Christopher M. Malone
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Christopher M. Malone has a total of 97 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Galen Shipman
Los Alamos National Laboratory
3 shared publications - Aimee L. Hungerford
Center for Theoretical Astrophysics, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545, USA
2 shared publications - Andrew Reisner
Los Alamos National Laboratory
2 shared publications Angela M. Herring
Los Alamos National Lab. (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States)
2 shared publicationsBenjamin Karl Bergen
Los Alamos National Lab. (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States)
2 shared publications- Brendan Krueger
Los Alamos National Lab. (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States)
2 shared publications
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 14 August 2026
- Published by The Open Journal in Journal of Open Source Software
- Vol. 11 (124) , 9333
FleCSI: Flexible Computational Science Infrastructure
- 14 August 2026
- Published by The Open Journal in Journal of Open Source Software
- Vol. 11 (124) , 9333
Open AccessFleCSI: Flexible Computational Science Infrastructure
- Open Access
- 10 June 2024
- Published by Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)
Ristra Project FY23 L2 Milestone Report, Rev.1: MRT #8541: Multiphysics Scaling on EAS-3
The U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Scientific and Technical Information
- 10 June 2024
- Published by Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)
Open AccessRistra Project FY23 L2 Milestone Report, Rev.1: MRT #8541: Multiphysics Scaling on EAS-3
The U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Scientific and Technical Information
- Open Access
- 6 December 2022
- Published by Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)
LANL ASC FY23 L2 Milestone Description and Completion Criteria [Slides]
The U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Scientific and Technical Information
- 6 December 2022
- Published by Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)
Open AccessLANL ASC FY23 L2 Milestone Description and Completion Criteria [Slides]
The U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Scientific and Technical Information
- 11 December 2020
- Published by Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)
The Ristra project: FY20/21 milestone report [Slides]
The U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Scientific and Technical Information
- 11 December 2020
- Published by Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)
The Ristra project: FY20/21 milestone report [Slides]
The U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Scientific and Technical Information
- 11 December 2020
- Published by Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)
The Ristra Project: FY20/21 Milestone Report
The ASC Advanced Technology Development and Mitigation (ATDM) sub-program was established in2014to develop new simulation tools operating on exascale-class computers to serve NNSA (see Appendix B). Over the course of ATDM, LANL management have set a strategy for exascale-class application codes that follows two supportive and mutually risk-mitigating paths: evolution for established production integrated design codes (IDCs) – with a strong pedigree within the user community – based upon existing programming paradigms(MPI+X); and a new start ATDM project, Ristra, a high-risk/high-reward push for a next-generation multi-physics, multi-scale simulation toolkit based on emerging advanced programming systems(with an initial focus on data-flow task-based models exemplified by Legion). The role of Ristra as the high-risk/high-reward path for LANL’s codes was fully consistent with the goals of ATDM as described in Appendix B, in particular its emphasis on evolving ASC capabilities through novel computing programming models and computing technologies.
- 11 December 2020
- Published by Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)
The Ristra Project: FY20/21 Milestone Report
The ASC Advanced Technology Development and Mitigation (ATDM) sub-program was established in2014to develop new simulation tools operating on exascale-class computers to serve NNSA (see Appendix B). Over the course of ATDM, LANL management have set a strategy for exascale-class application codes that follows two supportive and mutually risk-mitigating paths: evolution for established production integrated design codes (IDCs) – with a strong pedigree within the user community – based upon existing programming paradigms(MPI+X); and a new start ATDM project, Ristra, a high-risk/high-reward push for a next-generation multi-physics, multi-scale simulation toolkit based on emerging advanced programming systems(with an initial focus on data-flow task-based models exemplified by Legion). The role of Ristra as the high-risk/high-reward path for LANL’s codes was fully consistent with the goals of ATDM as described in Appendix B, in particular its emphasis on evolving ASC capabilities through novel computing programming models and computing technologies.
- 1 July 2015
- Published by American Astronomical Society in The Astrophysical Journal
- Vol. 807 (1) , 60
COMPARISONS OF TWO- AND THREE-DIMENSIONAL CONVECTION IN TYPE I X-RAY BURSTS
We perform the first detailed three-dimensional simulation of low Mach number convection preceding runaway thermonuclear ignition in a mixed H/He X-ray burst. Our simulations include a moderate-sized, approximate network that captures hydrogen and helium burning up through rp-process breakout. We look at the difference between two- and three-dimensional convective fields, including the details of the turbulent convection.
- 1 July 2015
- Published by American Astronomical Society in The Astrophysical Journal
- Vol. 807 (1) , 60
COMPARISONS OF TWO- AND THREE-DIMENSIONAL CONVECTION IN TYPE I X-RAY BURSTS
We perform the first detailed three-dimensional simulation of low Mach number convection preceding runaway thermonuclear ignition in a mixed H/He X-ray burst. Our simulations include a moderate-sized, approximate network that captures hydrogen and helium burning up through rp-process breakout. We look at the difference between two- and three-dimensional convective fields, including the details of the turbulent convection.