KCKirk L. Cumpston

Kirk L. Cumpston

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Kirk L. Cumpston has a total of 191 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Is Low Molecular Weight Polyethylene Glycol Used for Decontamination of Dermal Phenol Exposures?

    by Joseph Testa, Andrew Chambers, Kirk Cumpston

    Dermal phenol exposures have the capacity to cause extensive chemical burns and systemic toxicity. Decontamination with low molecular weight (300–400 MW) polyethylene glycol (LMW-PEG) is recommended, but it is unclear if LMW-PEG is readily accessible. Our aim was to identify dermal exposures of phenol that were reported to a regional poison center and describe the types of decontamination agents used. We performed a retrospective study of phenol exposures reported to a single poison center from 2002 to 2025. Dermal decontamination was performed in 14/17 (82%) of cases, utilizing LMW-PEG in 0/14 (0%), water in 7/14 (50%), high molecular weight PEG (HMW-PEG) in 1/14 (7%), both water and HMW-PEG in 5/14 (36%), and water and isopropanol in 1/14 (7%). No systemic toxicity was reported. Our findings suggest that alternative measures such as water or HMW-PEG are effective for decontamination of dermal phenol exposures.

  • The Clinical Toxicology Recommendations Collaborative: purpose, organization, and methodology

    by Martin F. Wilks, Christopher Hoyte, Kirk L. Cumpston, Hossein Hassanian-Moghaddam, Man-Li Tse, Ana Ferrer-Dufol, Horst Thiermann

    Scientific societies aim to provide a collective voice and unified stance on important issues. The Clinical Toxicology Recommendations Collaborative was formed in 2016 to develop evidence- and consensus-based recommendations for the management of patients exposed to common and/or serious poisonings for which the management is unclear or controversial. The Clinical Toxicology Recommendations Collaborative is led jointly by the American Academy of Clinical Toxicology, the Asia Pacific Association of Medical Toxicology, and the European Association of Poison Centres and Clinical Toxicologists. The Governance Committee is chaired by a Past-President of one of these Societies and comprised of the six Presidents and Immediate Past-Presidents of the three Societies. A Steering Committee oversees the process of each project workgroup. The overall process is guided by standards set forth by the Institute of Medicine for developing trustworthy guidelines and the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation Instrument. Systematic reviews are produced using the framework set in the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) methodology. Workgroup members jointly review the evidence and prepare statements on which they vote anonymously using a 9-point Likert scale. A two-round modified Delphi method is used to reach a consensus on clinical recommendations using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method. Final recommendations are approved by unanimous consent of the workgroup and are expressed as both levels of evidence and strength of recommendations. The major limitations of the Clinical Toxicology Recommendations Collaborative process centre around the amount and quality of evidence, the assessment of that evidence, and the voting of the panel. By using a transparent evidence- and consensus-based approach to produce systematic reviews and clinical recommendations, the Clinical Toxicology Recommendations Collaborative aims to create an international framework for clinical toxicology education and decision-making and foster positive change for the benefit of poisoned patients.


  • Open Access

    Cotton fever: A case report and review of the literature

    by Natasha Tobarran, John Huchison, Emily Kershner, Andrew Chambers, Kirk L. Cumpston, Brandon K. Wills


  • Clinical Toxicology review metrics and expert reviewers, 2020

    by Steven A. Seifert, Nicholas Buckley, Betty Chan, Thomas Y. K. Chan, Kirk Cumpston, Ronald I. Kirschner, Bruno Megarbane, Michael Mullins, Donna Seger, Simon Thomas, et al.

    The editors would like to acknowledge and thank all of those who assisted us in 2020 by providing peer review of the submitted manuscripts. Reviewers serve without pay. The time, effort and experti...

  • Open Access

    “Road Rash” and Dizziness: A Case of Hemodynamically Significant Topical Clonidine Toxicity

    by John W Downs, Kirk L Cumpston

    Clonidine is a central alpha-2 agonist well known to produce a syndrome of bradycardia and hypotension in overdose. However, few examples of overt clinical clonidine toxicity secondary to cutaneous absorption have been reported. We report a case of unintentional systemic clonidine toxicity in an adult because of a compounded preparation of clonidine applied to a degraded skin barrier. A 35-year-old male suffered a motorcycle accident 48 hours before presentation resulting in an abrasion to his distal left leg. On the day of presentation, he self-treated the wound by repeated application of a family member’s pain-relieving cream. Later he was found confused and unable to stand by a family member. The family member recognized the thick visible coat of cream as the likely cause and decontaminated the patient while calling 911. Prehospital vitals were notable for a blood pressure of 80/30 mm Hg and heart rate of 38 beats per minute. In the emergency department, the patient was resuscitated with intravenous fluids with resultant normalization of blood pressure. Upon later review, the cream was determined to have been created by a local compounding pharmacy for the use in neuropathic pain and was labeled to contain clonidine, lidocaine, ketamine, and gabapentin. Cutaneous absorption of the pain cream was greatly increased because of loss of skin integrity. Military physicians and compounding pharmacies should ensure that patients are aware of the proper application of compounded creams and the potential risk for systemic toxicity with overuse or degraded skin.


  • Absorption of salicylate powders versus tablets following overdose: a poison center observational study

    by S. Rutherfoord Rose, Kirk L. Cumpston, Janice Kim, Danielle Difranco, Brandon K. Wills

    Salicylate absorption following overdose of aspirin (ASA) tablet formulations can be prolonged for greater than 24 h. Accordingly, serial serum concentrations are typically recommended to guide treatment. However, there are little published data on absorption following ingestion of powder ASA formulations, and it is not known if delayed ASA absorption occurs following overdose of powder formulations. The objective of this study is to compare the absorption characteristics of powder and tablet formulations of ASA in patients reported to a single poison center. Electronic records from an accredited poison center were searched for single substance acute or acute on chronic ingestions of ASA in powder form between 1 January 2002 and 31 January 2014. An identical search for ingestions of ASA tablet products between 1 January 2012 and 31 December 2013 was undertaken as the comparator group. Other inclusion criteria were age >12 years, documented time of ingestion, treatment in a health care facility within nine hours of ingestion and at least two detectable serum salicylate concentrations. 16 of 25 powder and 22 of 49 tablet cases met inclusion criteria for analysis. Repeat serum salicylate concentrations following ingestion of tablets increased or insignificantly changed in 11 of 22 (50%) cases, and median serum salicylate concentrations in followed cases remained elevated for up to 12 h in some cases. In comparison, serum salicylate concentrations following powder ingestions declined in 15 of 16 (94%) cases. One patient, who ingested a powder product, underwent hemodialysis pursuant to an initial serum salicylate concentration of 96 mg/dL. In contrast to persistent concentrations following overdose of tablets, the majority of serum salicylate concentrations declined following ingestion of powder formulations. In this small study population, these findings suggest that prolonged absorption is unlikely following ingestions of ASA powders.


  • CONTRIBUTORS

    by Cynthia K. Aaron, Jawaid Akhtar, Steven E. Aks, Timothy E. Albertson, Alfred Aleguas, Linda G. Allison, Angela C. Anderson, Juan C. Arias, Alexander B. Baer, Frèdèric J. Baud, et al.

    • 1 August 2003
      • Vol. 45  (4) , 217-8

    Facial nerve neuritis secondary to ultraviolet radiation.

    by Sean M Bryant, Kirk L Cumpston, Jerrold B Leikin, Mark B Mycyk, Erin Pallasch, Michael Rezak

    We describe a patient who developed facial nerve injury following significant exposure to UV radiation. A 49-y-old construction worker developed erythema and edema on the left side of his face (exposed side) 12 h after working within 18 in of a compromised metal halide incandescent light bulb for a total of 2 h. One month later, the patient noted a painful burning sensation over the left side of his face associated with marked left facial weakness and inability to close his eye (peripheral VIIth nerve palsy). Two months later, synkinetic left facial movements were consistent with aberrant regeneration. Over the next several months, forceful episodic spasmodic activity developed in the muscles of facial expression on the left, identical to that seen in hemifacial spasm. Rarely has UV radiation been implicated in damage to subcutaneous nerves. This case demonstrates that significant neurologic morbidity may follow high exposure to UV radiation.