Carolyn S. Grove

In randomized studies, addition of FLT3 inhibitors failed to improve survival in older patients with FLT3-ITD AML unfit for intensive chemotherapy. Although hypomethylating agents or low-dose cytarabine combined with venetoclax is standard, FLT3-ITD is an important mechanism of resistance and a barrier to improved survival. Recent studies show promise for the addition of gilteritinib or quizartinib to less intensive venetoclax-based therapy, however resulting marrow toxicity requires substantial reductions to administered treatment. The INTERVENE study (Investigating Novel Triplets to Extend Remission with VENetoclax in Elderly AML) (ACTRN12619001655134) examined the role of midostaurin (M) administered sequentially after low-dose cytarabine (L) combined with venetoclax (V) in patients with newly diagnosed AML ≥60 years with non-adverse karyotype. After a run-in phase (n=18) established that LDAC combined with venetoclax from days 1-28 and midostaurin from days 11-28 was tolerable, 120 patients were randomized 2:1 to receive either LVM or LV. For the primary endpoint, LVM did not improve composite complete remission (CRc), compared to LV (72% vs 68%). Combining midostaurin with LV enhanced CRc among the sub-group of patients (n=29) with FLT3-ITD (82% vs 57%, difference = 25%, 0.85 posterior probability true difference > 5%, 95% CrI: -10 to 59%) and improved FLT3-ITD clearance as measured by ultrasensitive NGS (65% vs 0%), resulting in longer OS (median 24.2 vs 8.8 months, HR=0.34, 95% CrI: 0.071 to 0.960), compared to LV. In conclusion, midostaurin combined with low-dose cytarabine and venetoclax is well-tolerated and may have a role in newly diagnosed FLT3-ITD AML unfit for intensive chemotherapy.

The prognosis for relapsed or refractory (R/R) nucleophosmin 1–mutated (NPM1m) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is poor and represents an urgent unmet medical need. Revumenib, a potent, selective menin inhibitor, was recently approved for the treatment of R/R acute leukemia with a KMT2A translocation in patients aged ≥1 year based on results from the phase 1/2 AUGMENT-101 study. Here, we present results from patients with R/R NPM1m AML enrolled in the phase 2 portion of AUGMENT-101. Enrolled patients received revumenib with or without a strong CYP3A4 inhibitor every 12 hours in 28-day cycles. Primary end points were rate of complete remission (CR) or CR with partial hematologic recovery (CRh; CR + CRh), safety, and tolerability. Secondary end points included overall response rate (ORR) and duration of response. As of 18 September 2024, 84 patients received ≥1 dose of revumenib. Median age was 63 years; 1 patient was aged <18 years. The protocol-defined, efficacy-evaluable population for the primary analysis included 64 adult patients (≥3 previous lines of therapy, 35.9%; previous venetoclax, 75.0%). The CR + CRh rate was 23.4% (1-sided P = .0014); the ORR was 46.9%. Median duration of CR + CRh was 4.7 months. Of 30 responders, 5 (16.7%) proceeded to hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) and 3 resumed revumenib after HSCT. Treatment-related adverse events led to treatment discontinuation in 4 patients (4.8%). Revumenib demonstrated clinically meaningful responses in this heavily pretreated, older population with NPM1m AML, including remissions that enabled HSCT. The safety profile of revumenib was consistent with previously reported results. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT04065399.

Asciminib is a myristoyl site BCR::ABL1 inhibitor approved for patients with chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CP-CML) failing ≥2 prior lines of therapy. The Australasian Leukaemia and Lymphoma Group conducted the Asciminib Evaluation in Newly Diagnosed CML study to assess efficacy of asciminib for newly diagnosed CP-CML. Patients commenced asciminib 40 mg twice daily. Patients with treatment failure, defined as BCR::ABL1 of >10% at 3 or 6 months, or >1% at 12 or 18 months, received either imatinib, nilotinib, or dasatinib in addition to asciminib. In patients with suboptimal response, defined as levels of 1% to 10% at 6 months, >0.1% to 1% at 12 months, or >0.01% to 1% at 18 months, the asciminib dose was increased to 80 mg twice daily. With a median follow-up of 21 months (range, 0-36), 82 of 101 patients continue asciminib. Most common reasons for treatment discontinuation were adverse events (6%), loss of response (4%), and withdrawn consent (5%). There were no deaths; 1 patient developed lymphoid blast crisis. The coprimary end points were early molecular response (BCR::ABL1 of ≤10% at 3 months), achieved in 93% (96% confidence interval [CI], 86-97%), and major molecular response by 12 months achieved in 79%; (95% CI, 70-87%), respectively. Cumulative incidence of molecular response 4.5 was 53% by 24 months. One patient had 2 cerebrovascular events; no other arterial occlusive events were reported. Asciminib as frontline CP-CML therapy leads to high rates of molecular response with excellent tolerance and a low rate of discontinuation for toxicity. This trial was registered at https://www.anzctr.org.au/ as #ACTRN12620000851965.

Olutasidenib (FT-2102) is a potent, selective, oral, small-molecule inhibitor of mutant isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (mIDH1). Overall, 153 IDH1 inhibitor–naive patients with mIDH1R132 relapsed/refractory (R/R) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) received olutasidenib monotherapy 150 mg twice daily in the pivotal cohort of this study. The median age of participants was 71 years (range, 32-87 years) and the median number of prior regimens received by patients was 2 (1-7). The rate of complete remission (CR) plus CR with partial hematologic recovery (CRh) was 35%, and the overall response rate was 48%. Response rates were similar in patients who had, and who had not, received prior venetoclax. With 55% of patients censored at the time of data cut-off, the median duration of CR/CRh was 25.9 months. The median duration of overall response was 11.7 months, and the median overall survival was 11.6 months. Of 86 patients who were transfusion dependent at baseline, a 56-day transfusion independence was achieved in 29 (34%), which included patients in all response groups. Grade 3 or 4 treatment-emergent adverse events (≥10%) were febrile neutropenia and anemia (n = 31; 20% each), thrombocytopenia (n = 25; 16%), and neutropenia (n = 20; 13%). Differentiation syndrome adverse events of special interest occurred in 22 (14%) patients, with 14 (9%) grade ≥3 and 1 fatal case reported. Overall, olutasidenib induced durable remissions and transfusion independence with a well-characterized and manageable side effect profile. The observed efficacy represents a therapeutic advance in this molecularly defined, poor-prognostic population of patients with mIDH1 R/R AML. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02719574.

Monitoring of NPM1 mutant (NPM1mut) measurable residual disease (MRD) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has an established role in patients who are treated with intensive chemotherapy. The European LeukemiaNet has defined molecular persistence at low copy number (MP-LCN) as an MRD transcript level <1% to 2% with a <1-log change between any 2 positive samples collected after the end of treatment (EOT). Because the clinical impact of MP-LCN is unknown, we sought to characterize outcomes in patients with persistent NPM1mut MRD after EOT and identify factors associated with disease progression. Consecutive patients with newly diagnosed NPM1mut AML who received ≥2 cycles of intensive chemotherapy were included if bone marrow was NPM1mut MRD positive at the EOT, and they were not transplanted in first complete remission. One hundred patients were followed for a median of 23.5 months; 42% remained free of progression at 1 year, either spontaneously achieving complete molecular remission (CRMRD−; 30%) or retaining a low-level NPM1mut transcript (12% for ≥12 months and 9% at last follow-up). Forty percent met the criteria for MP-LCN. Preemptive salvage therapy significantly prolonged relapse-free survival. Risk factors associated with disease progression were concurrent FLT3-internal tandem duplication at diagnosis and suboptimal MRD response (NPM1mut reduction <4.4-log) at EOT.

The application of molecular genomics and our understanding of its clinical implications in the diagnosis, prognostication and treatment of lymphoproliferative disorders has rapidly evolved over the past few years. Of particular importance are indolent B-cell malignancies where tumour cell survival and proliferation are commonly driven by mutations involving the B-cell receptor and downstream signalling pathways. In addition, the increasing number of novel therapies and targeted agents have provided clinicians with new therapeutic options with the aim of exploiting such mutations. In this case report, we highlight one such success story involving the diagnostic impact of the MYD88^L265P mutation in Waldenstrom’s macroglobulinemia (WM), its prognostic implications and effect on choice of therapy in the era of novel therapies.

A small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor protects the bone marrow from chemotherapy.