CGCynthia A. Gerhardt

Cynthia A. Gerhardt

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article

Previous Organizations / Institutes

The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years


Cynthia A. Gerhardt has a total of 202 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    Preparing the Psychology Workforce: Outcomes of a Novel Post-Baccalaureate Training Program at an Academic Medical Center

    by Charleen I. Roche, Megan M. Griffith, Chenelle Miller, Cynthia A. Gerhardt, Ahna Pai, Canice E. Crerand, Leena Nahata

    Graduate school admissions are competitive, and few studies have documented post-baccalaureate (post-bacc) training program outcomes. This paper describes a post-bacc training program at an academic medical center and aims to (a) characterize participants and program recruitment, (b) examine productivity and graduate school matriculation, and (c) assess change in key outcomes (e.g., publications), demographic characteristics, and program reflections. Seventy-nine post-baccs have completed the post-bacc training program since 2017. Publication data were obtained via institution record-keeping and public resources (e.g., PubMed). Starting in 2021, new post-baccs ( n = 28) completed entry and exit surveys (reporting demographics/academic history, awards/honors, publications/presentations, research skill confidence, and next steps). Of 79 post-baccs, 89% ( n = 70) matriculated to graduate or medical school (41% clinical psychology). The median number of publications during training was three. Publications, presentations, and confidence were higher at exit vs. entry ( p’s < .05). There were no differences based on underrepresented group status ( p > .05). Program satisfaction was high. Findings demonstrate success preparing post-baccs for admission into advanced degree programs, improving research productivity/skill (regardless of underrepresented group status), and garnering high satisfaction among post-baccs. This program model can serve as a bridge, offering rigorous clinical research training for the future workforce of clinical psychologists and related professionals.

  • Open Access

    Supporting Medication Adherence in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Using the BMT4me mHealth App: Mixed Methods Usability Study

    by Mariam Kochashvili, Parishma Guttoo, Emre Sezgin, Ahna Pai, Rajinder Bajwa, Wendy Landier, Cynthia Gerhardt, Micah Skeens

    Background: Due to multifaceted outpatient regimens, children receiving hematopoietic stem cell transplants (HCTs) are at high risk of medication nonadherence, leading to life-threatening complications. Mobile health (mHealth) interventions have proven effective in improving adherence in various pediatric conditions; however, adherence intervention literature on HCT is limited. Objective: This study aimed to assess the usability of a mHealth intervention (BMT4me) designed to serve as a real-time, personalized tool for medication management or adherence, symptom tracking, and journal keeping. Methods: Following a mixed methods approach, 14 caregivers (n=11, 79% female; n=10, 71% White) of children aged 2‐18 (mean age 8.51, SD 5.18) years in the acute phase (first 100 d) post-HCT were recruited. Caregivers were asked to use the BMT4me app for 100 days or until weaning of the immunosuppressant medications to measure usability. The System Usability Scale (assessing functionality and acceptability), reaction cards (assessing desirability), caregiver satisfaction (assessing satisfaction) with the app, and semistructured interviews (assessing participant experience using the app and feedback regarding features) were conducted at two time points, at enrollment and study completion. Results: The mean System Usability Scale score was 86.15 (SD 12.81) at enrollment and 73.13 (SD 16.13) at study completion, with most participants reporting the app easy to use and accepable during both time points. At enrollment, 80% (n=12) of caregivers reported that the app was effective in motivating them to stay on schedule, and 87% (n=13) indicated they would recommend it to others. At study completion, 75% (n=6) of caregivers found the app helpful for tracking their child’s medication schedule, and 64% (n=5) would recommend it to others. Caregivers described the app as “accessible,” “useful,” and “valuable.” Qualitative interviews during both time points revealed caregivers’ positive reactions to the app, particularly regarding medication reminders, tracking symptoms, and notes features, while also providing suggestions for improvements, such as integrating the BMT4me app with electronic medical records, incorporating educational content, adding fields for recording vital signs, and important phone numbers. Conclusions: The BMT4me app demonstrated promising usability as a mHealth intervention among pediatric patients undergoing HCT. Caregivers considered the app user-friendly and valuable, with positive feedback on its features, such as medication reminders and symptom tracking. Despite minor reported issues with app functionality, the overall acceptance of the app suggests its potential to support families in managing complex treatment. The findings from this study will inform the feasibility of testing in larger randomized controlled trials.


  • Open Access

    Usability Testing of an Online Responsive Parenting Program for Rural and Appalachian Caregivers of Young Childhood Cancer Survivors: A Mixed Methods Study (Preprint)

    by Emily L. Moscato, Eva Darow, Jessica Quach, Adrien Winning, Matthew Schmidt, Shari L. Wade, Cynthia A. Gerhardt, Emre Sezgin

    Journal of Medical Internet Research - International Scientific Journal for Medical Research, Information and Communication on the Internet #Preprint #PeerReviewMe: Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint. Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn. Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period. Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author). Background: Young childhood cancer survivors (YCCS) diagnosed and treated before age 7 are at heightened risk of developmental difficulties. As a result, their caregivers may experience stress as they navigate various educational and hospital systems, and advocate for their child’s needs. To our knowledge, there are no tailored early intervention or support programs to address the unique and multifaceted needs of YCCS and their caregivers. Digital platforms can provide anticipatory guidance and developmental resources, which may be especially impactful for families at increased risk for health and educational disparities, particularly in underserved rural and Appalachian areas. Objective: This mixed-methods study describes the usability testing of an online responsive parenting program for caregivers of YCCS, called the Preparing for Life and Academics for Young cancer survivors (PLAY) program. Methods: Twelve caregivers of YCCS (9 biological parents, 2 grandfathers, 1 legal guardian; 33% rural; 33% Appalachian; 83% White) participated in a virtual usability session utilizing a task-based, think-aloud method. This session was followed by completion of the System Usability Scale (SUS), responses to reaction cards to describe their experiences with the platform, and a semi-structured interview. Two trained coders used rapid analysis and consensus methods to identify themes. Results: Overall, caregivers found the platform easy to use (92% SUS>68; M = 82.2, SD = 14.45). Most caregivers provided positive feedback in response to reaction cards (e.g., useful, appealing, valuable) to describe the platform. Qualitative findings highlighted that most caregivers perceived the platform as easy to use, and several participants described it as a helpful educational tool. Participants noted potential platform improvements should include accessibility features (e.g., closed captioning for videos), content, and usability on mobile devices. Conclusions: With further improvements, digital platforms such as PLAY may be a promising avenue to bridge access to care for high-need groups and ultimately, to improve child neurodevelopmental outcomes.


  • Open Access

    Benefit-finding in children with advanced cancer and their parents

    by Emma Siefring, Anna L. Olsavsky, Megan Schaefer, Malcolm Sutherland-Foggio, Alexandra C. Himelhoch, Kylie N. Hill, Ansley E. Kenney, Lisa Humphrey, Randal Olshefski, Cynthia A. Gerhardt

    Objectives: Although pediatric cancer often causes significant stress for families, most childhood cancer survivors are resilient and do not exhibit severe or lasting psychopathology. Research demonstrates some survivors may report benefit-finding or positive outcomes following this stressful life event. However, considerably less research has included families of children who are unlikely to survive their illness. Thus, this study investigated benefit-finding among parents and their children with advanced cancer, as well as associated demographic and medical factors. Methods: Families (N = 72) of children with advanced cancer (ages 5–25) were recruited from a large pediatric hospital. Advanced cancer was defined as relapsed or refractory disease, an estimated prognosis of <60%, or referral to end-of-life care. Participants completed a demographic survey and the Benefit Finding Scale at enrollment. Results: Children, mothers, and fathers reported moderate to high benefit-finding scores. Correlations between family members were weak and non-significant. Children reported significantly higher benefit-finding than fathers. Demographic and medical factors were not associated with benefit-finding in children, mothers, or fathers. Significance of results: Families of children with advanced cancer reported moderate to high benefit-finding regardless of background or medical factors. Children identified benefits of their cancer experience independent of the experiences of their mothers and fathers. Larger studies should continue to examine factors associated with positive and negative outcomes in the context of childhood cancer to inform interventions.


  • Initial Development of the Nurse Perception of Infant Condition (NPIC) Scale

    by Christine A. Fortney, Nathan P. Helsabeck, Kayla Thomsen, Chyongchiou J. Lin, Amy E. Baughcum, Cynthia A. Gerhardt

    Background: More than 350,000 U.S. infants are admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) annually and likely experience discomfort. Although nurse perceptions of infant symptoms, suffering, and quality of life (QOL) are valuable, the availability of standardized assessment tools to measure these concepts are limited. Purpose: To provide preliminary evidence of the internal structure, reliability, and validity of the Nurse Perception of Infant Condition (NPIC) scale. Methods: Infants were enrolled from a Level IV NICU in the U.S. Midwest. Nurses reported on their perceptions of the infant symptom experience and their expectations for infant survival. Weekly behavioral observations of infants were obtained before and after standard delivery of care to obtain a comfort score. Results: 237 nurses who cared for 73 infants completed 569 surveys over 28 months. All NPIC items were significantly correlated with each other (P < .001). Factor analysis revealed strong evidence of a 2-factor structure (survival and suffering subscales). Both subscales demonstrated good to excellent internal consistency. Together the 2 factors explained 82% of the variability in the scale responses. Limited validity evidence was found. Implications for Practice and Research: Evidence was found to support the internal structure and reliability of the NPIC scale. However, further item development and refinement is needed to increase the utility NPIC scale in clinical and research settings. The development of improved assessments of the infant NICU experience is warranted. Nurse perceptions of infant suffering or poor QOL may have implications for their expectations for infant survival and possibly care delivery.


  • Open Access

    Mixed-method examination of factors associated with adolescent decision-making and involvement in care in the context of advanced cancer

    by Malcolm Sutherland-Foggio, Anna L. Olsavsky, Micah A. Skeens, Leena Nahata, Kylie Hill, Megan Schaefer, Alexandra Himelhoch, Ansley E. Kenney, Lisa Humphrey, Randal Olshefski, et al.

    Objectives: Adolescents with cancer often experience significant symptom burden and aggressive treatment near end-of-life. Increased adolescent involvement in care and decision-making may benefit health outcomes. Limited research has examined factors associated with adolescents’ involvement in care in the context of advanced disease. Thus, we examined the impact of background factors and decision-making perceptions on both adolescents’ involvement in care and their desired change in involvement.Methods: Adolescents with advanced cancer (n = 41; Mage = 15.37), were recruited approximately 1 month after diagnosis to complete measures of decision-making perceptions and their family role. Hierarchical regressions examined the contributions of background factors and decision-making perceptions to adolescents’ frequency and desired involvement in their care. Qualitative interviews regarding decision-making were analyzed using deductive analysis.Results: The model examining frequency of involvement in care was significant, F(5,34) = 3.12, p = .02, R2= .31. Older age was the only significant predictor (β = .13, p= .003). The model examining desired involvement was non-significant, F(5,34) = 2.22, p = .075. Qualitative analysis indicated that (1) older adolescents have more involvement in decision-making, (2) collaborative decision-making occurred between the adolescent and extended family, and (3) adolescents trusted others to make decisions. Integration of qualitative and quantitative data revealed congruence in findings.Significance of results: Adolescents with advanced cancer, who consider how decisions directly impact them and prefer greater autonomy, may be more involved in their medical care. Research is needed to identify other longitudinal predictors of decision-making and involvement in care. Providers should consider encouraging families to communicate their preferences and engage in shared decision-making.


  • Associations between parental depression, communication, and self-worth of siblings bereaved by cancer.

    by Dana Garcia, Anna L. Olsavsky, Kylie N. Hill, Valdeoso Patterson, Amy E. Baughcum, Kristin A. Long, Maru Barrera, Mary Jo Gilmer, Diane L. Fairclough, Terrah Foster Akard, et al.

    A child's death from cancer may increase the risk for poor self-worth in bereaved siblings. Furthermore, bereaved parents may experience depressive symptoms and communicate differently with their surviving children. However, limited research has examined family factors associated with self-worth in bereaved siblings. Thus, we examined: (a) differences in parental depressive symptoms, parent-child communication, and sibling self-worth between bereaved and nonbereaved families and (b) indirect effects of parental depressive symptoms and communication quality on the association between bereavement and sibling self-worth. Bereaved parents and siblings were recruited 3-12 months after a child's death from cancer. Bereaved (n = 72) and nonbereaved families of classmates (n = 58) completed home-based questionnaires upon enrollment (T1), and 48 bereaved and 45 nonbereaved families completed 1-year follow-up (T2). Relative to controls at T1 and T2, bereaved mothers, but not fathers, reported more depressive symptoms. Bereaved siblings reported poorer maternal and similar paternal communication, and similar levels of self-worth compared to controls. Both cross-sectional and longitudinal serial mediation models for mothers were significant. Bereaved mothers were at greater risk for depressive symptoms, which adversely affected sibling self-worth over time through disrupted mother-child communication. The father sample was limited, but the cross-sectional model was nonsignificant. Mothers and fathers may grieve differently and may require different therapeutic approaches. Family-centered interventions should target bereaved mothers' emotional adjustment and communication to enhance sibling self-worth. Additionally, clinicians should bolster other sources of support for bereaved siblings to promote adaptive outcomes.


  • Cancer‐related stress in childhood cancer survivorship: Prevalence and associations with perceptions of health risks and quality of life

    by Alexandra C. Himelhoch, Anna L. Olsavsky, Eva L. Darow, Keagan G. Lipak, Ansley E. Kenney, Rachel S. Fisher, Kemar V. Prussien, Kathryn A. Vannatta, Bruce E. Compas, Cynthia A. Gerhardt

    Objective: Limited research has characterized cancer‐related stress (CRS) among families of childhood cancer survivors. We examined the prevalence of CRS among survivors and caregivers, as well as its association with health risk perceptions (i.e., prognosis, risk for diminished quality of life) and views of survivor quality of life (QoL).Methods: At five years post‐diagnosis or relapse, survivors (n = 100; Mage = 15.84 years; 89% White), mothers (n = 127), and fathers (n = 59) reported their CRS. Perceived prognosis and risk for diminished QoL were rated on a 0%–100% visual analogue scale, while the PedsQL assessed QoL.Results: CRS was low (M = 1.6–1.8, scale: 1–4); mothers reported greater stress than survivors, p = 0.038, d = 0.25. There was an indirect effect of survivors' perceived prognosis on their QoL through CRS, CI = 0.04 to 0.25, R2 = 0.32. Among mothers, there was an indirect effect of perceived prognosis/risk for diminished QoL on their reports of survivor QoL through CRS, CI = 0.03 to 0.23 and −0.15 to −0.03, R2 = 0.28 and 0.32, respectively. There were no indirect effects among fathers.Conclusions: CRS may be an important, modifiable factor that could improve survivors' QoL. Research is needed to examine how CRS changes over time to assess the utility of interventions among female survivors, mothers, and those with lower prognosis estimates.


  • VARIATIONS IN APPROACHES TO SPERM BANKING IN ADOLESCENT BOYS WITH CANCER: A MIXED METHODS STUDY

    by Dona Jalili, Sophia M. Liles, Cynthia Gerhardt, Ashley Housten, Susan T. Vadaparampil, Gwendolyn P. Quinn, Leena Nahata

  • Regional Cortical Thickness Correlates of Intellectual Abilities Differ in Children With Traumatic Brain Injury Versus Those With Orthopedic Injury in the Chronic Post-Injury Phase

    by Tricia L. Merkley, Colt Halter, Benjamin Graul, Shawn D. Gale, Chase Junge, Madeleine Reading, Sierra Jarvis, Kaitlyn Greer, Chad Squires, Erin D. Bigler, et al.

    A decline in intellectual functioning (intelligence quotient [IQ]) is often observed following more severe forms of traumatic brain injury (TBI) and is a useful index for long-term outcome. Identifying brain correlates of IQ can serve to inform developmental trajectories of behavior in this population. Using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), we examined the relationship between intellectual abilities and patterns of cortical thickness in children with a history of TBI or with orthopedic injury (OI) in the chronic phase of injury recovery. Participants were 47 children with OI and 58 children with TBI, with TBI severity ranging from complicated-mild to severe. Ages ranged from 8 to 14 years old, with an average age of 10.47 years, and an injury-to-test range of ∼1–5 years. The groups did not differ in age or sex. The intellectual ability estimate (full-scale [FS]IQ-2) was derived from a two-form (Vocabulary and Matrix Reasoning subtests) Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence (WASI). MRI data were processed using the FreeSurfer toolkit and harmonized across data collection sites using neuroComBat procedures, while holding demographic features (i.e., sex, socioeconomic status [SES]), TBI status, and FSIQ-2 constant. Separate general linear models per group (TBI and OI) and a single interaction model with all participants were conducted with all significant results withstanding correction for multiple comparisons via permutation testing. Intellectual ability was higher ( p < 0.001) in the OI group (FSIQ-2 = 110.81) than in the TBI group (FSIQ-2 = 99.81). In children with OI, bi-hemispheric regions, including the right pre-central gyrus and precuneus and bilateral inferior temporal and left occipital areas were related to IQ, such that higher IQ was associated with thicker cortex in these regions. In contrast, only cortical thickness in the right pre-central gyrus and bilateral cuneus positively related to IQ in children with TBI. Significant interaction effects were found in the bilateral temporal, parietal, and occipital lobes and left frontal regions, indicating that the relationship between IQ and cortical thickness differed between groups in these regions. Changes in cortical associations with IQ after TBI may reflect direct injury effects and/or adaptation in cortical structure and intellectual functioning, particularly in the bilateral posterior parietal and inferior temporal regions. This suggests that the substrates of intellectual ability are particularly susceptible to acquired injury in the integrative association cortex. Longitudinal work is needed to account for normal developmental changes and to investigate how cortical thickness and intellectual functioning and their association change over time following TBI. Improved understanding of how TBI-related cortical thickness alterations relate to cognitive outcome could lead to improved predictions of outcome following brain injury.