EAEric Agius

Eric Agius

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article

Previous Organizations / Institutes

The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years


Eric Agius has a total of 96 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:

  • Fabienne Pituello

    Centre de Biologie du Développement (CBD), Centre de Biologie Intégrative (CBI), Université de Toulouse, CNRS, UPS, France

    8 shared publications
  • Cathy Soula

    Centre de Biologie Intégrative (CBI), Centre de Biologie du Développement (CBD), Université de Toulouse, CNRS (UMR 5547), Toulouse, France

    7 shared publications
  • Philippe Cochard

    Centre de Biologie du Développement (CBD) CNRS/UPS, Centre de Biologie Intégrative (CBI), Université de Toulouse, F-31062, Toulouse, France

    7 shared publications
  • Chadi Soukkarieh

    Department of Animal Biology Faculty of Science Damascus University Damascus Syria damascusuniversity.edu.sy

    6 shared publications
  • Jacques Gautrais

    Affiliations CNRS, INPT, UPS, LAPLACE, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France, Centre de Recherches sur la Cognition Animale (CRCA), Centre de Biologie Intégrative (CBI), CNRS, UPS, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France

    6 shared publications
  • Sophie Bel-Vialar

    Centre de Biologie Intégrative (CBI), Université de Toulouse, CNRS, Université Toulouse III – Paul Sabatier 1 Unité de Biologie Moléculaire, Cellulaire et du Développement (MCD) Toulouse 31062 CEDEX 9 , France

    5 shared publications

Latest Publications

  • Single-cell imaging of the cell cycle reveals CDC25B-induced heterogeneity of G1 phase length in neural progenitor cells

    by Angie Molina, Frédéric Bonnet, Julie Pignolet, Valerie Lobjois, Sophie Bel-Vialar, Jacques Gautrais, Fabienne Pituello, Eric Agius

    Although lengthening of the cell cycle and G1 phase is a generic feature of tissue maturation during development, the underlying mechanism remains poorly understood. Here, we develop a time-lapse imaging strategy to measure the four cell cycle phases in single chick neural progenitor cells in their endogenous environment. We show that neural progenitors are widely heterogeneous with respect to cell cycle length. This variability in duration is distributed over all phases of the cell cycle, with the G1 phase contributing the most. Within one cell cycle, each phase duration appears stochastic and independent except for a correlation between S and M phase duration. Lineage analysis indicates that the majority of daughter cells may have a longer G1 phase than mother cells, suggesting that, at each cell cycle, a mechanism lengthens the G1 phase. We identify that the CDC25B phosphatase known to regulate the G2/M transition indirectly increases the duration of the G1 phase, partly through delaying passage through the restriction point. We propose that CDC25B increases the heterogeneity of G1 phase length, revealing a previously undescribed mechanism of G1 lengthening that is associated with tissue development.


  • Open Access

    G1 Phase Lengthening During Neural Tissue Development Involves CDC25B Induced G1 Heterogeneity

    by Angie Molina, Frédéric Bonnet, V. Lobjois, Sophie Bel-Vialar, Jacques Gautrais, Fabienne Pituello, Eric Agius

    While lengthening of the cell cycle and G1 phase is a generic feature of tissue maturation during development, the underlying mechanism remains still poorly understood. Here we develop a time lapse imaging strategy to measure the four phases of the cell cycle in single neural progenitor cells in their endogenous environment. Our results show that neural progenitors possess a great heterogeneity of the cell cycle length. This duration variability is distributed over all phases of the cell cycle, with the G1 phase being the one contributing primarily to cell cycle variability. Within one cell cycle, each phase duration appears stochastic and independent except for a surprising correlation between S and M phase. Lineage analysis indicates that the majority of daughter cells display longer G1 phase than their mother’s suggesting that at each cell cycle a mechanism lengthens the G1 phase. We identify an actor of the core cell cycle machinery, the CDC25B phosphatase known to regulate G2/M transition, as an indirect regulator of the duration of the G1 phase. We propose that CDC25B acts via a cell to cell increase in G1 phase heterogeneity revealing a novel mechanism of G1 lengthening associated with tissue development.


  • Open Access

    Correction: Neurogenic decisions require a cell cycle independent function of the CDC25B phosphatase

    by Frédéric Bonnet, Angie Molina, Melanie Roussat, Manon Azais, Sophie Bel-Vialar, Jacques Gautrais, Fabienne Pituello, Eric Agius

    Bonnet F, Molina A, Roussat M, Azais M, Bel-Vialar S, Gautrais J, Pituello F, Agius E. 2018. Neurogenic decisions require a cell cycle independent function of the CDC25B phosphatase. eLife 7:e32937. doi: 10.7554/eLife.32937.


  • Open Access

    Timing the spinal cord development with neural progenitor cells losing their proliferative capacity: a theoretical analysis

    by Manon Azaïs, Eric Agius, Stéphane Blanco, Angie Molina, Fabienne Pituello, Jean-Marc Tregan, Anaïs Vallet, Jacques Gautrais

    In the developing neural tube in chicken and mammals, neural stem cells proliferate and differentiate according to a stereotyped spatiotemporal pattern. Several actors have been identified in the control of this process, from tissue-scale morphogens patterning to intrinsic determinants in neural progenitor cells. In a previous study (Bonnet et al. eLife 7, 2018), we have shown that the CDC25B phosphatase promotes the transition from proliferation to differentiation by stimulating neurogenic divisions, suggesting that it acts as a maturating factor for neural progenitors. In this previous study, we set up a mathematical model linking fixed progenitor modes of division to the dynamics of progenitors and differentiated populations. Here, we extend this model over time to propose a complete dynamical picture of this process. We start from the standard paradigm that progenitors are homogeneous and can perform any type of divisions (proliferative division yielding two progenitors, asymmetric neurogenic divisions yielding one progenitor and one neuron, and terminal symmetric divisions yielding two neurons). We calibrate this model using data published by Saade et al. (Cell Reports 4, 2013) about mode of divisions and population dynamics of progenitors/neurons at different developmental stages. Next, we explore the scenarios in which the progenitor population is actually split into two different pools, one of which is composed of cells that have lost the capacity to perform proliferative divisions. The scenario in which asymmetric neurogenic division would induce such a loss of proliferative capacity appears very relevant.


  • Open Access

    Neurogenic decisions require a cell cycle independent function of the CDC25B phosphatase

    by Frédéric Bonnet, Angie Molina, Mélanie Roussat, Manon Azais, Sophie Bel-Vialar, Jacques Gautrais, Fabienne Pituello, Eric Agius

    A fundamental issue in developmental biology and in organ homeostasis is understanding the molecular mechanisms governing the balance between stem cell maintenance and differentiation into a specific lineage. Accumulating data suggest that cell cycle dynamics play a major role in the regulation of this balance. Here we show that the G2/M cell cycle regulator CDC25B phosphatase is required in mammals to finely tune neuronal production in the neural tube. We show that in chick neural progenitors, CDC25B activity favors fast nuclei departure from the apical surface in early G1, stimulates neurogenic divisions and promotes neuronal differentiation. We design a mathematical model showing that within a limited period of time, cell cycle length modifications cannot account for changes in the ratio of the mode of division. Using a CDC25B point mutation that cannot interact with CDK, we show that part of CDC25B activity is independent of its action on the cell cycle.


  • Open Access

    FGF signaling controls Shh-dependent oligodendroglial fate specification in the ventral spinal cord

    by Marie-Amélie Farreny, Eric Agius, Sophie Bel-Vialar, Nathalie Escalas, Nagham Khouri-Farah, Chadi Soukkarieh, Cathy Danesin, Fabienne Pituello, Philippe Cochard, Cathy Soula

    Background: Most oligodendrocytes of the spinal cord originate from ventral progenitor cells of the pMN domain, characterized by expression of the transcription factor Olig2. A minority of oligodendrocytes is also recognized to emerge from dorsal progenitors during fetal development. The prevailing view is that generation of ventral oligodendrocytes depends on Sonic hedgehog (Shh) while dorsal oligodendrocytes develop under the influence of Fibroblast Growth Factors (FGFs). Results: Using the well-established model of the chicken embryo, we show that ventral spinal progenitor cells activate FGF signaling at the onset of oligodendrocyte precursor cell (OPC) generation. Inhibition of FGF receptors at that time appears sufficient to prevent generation of ventral OPCs, highlighting that, in addition to Shh, FGF signaling is required also for generation of ventral OPCs. We further reveal an unsuspected interplay between Shh and FGF signaling by showing that FGFs serve dual essential functions in ventral OPC specification. FGFs are responsible for timely induction of a secondary Shh signaling center, the lateral floor plate, a crucial step to create the burst of Shh required for OPC specification. At the same time, FGFs prevent down-regulation of Olig2 in pMN progenitor cells as these cells receive higher threshold of the Shh signal. Finally, we bring arguments favoring a key role of newly differentiated neurons acting as providers of the FGF signal required to trigger OPC generation in the ventral spinal cord. Conclusion: Altogether our data reveal that the FGF signaling pathway is activated and required for OPC commitment in the ventral spinal cord. More generally, our data may prove important in defining strategies to produce large populations of determined oligodendrocyte precursor cells from undetermined neural progenitors, including stem cells. In the long run, these new data could be useful in attempts to stimulate the oligodendrocyte fate in residing neural stem cells.


  • Open Access

    FGFs are orchestra conductors of Shh-dependent oligodendroglial fate specification in the ventral spinal cord

    by Marie-Amélie Farreny, Eric Agius, Sophie Bel-Vialar, Nathalie Escalas, Nagham Khouri-Farah, Chadi Soukkarieh, Fabienne Pituello, Philippe Cochard, Cathy Soula

    Most oligodendrocytes of the spinal cord originate from ventral progenitor cells of the pMN domain, characterized by expression of the transcription factor Olig2. A minority of oligodendrocytes is also recognized to emerge from dorsal progenitors during fetal development. The prevailing view is that generation of ventral oligodendrocytes depends on Sonic hedgehog (Shh) while dorsal oligodendrocytes develop under the influence of Fibroblast Growth Factors (FGFs). Using the well-established model of the chicken embryo, we evidence that ventral spinal progenitor cells activate FGF signaling at the onset of oligodendrocyte precursor cell (OPC) generation, as do they dorsal counterpart. Inhibition of FGF receptors at that time appears sufficient to prevent generation of ventral OPCs, highlighting that, in addition to Shh, FGF signaling is required also for generation of ventral OPCs. We further reveal an unsuspected interplay between Shh and FGF signaling by showing that FGFs serve dual essential functions in ventral OPC specification. FGFs are responsible for timely induction of a secondary Shh signaling center, the lateral floor plate, a crucial step to create the burst of Shh required for OPC specification. At the same time, FGFs prevent down-regulation of Olig2 in pMN progenitor cells as these cells receive higher threshold of the Shh signal. Finally, we bring arguments favoring a key role of newly differentiated neurons acting as providers of the FGF signal required to trigger OPC generation in the ventral spinal cord.


  • Open Access

    Neurogenic decisions require a cell cycle independent function of the CD25B phosphatase

    by Frédéric Bonnet, Mélanie Roussat, Angie Molina, Manon Azais, Sophie Belvialar, Jacques Gautrais, Fabienne Pituello, Eric Agius

    A fundamental issue in developmental biology and in organ homeostasis is understanding the molecular mechanisms governing the balance between stem cell maintenance and differentiation into a specific lineage. Accumulating data suggest that cell cycle dynamics plays a major role in the regulation of this balance. Here we show that the G2/M cell cycle regulator CDC25B phosphatase is required in mammals to finely tune neuronal production in the neural tube. We show that in chick neural progenitors, CDC25B activity is both required and sufficient to stimulate neurogenic divisions and to promote neuronal differentiation. We design a mathematical model showing that within a limited period of time, cell cycle length modifications cannot account for changes in the ratio of the mode of division. Using a CDC25B point mutation that cannot interact with CDK, we show that part of CDC25B activity on neurogenic divisions is independent of its action on the cell cycle.

  • Open Access

    Onset of Spinal Cord Astrocyte Precursor Emigration from the Ventricular Zone Involves the Zeb1 Transcription Factor

    by David Ohayon, Alain Garcès, Willy Joly, Chadi Soukkarieh, Tsuyoshi Takagi, Jean-Charles Sabourin, Eric Agius, Douglas S. Darling, Pascal De Santa Barbara, Yujiro Higashi, et al.


  • Cell cycle and cell fate in the developing nervous system: the role of CDC25B phosphatase

    by Eric Agius, Sophie Bel-Vialar, Frédéric Bonnet, Fabienne Pituello

    Deciphering the core machinery of the cell cycle and cell division has been primarily the focus of cell biologists, while developmental biologists have identified the signaling pathways and transcriptional programs controlling cell fate choices. As a result, until recently, the interplay between these two fundamental aspects of biology have remained largely unexplored. Increasing data show that the cell cycle and regulators of the core cell cycle machinery are important players in cell fate decisions during neurogenesis. Here, we summarize recent data describing how cell cycle dynamics affect the switch between proliferation and differentiation, with an emphasis on the roles played by the cell cycle regulators, the CDC25 phosphatases.