells, as well as their functional states and niche-specific behaviors, remain poorly characterised. In this study, we leverage a meta-analysis of scRNA-seq and spatial transcriptomic datasets to comprehensively map the heterogeneity of colonic stem cells. We identify multiple, previously underappreciated stem cell states, including distinct quiescent subtypes marked by CDKN1A (P21), CDKN1B (P27), and CDKN1C (P57), proliferative populations defined by MKI67 (Ki67) and LRIG1 , and a lineage-committed intermediate subpopulation expressing MUC2 . Strikingly, we find that these states can be robustly identified solely by their extracellular matrix (ECM) gene expression signatures, revealing ECM composition as a critical determinant of stem cell identity. Notably, LAMA1 expression is highly specific to the P57+ quiescent population, linking laminin-mediated microenvironments to the active maintenance of deep quiescence, consistent with our recent findings associating LAMA1 with quiescent cell survival. By applying these ECM gene signatures, we delineate discrete “micro-niches” of quiescent stem cells in healthy tissue and provide evidence that analogous states persist in the colorectal cancer (CRC) environment. Extending our approach to an unrelated tissue, the pancreas, we detect parallel quiescent cell subtypes, illustrating the broader applicability of ECM-based signatures. Taken together, our findings redefine the concept of stem cell heterogeneity in the colon, establish ECM-driven gene signatures as a powerful tool for characterizing stem cell states, and offer new perspectives on the niche-dependent regulation of both healthy and cancerous stem cell populations.
- Open Access
Laminin 111 triggers cell quiescence and long-term survival by inducing IQGAP1-mediated cytosolic scaffolding of ERK and BAD inactivation
SUMMARY: In an adult human body, only a minority (∼1%) of cells are dividing; all others are either quiescent, senescent or terminally differentiated. Cellular quiescence, also called G0, is a reversible non-proliferative state in which cells, such as adult stem cells, exist until stimuli trigger their re-entry into the cell cycle. Quiescent cells are known to reside within microenvironment niches of specific extracellular matrix (ECM) composition, but the molecular mechanisms that control their entry and maintenance into G0 and their long-term survival are poorly understood. Here, using a reproducible and homogenous in vitro model of quiescence, ex vivo tissue histology, phosphoproteomics, and molecular cell biological assays, we revealed that Laminin 111 was sufficient to trigger i) reversible cell cycle exit into G0; ii) sustained and elevated MAPK/ERK signaling; and iii) long-term survival. We found that ERK was activated through the Rap1-BRAF-MEK arm underneath Laminin-binding Integrin α3β1. Activated pERK was scaffolded into the cytoplasm by IQGAP1, thereby blocking its translocation into the nucleus and the activation of proliferative transcription factors. Instead, cytoplasmic pERK inhibited pro-apoptotic protein BAD, which mediated the survival of quiescent cells even in absence of mitogen stimuli. Importantly, we confirmed that pERK was elevated and retained in the cytoplasm of Lgr5 + stem cells when they were located within Laminin α1-positive niches in porcine intestine. These findings uncovered a molecular mechanism that may explain how quiescent cell pools, such as dormant adult stem cells, can survive many years despite low mitogen stimuli and be resistant to apoptotic challenges, including chemotherapy. HIGHLIGHTS: Laminin 111 is sufficient to induce cellular quiescence (G0) and long-term survival. Laminin 111 triggers the sustained and elevated activation of ERK during G0. ERK is activated not by growth factor receptors but through the Rap1-BRAF-MEK arm underneath Laminin-binding Integrin α3β1. Active, phosphorylated ERK (pERK) is scaffolded by IQGAP1, which prevents it from translocating into the nucleus and activating proliferative transcription factors. Instead, cytoplasmic pERK mediates the phosphorylation, and thus inhibition, of BAD, thereby raising the threshold at which G0 cells enter apoptosis.
Open AccessLaminin 111 triggers cell quiescence and long-term survival by inducing IQGAP1-mediated cytosolic scaffolding of ERK and BAD inactivation
SUMMARY: In an adult human body, only a minority (∼1%) of cells are dividing; all others are either quiescent, senescent or terminally differentiated. Cellular quiescence, also called G0, is a reversible non-proliferative state in which cells, such as adult stem cells, exist until stimuli trigger their re-entry into the cell cycle. Quiescent cells are known to reside within microenvironment niches of specific extracellular matrix (ECM) composition, but the molecular mechanisms that control their entry and maintenance into G0 and their long-term survival are poorly understood. Here, using a reproducible and homogenous in vitro model of quiescence, ex vivo tissue histology, phosphoproteomics, and molecular cell biological assays, we revealed that Laminin 111 was sufficient to trigger i) reversible cell cycle exit into G0; ii) sustained and elevated MAPK/ERK signaling; and iii) long-term survival. We found that ERK was activated through the Rap1-BRAF-MEK arm underneath Laminin-binding Integrin α3β1. Activated pERK was scaffolded into the cytoplasm by IQGAP1, thereby blocking its translocation into the nucleus and the activation of proliferative transcription factors. Instead, cytoplasmic pERK inhibited pro-apoptotic protein BAD, which mediated the survival of quiescent cells even in absence of mitogen stimuli. Importantly, we confirmed that pERK was elevated and retained in the cytoplasm of Lgr5 + stem cells when they were located within Laminin α1-positive niches in porcine intestine. These findings uncovered a molecular mechanism that may explain how quiescent cell pools, such as dormant adult stem cells, can survive many years despite low mitogen stimuli and be resistant to apoptotic challenges, including chemotherapy. HIGHLIGHTS: Laminin 111 is sufficient to induce cellular quiescence (G0) and long-term survival. Laminin 111 triggers the sustained and elevated activation of ERK during G0. ERK is activated not by growth factor receptors but through the Rap1-BRAF-MEK arm underneath Laminin-binding Integrin α3β1. Active, phosphorylated ERK (pERK) is scaffolded by IQGAP1, which prevents it from translocating into the nucleus and activating proliferative transcription factors. Instead, cytoplasmic pERK mediates the phosphorylation, and thus inhibition, of BAD, thereby raising the threshold at which G0 cells enter apoptosis.
- 1 August 2021
- Published by Elsevier in Current Opinion in Cell Biology
- Vol. 71, 120-129
Unconventional endocytic mechanisms
- 1 August 2021
- Published by Elsevier in Current Opinion in Cell Biology
- Vol. 71, 120-129
Unconventional endocytic mechanisms
- Open Access
- 23 April 2021
- Published by Springer Nature in Nature Communications
- Vol. 12 (1) , 1-16
Cdk5 and GSK3β inhibit fast endophilin-mediated endocytosis
Endocytosis mediates the cellular uptake of micronutrients and cell surface proteins. Fast Endophilin-mediated endocytosis, FEME, is not constitutively active but triggered upon receptor activation. High levels of growth factors induce spontaneous FEME, which can be suppressed upon serum starvation. This suggested a role for protein kinases in this growth factor receptor-mediated regulation. Using chemical and genetic inhibition, we find that Cdk5 and GSK3β are negative regulators of FEME. They antagonize the binding of Endophilin to Dynamin-1 and to CRMP4, a Plexin A1 adaptor. This control is required for proper axon elongation, branching and growth cone formation in hippocampal neurons. The kinases also block the recruitment of Dynein onto FEME carriers by Bin1. As GSK3β binds to Endophilin, it imposes a local regulation of FEME. Thus, Cdk5 and GSK3β are key regulators of FEME, licensing cells for rapid uptake by the pathway only when their activity is low.
- 23 April 2021
- Published by Springer Nature in Nature Communications
- Vol. 12 (1) , 1-16
Open AccessCdk5 and GSK3β inhibit fast endophilin-mediated endocytosis
Endocytosis mediates the cellular uptake of micronutrients and cell surface proteins. Fast Endophilin-mediated endocytosis, FEME, is not constitutively active but triggered upon receptor activation. High levels of growth factors induce spontaneous FEME, which can be suppressed upon serum starvation. This suggested a role for protein kinases in this growth factor receptor-mediated regulation. Using chemical and genetic inhibition, we find that Cdk5 and GSK3β are negative regulators of FEME. They antagonize the binding of Endophilin to Dynamin-1 and to CRMP4, a Plexin A1 adaptor. This control is required for proper axon elongation, branching and growth cone formation in hippocampal neurons. The kinases also block the recruitment of Dynein onto FEME carriers by Bin1. As GSK3β binds to Endophilin, it imposes a local regulation of FEME. Thus, Cdk5 and GSK3β are key regulators of FEME, licensing cells for rapid uptake by the pathway only when their activity is low.
- 22 November 2020
- Published by Springer Nature
- Vol. 2233, 19-42
Measuring Endocytosis During Proliferative Cell Quiescence
Quiescence (also called “G0”) is the state in which cells have exited the cell cycle but are capable to reenter as required. Though poorly understood, it represents one of the most prevalent cell states across all life. Many biologically important cell types reside in quiescence including mature hepatocytes, endothelial cells, and dormant adult stem cells. Furthermore, the quiescence program occurs in both short- and long-term varieties, depending on the physiological environments. A barrier slowing our understanding of quiescence has been a scarcity of available in vitro model systems to allow for the exploration of key regulatory pathways, such as endocytosis. Endocytosis, the internalization of extracellular material into the cell, is a fundamental and highly regulated process that impacts many cell biological functions. Accordingly, we have developed an in vitro model of deep quiescence in hTERT-immortalized RPE1 cells, combining both long-term contact inhibition and mitogen removal, to measure endocytosis. In addition, we present an analytical approach employing automated high-throughput microscopy and image analysis that yields high-content data allowing for meaningful and statistically robust interpretation. Importantly, the methods presented herein provide a suitable platform that can be easily adapted to investigate other regulatory processes across the cell cycle.
- 22 November 2020
- Published by Springer Nature
- Vol. 2233, 19-42
Measuring Endocytosis During Proliferative Cell Quiescence
Quiescence (also called “G0”) is the state in which cells have exited the cell cycle but are capable to reenter as required. Though poorly understood, it represents one of the most prevalent cell states across all life. Many biologically important cell types reside in quiescence including mature hepatocytes, endothelial cells, and dormant adult stem cells. Furthermore, the quiescence program occurs in both short- and long-term varieties, depending on the physiological environments. A barrier slowing our understanding of quiescence has been a scarcity of available in vitro model systems to allow for the exploration of key regulatory pathways, such as endocytosis. Endocytosis, the internalization of extracellular material into the cell, is a fundamental and highly regulated process that impacts many cell biological functions. Accordingly, we have developed an in vitro model of deep quiescence in hTERT-immortalized RPE1 cells, combining both long-term contact inhibition and mitogen removal, to measure endocytosis. In addition, we present an analytical approach employing automated high-throughput microscopy and image analysis that yields high-content data allowing for meaningful and statistically robust interpretation. Importantly, the methods presented herein provide a suitable platform that can be easily adapted to investigate other regulatory processes across the cell cycle.
- Open Access
- 26 June 2020
- Published by Portland Press Ltd. in Biochemical Journal
- Vol. 477 (12) , 2327-2345
Molecular mechanism of Fast Endophilin-Mediated Endocytosis
Endocytosis mediates the cellular uptake of micronutrients and cell surface proteins. Clathrin-mediated endocytosis (CME) is the housekeeping pathway in resting cells but additional Clathrin-independent endocytic (CIE) routes, including Fast Endophilin-Mediated Endocytosis (FEME), internalize specific cargoes and support diverse cellular functions. FEME is part of the Dynamin-dependent subgroup of CIE pathways. Here, we review our current understanding of the molecular mechanism of FEME. Key steps are: (i) priming, (ii) cargo selection, (iii) membrane curvature and carrier formation, (iv) membrane scission and (v) cytosolic transport. All steps are controlled by regulatory mechanisms mediated by phosphoinositides and by kinases such as Src, LRRK2, Cdk5 and GSK3β. A key feature of FEME is that it is not constitutively active but triggered upon the stimulation of selected cell surface receptors by their ligands. In resting cells, there is a priming cycle that concentrates Endophilin into clusters on discrete locations of the plasma membrane. In the absence of receptor activation, the patches quickly abort and new cycles are initiated nearby, constantly priming the plasma membrane for FEME. Upon activation, receptors are swiftly sorted into pre-existing Endophilin clusters, which then bud to form FEME carriers within 10 s. We summarize the hallmarks of FEME and the techniques and assays required to identify it. Next, we review similarities and differences with other CIE pathways and proposed cargoes that may use FEME to enter cells. Finally, we submit pending questions and future milestones and discuss the exciting perspectives that targeting FEME may boost treatments against cancer and neurodegenerative diseases.
- 26 June 2020
- Published by Portland Press Ltd. in Biochemical Journal
- Vol. 477 (12) , 2327-2345
Open AccessMolecular mechanism of Fast Endophilin-Mediated Endocytosis
Endocytosis mediates the cellular uptake of micronutrients and cell surface proteins. Clathrin-mediated endocytosis (CME) is the housekeeping pathway in resting cells but additional Clathrin-independent endocytic (CIE) routes, including Fast Endophilin-Mediated Endocytosis (FEME), internalize specific cargoes and support diverse cellular functions. FEME is part of the Dynamin-dependent subgroup of CIE pathways. Here, we review our current understanding of the molecular mechanism of FEME. Key steps are: (i) priming, (ii) cargo selection, (iii) membrane curvature and carrier formation, (iv) membrane scission and (v) cytosolic transport. All steps are controlled by regulatory mechanisms mediated by phosphoinositides and by kinases such as Src, LRRK2, Cdk5 and GSK3β. A key feature of FEME is that it is not constitutively active but triggered upon the stimulation of selected cell surface receptors by their ligands. In resting cells, there is a priming cycle that concentrates Endophilin into clusters on discrete locations of the plasma membrane. In the absence of receptor activation, the patches quickly abort and new cycles are initiated nearby, constantly priming the plasma membrane for FEME. Upon activation, receptors are swiftly sorted into pre-existing Endophilin clusters, which then bud to form FEME carriers within 10 s. We summarize the hallmarks of FEME and the techniques and assays required to identify it. Next, we review similarities and differences with other CIE pathways and proposed cargoes that may use FEME to enter cells. Finally, we submit pending questions and future milestones and discuss the exciting perspectives that targeting FEME may boost treatments against cancer and neurodegenerative diseases.
- Open Access
Cdk5 and GSK3β inhibit Fast Endophilin-Mediated Endocytosis
Endocytosis mediates the cellular uptake of micronutrients and cell surface proteins. Parallel to Clathrin-mediated endocytosis, additional Clathrin-independent endocytic routes exist, including fast Endophilin-mediated endocytosis (FEME). The latter is not constitutively active but requires the activation of selected receptors. In cell culture, however, the high levels of growth factors in the regular culture media induce spontaneous FEME, which can be suppressed upon serum starvation. Thus, we predicted a role for protein kinases in this growth factor receptor-mediated regulation of the pathway. Using chemical and genetic inhibition, we found that Cdk5 and GSK3β are negative regulators of FEME. Their inhibition was sufficient to activate FEME promptly in resting cells and boosted the production of endocytic carriers containing β 1-adrenergic receptor, following dobutamine addition. We established that the kinases suppress FEME at several levels. They control Dynamin-1 and Dynein recruitment and sorting of cargo receptors such as Plexin A1 and ROBO1 into FEME carriers. They do so by antagonizing the binding of Endophilin to Dynamin-1 as well as to Collapsin response mediator protein 4 (CRMP4), a Plexin A1 adaptor. Cdk5 and GSK3β also hamper the binding and recruitment of Dynein onto FEME carriers by Bin1. Interestingly, we found that GSK3β binds to Endophilin, thus imposing a local regulation of FEME. Collectively, these findings place the two kinases as key regulators of FEME, licensing cells for rapid uptake by the pathway only upon when Cdk5 and GSK3β activity is low.
Open AccessCdk5 and GSK3β inhibit Fast Endophilin-Mediated Endocytosis
Endocytosis mediates the cellular uptake of micronutrients and cell surface proteins. Parallel to Clathrin-mediated endocytosis, additional Clathrin-independent endocytic routes exist, including fast Endophilin-mediated endocytosis (FEME). The latter is not constitutively active but requires the activation of selected receptors. In cell culture, however, the high levels of growth factors in the regular culture media induce spontaneous FEME, which can be suppressed upon serum starvation. Thus, we predicted a role for protein kinases in this growth factor receptor-mediated regulation of the pathway. Using chemical and genetic inhibition, we found that Cdk5 and GSK3β are negative regulators of FEME. Their inhibition was sufficient to activate FEME promptly in resting cells and boosted the production of endocytic carriers containing β 1-adrenergic receptor, following dobutamine addition. We established that the kinases suppress FEME at several levels. They control Dynamin-1 and Dynein recruitment and sorting of cargo receptors such as Plexin A1 and ROBO1 into FEME carriers. They do so by antagonizing the binding of Endophilin to Dynamin-1 as well as to Collapsin response mediator protein 4 (CRMP4), a Plexin A1 adaptor. Cdk5 and GSK3β also hamper the binding and recruitment of Dynein onto FEME carriers by Bin1. Interestingly, we found that GSK3β binds to Endophilin, thus imposing a local regulation of FEME. Collectively, these findings place the two kinases as key regulators of FEME, licensing cells for rapid uptake by the pathway only upon when Cdk5 and GSK3β activity is low.
- Open Access
- 30 November 2018
- Published by The Company of Biologists in Journal of Cell Science
- Vol. 131 (23) , jcs216804
Endocytosis in proliferating, quiescent and terminally differentiated cells
Endocytosis mediates nutrient uptake, receptor internalization and the regulation of cell signaling. It is also hijacked by many bacteria, viruses and toxins to mediate their cellular entry. Several endocytic routes exist in parallel, fulfilling different functions. Most studies on endocytosis have used transformed cells in culture. However, as the majority of cells in an adult body have exited the cell cycle, our understanding is biased towards proliferating cells. Here, we review the evidence for the different pathways of endocytosis not only in dividing, but also in quiescent, senescent and terminally differentiated cells. During mitosis, residual endocytosis is dedicated to the internalization of caveolae and specific receptors. In non-dividing cells, clathrin-mediated endocytosis (CME) functions, but the activity of alternative processes, such as caveolae, macropinocytosis and clathrin-independent routes, vary widely depending on cell types and functions. Endocytosis supports the quiescent state by either upregulating cell cycle arrest pathways or downregulating mitogen-induced signaling, thereby inhibiting cell proliferation. Endocytosis in terminally differentiated cells, such as skeletal muscles, adipocytes, kidney podocytes and neurons, supports tissue-specific functions. Finally, uptake is downregulated in senescent cells, making them insensitive to proliferative stimuli by growth factors. Future studies should reveal the molecular basis for the differences in activities between the different cell states.
- 30 November 2018
- Published by The Company of Biologists in Journal of Cell Science
- Vol. 131 (23) , jcs216804
Open AccessEndocytosis in proliferating, quiescent and terminally differentiated cells
Endocytosis mediates nutrient uptake, receptor internalization and the regulation of cell signaling. It is also hijacked by many bacteria, viruses and toxins to mediate their cellular entry. Several endocytic routes exist in parallel, fulfilling different functions. Most studies on endocytosis have used transformed cells in culture. However, as the majority of cells in an adult body have exited the cell cycle, our understanding is biased towards proliferating cells. Here, we review the evidence for the different pathways of endocytosis not only in dividing, but also in quiescent, senescent and terminally differentiated cells. During mitosis, residual endocytosis is dedicated to the internalization of caveolae and specific receptors. In non-dividing cells, clathrin-mediated endocytosis (CME) functions, but the activity of alternative processes, such as caveolae, macropinocytosis and clathrin-independent routes, vary widely depending on cell types and functions. Endocytosis supports the quiescent state by either upregulating cell cycle arrest pathways or downregulating mitogen-induced signaling, thereby inhibiting cell proliferation. Endocytosis in terminally differentiated cells, such as skeletal muscles, adipocytes, kidney podocytes and neurons, supports tissue-specific functions. Finally, uptake is downregulated in senescent cells, making them insensitive to proliferative stimuli by growth factors. Future studies should reveal the molecular basis for the differences in activities between the different cell states.
- 21 August 2018
- Published by Springer Nature
- Vol. 1847, 23-35
Probing Endocytosis During the Cell Cycle with Minimal Experimental Perturbation
Endocytosis mediates the cellular uptake of nutrients, modulates signaling by regulating levels of cell surface receptors, and is usurped by pathogens during infection. Endocytosis activity is known to vary during the cell cycle, in particular during mitosis. Importantly, different experimental conditions can lead to opposite results and conclusions, thereby emphasizing the need for a careful design of protocols. For example, experiments using serum-starvation, ice-cold steps or using mitotic arrest produced by chemicals widely used to synchronize cells (nocodazole, RO-3306, or S-trityl-L-cysteine) induce a blockage of clathrin-mediated endocytosis during mitosis not observed in unperturbed, dividing cells. In addition, perturbations produced by mRNA interference or dominant-negative mutant overexpression affect endocytosis long before cells are being assayed. Here, we describe simple experimental procedures to assay endocytosis along the cell cycle with minimal perturbations.
- 21 August 2018
- Published by Springer Nature
- Vol. 1847, 23-35
Probing Endocytosis During the Cell Cycle with Minimal Experimental Perturbation
Endocytosis mediates the cellular uptake of nutrients, modulates signaling by regulating levels of cell surface receptors, and is usurped by pathogens during infection. Endocytosis activity is known to vary during the cell cycle, in particular during mitosis. Importantly, different experimental conditions can lead to opposite results and conclusions, thereby emphasizing the need for a careful design of protocols. For example, experiments using serum-starvation, ice-cold steps or using mitotic arrest produced by chemicals widely used to synchronize cells (nocodazole, RO-3306, or S-trityl-L-cysteine) induce a blockage of clathrin-mediated endocytosis during mitosis not observed in unperturbed, dividing cells. In addition, perturbations produced by mRNA interference or dominant-negative mutant overexpression affect endocytosis long before cells are being assayed. Here, we describe simple experimental procedures to assay endocytosis along the cell cycle with minimal perturbations.
- Open Access
- 20 August 2018
- Published by Springer Nature in Nature Cell Biology
- Vol. 20 (10) , 1229
Publisher Correction: FBP17 and CIP4 recruit SHIP2 and lamellipodin to prime the plasma membrane for fast endophilin-mediated endocytosis
In the version of this Letter originally published, the name of co-author Safa Lucken-Ardjomande Häsler was coded wrongly, resulting in it being incorrect when exported to citation databases. This has been corrected, though no visible changes will be apparent.
- 20 August 2018
- Published by Springer Nature in Nature Cell Biology
- Vol. 20 (10) , 1229
Open AccessPublisher Correction: FBP17 and CIP4 recruit SHIP2 and lamellipodin to prime the plasma membrane for fast endophilin-mediated endocytosis
In the version of this Letter originally published, the name of co-author Safa Lucken-Ardjomande Häsler was coded wrongly, resulting in it being incorrect when exported to citation databases. This has been corrected, though no visible changes will be apparent.