RBRebecca Boucher

Rebecca Boucher

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article


Rebecca Boucher has a total of 42 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:

  • Adam J. Mead

    MRC Molecular Haematology Unit, MRC Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, Radcliffe Department of Medicine and National Institute of Health Research (NIHR), Oxford Biomedical Research Centre University of Oxford Oxford United Kingdom

    2 shared publications
  • Mary Frances McMullin

    Belfast Health and Social Care Trust Belfast UK

    2 shared publications
  • Sonia Fox

    Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom

    2 shared publications
  • Aimee Jackson

    Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom

    1 shared publication
  • Amylou Dueck

    Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, USA

    1 shared publication
  • Anesh Panchal

    Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom

    1 shared publication

Latest Publications

  • Top Cited Papers
    Open Access

    Ruxolitinib Versus Best Available Therapy for Polycythemia Vera Intolerant or Resistant to Hydroxycarbamide in a Randomized Trial

    by Claire N. Harrison, Jyoti Nangalia, Rebecca Boucher, Aimee Jackson, Christina Yap, Jennifer O'Sullivan, Sonia Fox, Isaak Ailts, Amylou C. Dueck, Holly L. Geyer, et al.

    PURPOSE: Polycythemia vera (PV) is characterized by JAK/STAT activation, thrombotic/hemorrhagic events, systemic symptoms, and disease transformation. In high-risk PV, ruxolitinib controls blood counts and improves symptoms. PATIENTS AND METHODS: MAJIC-PV is a randomized phase II trial of ruxolitinib versus best available therapy (BAT) in patients resistant/intolerant to hydroxycarbamide (HC-INT/RES). Primary outcome was complete response (CR) within 1 year. Secondary outcomes included duration of response, event-free survival (EFS), symptom, and molecular response. RESULTS: One hundred eighty patients were randomly assigned. CR was achieved in 40 (43%) patients on ruxolitinib versus 23 (26%) on BAT (odds ratio, 2.12; 90% CI, 1.25 to 3.60; P = .02). Duration of CR was superior for ruxolitinib (hazard ratio [HR], 0.38; 95% CI, 0.24 to 0.61; P < .001). Symptom responses were better with ruxolitinib and durable. EFS (major thrombosis, hemorrhage, transformation, and death) was superior for patients attaining CR within 1 year (HR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.21 to 0.78; P = .01); and those on ruxolitinib (HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.35 to 0.94; P = .03). Serial analysis of JAK2V617F variant allele fraction revealed molecular response was more frequent with ruxolitinib and was associated with improved outcomes (progression-free survival [PFS] P = .001, EFS P = .001, overall survival P = .01) and clearance of JAK2V617F stem/progenitor cells. ASXL1 mutations predicted for adverse EFS (HR, 3.02; 95% CI, 1.47 to 6.17; P = .003). The safety profile of ruxolitinib was as previously reported. CONCLUSION: The MAJIC-PV study demonstrates ruxolitinib treatment benefits HC-INT/RES PV patients with superior CR, and EFS as well as molecular response; importantly also demonstrating for the first time, to our knowledge, that molecular response is linked to EFS, PFS, and OS.


  • The poor outcome in high molecular risk, hydroxycarbamide-resistant/intolerant ET is not ameliorated by ruxolitinib

    by Jennifer M. O’sullivan, Angela Hamblin, Christina Yap, Sonia Fox, Rebecca Boucher, Anesh Panchal, Samah Alimam, Helene Dreau, Kieran Howard, Pauline Ware, et al.

    Essential Thrombocythemia (ET) patients at high-risk of thrombosis require cytoreductive treatment, typically with hydroxycarbamide. Many patients are resistant or intolerant to hydroxycarbamide (HC-RES/INT) and are at increased risk of disease progression. MAJIC-ET is a randomized phase 2 study comparing ruxolitinib (RUX) to best available therapy (BAT) in HC-RES/INT ET, which showed no difference between the two arms in rates of hematological response or disease progression. The impact of additional non-MPN driver mutations (NDM) on the risk of disease complications in HC-RES/INT ET patients is unknown. Since the presence of NDM may influence trial outcomes, we expand the primary MAJIC-ET analysis to serially evaluate NDM in MAJIC-ET patients using a targeted myeloid 32-gene panel. NDM at baseline were detected in 30% of patients, most frequently affecting TET2 (11%) followed by TP53 (6.4%) and SF3B1 (6.4%). The presence of a NDM was associated with inferior 4-year transformation-free survival (TFS; 65.4% [95% CI 53.3 – 75%] vs. 82.8% [95% CI 73.2 – 89.1%], p=0.017). Specifically, TP53 (p=0.01) and splicing factor (SF, SF3B1, ZRSR2, SRSF2; p<0.001), but not TET2 mutations were associated with reduced TFS which was not mitigated by RUX treatment. Longitudinal analysis identified new mutations in 19.3% of patients; primarily affecting TET2, TP53 and SF3B1. We report the first comprehensive mutational analysis of HC-RES/INT ET patients and highlight the clinical/prognostic utility of serial mutation analysis for NDM in HC-RES/INT ET, including the importance of SF and TP53 mutations which identify HC-RES/INT ET patients at increased risk of disease transformation.