Matthias Buechter

Background and Aims: Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) leads to the slow, progressive destruction of the small bile ducts with consecutive cholestasis and intrahepatic cholangitis. If this disease remains untreated, liver parenchyma will be damaged resulting in fibrosis and end-stage liver disease with the need for transplantation. The approval of the Farnesoid X receptor agonist obeticholic acid (Ocaliva; OCA) in early 2017 expanded the drug therapy options of PBC, which previously consisted primarily of the administration of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA). Patients and Methods: Included in our prospective pilot study were 16 patients with a confirmed diagnosis of PBC who were treated with an add-on therapy with OCA (5 mg/d). None of the patients had an overlap to autoimmune hepatitis. Patients were investigated between 09/2022 and 09/2023. Results: The majority of patients was female (15/16, 93.75%), and the mean age was 57.63 ± 9.59 (43–77) years. OCA treatment led to a statistically significant decrease in aspartate aminotransferase (AST; AST baseline: 38.50 [26.25; 50.00] IU/L vs. AST 6-month follow-up: 23.50 [21.50; 44.25] IU/L, p = 0.0012), alanine aminotransferase (ALT; ALT baseline: 55.50 [28.75; 97.00] IU/L vs. ALT 6-month follow-up: 36.50 [28.00; 57.25] IU/L, p = 0.0035), and gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT; GGT baseline: 168.00 [100.30; 328.50] IU/L vs. GGT 6-month follow-up: 88.00 [44.50; 259.80] IU/L, p = 0.0063), while the decrease in alkaline phosphatase (AP) was not statistically significant (AP baseline: 197.00 [170.00; 253.30] IU/L vs. AP 6-month follow-up: 196.00 [134.00; 227.00] IU/L, p = 0.0915). In addition, liver stiffness measurement (LSM) showed a statistically significant decrease after six months of treatment with OCA (LSM baseline: 7.85 [5.55; 10.13] kPa vs. LSM 6-month follow-up: 5.95 [4.55; 8.225] kPa, p = 0.0001). However, the increase in enzymatic liver function measured by LiMAx failed to reach statistical significance, but showed a positive trend (LiMAx baseline: 402.50 [341.50; 469.80] μg/kg/h vs. LiMAx 6-month follow-up: 452.50 [412.50; 562.00] μg/kg/h, p = 0.0625). In none of our patients did therapy with obeticholic acid have to be stopped due to pruritus or poor tolerability. Conclusions: In patients with PBC without adequate response to UDCA, OCA is a promising alternative, which in our group of 16 patients led to a significant improvement of liver enzymes, the amelioration of liver fibrosis, and an increase in liver function capacity in a short-term clinical course.

Background and Aims: Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is a global public health challenge since more than 250 million individuals are affected worldwide. Since different treatment modalities are available and not all patients are candidates for antiviral treatment, biomarkers that potentially predict the possibility of HBsAg clearance and seroconversion may be useful in clinical practice. Patients and methods: In this retrospective study, we aimed to identify factors positively correlated with HBsAg seroconversion in a large cohort of 371 chronic hepatitis B patients treated at a German tertial center between 2005 and 2020. Results: Seroconversion occurred in 25/371 (6.7%) and HBsAg loss in 29/371 patients (7.8%) with chronic HBV infection. Antiviral therapy was associated with a lower chance of seroconversion (seroconversion antiviral therapy 14/260 (5.4%) vs. therapy-naïve patients 11/111 (9.9%), p = 0.027). Seroconversion rates were higher in patients with (very) low titers of HBV DNA (best cut-off value 357 IU/mL) and quantitative HBsAg. The best cut-off value with regard to seroconversion was 357 IU/mL for HBV DNA (AUC 0.693 (95%-CI 0.063–0.422), sensitivity 0.714, specificity 0.729; p < 0.0005) and 33,55 IU/mL for HBsAg (AUC 0.794 (95%-CI 0.651–0.937), sensitivity 0.714, specificity 0.949; p < 0.0005). However, male gender was positively associated with seroconversion (seroconversion: males 7.6% vs. females 2.7%, p = 0.036). Conclusions: Treatment-naïve male chronic HBV patients with low viral load and inflammatory activity have the best chance to achieve seroconversion. In the absence of cirrhosis, antiviral therapy should therefore not be performed in this patient collective.

Background and aims: Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a complex and progressive inflammatory liver disease characterized by immune-mediated destruction of the liver parenchyma, hypergammaglobulinemia, the presence of circulating autoantibodies, and good response to immunosuppressive therapy. Since the prevalence of AIH is relatively rare, data on the clinical course and the long-term outcome are scarce. Patients and methods: We retrospectively analyzed the data of 535 well-documented AIH patients treated at the University Hospital Essen between 2000 and 2020. Results: The majority of patients were middle-aged females (75% women, mean age 45 years) with AIH type 1 (97%). Approximately 32% of patients were diagnosed with cirrhosis due to AIH, 29% had concomitant autoimmune (predominantly autoimmune thyroiditis), and 10% had psychiatric diseases, respectively. Skin tumors were the most common malignant diseases (47% of all tumors), while hepatocellular carcinoma rarely occurred (only six cases). Overall long-term mortality and liver-associated mortality were 9.16% and 4.67%, respectively. However, long-term survival was strongly associated with disease remission. Conclusions: Although AIH is a silent disease and cirrhosis is present in many cases, a favorable long-term prognosis can be achieved by consequent immunosuppressive therapy. The incidence of (liver-associated) complications seems to be lower in comparison to other etiologies, such as viral hepatitis or NASH, and mainly depends on the long-term side effects of immunosuppressive therapy.

Background: In patients with liver cirrhosis, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is considered a standardized treatment of refractory ascites or variceal bleeding. TIPS thrombosis (TT) and/or portal vein thrombosis (PVT) are possible complications during/after TIPS placement. Previous studies suggested increased clotting activity in portal circulation (PORC). This pilot study aimed to evaluate alterations and differences of coagulation function in PORC and in peripheral circulation (PERC) via rotational thromboelastometry during TIPS. Methods: Blood samples were collected from cirrhotic patients (n = 13; median Model of End Stage Liver Disease, MELD Score: 12; median age: 60 years) undergoing TIPS (10/13 TIPSs were elective procedures due to refractory ascites) as follows: median cubital vein (MCV; PERC)—confluence of the three hepatic veins to the inferior cava vein (HV/ICV; PORC)—portal vein (PV; PORC)—TIPS (PORC). This research utilized four variables of the extrinsic test EXTEM, i.e., clotting time (CT), clot formation time (CFT), maximum clot firmness (MCF), and maximum lysis (ML). Results: EXTEM results [mean, M (range) ± standard deviation, SD (range)] showed no significant differences for CT [M (70–73) ± SD (9–13); p = 0.93] or CFT [M (137–155) ± SD (75–112); p = 0.97] or MCF [M (51–54) ± SD (9–10); p = 0.90] or ML [M (9–10) ± SD (4–5); p = 0.89] between the compartments, i.e., MCV vs. HV/ICV vs. PV vs. TIPS. Overall, we detected no differences in coagulation function between PERC and PORC. Conclusion: These results are in contrast to previous reports suggesting increased clotting activity in PORC vs. PERC in association with liver cirrhosis. Rotational thromboelastometry-based evaluation of coagulation function in PERC appears to reliably reflect coagulation function in PORC with respect to risk estimation for TT and/or PVT in cirrhotic patients undergoing TIPS.

Acute and chronic liver disease is a relevant problem worldwide. Liver function plays a crucial role in the course of liver diseases not only in estimating prognosis but also with regard to therapeutic interventions. Within this review, we discuss and evaluate different tools from screening to diagnosis and give insights from personal experiences, controlled clinical studies and future perspectives. Finally, we offer our novel diagnostic algorithm to screen patients with presumptive acute or chronic liver disease in the daily clinical routine.

Background and Aims: Radioembolization (RE) has recently demonstrated a non-inferior survival outcome compared to systemic therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Therefore, current guidelines recommend RE for patients with advanced HCC and preserved liver function who are unsuitable for transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) or systemic therapy. However, despite the excellent safety profile of RE, post-therapeutic hepatic decompensation remains a serious complication that is difficult to predicted by standard laboratory liver function parameters or imaging modalities. LiMAx^® is a non-invasive test for liver function assessment, measuring the maximum metabolic capacity for 13C-Methacetin by the liver-specific enzyme CYP 450 1A2. Our study investigates the potential of LiMAx^® for predicting post-interventional decompensation of liver function. Patients and methods: In total, 50 patients with HCC with or without liver cirrhosis and not amenable to TACE or systemic treatments were included in the study. For patients prospectively enrolled in our study, LiMAx^® was carried out one day before RE (baseline) and 28 and 90 days after RE. Established liver function parameters were assessed at baseline, day 28, and day 90 after RE. The relationship between baseline LiMAx^® and pre-and post-interventional liver function parameters, as well as the ability of LiMAx^® to predict hepatic decompensation, were analyzed. Results: We observed a strong association between baseline LiMAx^® and bilirubin, albumin, ALBI grade, and MELD score. Patients presenting with Child–Pugh score B 28 days after RE or with a deterioration in Child–Pugh score by at least one point had a significantly lower baseline LiMAx^® compared to those with Child–Pugh score A or with stable Child–Pugh score. The ability of LiMAx^® to predict hepatic decompensation after RE was determined using ROC curve analysis and was compared to MELD score and ALBI grade. LiMAx^® achieved a substantial AUC of 0.8117, comparable to MELD score and ALBI grade. Conclusion: Patients with lower LiMAx^® values at baseline have a significantly increased risk for hepatic decompensation after RE, despite being categorized as Child–Pugh A. Therefore, LiMAx^® can be used as an additional tool to identify patients at high risk of post-interventional hepatic failure.

(1) Background: Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is a standard therapy for portal hypertension. We aimed to explore the association of established baseline scores with TIPS outcomes. (2) Methods: In total, 136 liver cirrhosis patients underwent TIPS insertion, mainly to treat refractory ascites (86%), between January 2016 and December 2019. An external validation cohort of 187 patients was chosen. (3) Results: The majority of the patients were male (62%); the median follow-up was 715 days. The baseline Child—Turcotte–Pugh stage was A in 14%, B in 75% and C in 11%. The patients’ liver-transplant-free (LTF) survival rates after 3, 12 and 24 months were 87%, 72% and 61%, respectively. In the univariate analysis, neither bilirubin, nor the international normalized ratio (INR), nor liver enzymes were associated with survival. However, both the APRI (AST-to-platelet ratio index) and the FIB-4 (fibrosis-4 score) were associated with LTF survival. For patients with FIB-4 > 3.25, the hazard ratio for mortality after 2 years was 3.952 (p < 0.0001). Liver-related clinical events were monitored for 24 months. High FIB-4 scores were predictive of liver-related events (HR = 2.404, p = 0.001). Similarly, in our validation cohort, LTF survival was correlated with the APRI and FIB-4 scores. (4) Conclusions: Well-established scores that reflect portal hypertension and biochemical disease activity predict long-term outcomes after TIPS and support clinical decisions over TIPS insertion.

Background: Acute liver failure (ALF) occurs as a rare, sudden, extensive loss of liver function in a previously healthy liver. In advanced cases, ALF may require liver transplantation (LT). Available prognostic parameters have limited accuracy to decide, which patient to consider for LT. The liver maximum function capacity test (LiMAx) can accurately determine liver function and was assessed as predictor of survival, along with coagulation parameters and liver stiffness in nonacetaminophen-induced ALF. Methods: Various liver function tests, including LiMAx measurements, coagulation factors, and transient elastography (TE), were analyzed retrospectively for associations with clinical outcome in 34 patients with ALF or acute hepatitis (AH). Data were compared between patients with spontaneous recovery (SR) and non-SR (3-month mortality/LT; NSR). Results: The analysis included 34 patients (22 ALF, 12 AH; 19 males, 15 females; age 36.7 ± 14.6 years) with drug-induced liver injury (DILI) (n = 12), autoimmune hepatitis (AIH; n = 13), AIH-DILI overlap (n = 1), viral (n = 9), or cryptogenic liver failure (n = 1). Thirty-one patients recovered spontaneously, 2 patients died, and 1 patient underwent LT. The LiMAx was 197.6 (±68.4) for SR versus 92.33 (±65.0) for NSR (p = 0.0157). Fibrinogen was significantly lower in patients with NSR than in SR patients (209.0 vs. 106.3; p = 0.02). Mean liver stiffness measured by TE was 39.3 for NSR and 17.3 for SR (p = 0.26). KCC was fulfilled in only 4 patients (3 SR, 1 NSR). LiMAx results correlated positively with serum fibrinogen and antithrombin III concentrations and correlated negatively with liver stiffness. No other analyzed factor could differentiate between SR and NSR. Conclusion: Decision-making in ALF remains challenging. LiMAx and fibrinogen might predict the prognosis in patients with nonacetaminophen-induced ALF and in combination could be feasible tools to decide if LT is necessary.

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is the gold standard for minimally-invasive treatment of biliary or pancreatic tract disease. When treating patients on intensive care units (ICU) with ERCP, interventionalists are faced with considerably higher morbidity compared to patients in ambulatory settings. However, data on complications and outcome of critical ill patients undergoing emergency ERCP are limited. A retrospective analysis of 102 patients treated on ICUs undergoing 121 ERCP procedures at the University Hospital of Essen, Germany between 2002 and 2016 was performed. Indications, interventional success, outcome including survival and procedure-related complications were analyzed. Patients’ condition pre-ERCP was categorized by using the “Simplified Acute Physiology Score” (SAPS 3). 66/102 patients (64.7%) were referred to ERCP from surgical ICU, 36/102 (35.3%) from nonsurgical ICU. The majority of patients were male (63.7%), the mean age was 54.1 ± 14.9 [21–88] years. Indications for ERCP were biliary complications after liver transplantation (n = 34, 33.3%), biliary leakage after hepatobiliary surgery (n = 32, 31.4%), and cholangitis/biliary sepsis (n = 36; 35.3%), respectively. 117/121 (96.7%) ERCPs were successful, 1 patient (1.0%) died during ERCP. Post-ERCP pancreatitis occurred in 11.8% of interventions. The median simplified acute physiology score 3 was 65 points, predicting a risk-adjusted estimated mortality of 48.8%, corresponding to an observed mortality of 52.2% (P = n.s.). ERCP is safe in critically ill patients on ICU, it does not increase overall mortality rate and has a relatively low rate of procedure-associated complications.