Hok Pan Yuen

Aims: Negative symptoms are a core component of schizophrenia, affecting up to 60% of individuals with the disorder. They are categorised into primary negative symptoms (PNS), which are intrinsic to the illness, and secondary negative symptoms, which arise from external factors such as depression or medication side effects. They can also be divided into diminished expression and amotivation/anhedonia subtypes. While inflammation has been implicated in schizophrenia and linked to negative symptoms, little is known about whether inflammatory profiles differ between negative symptom subtypes in individuals at Ultra‐High Risk (UHR) for psychosis. Methods: We conducted a secondary analysis of 147 UHR participants from the Staged Treatment in Early Psychosis (STEP) study to examine whether inflammatory markers (Alpha‐2‐Macroglobulin, IL‐6, CRP, sICAM‐1, sVCAM‐1, and suPAR) differed across negative symptom subgroups, using multinomial and binomial logistic regression models adjusted for age, sex, smoking, and BMI. Results: Overall, most inflammatory markers were not significantly associated with negative symptom subgroups. However, higher sICAM‐1 levels were asscoiated with lower odds of primary negative symptoms compared with no negative symptoms. Additionally, younger age was associated with increased odds of PNS and amotivation, while smoking was associated with higher odds of secondary negative symptoms compared with no negative symptoms. Discussion: These findings suggest that inflammation may not broadly distinguish negative symptom subtypes at the UHR stage, although sICAM‐1 may play a role in early illness processes. Limitations include sample ascertainment, potential misclassification of negative symptoms, and the relatively small number of participants with PNS. Future studies with larger samples and longitudinal designs are needed to clarify whether inflammatory changes contribute to the emergence of specific negative symptom subtypes.

Background: In the ultra-high risk for psychosis (UHR) field, it is unknown whether understanding symptom relationships, beyond symptom severity alone, may hold prognostic value and inform preventive care. In this study, network analysis was performed to examine the interconnections between baseline symptoms in UHR youth who did and did not transition to psychosis over three years. Methods: In a sample selected from the UHR1000+ cohort, positive and basic symptoms were assessed using the Comprehensive Assessment of At-Risk Mental States. Network analyses and network comparison tests were performed. Results: 195 UHR youth transitioned to psychosis within three years and 346 did not. The two groups did not differ in the network structure, global strength (i.e., the overall level of connectivity between symptoms), or centrality of symptoms (i.e., their importance within networks). The transitioned group was characterized by unusual thought content not being connected to other symptoms; however, its centrality between networks was comparable. Across networks, impaired cognitive functioning connected disorganized speech to impaired emotional functioning, motor functioning, and tolerance to normal stress. Impaired bodily sensation connected perceptual abnormalities to other symptoms. Conclusions: The networks of youth who transitioned and who did not transition were similar, indicating similar baseline symptom relationships. Across groups, unusual thought content, despite being traditionally associated with transition, had little to no interactions with other symptoms. Clinical manifestations that may need attention include impaired cognitive functioning, which connected several symptoms, and impaired bodily sensation. Future research using time series data may support progress toward individualized care.

Background Clinical outcomesfollowing a first episode of psychosis (FEP) are highly heterogeneous between patients. The identification of prognostic biomarkers would greatly facilitate personalized treatments. Psychosis patients often display brain-wide disruptions of inter-regional functional coupling (FC), with some being linked to symptom severity and remission. FC may thus hold prognostic potential for people experiencing psychosis. Methods Ninety antipsychotic-naïve FEP patients (51% female, 15-25 years) were randomized to receive either antipsychotic or placebo tablets for 6 months alongside psychosocial interventions. A subset of these patients also completed functional magnetic resonance imaging (55 with usable data at baseline and 37 at 3 months), which was used to evaluate whether baseline FC, or 3-month change in FC, could predict 6- and 12-month changes in symptoms and functioning, quantified using the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale and the Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale, respectively. We considered three different cross-validated prediction algorithms: (i) connectome-based predictive modelling; (ii) kernel ridge regression; and (iii) multilayer meta-matching. Results All algorithms showed poor performance in predicting patients’ 6- and 12-month changes in symptoms and functioning (all r_mean < 0.3), and no model achieved significance via permutation testing (all p > 0.05). Conclusions Our findings suggest that brain-wide measures of FC may not be suitable for predicting extended clinical outcomes over a 6- to 12-month period in FEP patients.

Modern research management, particularly for publicly funded studies, assumes a data governance model in which grantees are considered stewards rather than owners of important data sets. Thus, there is an expectation that collected data are shared as widely as possible with the general research community. This presents problems in complex studies that involve sensitive health information. The latter requires balancing participant privacy with the needs of the research community. Here, we report on the data operation ecosystem crafted for the Accelerating Medicines Partnership® Schizophrenia project, an international observational study of young individuals at clinical high risk for developing a psychotic disorder. We review data capture systems, data dictionaries, organization principles, data flow, security, quality control protocols, data visualization, monitoring, and dissemination through the NIMH Data Archive platform. We focus on the interconnectedness of these steps, where our goal is to design a seamless data flow and an alignment with the FAIR (Findability, Accessibility, Interoperability, and Reusability) principles while balancing local regulatory and ethical considerations. This process-oriented approach leverages automated pipelines for data flow to enhance data quality, speed, and collaboration, underscoring the project’s contribution to advancing research practices involving multisite studies of sensitive mental health conditions. An important feature is the data’s close-to-real-time quality assessment (QA) and quality control (QC). The focus on close-to-real-time QA/QC makes it possible for a subject to redo a testing session, as well as facilitate course corrections to prevent repeating errors in future data acquisition. Watch Dr. Sylvain Bouix discuss his work and this article: https://vimeo.com/1025555648.

Background: Current treatments for schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders have limited efficacy, with high rates of nonresponse to “gold standard” treatments. New approaches are therefore urgently required. Objective: The aims of this pilot study are to investigate the feasibility, acceptability, safety, and usability of Hybrid treatment (primary aim); and to explore Hybrid’s treatment efficacy and engagement of treatment targets (secondary aim). The primary aim will be assessed via face-to-face user experience surveys on a (self-assessed) 5-point Likert scale (and qualitative open-ended questions) examining: (1) acceptability, (2) helpfulness, (3) engagement, and (4) perceived safety. We will also examine consent and completion rates, and the number of sessions attended. Our threshold for moving on to efficacy trials will be at least 70% of our participants to rate 3 and above (which corresponds to agree or strongly agree) that the intervention package was acceptable, feasible, and safe. The secondary aims will be assessed by observing whether individuals achieve self-directed modulation of high-β neurophysiological activity (neural target) and progression upwards through the VR-based exposure hierarchy (psychological target), and by assessing symptom change scores. This study developed a new treatment approach for auditory verbal hallucinations, a major symptom of psychotic disorders, that integrates advances in psychological therapy (cognitive behavioral therapy for psychosis), technology (virtual reality, VR), and neuroscience (electroencephalography-based neurofeedback). Methods: Hybrid takes a “symptom capture” approach using individually tailored VR-based exposure exercises. Participants (N=10) will receive the intervention package weekly over 12 face-to-face sessions. Here, participants will be progressively exposed to symptom triggers and develop methods of downregulating neural activity associated with these symptoms (neurofeedback component) while concurrently receiving clinician-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy for psychosis. Results: As of February 2025, Hybrid has commenced (unblinded) recruitment activities from Orygen clinical services in Northwestern Melbourne, Australia. A total of 75 individuals have been approached and 64 individuals have been prescreened (41 individuals were deemed eligible, 15 individuals were ineligible, and 8 individuals declined or did not respond to contact attempts) and 5 individuals have been included in the study. Of the 5 individuals who have commenced the Hybrid treatment, 4 are actively engaged in the program and 1 individual has withdrawn. We expect recruitment to conclude in July 2025 and for the results to be published in 2026. Conclusions: The Hybrid study is piloting a novel approach that has the potential to address the shortcomings of current treatments for psychotic symptoms. If there is favorable evidence for the acceptability, feasibility, safety and usability of Hybrid, the study team will move on to efficacy trials. Trial Registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12624000357550; https://tinyurl.com/24ey8hpy International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/63405

BACKGROUND Current treatments for schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders have limited efficacy, with high rates of nonresponse to “gold standard” treatments. New approaches are therefore urgently required. OBJECTIVE The aims of this pilot study are to investigate the feasibility, acceptability, safety, and usability of Hybrid treatment (primary aim); and to explore Hybrid’s treatment efficacy and engagement of treatment targets (secondary aim). The primary aim will be assessed via face-to-face user experience surveys on a (self-assessed) 5-point Likert scale (and qualitative open-ended questions) examining: (1) acceptability, (2) helpfulness, (3) engagement, and (4) perceived safety. We will also examine consent and completion rates, and the number of sessions attended. Our threshold for moving on to efficacy trials will be at least 70% of our participants to rate 3 and above (which corresponds to agree or strongly agree) that the intervention package was acceptable, feasible, and safe. The secondary aims will be assessed by observing whether individuals achieve self-directed modulation of high-β neurophysiological activity (neural target) and progression upwards through the VR-based exposure hierarchy (psychological target), and by assessing symptom change scores. This study developed a new treatment approach for auditory verbal hallucinations, a major symptom of psychotic disorders, that integrates advances in psychological therapy (cognitive behavioral therapy for psychosis), technology (virtual reality, VR), and neuroscience (electroencephalography-based neurofeedback). METHODS Hybrid takes a “symptom capture” approach using individually tailored VR-based exposure exercises. Participants (N=10) will receive the intervention package weekly over 12 face-to-face sessions. Here, participants will be progressively exposed to symptom triggers and develop methods of downregulating neural activity associated with these symptoms (neurofeedback component) while concurrently receiving clinician-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy for psychosis. RESULTS As of February 2025, Hybrid has commenced (unblinded) recruitment activities from Orygen clinical services in Northwestern Melbourne, Australia. A total of 75 individuals have been approached and 64 individuals have been prescreened (41 individuals were deemed eligible, 15 individuals were ineligible, and 8 individuals declined or did not respond to contact attempts) and 5 individuals have been included in the study. Of the 5 individuals who have commenced the Hybrid treatment, 4 are actively engaged in the program and 1 individual has withdrawn. We expect recruitment to conclude in July 2025 and for the results to be published in 2026. CONCLUSIONS The Hybrid study is piloting a novel approach that has the potential to address the shortcomings of current treatments for psychotic symptoms. If there is favorable evidence for the acceptability, feasibility, safety and usability of Hybrid, the study team will move on to efficacy trials. CLINICALTRIAL Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12624000357550; https://tinyurl.com/24ey8hpy INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT PRR1-10.2196/63405

Background: Suicide is the leading cause of death among young Australians, accounting for one-third of all deaths in those under 25. Schools are a logical setting for youth suicide prevention activities, with universal, selective and indicated approaches all demonstrating efficacy. Given that international best practice recommends suicide prevention programmes combine these approaches, and that to date this has not been done in school settings, this study aims to evaluate a suicide prevention programme incorporating universal, selective and indicated components in schools. Methods: This study is a trial of a multimodal suicide prevention programme for young people. The programme involves delivering universal psychoeducation (safeTALK) to all students, screening them for suicide risk, and delivering internet-based Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (Reframe IT) to those students identified as being at high risk for suicide. The programme will be trialled in secondary schools in Melbourne, Australia, and target year 10 students (15 and 16 year-olds). safeTALK and screening will be evaluated using a single group pre-test/post-test case series, and Reframe IT will be evaluated in a Randomised Controlled Trial. The primary outcome is change in suicidal ideation; other outcomes include help-seeking behaviour and intentions, and suicide knowledge and stigma. The programme’s cost-effectiveness will also be evaluated. Discussion: This study is the first to evaluate a suicide prevention programme comprising universal, selective and indicated components in Australian schools. If the programme is found to be efficacious and cost-effective, it could be more widely disseminated in schools and may ultimately lead to reduced rates of suicide and suicidal behaviour in school students across the region.