Nils Olsen
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Research Subjects
Nils Olsen has a total of 452 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Christopher C. Finlay
Division of Geomagnetism and Geospace DTU Space Technical University of Denmark Kongens Lyngby Denmark
19 shared publications - Lars Tøffner-Clausen
Division of Geomagnetism, DTU Space, Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark
15 shared publications - Claudia Stolle
Leibniz Institute of Atmospheric Physics at the University of Rostock Kühlungsborn Germany
12 shared publications Mioara Mandea
CNES, Centre National d’Etudes Spatiales, 2 Place Maurice Quentin F-75001, Paris, France
12 shared publicationsTerence J. Sabaka
Planetary Geodynamics Laboratory, NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA
12 shared publications- Vincent Lesur
Université Paris Cité, Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris, CNRS, Paris, France
11 shared publications
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 24 August 2026
- Published by Copernicus GmbH in Annales Geophysicae
- Vol. 44 (2) , 811-823
High latitude, dayside rapid geomagnetic variations observed with ground-based magnetometers in Greenland
We identify a previously unrecognized population of rapid geomagnetic variations associated with cusp dynamics. These variations produce distinct summertime signatures in the high–latitude ground magnetometer observations near the cusp. In this study, we apply four years of data from the high time resolution West Greenland magnetometer chain and perform a statistical analysis of rapid geomagnetic variations in the ultra low frequency (ULF) regime as a function of season, magnetic latitude, magnetic local time, and interplanetary magnetic field parameters. The magnetic perturbations are characterised using a broadband metric that integrates variability in the 10–600 s period range. This metric captures geomagnetic responses to transient, impulsive, and wave-like magnetospheric phenomena as well as ULF wave activity. We find that rapid geomagnetic variability at the highest latitudes, in the cusp and beyond, is sensitive to seasonal change, indicating that the ionospheric currents generating the observed ground magnetic signatures depend on solar illumination to obtain sufficient conductivities. This effect, in concert with dipole tilt, was investigated, and a clear cusp-related population during summer was found. In winter, this population weakens owing to a lack of sunlight and merges with other signals such as ULF waves associated with Alfvénic interhemispheric bouncing further south, and, thus, becomes indiscernible. Furthermore, we discuss other aspects of our statistical analysis and briefly address relationships between our detected signals and other known cusp phenomena.
- 24 August 2026
- Published by Copernicus GmbH in Annales Geophysicae
- Vol. 44 (2) , 811-823
Open AccessHigh latitude, dayside rapid geomagnetic variations observed with ground-based magnetometers in Greenland
We identify a previously unrecognized population of rapid geomagnetic variations associated with cusp dynamics. These variations produce distinct summertime signatures in the high–latitude ground magnetometer observations near the cusp. In this study, we apply four years of data from the high time resolution West Greenland magnetometer chain and perform a statistical analysis of rapid geomagnetic variations in the ultra low frequency (ULF) regime as a function of season, magnetic latitude, magnetic local time, and interplanetary magnetic field parameters. The magnetic perturbations are characterised using a broadband metric that integrates variability in the 10–600 s period range. This metric captures geomagnetic responses to transient, impulsive, and wave-like magnetospheric phenomena as well as ULF wave activity. We find that rapid geomagnetic variability at the highest latitudes, in the cusp and beyond, is sensitive to seasonal change, indicating that the ionospheric currents generating the observed ground magnetic signatures depend on solar illumination to obtain sufficient conductivities. This effect, in concert with dipole tilt, was investigated, and a clear cusp-related population during summer was found. In winter, this population weakens owing to a lack of sunlight and merges with other signals such as ULF waves associated with Alfvénic interhemispheric bouncing further south, and, thus, becomes indiscernible. Furthermore, we discuss other aspects of our statistical analysis and briefly address relationships between our detected signals and other known cusp phenomena.
- Open Access
- 30 March 2026
- Published by Springer Nature in Earth, Planets and Space
- Vol. 78 (1) , 59
Space magnetometry: mapping Earth’s magnetic field with satellites
Magnetic measurements from low earth orbiting (LEO) satellites have revolutionised our ability to globally map Earth’s magnetic field. This paper reviews the processing and calibration of satellite magnetometer data from both dedicated magnetic field missions and satellites carrying platform magnetometers. It describes the successive steps of vector magnetometer calibration, characterisation of spacecraft disturbance fields and alignment of the corrected magnetic field vectors into an Earth-fixed reference frame. Different parametrisations for these steps are discussed, including approaches to account for time- and temperature-dependent effects and non-linear response of the magnetometer. Dedicated missions such as Ørsted, CHAMP, Swarm and MSS-1, equipped with absolute scalar magnetometers, allow separate and highly accurate calibration steps; whereas, platform magnetometers on missions such as CryoSat-2, GRACE and GRACE-FO require joint estimation procedures using geomagnetic field models as reference. Despite their limitations, platform magnetometer data are a valuable supplement to dedicated missions, offering improved space–time coverage for modelling ionospheric, magnetospheric and induced magnetic field contributions. Recent advances in automated calibration are highlighted, underscoring the growing role of non-dedicated satellites in geomagnetic research. Graphical Abstract
- 30 March 2026
- Published by Springer Nature in Earth, Planets and Space
- Vol. 78 (1) , 59
Open AccessSpace magnetometry: mapping Earth’s magnetic field with satellites
Magnetic measurements from low earth orbiting (LEO) satellites have revolutionised our ability to globally map Earth’s magnetic field. This paper reviews the processing and calibration of satellite magnetometer data from both dedicated magnetic field missions and satellites carrying platform magnetometers. It describes the successive steps of vector magnetometer calibration, characterisation of spacecraft disturbance fields and alignment of the corrected magnetic field vectors into an Earth-fixed reference frame. Different parametrisations for these steps are discussed, including approaches to account for time- and temperature-dependent effects and non-linear response of the magnetometer. Dedicated missions such as Ørsted, CHAMP, Swarm and MSS-1, equipped with absolute scalar magnetometers, allow separate and highly accurate calibration steps; whereas, platform magnetometers on missions such as CryoSat-2, GRACE and GRACE-FO require joint estimation procedures using geomagnetic field models as reference. Despite their limitations, platform magnetometer data are a valuable supplement to dedicated missions, offering improved space–time coverage for modelling ionospheric, magnetospheric and induced magnetic field contributions. Recent advances in automated calibration are highlighted, underscoring the growing role of non-dedicated satellites in geomagnetic research. Graphical Abstract
- Open Access
- 14 March 2026
- Published by Copernicus GmbH
Swarm After 12 Years in Orbit: Mission Status, Instrument Performance, and Data Quality
Launched by the European Space Agency (ESA) in November 2013, the three-satellite Swarm constellation continues to deliver high-quality measurements of Earth’s magnetic field and the surrounding plasma environment. After more than 12 years in orbit, the mission has achieved remarkable scientific results, deepening our understanding of geomagnetic field dynamics and supporting applications that go well beyond the mission’s original goals.Equipped with 7 complementary instruments each spacecraft — including a Vector Field and an Absolute Scalar Magnetometer (VFM and ASM); star trackers (STR); a dual-frequency GPS receiver (GPSR); an accelerometer (ACC); an Electric Field Instrument (EFI), composed of two Langmuir Probes (LPs) and two Thermal Ion Imagers (TIIs) — Swarm has become a pivotal reference for geophysical research, supporting advances in areas such as core dynamics, ionospheric and magnetospheric processes, space weather monitoring, and the characterization of electric currents throughout the Geospace environment.This paper presents a comprehensive overview of the current status of the Swarm mission and constellation, with particular focus on the long-term performance, stability, and calibration of its instruments. The discussion highlights how the constellation’s unique configuration and consistently high data quality have ensured the continuity and reliability of key geophysical observations for more than a decade, with a look at plans for the next future of the mission.Furthermore, we outline the significant enhancements introduced with the latest Swarm data-processing baseline, which improves the accuracy, consistency, and overall usability of the mission’s data products.
- 14 March 2026
- Published by Copernicus GmbH
Open AccessSwarm After 12 Years in Orbit: Mission Status, Instrument Performance, and Data Quality
Launched by the European Space Agency (ESA) in November 2013, the three-satellite Swarm constellation continues to deliver high-quality measurements of Earth’s magnetic field and the surrounding plasma environment. After more than 12 years in orbit, the mission has achieved remarkable scientific results, deepening our understanding of geomagnetic field dynamics and supporting applications that go well beyond the mission’s original goals.Equipped with 7 complementary instruments each spacecraft — including a Vector Field and an Absolute Scalar Magnetometer (VFM and ASM); star trackers (STR); a dual-frequency GPS receiver (GPSR); an accelerometer (ACC); an Electric Field Instrument (EFI), composed of two Langmuir Probes (LPs) and two Thermal Ion Imagers (TIIs) — Swarm has become a pivotal reference for geophysical research, supporting advances in areas such as core dynamics, ionospheric and magnetospheric processes, space weather monitoring, and the characterization of electric currents throughout the Geospace environment.This paper presents a comprehensive overview of the current status of the Swarm mission and constellation, with particular focus on the long-term performance, stability, and calibration of its instruments. The discussion highlights how the constellation’s unique configuration and consistently high data quality have ensured the continuity and reliability of key geophysical observations for more than a decade, with a look at plans for the next future of the mission.Furthermore, we outline the significant enhancements introduced with the latest Swarm data-processing baseline, which improves the accuracy, consistency, and overall usability of the mission’s data products.
- Open Access
- 14 March 2026
- Published by Copernicus GmbH
Swarm Electric Field Instruments, processors and data quality: evolutions, new baseline and scientific highlights
ESA Earth Explorer Swarm mission, launched in November 2013 with the purpose of exploring and understanding the Earth’s interior and its environment, provided significant achievements in the observation of the geomagnetic field, the ionosphere, and electric currents. And it continues contributing to geomagnetism and ionospheric science fields.Each of the three satellites of the Swarm constellations carries onboard a set of instruments to achieve the mission objectives: a Vector Field and an Absolute Scalar Magnetometer (VFM and ASM); three star trackers (STR) for accurate attitude determination and, recently, for energetic particle detection; a dual-frequency GPS receiver (GPSR); an accelerometer (ACC); an Electric Field Instrument (EFI), composed of two Langmuir Probes (LPs) and two Thermal Ion Imagers (TIIs), dedicated to electric field and plasma measurements. The products derived from EFI instruments represent the focus of this work.A defining feature of the Swarm mission is its commitment to continuous improvement. Since its launch, advancements in data processing algorithms have been continuously applied: these updates have not only maintained the good quality of Swarm's measurements but have also allowed the mission to evolve and continue meeting the needs of the scientific community. These refinements served the development of novel Swarm-based data products and services, further broadening the mission’s impact, and allowing it to overcome the initial objectives and go beyond its original scope, such as in the Space Weather field.In December 2025, the most recent baseline has been transferred to operations, delivering updated datasets and evolved products. These algorithm updates greatly impacted the EFI LP products. This work will provide an overview of the improvements applied on Swarm plasma data products: detailed analyses are presented, dedicated to new plasma densities and temperatures parameters, new flags, and other upgrades; comparisons with other L1B and L2 Swarm products are performed; case studies in correspondence of recent main Space Weather events are also displayed, to highlight the innovative application of Swarm to this field.
- 14 March 2026
- Published by Copernicus GmbH
Open AccessSwarm Electric Field Instruments, processors and data quality: evolutions, new baseline and scientific highlights
ESA Earth Explorer Swarm mission, launched in November 2013 with the purpose of exploring and understanding the Earth’s interior and its environment, provided significant achievements in the observation of the geomagnetic field, the ionosphere, and electric currents. And it continues contributing to geomagnetism and ionospheric science fields.Each of the three satellites of the Swarm constellations carries onboard a set of instruments to achieve the mission objectives: a Vector Field and an Absolute Scalar Magnetometer (VFM and ASM); three star trackers (STR) for accurate attitude determination and, recently, for energetic particle detection; a dual-frequency GPS receiver (GPSR); an accelerometer (ACC); an Electric Field Instrument (EFI), composed of two Langmuir Probes (LPs) and two Thermal Ion Imagers (TIIs), dedicated to electric field and plasma measurements. The products derived from EFI instruments represent the focus of this work.A defining feature of the Swarm mission is its commitment to continuous improvement. Since its launch, advancements in data processing algorithms have been continuously applied: these updates have not only maintained the good quality of Swarm's measurements but have also allowed the mission to evolve and continue meeting the needs of the scientific community. These refinements served the development of novel Swarm-based data products and services, further broadening the mission’s impact, and allowing it to overcome the initial objectives and go beyond its original scope, such as in the Space Weather field.In December 2025, the most recent baseline has been transferred to operations, delivering updated datasets and evolved products. These algorithm updates greatly impacted the EFI LP products. This work will provide an overview of the improvements applied on Swarm plasma data products: detailed analyses are presented, dedicated to new plasma densities and temperatures parameters, new flags, and other upgrades; comparisons with other L1B and L2 Swarm products are performed; case studies in correspondence of recent main Space Weather events are also displayed, to highlight the innovative application of Swarm to this field.
- Open Access
- 14 March 2026
- Published by Copernicus GmbH
Advanced Modelling of Geospace (AMOG) Using Satellite Platform Magnetometers
Continuous monitoring of electric current systems in Earth’s environment, including the ionosphere and magnetosphere, is essential for characterising geospace. Such observations are required, for example, to determine the energy input into the upper atmosphere and to monitor disturbances in the space environment and associated hazards. This monitoring can be achieved through magnetic field measurements acquired both on the ground and in space.The spatio-temporal sampling provided by dedicated magnetic satellite missions such as Swarm and MSS can be significantly enhanced by incorporating platform magnetometer data from non-dedicated missions, including CryoSat-2, GRACE, and GRACE-FO.This presentation reports recent achievements in the use of platform magnetometer data within a study funded by ESA’s General Support Technology Programme (GSTP). In particular, it highlights the calibration and provision of magnetic field data from ESA’s Aeolus satellite.
- 14 March 2026
- Published by Copernicus GmbH
Open AccessAdvanced Modelling of Geospace (AMOG) Using Satellite Platform Magnetometers
Continuous monitoring of electric current systems in Earth’s environment, including the ionosphere and magnetosphere, is essential for characterising geospace. Such observations are required, for example, to determine the energy input into the upper atmosphere and to monitor disturbances in the space environment and associated hazards. This monitoring can be achieved through magnetic field measurements acquired both on the ground and in space.The spatio-temporal sampling provided by dedicated magnetic satellite missions such as Swarm and MSS can be significantly enhanced by incorporating platform magnetometer data from non-dedicated missions, including CryoSat-2, GRACE, and GRACE-FO.This presentation reports recent achievements in the use of platform magnetometer data within a study funded by ESA’s General Support Technology Programme (GSTP). In particular, it highlights the calibration and provision of magnetic field data from ESA’s Aeolus satellite.
- Open Access
- 14 March 2026
- Published by Copernicus GmbH
Low-latitude effects of high-latitude field-aligned currents
High-latitude field-aligned currents (FACs) reflect, in steady-state, the force balance between magnetospheric plasma dynamics and the collisional coupling of plasma to the neutral atmosphere in the ionosphere. Assessing the impact of high-latitude FACs at low latitudes is difficult for at least two reasons. First, FACs are primarily inferred from magnetometer measurements in low-Earth orbit by estimating the radial current using horizontal magnetic field perturbations and converting it to a FAC using a geometric factor. While this yields a locally correct estimate of the FAC density, the magnetic field generated by a radial current system differs from that generated by the corresponding FAC system when field lines are not radial. As a result, the magnetic field of the horizontal component of FACs, including their remote magnetic field observed at low latitudes, are neglected. Second, in many numerical simulations, FACs are coupled to the ionosphere only at high latitudes, while boundary conditions are imposed at lower latitudes, arguably making it difficult, from a fundamental physics perspective, to trace how high-latitude forcing influences low latitudes.Here we use AMPERE estimates of high-latitude FACs at 10-min resolution derived from magnetometer measurements on the Iridium satellite constellation to quantify their low-latitude impact. FACs in both polar regions are used to calculate the remote magnetic field using the integration method of Engels and Olsen (1998, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6826(98)00094-7). A recently developed magnetosphere-ionosphere coupling model (Laundal et al. 2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-43-803-2025) is used to compute the associated penetration electric field. The resulting magnetic and electric fields are compared with observations at low latitudes.
- 14 March 2026
- Published by Copernicus GmbH
Open AccessLow-latitude effects of high-latitude field-aligned currents
High-latitude field-aligned currents (FACs) reflect, in steady-state, the force balance between magnetospheric plasma dynamics and the collisional coupling of plasma to the neutral atmosphere in the ionosphere. Assessing the impact of high-latitude FACs at low latitudes is difficult for at least two reasons. First, FACs are primarily inferred from magnetometer measurements in low-Earth orbit by estimating the radial current using horizontal magnetic field perturbations and converting it to a FAC using a geometric factor. While this yields a locally correct estimate of the FAC density, the magnetic field generated by a radial current system differs from that generated by the corresponding FAC system when field lines are not radial. As a result, the magnetic field of the horizontal component of FACs, including their remote magnetic field observed at low latitudes, are neglected. Second, in many numerical simulations, FACs are coupled to the ionosphere only at high latitudes, while boundary conditions are imposed at lower latitudes, arguably making it difficult, from a fundamental physics perspective, to trace how high-latitude forcing influences low latitudes.Here we use AMPERE estimates of high-latitude FACs at 10-min resolution derived from magnetometer measurements on the Iridium satellite constellation to quantify their low-latitude impact. FACs in both polar regions are used to calculate the remote magnetic field using the integration method of Engels and Olsen (1998, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6826(98)00094-7). A recently developed magnetosphere-ionosphere coupling model (Laundal et al. 2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-43-803-2025) is used to compute the associated penetration electric field. The resulting magnetic and electric fields are compared with observations at low latitudes.
- Open Access
- 26 January 2026
- Published by Copernicus GmbH
- Vol. 2025, 1-17
Comment on egusphere-2025-5396
Ultra-low frequency (ULF) waves propagate through the cusp and generate distinct summertime signatures in high latitude ground-based magnetometer measurements. In this study, we apply four years of data from the high time resolution West Greenland magnetometer chain and perform a statistical analysis of ULF signal distribution as a function of season, magnetic latitude, magnetic local time, and interplanetary magnetic field parameters. We find that ULF signals at the highest latitudes, in the cusp and beyond, are sensitive to seasonal change, indicating that the ionospheric currents that generate the signal depend on solar illumination to obtain sufficient conductivities. This effect, in concert with dipole tilt, is investigated, and a clear cusp-related ULF signal population during summer was found. In winter, this population merges with other ULF signals associated with Alfvénic interhemispheric bouncing further south and thus disappears. Earlier studies, which have mainly been performed during winter conditions, failed to unambiguously identify cusp ULF signals. Furthermore, we discuss other aspects of our statistical analysis and briefly address implications for other known cusp phenomena.
- 26 January 2026
- Published by Copernicus GmbH
- Vol. 2025, 1-17
Open AccessComment on egusphere-2025-5396
Ultra-low frequency (ULF) waves propagate through the cusp and generate distinct summertime signatures in high latitude ground-based magnetometer measurements. In this study, we apply four years of data from the high time resolution West Greenland magnetometer chain and perform a statistical analysis of ULF signal distribution as a function of season, magnetic latitude, magnetic local time, and interplanetary magnetic field parameters. We find that ULF signals at the highest latitudes, in the cusp and beyond, are sensitive to seasonal change, indicating that the ionospheric currents that generate the signal depend on solar illumination to obtain sufficient conductivities. This effect, in concert with dipole tilt, is investigated, and a clear cusp-related ULF signal population during summer was found. In winter, this population merges with other ULF signals associated with Alfvénic interhemispheric bouncing further south and thus disappears. Earlier studies, which have mainly been performed during winter conditions, failed to unambiguously identify cusp ULF signals. Furthermore, we discuss other aspects of our statistical analysis and briefly address implications for other known cusp phenomena.
- Top Cited PapersOpen Access
- 26 January 2026
- Published by Springer Nature in Earth, Planets and Space
- Vol. 78 (1)
The CHAOS-8 geomagnetic field model
We present CHAOS-8, an extension of the CHAOS field model series that describes the time-dependent near-Earth geomagnetic field, valid from 1999 to 2025. It is estimated from magnetic measurements collected by multiple low-earth-orbit satellites, such as CHAMP and Swarm , and ground observatories. An initial version of this model, CHAOS-8.1, served as the parent model for constructing DTU’s candidate models for the 14th generation International Geomagnetic Reference Field. CHAOS-8 comprises a time-dependent internal field up to spherical harmonic degree 20, a static internal field that merges with the LCS-1 lithospheric field model above degree 25, a model of the magnetospheric field and its induced counterpart, and estimates of alignment parameters for satellite vector magnetometers, along with calibration parameters for platform magnetometers. It also includes a co-estimated climatological model of the ionospheric field previously ignored within the CHAOS framework. The climatological model describes magnetic fields produced by polar ionospheric E-layer currents, which can be significant even under dark conditions. A new temporal regularization of the internal field is implemented, based on a priori statistics of the secular acceleration extracted from numerical geodynamo simulations. This enables rapid internal field changes to be better captured at small length scales. Magnetic measurements from the MSS-1 and CSES satellite missions were included for the first time in a CHAOS model. Model parameters were estimated using regularized iteratively reweighted least squares. The fit to the data was generally comparable to earlier versions of the CHAOS model. Co-estimation of an ionospheric field resulted in an improved fit in the polar regions. The new temporal regularization allowed stronger and more rapid temporal variations of the internal field at high spherical harmonic degrees. Analyzing sub-decadal variations of the internal field at the core–mantle boundary, we find westward-moving features and tentative evidence for eastward-moving features at low latitudes. The latter are of small length scales (apparent azimuthal wavenumber 13), moving at a speed of 200km/yr at the equator between $${0}^\circ$$ and $${90}^\circ$$ E after 2012. There are also indications of features moving across the geographic equator. These propagating features provide further evidence of traveling hydromagnetic waves at the core–mantle boundary. Graphical Abstract- 26 January 2026
- Published by Springer Nature in Earth, Planets and Space
- Vol. 78 (1)
Top Cited PapersOpen AccessThe CHAOS-8 geomagnetic field model
We present CHAOS-8, an extension of the CHAOS field model series that describes the time-dependent near-Earth geomagnetic field, valid from 1999 to 2025. It is estimated from magnetic measurements collected by multiple low-earth-orbit satellites, such as CHAMP and Swarm , and ground observatories. An initial version of this model, CHAOS-8.1, served as the parent model for constructing DTU’s candidate models for the 14th generation International Geomagnetic Reference Field. CHAOS-8 comprises a time-dependent internal field up to spherical harmonic degree 20, a static internal field that merges with the LCS-1 lithospheric field model above degree 25, a model of the magnetospheric field and its induced counterpart, and estimates of alignment parameters for satellite vector magnetometers, along with calibration parameters for platform magnetometers. It also includes a co-estimated climatological model of the ionospheric field previously ignored within the CHAOS framework. The climatological model describes magnetic fields produced by polar ionospheric E-layer currents, which can be significant even under dark conditions. A new temporal regularization of the internal field is implemented, based on a priori statistics of the secular acceleration extracted from numerical geodynamo simulations. This enables rapid internal field changes to be better captured at small length scales. Magnetic measurements from the MSS-1 and CSES satellite missions were included for the first time in a CHAOS model. Model parameters were estimated using regularized iteratively reweighted least squares. The fit to the data was generally comparable to earlier versions of the CHAOS model. Co-estimation of an ionospheric field resulted in an improved fit in the polar regions. The new temporal regularization allowed stronger and more rapid temporal variations of the internal field at high spherical harmonic degrees. Analyzing sub-decadal variations of the internal field at the core–mantle boundary, we find westward-moving features and tentative evidence for eastward-moving features at low latitudes. The latter are of small length scales (apparent azimuthal wavenumber 13), moving at a speed of 200km/yr at the equator between $${0}^\circ$$ and $${90}^\circ$$ E after 2012. There are also indications of features moving across the geographic equator. These propagating features provide further evidence of traveling hydromagnetic waves at the core–mantle boundary. Graphical Abstract - Open Access
- 23 January 2026
- Published by Springer Nature in Earth, Planets and Space
- Vol. 78 (1)
Second generation of CSES global geomagnetic field model (CGGM-2) and associated candidate models for IGRF-14
This paper presents the second generation of the China Seismo-Electromagnetic Satellite (CSES) Global Geomagnetic Field Model (CGGM-2), specifically designed to derive candidate models for the fourteenth generation of the International Geomagnetic Reference Field (IGRF-14). To build this CGGM-2 model, we utilize more than six years of geomagnetic field data collected by the high-precision magnetometer (HPM) onboard CSES. The model is parametrized by expanding the internal field to spherical harmonic degree and order 45, now incorporating lithospheric contributions. This was not the case for the first generation CGGM model, which was limited to spherical harmonic degrees up to 15. We now also implement order six B-splines in time with one year knot spacing for degrees 1 to 13 to capture non-linear temporal variations in the core field, superseding the linear approximation used in CGGM. Despite a number of challenges, such as boom deformation on which the HPM is located (away from the star imager that provides attitude information) and high-latitude magnetic field platform disturbances, the CGGM-2 model succeeds at capturing the non-linear temporal variations of the geomagnetic field. In particular, the SV-2025-2030 candidate model derived from CGGM-2 performs particularly well among all 18 candidate models for IGRF-14. Candidate models derived from the CGGM-2 are also the only IGRF-14 candidate models using CSES data only and not directly relying on any ESA’s Swarm satellite data, thus providing useful candidate models to compare against all other IGRF candidate models. Our findings underscore the potential of CSES data for geomagnetic field modeling and the likely benefits of CSES’s revisiting capability for accurately capturing the main field's variations. It is expected that future data from the forthcoming companion CSES-02 mission will help improve the temporal–spatial resolution of the model and mitigate high-latitude magnetic platform disturbances. Graphical Abstract
- 23 January 2026
- Published by Springer Nature in Earth, Planets and Space
- Vol. 78 (1)
Open AccessSecond generation of CSES global geomagnetic field model (CGGM-2) and associated candidate models for IGRF-14
This paper presents the second generation of the China Seismo-Electromagnetic Satellite (CSES) Global Geomagnetic Field Model (CGGM-2), specifically designed to derive candidate models for the fourteenth generation of the International Geomagnetic Reference Field (IGRF-14). To build this CGGM-2 model, we utilize more than six years of geomagnetic field data collected by the high-precision magnetometer (HPM) onboard CSES. The model is parametrized by expanding the internal field to spherical harmonic degree and order 45, now incorporating lithospheric contributions. This was not the case for the first generation CGGM model, which was limited to spherical harmonic degrees up to 15. We now also implement order six B-splines in time with one year knot spacing for degrees 1 to 13 to capture non-linear temporal variations in the core field, superseding the linear approximation used in CGGM. Despite a number of challenges, such as boom deformation on which the HPM is located (away from the star imager that provides attitude information) and high-latitude magnetic field platform disturbances, the CGGM-2 model succeeds at capturing the non-linear temporal variations of the geomagnetic field. In particular, the SV-2025-2030 candidate model derived from CGGM-2 performs particularly well among all 18 candidate models for IGRF-14. Candidate models derived from the CGGM-2 are also the only IGRF-14 candidate models using CSES data only and not directly relying on any ESA’s Swarm satellite data, thus providing useful candidate models to compare against all other IGRF candidate models. Our findings underscore the potential of CSES data for geomagnetic field modeling and the likely benefits of CSES’s revisiting capability for accurately capturing the main field's variations. It is expected that future data from the forthcoming companion CSES-02 mission will help improve the temporal–spatial resolution of the model and mitigate high-latitude magnetic platform disturbances. Graphical Abstract
- Open Access
- 13 January 2026
- Published by Copernicus GmbH
- Vol. 2025, 1-17
Comment on egusphere-2025-5396
Ultra-low frequency (ULF) waves propagate through the cusp and generate distinct summertime signatures in high latitude ground-based magnetometer measurements. In this study, we apply four years of data from the high time resolution West Greenland magnetometer chain and perform a statistical analysis of ULF signal distribution as a function of season, magnetic latitude, magnetic local time, and interplanetary magnetic field parameters. We find that ULF signals at the highest latitudes, in the cusp and beyond, are sensitive to seasonal change, indicating that the ionospheric currents that generate the signal depend on solar illumination to obtain sufficient conductivities. This effect, in concert with dipole tilt, is investigated, and a clear cusp-related ULF signal population during summer was found. In winter, this population merges with other ULF signals associated with Alfvénic interhemispheric bouncing further south and thus disappears. Earlier studies, which have mainly been performed during winter conditions, failed to unambiguously identify cusp ULF signals. Furthermore, we discuss other aspects of our statistical analysis and briefly address implications for other known cusp phenomena.
- 13 January 2026
- Published by Copernicus GmbH
- Vol. 2025, 1-17
Open AccessComment on egusphere-2025-5396
Ultra-low frequency (ULF) waves propagate through the cusp and generate distinct summertime signatures in high latitude ground-based magnetometer measurements. In this study, we apply four years of data from the high time resolution West Greenland magnetometer chain and perform a statistical analysis of ULF signal distribution as a function of season, magnetic latitude, magnetic local time, and interplanetary magnetic field parameters. We find that ULF signals at the highest latitudes, in the cusp and beyond, are sensitive to seasonal change, indicating that the ionospheric currents that generate the signal depend on solar illumination to obtain sufficient conductivities. This effect, in concert with dipole tilt, is investigated, and a clear cusp-related ULF signal population during summer was found. In winter, this population merges with other ULF signals associated with Alfvénic interhemispheric bouncing further south and thus disappears. Earlier studies, which have mainly been performed during winter conditions, failed to unambiguously identify cusp ULF signals. Furthermore, we discuss other aspects of our statistical analysis and briefly address implications for other known cusp phenomena.