Toni Cannard
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Research Subjects
Toni Cannard has a total of 191 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Sean Pascoe
CSIRO Environment
11 shared publications - Catherine Mary Dichmont
Cathy Dichmont Consulting Banksia Beach Queensland Australia
3 shared publications - Gabriela Scheufele
CSIRO Environment, St Lucia 4067, Australia
3 shared publications - Jacki Schirmer
Faculty of Health, Health Research Institute, University of Canberra, Canberra, Australia
3 shared publications - Amar Doshi
Natural Capital and Climate, Fortitude Valley 4006, Australia
2 shared publications - Catherine E. Lovelock
University of Queensland
2 shared publications
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 9 July 2026
- Published by MDPI AG in Sustainability
- Vol. 18 (14) , 7035
Determining Marine Protected Area Zoning Under Multiple Objectives: Do Marine Managers’ Priorities Align?
Globally, marine protected areas (MPAs) have been designated with the aim of protecting marine biodiversity, primarily from extractive activities such as fishing. Most MPAs also include a range of zones with different fishing or other activities allowed in each, generally referred to as partially protected areas (PPAs). How these zones are implemented is often subject to disagreement between the impacted interest groups. Opposition to zoning may, in some cases, be the result of political lobbying or other interventions to stall or influence the process. In this study, we identify the key objectives considered by Australian MPA managers when planning uses in different areas of MPAs as well as their relative importance to decision-making. We also assess their relative importance from the perspective of fisheries managers, who are also responsible for the management of the primary users of the PPAs. We apply the modified analytic hierarchy process using data collected in a national survey of both groups. We find that both place the highest importance on achieving ecological objectives, but the importance of different economic and social objectives varies significantly between the groups. This may result in conflict not over the designation of conservation critical areas but over which activities are allowed in the PPAs.
- 9 July 2026
- Published by MDPI AG in Sustainability
- Vol. 18 (14) , 7035
Open AccessDetermining Marine Protected Area Zoning Under Multiple Objectives: Do Marine Managers’ Priorities Align?
Globally, marine protected areas (MPAs) have been designated with the aim of protecting marine biodiversity, primarily from extractive activities such as fishing. Most MPAs also include a range of zones with different fishing or other activities allowed in each, generally referred to as partially protected areas (PPAs). How these zones are implemented is often subject to disagreement between the impacted interest groups. Opposition to zoning may, in some cases, be the result of political lobbying or other interventions to stall or influence the process. In this study, we identify the key objectives considered by Australian MPA managers when planning uses in different areas of MPAs as well as their relative importance to decision-making. We also assess their relative importance from the perspective of fisheries managers, who are also responsible for the management of the primary users of the PPAs. We apply the modified analytic hierarchy process using data collected in a national survey of both groups. We find that both place the highest importance on achieving ecological objectives, but the importance of different economic and social objectives varies significantly between the groups. This may result in conflict not over the designation of conservation critical areas but over which activities are allowed in the PPAs.
- Open Access
- 17 June 2026
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Australian Journal of Maritime & Ocean Affairs
- p. 1-32
An implementation roadmap for Australia’s Ocean Accounts
- 17 June 2026
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Australian Journal of Maritime & Ocean Affairs
- p. 1-32
Open AccessAn implementation roadmap for Australia’s Ocean Accounts
- Open Access
- 15 July 2025
- Published by Elsevier in Environmental Science & Policy
- Vol. 171
Interdisciplinary solutions to enable nature-based solutions for coastal protection achieve ecological and engineering outcomes
- 15 July 2025
- Published by Elsevier in Environmental Science & Policy
- Vol. 171
Open AccessInterdisciplinary solutions to enable nature-based solutions for coastal protection achieve ecological and engineering outcomes
- Open Access
Fisheries’ Economic Impacts from the Rezoning of the Multi-Use Moreton Bay Marine Park
Marine protected areas (MPAs) have been implemented globally to protect marine habitats and enhance biodiversity, often displacing commercial and recreational fishing activities previously occurring in the area. While the ecological impacts of MPAs have been the subject of considerable attention, the economic impacts on the displaced sectors have generally received less consideration. In this study, we examine the impacts of increasing the proportion of fully protected area within a coastal MPA—the Moreton Bay Marine Park in Queensland, Australia—on the economic performance of the fisheries operating in the area. This MPA is relatively unique as it is located adjacent to a major metropolitan area and, hence, heavily used for a range of activities. Analysis of commercial catch data suggests that the commercial fishery has been less impacted than expected by the loss of available area, although this result varies by species. Comparing fishing activity in the Bay with that in adjacent regions (assumed to reflect the counterfactual), we find evidence of strong improvements in fishery performance of the prawn trawl fleet, no significant change in fish net and line fisheries, and a small but significant decline in the performance of crab fishers. The impact on recreational fishing is uncertain as other external factors obfuscate the impacts of the rezoning.
Open AccessFisheries’ Economic Impacts from the Rezoning of the Multi-Use Moreton Bay Marine Park
Marine protected areas (MPAs) have been implemented globally to protect marine habitats and enhance biodiversity, often displacing commercial and recreational fishing activities previously occurring in the area. While the ecological impacts of MPAs have been the subject of considerable attention, the economic impacts on the displaced sectors have generally received less consideration. In this study, we examine the impacts of increasing the proportion of fully protected area within a coastal MPA—the Moreton Bay Marine Park in Queensland, Australia—on the economic performance of the fisheries operating in the area. This MPA is relatively unique as it is located adjacent to a major metropolitan area and, hence, heavily used for a range of activities. Analysis of commercial catch data suggests that the commercial fishery has been less impacted than expected by the loss of available area, although this result varies by species. Comparing fishing activity in the Bay with that in adjacent regions (assumed to reflect the counterfactual), we find evidence of strong improvements in fishery performance of the prawn trawl fleet, no significant change in fish net and line fisheries, and a small but significant decline in the performance of crab fishers. The impact on recreational fishing is uncertain as other external factors obfuscate the impacts of the rezoning.
- Open Access
- 2 November 2023
- Published by Springer Nature in Nature Sustainability
- Vol. 7 (1) , 31-44
Integrated assessment of river development on downstream marine fisheries and ecosystems
Demands on freshwater for human use are increasing globally, but water resource development (WRD) has substantial downstream impacts on fisheries and ecosystems. Our study evaluates trade-offs between WRDs and downstream ecosystem functioning considering alternative dam and water extraction options, diverse eco-hydrological responses and catchment-to-coast connectivity. We used a data-driven ensemble modelling approach to quantify the impacts of alternative WRDs. WRD impacts varied from weakly positive to severely negative depending on species, scenario and cross-catchment synergies. Impacts on fishery catches and the broader ecosystem (including mangroves) increased with catchment developments and volume of water removed, or if flow reduced below a threshold level. We found complex, linked-catchment dependence of banana prawns on flow and floods. Economic risks for this important fishery more than doubled under some scenarios. Sawfish emerged as the most sensitive across a range of WRD scenarios. Our findings highlight the need to consider marine ecosystems and fisheries to inform sustainable management of the world’s remaining free-flowing rivers.
- 2 November 2023
- Published by Springer Nature in Nature Sustainability
- Vol. 7 (1) , 31-44
Open AccessIntegrated assessment of river development on downstream marine fisheries and ecosystems
Demands on freshwater for human use are increasing globally, but water resource development (WRD) has substantial downstream impacts on fisheries and ecosystems. Our study evaluates trade-offs between WRDs and downstream ecosystem functioning considering alternative dam and water extraction options, diverse eco-hydrological responses and catchment-to-coast connectivity. We used a data-driven ensemble modelling approach to quantify the impacts of alternative WRDs. WRD impacts varied from weakly positive to severely negative depending on species, scenario and cross-catchment synergies. Impacts on fishery catches and the broader ecosystem (including mangroves) increased with catchment developments and volume of water removed, or if flow reduced below a threshold level. We found complex, linked-catchment dependence of banana prawns on flow and floods. Economic risks for this important fishery more than doubled under some scenarios. Sawfish emerged as the most sensitive across a range of WRD scenarios. Our findings highlight the need to consider marine ecosystems and fisheries to inform sustainable management of the world’s remaining free-flowing rivers.
- 1 February 2023
- Published by Elsevier in Ocean & Coastal Management
- Vol. 234
Integrating management of marine activities in Australia
- 1 February 2023
- Published by Elsevier in Ocean & Coastal Management
- Vol. 234
Integrating management of marine activities in Australia
- Open Access
- 8 December 2022
- Published by Elsevier in Marine Policy
- Vol. 148, 105444
Use of Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) to assess management alternatives in the presence of multiple objectives
- 8 December 2022
- Published by Elsevier in Marine Policy
- Vol. 148, 105444
Open AccessUse of Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) to assess management alternatives in the presence of multiple objectives
- 1 July 2020
- Published by Elsevier in Global Environmental Change
- Vol. 63
A national approach to greenhouse gas abatement through blue carbon management
- 1 July 2020
- Published by Elsevier in Global Environmental Change
- Vol. 63
A national approach to greenhouse gas abatement through blue carbon management
- 27 March 2020
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in ICES Journal of Marine Science
- Vol. 78 (2) , 731-742
Operationalizing triple bottom line harvest strategies
Over the past 50 years, the diversity of fisheries types being actively managed has changed from mainly data-rich, industrial sectors to more socially, economically, and environmentally complex multispecies and multisector fisheries. Accompanying this change has been a broadening of management objectives to include social and economic considerations with traditional resource sustainability objectives, the so-called triple bottom line, and the need to include these considerations into harvest strategies. The case of a line fishery in Australia’s Great Barrier Reef is used as a demonstration of the first steps in implementing triple bottom line harvest strategies. This fishery has several disparate sectors including commercial, tourism, and recreation; targets multiple but important reef species; and is undertaken in a World Heritage Site. This work highlights the need for a much-expanded set of objectives elicited from stakeholders that are either included in the trade-off analyses of the different harvest strategies or directly in an optimization. Both options demonstrated that a paradigm shift is required to emphasize representative participatory management systems that assemble teams from quite different backgrounds and viewpoints; use much broader set of objectives; and modify tools and (especially) the data collected within revised monitoring programmes to underpin these tools.
- 27 March 2020
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in ICES Journal of Marine Science
- Vol. 78 (2) , 731-742
Operationalizing triple bottom line harvest strategies
Over the past 50 years, the diversity of fisheries types being actively managed has changed from mainly data-rich, industrial sectors to more socially, economically, and environmentally complex multispecies and multisector fisheries. Accompanying this change has been a broadening of management objectives to include social and economic considerations with traditional resource sustainability objectives, the so-called triple bottom line, and the need to include these considerations into harvest strategies. The case of a line fishery in Australia’s Great Barrier Reef is used as a demonstration of the first steps in implementing triple bottom line harvest strategies. This fishery has several disparate sectors including commercial, tourism, and recreation; targets multiple but important reef species; and is undertaken in a World Heritage Site. This work highlights the need for a much-expanded set of objectives elicited from stakeholders that are either included in the trade-off analyses of the different harvest strategies or directly in an optimization. Both options demonstrated that a paradigm shift is required to emphasize representative participatory management systems that assemble teams from quite different backgrounds and viewpoints; use much broader set of objectives; and modify tools and (especially) the data collected within revised monitoring programmes to underpin these tools.
- Top Cited PapersOpen Access
- 2 October 2019
- Published by Springer Nature in Nature Communications
- Vol. 10 (1) , 1-10
Australian vegetated coastal ecosystems as global hotspots for climate change mitigation
Policies aiming to preserve vegetated coastal ecosystems (VCE; tidal marshes, mangroves and seagrasses) to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions require national assessments of blue carbon resources. Here, we present organic carbon (C) storage in VCE across Australian climate regions and estimate potential annual CO2 emission benefits of VCE conservation and restoration. Australia contributes 5–11% of the C stored in VCE globally (70–185 Tg C in aboveground biomass, and 1,055–1,540 Tg C in the upper 1 m of soils). Potential CO2 emissions from current VCE losses are estimated at 2.1–3.1 Tg CO2-e yr-1, increasing annual CO2 emissions from land use change in Australia by 12–21%. This assessment, the most comprehensive for any nation to-date, demonstrates the potential of conservation and restoration of VCE to underpin national policy development for reducing greenhouse gas emissions.
- 2 October 2019
- Published by Springer Nature in Nature Communications
- Vol. 10 (1) , 1-10
Top Cited PapersOpen AccessAustralian vegetated coastal ecosystems as global hotspots for climate change mitigation
Policies aiming to preserve vegetated coastal ecosystems (VCE; tidal marshes, mangroves and seagrasses) to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions require national assessments of blue carbon resources. Here, we present organic carbon (C) storage in VCE across Australian climate regions and estimate potential annual CO2 emission benefits of VCE conservation and restoration. Australia contributes 5–11% of the C stored in VCE globally (70–185 Tg C in aboveground biomass, and 1,055–1,540 Tg C in the upper 1 m of soils). Potential CO2 emissions from current VCE losses are estimated at 2.1–3.1 Tg CO2-e yr-1, increasing annual CO2 emissions from land use change in Australia by 12–21%. This assessment, the most comprehensive for any nation to-date, demonstrates the potential of conservation and restoration of VCE to underpin national policy development for reducing greenhouse gas emissions.