Biagio Merlino
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Biagio Merlino has a total of 66 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Alessandro Posa
Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Radiation Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
2 shared publications - Amato Infante
Advanced Radiology Center (ARC), Department of Oncological Radiotherapy, and Hematology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
2 shared publications - Luigi Natale
Advanced Radiology Center (ARC), Department of Radiology and Oncological Radiotherapy, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
2 shared publications - Roberto Iezzi
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
2 shared publications - Simona Gaudino
Facoltà di Medicina e Chirurgia Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore Rome Italy
2 shared publications - Alessandra Cassano
Department of Oncology, Catholic University School of Medicine, Rome, Italy
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 8 August 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Journal of Personalized Medicine
- Vol. 15 (8) , 363
Artificial Intelligence for Individualized Radiological Dialogue: The Impact of RadioBot on Precision-Driven Medical Practices
Background/Objectives: Radiology often presents communication challenges due to its technical complexity, particularly for patients, trainees, and non-specialist clinicians. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of RadioBot, an AI-powered chatbot developed on the Botpress platform, in enhancing radiological communication through natural language processing (NLP). Methods: RadioBot was designed to provide context-sensitive responses based on guidelines from the American College of Radiology (ACR) and the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA). It addresses queries related to imaging indications, contraindications, preparation, and post-procedural care. A structured evaluation was conducted with twelve participants—patients, residents, and radiologists—who assessed the chatbot using a standardized quality and satisfaction scale. Results: The chatbot received high satisfaction scores, particularly from patients (mean = 4.425) and residents (mean = 4.250), while radiologists provided more critical feedback (mean = 3.775). Users appreciated the system’s clarity, accessibility, and its role in reducing informational bottlenecks. The perceived usefulness of the chatbot inversely correlated with the user’s level of expertise, serving as an educational tool for novices and a time-saving reference for experts. Conclusions: RadioBot demonstrates strong potential in improving radiological communication and supporting clinical workflows, especially with patients where it plays an important role in personalized medicine by framing radiology data within each individual’s cognitive and emotional context, which improves understanding and reduces associated diagnostic anxiety. Despite limitations such as occasional contextual incoherence and limited multimodal capabilities, the system effectively disseminates radiological knowledge. Future developments should focus on enhancing personalization based on user specialization and exploring alternative platforms to optimize performance and user experience.
- 8 August 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Journal of Personalized Medicine
- Vol. 15 (8) , 363
Open AccessArtificial Intelligence for Individualized Radiological Dialogue: The Impact of RadioBot on Precision-Driven Medical Practices
Background/Objectives: Radiology often presents communication challenges due to its technical complexity, particularly for patients, trainees, and non-specialist clinicians. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of RadioBot, an AI-powered chatbot developed on the Botpress platform, in enhancing radiological communication through natural language processing (NLP). Methods: RadioBot was designed to provide context-sensitive responses based on guidelines from the American College of Radiology (ACR) and the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA). It addresses queries related to imaging indications, contraindications, preparation, and post-procedural care. A structured evaluation was conducted with twelve participants—patients, residents, and radiologists—who assessed the chatbot using a standardized quality and satisfaction scale. Results: The chatbot received high satisfaction scores, particularly from patients (mean = 4.425) and residents (mean = 4.250), while radiologists provided more critical feedback (mean = 3.775). Users appreciated the system’s clarity, accessibility, and its role in reducing informational bottlenecks. The perceived usefulness of the chatbot inversely correlated with the user’s level of expertise, serving as an educational tool for novices and a time-saving reference for experts. Conclusions: RadioBot demonstrates strong potential in improving radiological communication and supporting clinical workflows, especially with patients where it plays an important role in personalized medicine by framing radiology data within each individual’s cognitive and emotional context, which improves understanding and reduces associated diagnostic anxiety. Despite limitations such as occasional contextual incoherence and limited multimodal capabilities, the system effectively disseminates radiological knowledge. Future developments should focus on enhancing personalization based on user specialization and exploring alternative platforms to optimize performance and user experience.
- Open Access
Application and Validation of a transRADial Access Score (RAD-Access) in Patient Selection for Safe Radial Access in Liver Cancer Intra-Arterial Procedures
Objectives: To develop and internally validate a pre-treatment score for the safe selection of the best candidates for the transradial approach when performing liver cancer intra-arterial procedures. Methods: One hundred and twenty-two patients undergoing hepatic endovascular treatments via radial access between January and December 2022 were retrospectively selected to develop a prediction model. Pre-procedural imaging data were analyzed, and variables were selected to develop the RAD-access score. Intra-procedural data were analyzed to assess effective procedural complexity (ePC). The relationship between ePC and pre-procedural variables was statistically tested, and cutoff points were defined. Results: A final score (RAD-access) was created and prospectively validated on 139 patients enrolled between June and September 2023. Aortic arch diameter and angulation, left subclavian artery angulation, suprarenal abdominal aorta diameter, celiac trunk take-off angle, and radial artery diameter were the significant variables used to build the score. In the validation cohort, based on the pre-treatment RAD-access score, 69 patients underwent a transradial approach, with a significantly lower ePC rate obtained (78.2% easy, 20.3% intermediate, 1.5% complex). No major adverse events occurred. Conclusions: Pre-treatment RAD-access score provides a good prediction for the procedural complexity of the transradial approach in patients undergoing liver cancer intra-arterial treatments, identifying the best candidates for an easy and safe transradial procedure.
Open AccessApplication and Validation of a transRADial Access Score (RAD-Access) in Patient Selection for Safe Radial Access in Liver Cancer Intra-Arterial Procedures
Objectives: To develop and internally validate a pre-treatment score for the safe selection of the best candidates for the transradial approach when performing liver cancer intra-arterial procedures. Methods: One hundred and twenty-two patients undergoing hepatic endovascular treatments via radial access between January and December 2022 were retrospectively selected to develop a prediction model. Pre-procedural imaging data were analyzed, and variables were selected to develop the RAD-access score. Intra-procedural data were analyzed to assess effective procedural complexity (ePC). The relationship between ePC and pre-procedural variables was statistically tested, and cutoff points were defined. Results: A final score (RAD-access) was created and prospectively validated on 139 patients enrolled between June and September 2023. Aortic arch diameter and angulation, left subclavian artery angulation, suprarenal abdominal aorta diameter, celiac trunk take-off angle, and radial artery diameter were the significant variables used to build the score. In the validation cohort, based on the pre-treatment RAD-access score, 69 patients underwent a transradial approach, with a significantly lower ePC rate obtained (78.2% easy, 20.3% intermediate, 1.5% complex). No major adverse events occurred. Conclusions: Pre-treatment RAD-access score provides a good prediction for the procedural complexity of the transradial approach in patients undergoing liver cancer intra-arterial treatments, identifying the best candidates for an easy and safe transradial procedure.
- 29 November 2023
- Published by Elsevier in Clinical Radiology
- Vol. 79 (2) , 102-106
Large language models (LLMs) in the evaluation of emergency radiology reports: performance of ChatGPT-4, Perplexity, and Bard
- 29 November 2023
- Published by Elsevier in Clinical Radiology
- Vol. 79 (2) , 102-106
Large language models (LLMs) in the evaluation of emergency radiology reports: performance of ChatGPT-4, Perplexity, and Bard
- 7 October 2019
- Published by Galenos Yayinevi in Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology
- Vol. 25 (5) , 368-374
Operator learning curve for transradial liver cancer embolization: implications for the initiation of a transradial access program
Dir Journal Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology
- 7 October 2019
- Published by Galenos Yayinevi in Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology
- Vol. 25 (5) , 368-374
Operator learning curve for transradial liver cancer embolization: implications for the initiation of a transradial access program
Dir Journal Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology
- Open Access
- 1 September 2018
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging
- Vol. 11 (9) , e008174
From Cath Lab to Surgery Room
- 1 September 2018
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging
- Vol. 11 (9) , e008174
Open AccessFrom Cath Lab to Surgery Room