Francisco Molina-Holgado

Background We have previously reported that the brain cannabinoid signalling pathways regulates in the isocitrade dehydrogenase-1 wild-type glioblastoma (GBM) core and infiltrative boundary tumor cell proliferation. To uncover the mechanism behind these effects we have investigated the possible antitumoral actions of cannabidiol (CBD) in the tumour core cells (U87) and the Glioma Invasive Margin cells (GIN-8), the latter representing a better proxy of post-surgical residual disease. Methods Monolayer of GBM cells cultures were treated with increasing concentrations of CBD, Temozolomide (TMZ), Carmustine (BCUN), Fluoxetine, Doxorubicine (DOX) or vehicle. After treatment, cell viability was assessed using an MTT kit assay to evaluate mitochondrial activity/cell proliferation, cytotoxicity was evaluated by LDH release. In addition, we have investigated the effects of the CBD alone or in combination with the above drugs on the autophagic cell death, unfold protein response (UPR) mitochondrial response and release of proinflammatory cytokines. Summary This study highlights the potential therapeutic relevance of CBD in combination with other FDA-approved drugs against glioblastoma. We observed strong synergism between CBD and TMZ, FX, and DOXO in reducing U87-MG cell viability in vitro, with even stronger synergy between CBD and TMZ in GIN-8 cells. Our preliminary data identify CBD as a potential anti-neoplastic drug in both core and invasive margin cells. Given the heterogeneity of glioblastoma, further studies will elucidate the molecular mechanisms underlying CBD observed anti-tumoral actions and determine whether it can potentially be used in the future as an addition to current therapies.

Background: We have previously reported that the endocannabinoid receptor inverse agonist AM630 is a potent inhibitor of isocitrade dehydrogenase-1 wild-type glioblastoma (GBM) core tumour cell proliferation. To uncover the mechanism behind the anti-tumour effects we have performed a transcriptional analysis of AM630 activity both in the tumour core cells (U87) and the invasive margin cells (GIN-8), the latter representing a better proxy of post-surgical residual disease. Results: The core and invasive margin cells exhibited markedly different gene expression profiles and only the core cells had high expression of a potential AM630 target, the CB1 receptor. Both cell types had moderate expression of the HTR2B serotonin receptor, a reported AM630 target. We found that the AM630 driven transcriptional response was substantially higher in the central cells than in the invasive margin cells, with the former driving the up regulation of immune response and the down regulation of cell cycle and metastatic pathways and correlating with transcriptional responses driven by established anti-neoplastics as well as serotonin receptor antagonists. Conclusion: Our results highlight the different gene sets involved in the core and invasive margin cell lines derived from GBM and an associated marked difference in responsiveness to AM630. Our findings identify AM630 as an anti-neoplastic drug in the context of the core cells, showing a high correlation with the activity of known antiproliferative drugs. However, we reveal a key set of similarities between the two cell lines that may inform therapeutic intervention.

Background: We have previously reported that the endocannabinoid receptor inverse agonist AM630 is a potent inhibitor of isocitrade dehydrogenase-1 wild-type glioblastoma (GBM) core tumor cell proliferation. To uncover the mechanism behind the anti-tumour effects we have performed a transcriptional analysis of AM630 activity both in the tumour core cells (U87) and the invasive margin cells (GIN-8), the latter representing a better proxy of post-surgical residual disease. Results: The core and invasive margin cells exhibited markedly different gene expression profiles and only the core cells had high expression of a potential AM630 target, the CB1 receptor. Both cell types had moderate expression of the HTR2B serotonin receptor, a reported AM630 target. We found that the AM630 driven transcriptional response was substantially higher in the central cells than in the invasive margin cells, with the former driving the up regulation of immune response and the down regulation of cell cycle and metastatic pathways and correlating with transcriptional responses driven by established anti-neoplastics as well as serotonin receptor antagonists. Conclusion: Our results highlight the different responsiveness of the core and invasive margin cells. Taken together, whilst our findings identify AM630 as an anti-neoplastic drug, showing a high correlation with known anti-proliferative drugs, we find distinct drug sensitivies of the infiltrative margin relative to contrast-enhanced core regions of GBM upon which failed molecular targeted therapies to date have been predicated.

Cell fate events are regulated by different endogenous developmental factors such as the cell micro‐environment, external or remote signals and epigenetic factors. Among the many regulatory factors, endocannabinoid‐associated signalling pathways are known to conduct several of these events in the developing nervous system and in the adult brain. Interestingly, endocannabinoids exert modulatory actions in both physiological and pathological conditions. Endocannabinoid signalling can promote cell survival by acting on non‐transformed brain cells (neurons, astrocytes or oligodendrocytes) and can have either a protumoural or antitumoural effect on transformed cells. Moreover, endocannabinoids are able to attenuate the detrimental effects on neurogenesis and neuroinflammation associated with ageing. Thus, the endocannabinoid system emerges as an important regulator of cell fate, controlling cell survival/cell death decisions depending on the cell type and its environment.Linked Articles: This article is part of a themed section on 8^thEuropean Workshop on Cannabinoid Research. To view the other articles in this section visithttp://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bph.v176.10/issuetoc

The acute phase protein pentraxin 3 (PTX3) is a new biomarker of stroke severity and is a key regulator of oedema resolution and glial responses after cerebral ischaemia, emerging as a possible target for brain repair after stroke. Neurogenesis and angiogenesis are essential events in post-stroke recovery. Here, we investigated for the first time the role of PTX3 in neurogenesis and angiogenesis after stroke. PTX3 knockout (KO) or wild-type (WT) mice were subjected to experimental cerebral ischaemia (induced by middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAo)). Poststroke neurogenesis was assessed by nestin, doublecortin (DCX) and bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) immunostaining, whereas angiogenesis was assessed by BrdU, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR2) and PECAM-1 immunostaining. In vitro neurogenesis and angiogenesis assays were carried out on neurospheres derived from WT or interleukin-1β (IL-1β) KO mice, and mouse endothelial cell line bEnd.5 respectively. Behavioural function was assessed in WT and PTX3 KO mice using open-field, motor and Y-maze tests. Neurogenesis was significantly reduced in the dentate gyrus (DG) of the hippocampus of PTX3 KO mice, compared to WT mice, 6 days after MCAo. In addition, recombinant PTX3 was neurogenic in vitro when added to neurospheres, which was mediated by IL-1β. In vivo poststroke angiogenesis was significantly reduced in PTX3 KO mice compared to WT mice 14 days after MCAo, as revealed by reduced vascular density, less newly formed blood vessels and decreased expression of VEGFR2. In vitro, recombinant PTX3 induced marked endothelial cellular proliferation and promoted formation of tube-like structures of endothelial cell line bEnd.5. Finally, a lack of PTX3 potentiated motor deficits 14 days after MCAo. These results indicate that PTX3 mediates neurogenesis and angiogenesis and contributes to functional recovery after stroke, highlighting a key role of PTX3 as a mediator of brain repair and suggesting that PTX3 could be used as a new target for stroke therapy.

Endocannabinoids have recently emerged as instructive cues in the developing central nervous system, and, based on the expression of their receptors, we identified oligodendrocytes as potential targets of these molecules. Here, we show that the enzymes responsible for the synthesis of the endocannabinoid 2‐arachidonoylglycerol (2‐AG), diacylglycerol lipase alpha (DAGLα) and beta (DAGLβ), and degradation, monoacylglycerol lipase (MAGL), can be found in oligodendrocytes at different developmental stages. Moreover, cultured oligodendrocyte progenitor cells (OPCs) express DAGLα and β abundantly, resulting in the stronger production of 2‐AG than in differentiated oligodendrocytes. The opposite is observed with MAGL. CB1 and CB2 receptor antagonists (SR141716 and AM630) impaired OPC differentiation into mature oligodendrocytes and likewise, inhibiting DAGL activity with RHC‐80267 or tetrahydrolipstatin also blocked oligodendrocyte maturation, an effect reversed by the addition of exogenous 2‐AG. Likewise, 2‐AG synthesis disruption using specific siRNAs against DAGLα and DAGLβ significantly reduced myelin protein expression in vitro, whereas a pharmacological gain‐of‐function approach by using cannabinoid agonists or MAGL inhibition had the opposite effects. ERK/MAPK pathway is implicated in oligodendrocyte differentiation because PD98059, an inhibitor of MEK1, abrogated oligodendrocyte maturation. The cannabinoid receptor antagonists and RHC‐80267 all diminished basal ERK1/2 phosphorylation, effects that were partially reversed by the addition of 2‐AG. Overall, our data suggest a novel role of endocannabinoids in oligodendrocyte differentiation such that constitutive release of 2‐AG activates cannabinoid receptors in an autocrine/paracrine way in OPCs, stimulating the ERK/MAPK signaling pathway.

J. Neurochem. (2010) 114, 1277–1290. Neuroimmune networks and the brain endocannabinoid system contribute to the maintenance of neurogenesis. Cytokines and chemokines are important neuroinflammatory mediators that are involved in the pathological processes resulting from brain trauma, ischemia and chronic neurodegenerative diseases. However, they are also involved in brain repair and recovery. Compelling evidence obtained, in vivo and in vitro, establish a dynamic interplay between the endocannabinoid system, the immune system and neural stem/progenitor cells (NSC) in order to promote brain self‐repair. Cross‐talk between inflammatory mediators and NSC might have important consequences for neural development and brain repair. In addition, brain immune cells (microglia) support NSC renewal, migration and lineage specification. The proliferation and differentiation of multipotent NSC must be precisely controlled during the development of the CNS, as well as for adult brain repair. Although signalling through neuroimmune networks has been implicated in many aspects of neural development, how it affects NSC remains unclear. However, recent findings have clearly demonstrated that there is bi‐directional cross‐talk between NSC, and the neuroimmune network to control the signals involved in self‐renewal and differentiation of NSC. Specifically, there is evidence emerging that neuroimmune interactions control the generation of new functional neurones from adult NSC. Here, we review the evidence that neuroimmune networks contribute to neurogenesis, focusing on the regulatory mechanisms that favour the immune system (immune cells and immune molecules) as a novel element in the coordination of the self‐renewal, migration and differentiation of NSC in the CNS. In conjunction, these data suggest a novel mode of action for the immune system in neurogenesis that may be of therapeutic interest in the emerging field of brain repair.