James B. Caress

Most published studies on the clinical utility of genetic testing for neuromuscular diseases (NMDs) focus on disease-specific cohorts and/or involve multiple centers. The aim of this study was to examine the clinical utility and diagnostic yield of genetic testing at a single, large neuromuscular center. Unlike previous studies, this study is unique in that it includes a broad array of patients at a single, large neuromuscular center, providing real-world data that may assist both neuromuscular specialists as well as general neurologists in decision-making regarding the need for genetic testing in patients with suspected NMDs. Genetic testing results were reviewed for all patients who underwent testing through a single genetic testing company for NMDs in this single laboratory at a large neuromuscular center from 2015 to 2020. Retrospective chart reviews were performed to determine whether genetic testing results conferred a specific NMD diagnosis, including cases where a variant of uncertain significance (VUS) was identified. Genetic testing was pursued for 192 patients. A positive result, defined as a pathogenic mutation, a VUS, or both, was found in 77.1%. A definitive diagnosis was conferred in 35.9%. The most common testing indication was suspected neuropathy (53.3%), and the indication with the highest diagnostic yield was suspected myopathy (48.7%). This study provides further evidence of the clinical utility of genetic testing for NMDs in a real-world setting with over one-third of patients tested receiving a definitive diagnosis. Over time, genetic testing will continue to become increasingly accessible, cost-effective, and sensitive, which will lead to even more utilization.

See article on pages 354–362 in this issue.

Guillain‐Barré syndrome (GBS) is an inflammatory polyradiculoneuropathy associated with numerous viral infections. Recently, there have been many case reports describing the association between coronavirus disease‐2019 (COVID‐19) and GBS, but much remains unknown about the strength of the association and the features of GBS in this setting. We reviewed 37 published cases of GBS associated with COVID‐19 to summarize this information for clinicians and to determine whether a specific clinical or electrodiagnostic (EDx) pattern is emerging. The mean age (59 years), gender (65% male), and COVID‐19 features appeared to reflect those of hospitalized COVID‐19 patients early in the pandemic. The mean time from COVID‐19 symptoms to GBS symptoms was 11 days. The clinical presentation and severity of these GBS cases was similar to those with non–COVID‐19 GBS. The EDx pattern was considered demyelinating in approximately half of the cases. Cerebrospinal fluid, when assessed, demonstrated albuminocytologic dissociation in 76% of patients and was negative for severe acute respiratory distress syndrome–coronavirus‐2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) in all cases. Serum antiganglioside antibodies were absent in 15 of 17 patients tested. Most patients were treated with a single course of intravenous immunoglobulin, and improvement was noted within 8 weeks in most cases. GBS‐associated COVID‐19 appears to be an uncommon condition with similar clinical and EDx patterns to GBS before the pandemic. Future studies should compare patients with COVID‐19–associated GBS to those with contemporaneous non–COVID‐19 GBS and determine whether the incidence of GBS is elevated in those with COVID‐19.

Objective To identify preferred neurofilament assays and clinically validate serum neurofilament light (NfL) and phosphorylated neurofilament heavy (pNfH) as prognostic and potential pharmacodynamic biomarkers relevant to amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) therapy development. Methods In this prospective, multicenter, longitudinal observational study of patients with ALS (n = 229), primary lateral sclerosis (n = 20), and progressive muscular atrophy (n = 11), biological specimens were collected, processed, and stored according to strict standard operating procedures (SOPs). Neurofilament assays were performed in a blinded manner by independent contract research organizations. Results For serum NfL and pNfH measured using the Simoa assay, there were no missing data (i.e., technical replicates below the lower limit of detection were not encountered). For the Iron Horse and Euroimmun pNfH assays, such missingness was encountered in ∼4% and ∼10% of serum samples, respectively. Mean coefficients of variation for NfL in serum and CSF were both ∼3%. Mean coefficients of variation for pNfH in serum and CSF were ∼4%–5% and ∼2%–3%, respectively, in all assays. Baseline serum NfL concentration, but not pNfH, predicted the future Revised ALS Functional Rating Scale (ALSFRS-R) slope and survival. Incorporation of baseline serum NfL into mixed effects models of ALSFRS-R slopes yields an estimated sample size saving of ∼8%. Depending on the method used to estimate effect size, use of serum NfL (and perhaps pNfH) as pharmacodynamic biomarkers, instead of the ALSFRS-R slope, yields significantly larger sample size savings. Conclusions Serum NfL may be considered a clinically validated prognostic biomarker for ALS. Serum NfL (and perhaps pNfH), quantified using the Simoa assay, has potential utility as a pharmacodynamic biomarker of treatment effect.

Introduction: Our aim in this study was to identify the prevalence and clinical characteristics of LRP4/agrin‐antibody–positive double‐seronegative myasthenia gravis (DNMG).Methods: DNMG patients at 16 sites in the United States were tested for LRP4 and agrin antibodies, and the clinical data were collected.Results: Of 181 DNMG patients, 27 (14.9%) were positive for either low‐density lipoprotein receptor–related protein 4 (LRP4) or agrin antibodies. Twenty‐three DNMG patients (12.7%) were positive for both antibodies. More antibody‐positive patients presented with generalized symptoms (69%) compared with antibody‐negative patients (43%) (P ≤ .02). Antibody‐positive patients’ maximum classification on the Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) scale was significantly higher than that for antibody‐negative patients (P ≤ .005). Seventy percent of antibody‐positive patients were classified as MGFA class III, IV, or V compared with 39% of antibody‐negative patients. Most LRP4‐ and agrin‐antibody–positive patients (24 of 27, 89%) developed generalized myathenia gravis (MG), but with standard MG treatment 81.5% (22 of 27) improved to MGFA class I or II during a mean follow‐up of 11 years.Discussion: Antibody‐positive patients had more severe clinical disease than antibody‐negative patients. Most DNMG patients responded to standard therapy regardless of antibody status.

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a multi-system disease characterized primarily by progressive muscle weakness. Cognitive dysfunction is commonly observed in patients, however factors influencing risk for cognitive dysfunction remain elusive. Using sparse canonical correlation analysis (sCCA), an unsupervised machine-learning technique, we observed that single nucleotide polymorphisms collectively associate with baseline cognitive performance in a large ALS patient cohort (N=327) from the multicenter Clinical Research in ALS and Related Disorders for Therapeutic Development (CReATe) Consortium. We demonstrate that a polygenic risk score derived using sCCA relates to longitudinal cognitive decline in the same cohort, and also to in vivo cortical thinning in the orbital frontal cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, lateral temporal cortex, premotor cortex, and hippocampus (N=90) as well as post mortem motor cortical neuronal loss (N=87) in independent ALS cohorts from the University of Pennsylvania Integrated Neurodegenerative Disease Biobank. Our findings suggest that common genetic polymorphisms may exert a polygenic contribution to the risk of cortical disease vulnerability and cognitive dysfunction in ALS.

Introduction: Charcot‐Marie‐Tooth (CMT) phenotypes can be distinguished by electrophysiology and genetic analysis but few can be identified by their clinical characteristics. Distinctive phenotypes are useful in identifying affected individuals and providing additional clues about the mechanism of the neuropathy. Cranial neuropathies are uncommon features of CMT, and few reports of familial hemifacial spasm (HFS) and trigeminal neuralgia (TN) have been published. Methods: Sixty‐three members of a large CMT 1B kindred were assessed for signs of peripheral neuropathy and cranial neuropathies then tested for the G163R mutation in the myelin protein zero (MPZ) gene. Results: Of 27 individuals with the G163R mutation in MPZ, 10 had HFS or TN. Co‐existing HFS and TN were found in 3 of these and 4 had bilateral HFS or TN. Conclusions: This kindred exhibits a distinct CMT phenotype characterized by the development of HFS or TN decades after clinical signs of hereditary neuropathy are manifest. Muscle Nerve, 2019